Stock Analysis on Net

Kraft Heinz Co. (NASDAQ:KHC)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since July 31, 2020.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Kraft Heinz Co., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover
Receivables turnover
Payables turnover
Working capital turnover
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period
Add: Average receivable collection period
Operating cycle
Less: Average payables payment period
Cash conversion cycle

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The financial ratios and related metrics exhibit several noteworthy trends over the five-year period ending December 28, 2019.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio improved from 4.8 in 2015 to 6.3 in 2016, indicating increased efficiency in managing inventory. Although it slightly decreased to 5.87 in 2017, it rebounded to 6.5 in 2018 before experiencing a small decline to 6.19 in 2019. Overall, the ratio shows a generally positive trend signifying better inventory management and quicker movement of goods.
Receivables Turnover
This ratio increased sharply from 21.05 in 2015 to 34.44 in 2016, suggesting faster collection of receivables. However, it then declined progressively through 2017 (28.48), and more significantly in 2018 (12.34) and 2019 (12.66). The sharp drop after 2016 indicates a weakening efficiency in collecting outstanding customer payments.
Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio remained relatively stable, decreasing slightly from 4.42 in 2015 to 4.23 in 2016 and further to 3.72 in 2017. It recovered to 4.18 in 2018 and remained stable at 4.20 in 2019. This stability suggests consistent payment practices to suppliers over the observed years.
Working Capital Turnover
This metric displays a significant increase from 6.44 in 2015 to 16.71 in 2018 and surges dramatically to 112.51 in 2019. Data for 2016 and 2017 are missing, but the marked rise in the latest years indicates a substantial improvement in the efficiency with which working capital is employed to generate revenue.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The number of days to process inventory dropped from 76 days in 2015 to 58 days in 2016, showing improved inventory management. Although it increased slightly to 62 days in 2017, it again decreased to 56 in 2018 before marginally rising to 59 in 2019. This pattern suggests a sustained effort to maintain quicker inventory turnover.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period shortened from 17 days in 2015 to 11 days in 2016, reflecting enhanced cash recovery speed. However, it lengthened thereafter to 13 days in 2017 and jumped significantly to 30 days in 2018, maintaining a similar level (29 days) in 2019. Such an increase points to deteriorating efficiency in collecting receivables.
Operating Cycle
The operating cycle generally decreased from 93 days in 2015 to 69 days in 2016, indicating faster conversion of inventory and receivables into cash. It subsequently lengthened to 75 days in 2017, and further to 86 and 88 days in 2018 and 2019, respectively. This trend suggests a slowdown in overall operational efficiency during the later years.
Average Payables Payment Period
The payment period to suppliers increased from 83 days in 2015 to 86 days in 2016 and peaked at 98 days in 2017, implying extended payment terms or slower payment practices. It then decreased to 87 days in both 2018 and 2019, reflecting partial reversal toward quicker supplier payments.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle showed improvement in 2016 and 2017, moving from 10 days in 2015 to negative values (-17 and -23 days), indicating that the company was converting cash flows more rapidly and possibly leveraging supplier credit effectively. However, this advantage diminished in 2018 and 2019 as the cycle returned close to zero (-1 and 1 day), suggesting a reduction in the company's ability to efficiently manage cash flow through operational cycles.

In summary, the data reveals improvement in inventory management and working capital efficiency, while the receivables collection has weakened substantially since 2016. The operating cycle lengthened in recent years, and the cash conversion cycle's advantage has lessened, indicating potential challenges in sustaining efficient cash flow operations. Payables turnover and payment periods have remained relatively stable, with some fluctuation, implying consistent supplier relations and payment policies.


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

Kraft Heinz Co., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of products sold
Inventories
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of products sold ÷ Inventories
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Cost of Products Sold
The cost of products sold exhibited notable fluctuations over the five-year period. Starting at 12,577 million US dollars in 2015, it increased sharply to 16,901 million in 2016. Subsequently, a slight decline occurred, with values of 16,529 million in 2017 and 17,347 million in 2018, before a marginal decrease to 16,830 million in 2019. The overall trend indicates a peak in 2016 followed by relative stabilization with minor variations.
Inventories
Inventory levels showed a modest increasing trend from 2015 to 2019. The values rose gradually from 2,618 million US dollars in 2015 to 2,721 million in 2019, experiencing small fluctuations in intermediate years — reaching a peak of 2,815 million in 2017 before dipping to 2,667 million in 2018.
Inventory Turnover
Inventory turnover ratios demonstrated variability over the period under review. The ratio increased from 4.8 in 2015 to 6.3 in 2016, indicating improved efficiency in inventory management. There was a decrease to 5.87 in 2017, followed by a rise to 6.5 in 2018. In 2019, the ratio slightly declined to 6.19. This pattern suggests efforts to optimize inventory utilization with some yearly fluctuations.

