AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Kinder Morgan Inc. (NYSE:KMI)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 29, 2020.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

Kinder Morgan Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 8.80 11.48 10.25 9.80 10.11
Receivables turnover 9.64 9.44 9.46 9.53 10.95
Payables turnover 3.57 3.31 3.24 2.78 3.11
Working capital turnover — — — — —
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 42 32 36 37 36
Add: Average receivable collection period 38 39 39 38 33
Operating cycle 80 71 75 75 69
Less: Average payables payment period 102 110 113 131 117
Cash conversion cycle -22 -39 -38 -56 -48

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The operational efficiency ratios from 2015 to 2019 indicate a consistent ability to maintain a negative cash conversion cycle, though a general trend toward diminishing cash advantages is observed toward the end of the period. The company effectively utilizes supplier credit to finance its operating cycle, although the magnitude of this benefit decreased significantly by 2019.

Inventory Management
Inventory turnover remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, peaking at 11.48 in 2018 before experiencing a notable decline to 8.80 in 2019. This volatility is mirrored in the average inventory processing period, which stayed within the 32 to 37-day range for most of the period but extended to 42 days in 2019, suggesting a slowdown in inventory movement during the final year of the analysis.
Receivables Management
A slight degradation in receivables efficiency is evident, as the receivables turnover ratio decreased from 10.95 in 2015 to a plateau of approximately 9.4 to 9.6 between 2016 and 2019. Consequently, the average receivable collection period increased from 33 days in 2015 to an average of 38 to 39 days in subsequent years, indicating a marginal increase in the time required to collect payments from customers.
Payables Management
The payables turnover ratio showed a gradual increase from 3.11 in 2015 to 3.57 in 2019. This corresponds with a contraction in the average payables payment period, which peaked at 131 days in 2016 before trending downward to 102 days by 2019. This trend suggests a strategic shift toward faster settlement of obligations to suppliers.
Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle remained largely stable, fluctuating between 69 and 75 days, until it reached a five-year peak of 80 days in 2019. Despite this increase, the cash conversion cycle remained negative throughout the entire period, indicating that payables are settled significantly later than inventories are sold and receivables are collected. However, the cash conversion cycle shifted from a peak advantage of -56 days in 2016 to -22 days in 2019, reflecting a narrowing gap between cash outflows to suppliers and cash inflows from operations.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

Kinder Morgan Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Costs of sales 3,263 4,421 4,345 3,498 4,115
Inventories 371 385 424 357 407
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 8.80 11.48 10.25 9.80 10.11
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Costs of sales ÷ Inventories
= 3,263 ÷ 371 = 8.80

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2015 and 2019 reveals a fluctuating trend in inventory efficiency, characterized by relative stability for the first four years followed by a notable decline in the final period.

Inventory Turnover Ratio Trends
The turnover ratio remained within a consistent range from 2015 to 2017, oscillating between 9.80 and 10.25. A peak in efficiency was observed in 2018, where the ratio climbed to 11.48, indicating a more rapid conversion of inventory into costs of sales. This trend reversed sharply in 2019, with the ratio falling to its five-year low of 8.80.
Impact of Costs of Sales
The volatility in the turnover ratio is closely linked to fluctuations in the costs of sales. Between 2017 and 2018, costs of sales increased from 4,345 million to 4,421 million, supporting the peak turnover rate. Conversely, the significant drop in the 2019 ratio is primarily attributable to a substantial decrease in costs of sales, which fell to 3,263 million, the lowest level recorded in the observed period.
Inventory Level Stability
Inventory levels remained relatively stable throughout the five-year period, fluctuating between a minimum of 357 million in 2016 and a maximum of 424 million in 2017. Because inventory levels did not increase significantly in 2019 (decreasing slightly from 385 million to 371 million), the decline in the turnover ratio is interpreted as a result of reduced cost of sales volume rather than an inefficiency in inventory management or an accumulation of obsolete stock.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

Kinder Morgan Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenues 13,209 14,144 13,705 13,058 14,403
Accounts receivable, net 1,370 1,498 1,448 1,370 1,315
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 9.64 9.44 9.46 9.53 10.95
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Revenues ÷ Accounts receivable, net
= 13,209 ÷ 1,370 = 9.64

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2015 to 2019 reveals a period of adjustment in credit collection efficiency followed by a phase of relative stabilization. While revenues fluctuated throughout the five-year period, the relationship between sales and the collection of outstanding receivables shifted notably after 2015.

