Paying user area
Try for free
United Parcel Service Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to United Parcel Service Inc. for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
A review of the financial information reveals a consistent decline in profitability metrics from 2021 through 2024, followed by a stabilization in 2025. This trend is observable across net income, earnings before tax, earnings before interest and tax, and earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization.
- EBITDA Trend
- EBITDA decreased from US$20,242 million in 2021 to US$11,917 million in 2024, representing a substantial reduction. However, EBITDA experienced minimal change in 2025, remaining at US$11,927 million. This suggests that the rate of decline slowed considerably, potentially indicating a bottoming out of earnings.
- Relationship between Profitability Metrics
- The progression from EBITDA to net income demonstrates a consistent reduction at each stage. This indicates that while operating performance, as measured by EBITDA, is declining, the impact on net income is amplified by factors such as interest, taxes, and depreciation. The difference between EBITDA and EBIT narrowed slightly from 2021 to 2025, suggesting a relatively stable depreciation expense.
- EBIT and EBT Correlation
- Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and earnings before tax (EBT) exhibit a strong correlation, with differences attributable to interest expense. The consistent relationship between these two metrics suggests that changes in interest expense are not a primary driver of the overall decline in profitability. The decrease in both EBIT and EBT mirrors the trend observed in EBITDA.
- Net Income Decline
- Net income experienced the most significant percentage decrease, falling from US$12,890 million in 2021 to US$5,572 million in 2025. This substantial reduction highlights the cumulative effect of declining revenues and/or increasing expenses across all levels of the income statement.
In summary, the period from 2021 to 2024 was characterized by a consistent and significant decline in all reported profitability measures. The stabilization of EBITDA in 2025 suggests a potential shift in this trend, although further monitoring is necessary to confirm a sustained recovery.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| FedEx Corp. | |
| Uber Technologies Inc. | |
| Union Pacific Corp. | |
| United Airlines Holdings Inc. | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Transportation | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Industrials | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | ||||||
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | ||||||
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| FedEx Corp. | ||||||
| Uber Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Union Pacific Corp. | ||||||
| United Airlines Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Transportation | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
3 2025 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. Initially, the ratio decreased, followed by an increase, and then stabilized. Enterprise Value demonstrated a consistent decline from 2021 to 2024, with a slight increase in the final year. EBITDA also decreased from 2021 to 2023, then remained relatively stable through 2025.
- Enterprise Value
- Enterprise Value decreased from US$193,562 million in 2021 to US$113,786 million in 2024, representing a substantial reduction. A modest recovery was observed in 2025, with Enterprise Value reaching US$116,348 million. This suggests potential shifts in the company’s market capitalization and debt levels over the period.
- EBITDA
- EBITDA experienced a decline from US$20,242 million in 2021 to US$12,724 million in 2023. However, EBITDA stabilized in the subsequent two years, remaining at approximately US$11,900 million in both 2024 and 2025. This stabilization may indicate a leveling off of operational profitability.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio
- The EV/EBITDA ratio began at 9.56 in 2021 and decreased to 8.94 in 2022. It then increased to 11.46 in 2023, coinciding with the largest decline in EBITDA. The ratio subsequently decreased to 9.55 in 2024 and remained relatively consistent at 9.75 in 2025. The increase in 2023 suggests the market valued the company at a higher multiple of earnings despite lower EBITDA, potentially due to anticipated future growth or other factors. The stabilization in the final two years indicates a more consistent valuation relative to earnings.
The interplay between the declining Enterprise Value and the stabilizing EBITDA resulted in a fluctuating EV/EBITDA ratio. The ratio’s movement suggests changing investor sentiment and market conditions impacting the company’s valuation.