Liquidity ratios measure the company ability to meet its short-term obligations.
Liquidity Ratios (Summary)
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.69 | |
| Quick ratio | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.39 | |
| Cash ratio | 0.22 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.07 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The liquidity position is characterized by a persistent state where current liabilities exceed current assets, as evidenced by all liquidity ratios remaining below 1.0 throughout the observed five-year period. A synchronized peak in liquidity occurred in 2018, followed by a moderate contraction in 2019.
- Current Ratio
- A downward trend was observed from 2015 to 2017, with the ratio decreasing from 0.69 to a low of 0.44. A significant recovery took place in 2018, reaching a period high of 0.76, before declining to 0.63 in 2019. The consistent values below 1.0 indicate a structural reliance on operational cash flow or the refinancing of short-term obligations.
- Quick Ratio
- The quick ratio mirrored the trajectory of the current ratio, declining from 0.39 in 2015 to 0.29 in 2017. A sharp increase to 0.64 was recorded in 2018, followed by a decrease to 0.49 in 2019. The proximity of the quick ratio to the current ratio suggests that inventories or other non-quick current assets do not constitute a primary driver of the total current asset base.
- Cash Ratio
- The cash ratio exhibited the highest volatility of the three metrics. Following a period of relative stability between 0.05 and 0.13 from 2015 to 2017, the ratio surged to 0.44 in 2018. This significant spike suggests a substantial temporary increase in cash reserves or a reduction in current liabilities. By 2019, the ratio moderated to 0.22, indicating a decrease in the immediate cash availability relative to short-term debt.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Current Ratio
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Current assets | 3,238) | 5,722) | 2,715) | 3,229) | 2,824) | |
| Current liabilities | 5,100) | 7,557) | 6,181) | 5,924) | 4,065) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Current ratio1 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.44 | 0.55 | 0.69 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Current Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 3,238 ÷ 5,100 = 0.63
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity position of the entity exhibited significant volatility between 2015 and 2019, characterized by a current ratio that remained consistently below 1.0. This indicates a structural trend where current liabilities exceeded current assets throughout the analyzed period, suggesting a reliance on operational cash flow or external financing to meet short-term obligations.
- Liquidity Deterioration (2015-2017)
- A downward trend in liquidity is observed from 2015 to 2017, with the current ratio declining from 0.69 to a period low of 0.44. This contraction was primarily driven by a steady increase in current liabilities, which grew from 4,065 million to 6,181 million, while current assets failed to maintain pace, ending 2017 at 2,715 million.
- Liquidity Peak (2018)
- A significant recovery occurred in 2018, during which the current ratio reached a five-year high of 0.76. Although current liabilities climbed to their peak of 7,557 million, the ratio was supported by a substantial surge in current assets, which rose to 5,722 million, the highest value recorded in the period.
- Contraction and Stabilization (2019)
- The final year of the period shows a simultaneous reduction in both current assets and current liabilities. Current liabilities decreased to 5,100 million, while current assets retreated to 3,238 million. This resulted in a current ratio of 0.63, reflecting a normalization of the balance sheet following the 2018 spike.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Quick Ratio
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 185) | 3,280) | 264) | 684) | 229) | |
| Restricted deposits | 24) | 51) | 62) | 103) | 60) | |
| Marketable securities at fair value | 925) | —) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Accounts receivable, net | 1,370) | 1,498) | 1,448) | 1,370) | 1,315) | |
| Total quick assets | 2,504) | 4,829) | 1,774) | 2,157) | 1,604) | |
| Current liabilities | 5,100) | 7,557) | 6,181) | 5,924) | 4,065) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Quick ratio1 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.39 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Quick Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 2,504 ÷ 5,100 = 0.49
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity profile from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by significant fluctuations in both quick assets and current liabilities, resulting in a volatile quick ratio. The overall trend indicates that liquid assets consistently remained below the total of current liabilities throughout the five-year period, suggesting a reliance on cash flow generation or other current assets to meet short-term obligations.
- Quick Asset Volatility
- Quick assets exhibited considerable variability, starting at US$ 1,604 million in 2015 and reaching a peak of US$ 4,829 million in 2018. This peak represents a substantial temporary increase in liquidity before assets contracted to US$ 2,504 million by the end of 2019.
- Current Liabilities Trajectory
- Short-term obligations experienced a steady upward trajectory from 2015 through 2018, increasing from US$ 4,065 million to a peak of US$ 7,557 million. A sharp decline occurred in 2019, with liabilities reducing to US$ 5,100 million, indicating a significant reduction in immediate financial obligations.
- Quick Ratio Analysis
- The quick ratio trended downward from 0.39 in 2015 to a period low of 0.29 in 2017. A significant recovery occurred in 2018, where the ratio reached its peak of 0.64, driven primarily by the surge in quick assets. By the end of 2019, the ratio moderated to 0.49, reflecting a simultaneous decrease in both liquid assets and current liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Ratio
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 185) | 3,280) | 264) | 684) | 229) | |
| Restricted deposits | 24) | 51) | 62) | 103) | 60) | |
| Marketable securities at fair value | 925) | —) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Total cash assets | 1,134) | 3,331) | 326) | 787) | 289) | |
| Current liabilities | 5,100) | 7,557) | 6,181) | 5,924) | 4,065) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash ratio1 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.07 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 1,134 ÷ 5,100 = 0.22
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The cash ratio exhibits significant volatility between 2015 and 2019, reflecting substantial fluctuations in both liquid asset holdings and short-term obligations. The company maintained a low liquidity position for the first three years of the period, followed by a sharp increase in cash reserves and a subsequent correction.
- Cash Asset Trends
- Total cash assets remained relatively low from 2015 to 2017, ranging between US$ 289 million and US$ 787 million. A substantial increase occurred in 2018, where cash assets peaked at US$ 3,331 million, representing a more than ten-fold increase from the 2017 level. By 2019, this figure declined to US$ 1,134 million, though it remained higher than the levels seen prior to 2018.
- Current Liabilities Progression
- Short-term obligations showed a steady upward trend from 2015 to 2018, rising from US$ 4,065 million to a peak of US$ 7,557 million. This growth in liabilities coincided with the general increase in asset holdings until 2019, when current liabilities decreased significantly to US$ 5,100 million.
- Cash Ratio Analysis
- The cash ratio remained minimal between 2015 and 2017, reaching a low of 0.05 in 2017, which indicates a limited reliance on immediate cash for meeting current liabilities. A significant spike to 0.44 was observed in 2018, driven by the surge in total cash assets. In 2019, the ratio moderated to 0.22, reflecting a simultaneous reduction in both cash assets and current liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?