Revenue and Receivables Correlation
Revenues peaked in 2015 at 14,403 million US$ and experienced a dip in 2016, followed by a gradual recovery through 2018 before declining again in 2019. Concurrently, net accounts receivable exhibited a steady increase from 1,315 million US$ in 2015 to a peak of 1,498 million US$ in 2018. This divergence between fluctuating revenues and rising receivables contributed to the initial compression of the turnover ratio.
Receivables Turnover Trends
A significant decrease in the receivables turnover ratio is observed between 2015 and 2016, dropping from 10.95 to 9.53. This indicates a deceleration in the speed at which the company converted its receivables into cash during that transition. Following this decline, the ratio remained remarkably stable for three years, recording values of 9.46 in 2017 and 9.44 in 2018.
Recent Performance and Efficiency
In 2019, a slight recovery in efficiency is noted as the turnover ratio increased to 9.64. This improvement coincided with a reduction in net accounts receivable to 1,370 million US$, suggesting a more aggressive collection effort or a change in customer payment behavior despite a concurrent decrease in overall revenues for that year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

Kinder Morgan Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Costs of sales 3,263 4,421 4,345 3,498 4,115
Accounts payable 914 1,337 1,340 1,257 1,324
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 3.57 3.31 3.24 2.78 3.11
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Payables turnover = Costs of sales ÷ Accounts payable
= 3,263 ÷ 914 = 3.57

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity from 2015 to 2019 reveals a general upward trend in the efficiency of payables management, characterized by an increase in the turnover ratio despite fluctuations in the absolute cost of sales.

Payables Turnover Trend
The payables turnover ratio experienced a slight decline from 3.11 in 2015 to 2.78 in 2016, before initiating a consistent upward trajectory. By the end of 2019, the ratio reached its five-year peak of 3.57. This progression indicates an acceleration in the rate at which obligations to suppliers are settled over the analyzed period.
Costs of Sales and Payables Correlation
Costs of sales exhibited significant volatility, decreasing in 2016 and 2019, while increasing in 2017 and 2018. Accounts payable remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2018, fluctuating narrowly between 1,257 million and 1,340 million. However, a substantial reduction in accounts payable occurred in 2019, falling to 914 million, which contributed to the highest turnover ratio in the period.
Operational Efficiency Insights
The divergence observed in 2019, where the payables turnover ratio increased to 3.57 while both costs of sales and accounts payable decreased, suggests a strategic reduction in outstanding liabilities. The accelerated turnover indicates that the company settled its short-term obligations more rapidly relative to its procurement costs compared to previous years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

Kinder Morgan Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 3,238 5,722 2,715 3,229 2,824
Less: Current liabilities 5,100 7,557 6,181 5,924 4,065
Working capital (1,862) (1,835) (3,466) (2,695) (1,241)
 
Revenues 13,209 14,144 13,705 13,058 14,403
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 — — — — —
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Revenues ÷ Working capital
= 13,209 ÷ -1,862 = —

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a consistent state of negative working capital throughout the period from 2015 to 2019, juxtaposed against relatively stable revenue streams. This structural financial positioning indicates that current liabilities consistently exceeded current assets, a condition that results in a negative working capital turnover ratio.

Working Capital Trends
A significant expansion of the working capital deficit is observed between 2015 and 2017, with the deficit increasing from negative 1,241 million US dollars to a peak of negative 3,466 million US dollars. This represents a substantial increase in the reliance on short-term liabilities to fund operations. However, a partial recovery occurred in 2018 and 2019, where the deficit narrowed and stabilized around negative 1,800 million US dollars.
Revenue Performance
Revenues remained comparatively stable over the five-year period, fluctuating within a range of 13,058 million US dollars to 14,403 million US dollars. The lack of significant volatility in top-line growth suggests a steady demand for services, despite the volatility observed in the underlying working capital figures.
Working Capital Turnover Interpretation
Because working capital remained negative throughout the analysis period, the resulting turnover ratios are negative. In this context, the negative ratio suggests an aggressive liquidity strategy where the organization effectively utilizes its creditors to finance its operational needs. The peak deficit in 2017 resulted in the lowest absolute turnover ratio, while the reduction of the deficit in 2018 and 2019 led to an increase in the absolute value of the turnover ratio, indicating a shift in how efficiently the company leveraged its short-term obligations relative to its revenue generation.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

Kinder Morgan Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 8.80 11.48 10.25 9.80 10.11
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 42 32 36 37 36
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 8.80 = 42

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of inventory management efficiency between 2015 and 2019 reveals a period of relative stability followed by a significant increase in the inventory processing cycle during the final year of the observed period.

Inventory Turnover Trends
Inventory turnover remained consistent from 2015 to 2017, fluctuating narrowly between 9.80 and 10.25. A peak in operational efficiency was achieved in 2018, with the ratio reaching 11.48, representing the highest rate of inventory movement in the five-year span. However, a notable contraction occurred in 2019, as the ratio declined to 8.80, the lowest level recorded in the series.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The processing period exhibited a direct inverse correlation with the turnover ratios. Between 2015 and 2017, the cycle remained stable, ranging from 36 to 37 days. The optimization observed in 2018 resulted in the processing period dropping to its minimum of 32 days. This trend reversed sharply in 2019, with the processing period extending to 42 days, marking an increase of 10 days over the previous year's trough.
Overall Efficiency Analysis
The data indicates that the organization successfully accelerated its inventory throughput up until 2018. The subsequent shift in 2019 suggests a deterioration in short-term operating activity, as the extended processing period and lowered turnover ratio point toward slower inventory liquidation or a strategic accumulation of stock.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

Kinder Morgan Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 9.64 9.44 9.46 9.53 10.95
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 38 39 39 38 33
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 9.64 = 38

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The company's efficiency in managing its receivables experienced an initial decline in performance between 2015 and 2016, followed by a period of relative stabilization through 2019.

