Stock Analysis on Net

KLA Corp. (NASDAQ:KLAC)

Price to Book Value (P/BV) 
since 2005

Microsoft Excel

Calculation

KLA Corp., P/BV, long-term trends, calculation

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).

1 US$

2 Data adjusted for splits and stock dividends.

3 Closing price as at the filing date of KLA Corp. Annual Report.


The analysis of the Price to Book Value (P/BV) ratio reveals a distinct bifurcation in valuation metrics over the period from 2005 to 2025. The data indicates a transition from a period of relative stability and conservative multiples to a regime of significantly higher valuations relative to the company's book value, driven by both share price appreciation and volatility in the Book Value per Share (BVPS).

Early Stability Phase (2005–2014)
Between 2005 and 2014, the P/BV ratio remained consistently low, fluctuating within a narrow corridor between 2.11 and 3.26. During this decade, BVPS demonstrated a gradual upward trend, growing from 1.54 to 2.22. The stability of the P/BV ratio during this time suggests that market valuation was closely tied to the growth of the company's net asset base.
Structural Valuation Inflection (2015)
A sharp divergence occurred in 2015, marked by a dramatic increase in the P/BV ratio from 3.26 to 19.59. This spike was not driven by a sudden increase in share price, which actually declined from 7.23 to 5.24, but rather by a precipitous drop in BVPS from 2.22 to 0.27. This suggests a significant reduction in shareholders' equity, which fundamentally reset the valuation multiple.
Expansionary Valuation Period (2016–2021)
From 2016 to 2021, the P/BV ratio maintained an elevated profile, ranging from 8.15 to 15.98. This period was characterized by aggressive growth in share price, which rose from 7.76 to 35.34. While BVPS began a slow recovery, reaching 2.21 by 2021, the market maintained a significantly higher premium over the book value compared to the pre-2015 era.
Peak Valuation and Subsequent Moderation (2022–2025)
The P/BV ratio reached a historical peak of 40.04 in 2022, resulting from a combination of a continuing rise in share price to 39.57 and a simultaneous decline in BVPS to 0.99. Following this peak, the ratio moderated to 25.73 by 2025. This moderation occurred despite the share price reaching a high of 91.48, as BVPS experienced a strong recovery to 3.56, thereby expanding the equity base and lowering the relative multiple.

AI Ask an analyst for more



Comparison to Competitors

KLA Corp., P/BV, long-term trends, comparison to competitors

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).



Comparison to Sector (Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment)

KLA Corp., P/BV, long-term trends, comparison to sector (semiconductors & semiconductor equipment)

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).



Comparison to Industry (Information Technology)

KLA Corp., P/BV, long-term trends, comparison to industry (information technology)

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).