Receivables Turnover

Kraft Heinz Co., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales
Trade receivables, net of allowances
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Trade receivables, net of allowances
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Net Sales
The net sales demonstrated a significant increase from 2015 to 2016, rising from approximately 18.3 billion US dollars to about 26.5 billion. However, this upward trend did not continue, as net sales slightly declined in 2017 and remained relatively stable in 2018 before falling further in 2019 to around 25 billion. This indicates an initial period of substantial growth followed by stabilization and a modest decline by the end of the period.
Trade Receivables, Net of Allowances
Trade receivables showed fluctuations throughout the years. Starting at 871 million US dollars in 2015, the value decreased slightly in 2016 to 769 million but then increased substantially, reaching a peak at 2.13 billion in 2018. In 2019, receivables decreased slightly to 1.97 billion. The general trend suggests a considerable build-up of receivables after 2016, indicating either extended credit terms, slower collections, or increased sales on credit.
Receivables Turnover Ratio
The receivables turnover ratio exhibited a declining trend across the period. Beginning at a high 21.05 in 2015, the ratio peaked at 34.44 in 2016, suggesting very efficient collection practices or shorter credit terms that year. However, from 2016 onward, the turnover ratio drastically dropped to 28.48 in 2017 and further down to around 12.34 in 2018, remaining nearly stable at 12.66 in 2019. This decline implies that receivables were being converted to cash more slowly, which could be reflective of relaxed credit policies or challenges in collections.

Payables Turnover

Kraft Heinz Co., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of products sold
Trade payables
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of products sold ÷ Trade payables
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Cost of products sold
The cost of products sold increased significantly from 12,577 million USD in 2015 to 16,901 million USD in 2016, marking a sharp rise. After 2016, the cost slightly declined to 16,529 million USD in 2017, followed by a mild increase to 17,347 million USD in 2018, and then a small decrease again to 16,830 million USD in 2019. Overall, the cost of products sold showed an upward trend with some fluctuations, stabilizing near the higher levels reached from 2016 onward.
Trade payables
Trade payables demonstrated a steady increase from 2,844 million USD in 2015 to 3,996 million USD in 2016, then continued to rise to 4,449 million USD in 2017. However, in 2018 trade payables decreased to 4,153 million USD and further declined slightly to 4,003 million USD in 2019. This indicates growth in payables initially followed by a gradual reduction in the last two years, suggesting possible improvements in payment management or negotiation terms.
Payables turnover ratio
The payables turnover ratio dropped from 4.42 in 2015 to a low of 3.72 in 2017, indicating a slower rate of payment to suppliers during this period. It then improved, rising to 4.18 in 2018 and slightly increasing to 4.20 in 2019. This pattern shows a temporary elongation of payment cycles followed by a recovery toward a faster payment pace in the latter years.

Working Capital Turnover

Kraft Heinz Co., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets
Less: Current liabilities
Working capital
 
Net sales
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Working Capital
The working capital exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period. In 2015, it was positive at 2,848 million USD, indicating a solid liquidity position. However, in 2016 and 2017, working capital turned negative, reaching -748 million USD and further decreasing to -2,866 million USD respectively, reflecting potential liquidity challenges or increased short-term liabilities. The company recovered in 2018 with positive working capital of 1,572 million USD, though it decreased significantly to 222 million USD in 2019, suggesting a reduced buffer for short-term obligations at the end of the period.
Net Sales
Net sales increased notably from 18,338 million USD in 2015 to a peak of 26,487 million USD in 2016, representing strong revenue growth. Thereafter, net sales stabilized somewhat, with slight decreases to 26,232 million USD in 2017 and 26,268 million USD in 2018. In 2019, net sales declined to 24,977 million USD, marking a downward trend that might indicate challenges in maintaining sales volume or pricing power toward the end of the analyzed period.
Working Capital Turnover
The working capital turnover ratio, which measures the efficiency of using working capital to generate sales, showed significant fluctuations. The ratio was 6.44 in 2015, fell into missing data in 2016 and 2017, then rose sharply to 16.71 in 2018, indicating improved utilization of working capital. The ratio surged markedly to 112.51 in 2019, potentially reflecting very low working capital combined with substantial sales, which may signal efficiency gains or could point to increased financial risk due to low liquidity.

Average Inventory Processing Period

Kraft Heinz Co., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibited an overall increasing trend from 2015 to 2019, starting at 4.8 in 2015 and peaking at 6.5 in 2018. Although there was a slight decline to 6.19 in 2019, the ratio remained significantly higher than the 2015 level, indicating generally improved efficiency in managing and selling inventory over the analyzed period.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period showed a corresponding decreasing trend during the same timeframe, falling from 76 days in 2015 to a low of 56 days in 2018. This decrease aligns with the rise in inventory turnover, reflecting quicker inventory cycles. In 2019, however, the processing period increased slightly to 59 days, suggesting a modest slowdown in inventory turnover, consistent with the minor decline in the inventory turnover ratio that year.
Overall Assessment
The data suggests that over the five-year span, the company generally improved its inventory management efficiency, achieving faster inventory turnover and shorter inventory holding periods. Despite some fluctuations in 2017 and 2019, the patterns highlight a focus on optimizing stock levels and enhancing operational efficiency, which may positively impact working capital and profitability.