Receivables Turnover
The turnover ratio decreased from 10.95 in 2015 to 9.53 in 2016. Following this initial drop, the ratio remained remarkably stable, fluctuating slightly between a low of 9.44 in 2018 and a modest recovery to 9.64 in 2019.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A corresponding increase in the collection period is observed, rising from 33 days in 2015 to 38 days in 2016. The period peaked at 39 days during 2017 and 2018 before contracting slightly to 38 days in 2019, indicating a slight slowing in the conversion of receivables to cash compared to 2015 levels.

The inverse relationship between the turnover ratio and the collection period remained consistent throughout the analyzed timeframe. The convergence of these metrics between 2016 and 2019 suggests the establishment of a consistent credit and collection cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

Kinder Morgan Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 42 32 36 37 36
Average receivable collection period 38 39 39 38 33
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 80 71 75 75 69
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 42 + 38 = 80

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The overall operating cycle exhibits a general upward trend over the five-year period, extending from 69 days in 2015 to a peak of 80 days by the end of 2019. This indicates a gradual increase in the time required to convert current assets into cash, reflecting a reduction in short-term operational liquidity efficiency.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory processing remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating slightly between 36 and 37 days. A notable improvement in efficiency was observed in 2018, when the period decreased to 32 days. However, this trend reversed sharply in 2019, with the period rising to 42 days, the highest level within the analyzed timeframe.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period experienced an initial increase from 33 days in 2015 to a peak of 39 days in 2017 and 2018. Following this increase, the period remained largely stagnant, ending at 38 days in 2019. This suggests that while collection efficiency declined initially, it stabilized throughout the latter half of the period.
Operating Cycle Dynamics
The total operating cycle grew from 69 days in 2015 to 75 days in 2016 and 2017. Although a brief contraction to 71 days occurred in 2018—driven primarily by the reduction in inventory processing time—the cycle expanded to its maximum of 80 days in 2019. The 2019 peak is directly attributable to the significant increase in the inventory processing period, as the receivable collection period remained stable.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

Kinder Morgan Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 3.57 3.31 3.24 2.78 3.11
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 102 110 113 131 117
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.57 = 102

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term activity ratios indicates a general acceleration in the settlement of obligations to suppliers over the five-year period from 2015 to 2019, following a temporary deceleration in 2016.

Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio experienced a decline from 3.11 in 2015 to 2.78 in 2016. Subsequently, a consistent upward trend is observed, with the ratio increasing to 3.24 in 2017, 3.31 in 2018, and reaching 3.57 by 2019. This growth indicates that supplier obligations are being settled more frequently over time.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average time required to settle accounts payable peaked at 131 days in 2016, an increase from 117 days in 2015. From 2017 onward, a steady contraction in the payment cycle is evident, with the period decreasing to 113 days in 2017, 110 days in 2018, and reaching a five-year low of 102 days in 2019.

An inverse correlation is maintained between the turnover ratio and the payment period throughout the period. The reduction of the average payment period by 29 days between 2016 and 2019 suggests an increase in the efficiency of liability management or a potential shift in credit terms provided by vendors. The overall trajectory points toward a more aggressive settlement of short-term obligations toward the end of the analyzed timeframe.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

Kinder Morgan Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 42 32 36 37 36
Average receivable collection period 38 39 39 38 33
Average payables payment period 102 110 113 131 117
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 -22 -39 -38 -56 -48
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 42 + 38 – 102 = -22

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The cash conversion cycle maintained a consistently negative value throughout the period from 2015 to 2019, indicating that the organization effectively generates cash from its operating activities before its accounts payable obligations fall due. This negative cycle allows the company to utilize supplier financing to fund its working capital requirements.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The inventory processing period remained relatively stable between 32 and 37 days from 2015 through 2018. However, a notable increase to 42 days occurred in 2019, representing the highest duration within the analyzed period and suggesting a slowdown in inventory turnover.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A slight increase in the collection period is observed, rising from 33 days in 2015 to a stabilized range of 38 to 39 days between 2016 and 2019. This indicates a marginal extension in the time required to convert receivables into cash.
Average Payables Payment Period
The payment period reached a peak of 131 days in 2016, providing the company with significant liquidity advantages. Following this peak, a steady downward trend is observed, with the period declining to 102 days by 2019, reflecting a faster settlement of obligations to suppliers.
Overall Cash Conversion Cycle Trend
The cash conversion cycle experienced its most favorable position in 2016 at -56 days. Since then, the cycle has trended upward, ending at -22 days in 2019. This shift toward a less negative cycle is primarily attributable to the contraction of the payables payment period and the simultaneous increase in the inventory processing period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?