Average Receivable Collection Period

Kraft Heinz Co., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of the provided financial ratios reveals notable fluctuations in the company's receivables management over the five-year period.

Receivables Turnover
The receivables turnover ratio exhibited significant volatility. It increased sharply from 21.05 in 2015 to a peak of 34.44 in 2016, suggesting more frequent collection of receivables during that year. However, this was followed by a decline to 28.48 in 2017, and a more pronounced decrease in 2018 and 2019, with values of 12.34 and 12.66 respectively. The downward trend in the latter years indicates a reduction in the efficiency of the company's collection processes or potentially looser credit policies.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average collection period, measured in days, moved inversely to the receivables turnover ratio, as expected. It improved from 17 days in 2015 to a shorter 11 days in 2016, correlating with the peak turnover ratio. Subsequently, the period increased to 13 days in 2017, indicating slower collections. The most significant change occurred in 2018 and 2019, where the collection period approximately doubled to 30 and 29 days respectively, confirming a slowdown in converting receivables to cash.

Overall, the company demonstrated strong receivables management performance early in the period, reaching optimal turnover and collection times in 2016. However, the following years reflected a consistent decline in efficiency, as evidenced by decreasing turnover ratios and increasing collection periods. This may imply challenges in credit control or changes in customer payment behaviour that could impact cash flow and working capital management.


Operating Cycle

Kraft Heinz Co., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period
Average receivable collection period
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= + =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period exhibits a declining trend from 76 days in 2015 to 58 days in 2016, indicating an improvement in inventory management and faster turnover. Subsequently, the period slightly increased to 62 days in 2017, followed by a decrease to 56 days in 2018. The value then rose marginally to 59 days in 2019. Overall, the data suggests efforts to maintain efficient inventory processing with some fluctuations.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period demonstrates a decrease from 17 days in 2015 to 11 days in 2016, reflecting enhanced effectiveness in collecting receivables. However, there is a reversal in this trend starting in 2017, where the period increased to 13 days and sharply rose to 30 days in 2018, sustaining a similar level of 29 days in 2019. This pattern indicates challenges in receivables collection efficiency during the latter part of the period analyzed.
Operating Cycle
The operating cycle, representing the total time to turn inventory and receivables into cash, follows a general trend of reduction initially from 93 days in 2015 to 69 days in 2016. It then increases to 75 days in 2017 and continues rising to 86 days in 2018 and 88 days in 2019. This uptrend correlates with the increase in the receivable collection period, suggesting a lengthening cash conversion cycle, which may impact working capital management.

Average Payables Payment Period

Kraft Heinz Co., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of the payables-related financial ratios over the five-year period from 2015 to 2019 reveals certain trends in the company's payment behavior towards its suppliers.

Payables Turnover Ratio
The payables turnover ratio shows a declining trend from 4.42 in 2015 to its lowest point of 3.72 in 2017, followed by a recovery to 4.18 in 2018 and a slight increase to 4.2 in 2019. This pattern suggests that the company initially slowed down its payments to suppliers but later accelerated the payment cycle towards the end of the period.
Average Payables Payment Period
Consistent with the trend in the turnover ratio, the average payables payment period increased from 83 days in 2015 to a peak of 98 days in 2017, indicating extended payment terms or slower payments. Subsequently, this period decreased to 87 days in 2018 and remained steady in 2019, suggesting a partial emphasis on quicker payment settlements after 2017.

In summary, the data suggests that between 2015 and 2017, the company lengthened its payables payment period, potentially to optimize cash flow management or negotiate longer credit terms. After 2017, there was a shift towards reducing the payment period, reflecting possibly improved liquidity or strategic changes in working capital management.


Cash Conversion Cycle

Kraft Heinz Co., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 28, 2019 Dec 29, 2018 Dec 30, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period
Average receivable collection period
Average payables payment period
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= + =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period shows fluctuations over the five-year span. Initially, there is a decrease from 76 days in 2015 to 58 days in 2016, followed by a slight increase to 62 days in 2017. This is succeeded by a decline again to 56 days in 2018, and a modest rise to 59 days in 2019. Overall, the inventory processing period tends to hover in the mid-to-high 50s range after an initial reduction.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The receivable collection period decreases significantly from 17 days in 2015 to 11 days in 2016, indicating improved efficiency in collections. However, from 2017 onwards, there is an upward trend, increasing to 13 days in 2017 and substantially rising to 30 days in 2018, which slightly decreases to 29 days in 2019. This suggests a deterioration in the speed of receivable collections in recent years.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment period demonstrates a generally increasing trend from 83 days in 2015 to 98 days in 2017, implying extended time taken to pay suppliers. Following 2017, the period decreases to 87 days in 2018 and remains stable at 87 days in 2019, indicating a partial reversal in the lengthening trend.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle moves from a positive 10 days in 2015 to negative values of -17 days in 2016 and -23 days in 2017, indicating an improving cash flow position with faster conversion of resources into cash. In 2018, the cycle rises sharply to -1 day and becomes positive at 1 day in 2019, signifying a reduction in efficiency and a near-neutral conversion time. These changes reflect shifts in working capital management effectiveness over the years.