Stock Analysis on Net

Raytheon Co. (NYSE:RTN)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 12, 2020.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
Quarterly Data

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Raytheon Co., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2019 = ×
Sep 29, 2019 = ×
Jun 30, 2019 = ×
Mar 31, 2019 = ×
Dec 31, 2018 = ×
Sep 30, 2018 = ×
Jul 1, 2018 = ×
Apr 1, 2018 = ×
Dec 31, 2017 = ×
Oct 1, 2017 = ×
Jul 2, 2017 = ×
Apr 2, 2017 = ×
Dec 31, 2016 = ×
Oct 2, 2016 = ×
Jul 3, 2016 = ×
Apr 3, 2016 = ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).


The financial analysis over multiple quarters reveals several noteworthy trends in key performance metrics.

Return on Assets (ROA)
The ROA exhibits a generally positive trajectory, increasing from 6.77% initially to a peak of 10.03% during the latest observed period. Some fluctuations are evident, with minor declines in certain quarters, notably around the end of 2017 and mid-2019. Nonetheless, the overall upward movement suggests improved efficiency in asset utilization over the analyzed time frame.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage ratios remain relatively stable but show moderate variability throughout the periods. The ratio begins near 2.85, experiences slight decreases and increases, and ultimately stabilizes around the 2.7 to 2.8 range in the most recent quarters. The largest observed spike reaches slightly above 3.1, indicating occasional variation in the reliance on debt financing, yet no extreme volatility is apparent.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE demonstrates a strong upward trend, increasing from 19.28% to 27.35%. While there are some minor declines or plateaus at specific points—most notably around mid-2017—the overall pattern suggests enhanced profitability for equity holders. The rise in ROE outpaces the growth in ROA, which may reflect the impact of financial leverage and operational effectiveness combined.

In summary, the company exhibits steady improvement in asset efficiency and shareholder returns. Financial leverage remains moderate and relatively consistent, supporting the growth in equity returns without significant risk fluctuations. This reflects an effective balance between operational performance and capital structure management over the analyzed periods.


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Raytheon Co., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2019 = × ×
Sep 29, 2019 = × ×
Jun 30, 2019 = × ×
Mar 31, 2019 = × ×
Dec 31, 2018 = × ×
Sep 30, 2018 = × ×
Jul 1, 2018 = × ×
Apr 1, 2018 = × ×
Dec 31, 2017 = × ×
Oct 1, 2017 = × ×
Jul 2, 2017 = × ×
Apr 2, 2017 = × ×
Dec 31, 2016 = × ×
Oct 2, 2016 = × ×
Jul 3, 2016 = × ×
Apr 3, 2016 = × ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).


Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin shows a generally positive trend over the observed periods. Starting at 8.23% in the first quarter of 2016, it experiences moderate fluctuations but remains largely stable around the 8% to 9% range through 2017 and early 2018. From mid-2018 onward, there is a clear upward trajectory, culminating in a peak of approximately 11.47% by the end of 2019. This indicates growing profitability efficiency relative to revenue over time.
Asset Turnover
The asset turnover ratio remains relatively steady throughout the period, with minor oscillations between 0.80 and 0.88. The ratio exhibits a slight increase in late 2018 and maintains a level around 0.84 to 0.87 during 2019. This consistency suggests stable operational efficiency in using assets to generate sales, with no significant shifts in resource utilization.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage demonstrates variability within the reported timeframe, fluctuating between approximately 2.53 and 3.10. It shows a tendency to increase towards the end of 2016 and again at the end of 2017, followed by a general decline approaching late 2019. The fluctuations imply changes in the company’s reliance on debt relative to equity; a higher ratio indicates increased leverage and potentially higher financial risk, whereas the reduction observed towards the latter period suggests a cautious approach or deleveraging trend.
Return on Equity (ROE)
The ROE exhibits an overall upward trend, rising from 19.28% in the first quarter of 2016 to 27.35% at the end of 2019. Notable increments occur after mid-2018, where the ROE climbs sharply, peaking above 25% and reaching its highest value in the final reported quarter. This improvement reflects enhanced profitability and effective use of shareholders’ equity, driven by a combination of increasing net profit margins and relatively stable asset turnover, despite fluctuations in financial leverage.

Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Raytheon Co., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2019 = × × × ×
Sep 29, 2019 = × × × ×
Jun 30, 2019 = × × × ×
Mar 31, 2019 = × × × ×
Dec 31, 2018 = × × × ×
Sep 30, 2018 = × × × ×
Jul 1, 2018 = × × × ×
Apr 1, 2018 = × × × ×
Dec 31, 2017 = × × × ×
Oct 1, 2017 = × × × ×
Jul 2, 2017 = × × × ×
Apr 2, 2017 = × × × ×
Dec 31, 2016 = × × × ×
Oct 2, 2016 = × × × ×
Jul 3, 2016 = × × × ×
Apr 3, 2016 = × × × ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).


Tax Burden
The tax burden ratio exhibited a generally declining trend from the beginning of the period, falling from 0.75 in April 2016 to a low of 0.64 by December 2017. Subsequently, the ratio increased steadily, reaching a peak of 0.92 in December 2018 and stabilizing slightly lower around 0.84 by the end of 2019. This pattern indicates varying tax efficiency over the periods, with a notable increase in the effective tax rate during 2018 before a moderate reduction in 2019.
Interest Burden
The interest burden ratio remained relatively stable throughout the observed timeline, maintaining values close to 0.92–0.96. There was a slight gradual improvement, with the ratio increasing from 0.92 in early 2016 to about 0.96 by the end of 2019. This stability and modest increase imply consistent interest expense management relative to earnings before interest and taxes.
EBIT Margin
EBIT margin demonstrated modest fluctuations but generally showed a gradual improvement across the periods. Starting at approximately 12% in early 2016, it increased to a range around 14% by the end of 2019. Despite some troughs, the margin reflects a solid ability to convert sales into operating profit with a slight upward momentum in operational efficiency.
Asset Turnover
The asset turnover ratio remained fairly consistent, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 throughout the timeline. Minor variations were observed, but no significant trend emerged. The steady ratio suggests consistent efficiency in the use of assets to generate revenue, with the ratio fluctuating around 0.84 in the final quarter.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage showed some volatility, starting near 2.85 in early 2016, dipping below 2.6 around late 2018 and early 2019, and then rising again to approximately 2.83 by year-end 2019. This indicates fluctuations in the company’s use of debt financing, with a general pattern of leveraging crown in the latter part of the period.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE presented an overall improving trend from 19.28% in early 2016 to a peak of 27.35% by the end of 2019. Although some minor fluctuations occurred, the return on equity increased substantially, largely driven by improved profitability and leverage dynamics. This enhancement reflects positively on the company’s ability to generate shareholder returns over time.

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Raytheon Co., decomposition of ROA (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2019 = ×
Sep 29, 2019 = ×
Jun 30, 2019 = ×
Mar 31, 2019 = ×
Dec 31, 2018 = ×
Sep 30, 2018 = ×
Jul 1, 2018 = ×
Apr 1, 2018 = ×
Dec 31, 2017 = ×
Oct 1, 2017 = ×
Jul 2, 2017 = ×
Apr 2, 2017 = ×
Dec 31, 2016 = ×
Oct 2, 2016 = ×
Jul 3, 2016 = ×
Apr 3, 2016 = ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).


Net Profit Margin

The net profit margin exhibits an overall upward trend across the periods analyzed, starting from 8.23% and reaching a peak of approximately 11.47%. Initial fluctuations are observed in the first eight quarters, where values range between 7.98% and 9.41%. From early 2018 onward, a more consistent increase is evident, culminating in margins above 11% in the last two quarters. This suggests improving profitability and operational efficiency over time.

Asset Turnover

The asset turnover ratio demonstrates relative stability with minor variations around an average of approximately 0.83. It remains within a narrow band from 0.80 to 0.88 throughout the periods. Notably, slight increases occur toward the middle of the timeline, but no significant upward or downward trend is apparent. This indicates consistent efficiency in utilizing assets to generate sales over the examined timeframe.

Return on Assets (ROA)

The return on assets shows a general positive progression with some volatility. Starting around 6.77%, it increases steadily to surpass 10% by the later periods. The increase is more pronounced after 2017, with ROA rising from below 7% to consistently near or above 9% in the final quarters. This behavior aligns with the trends in net profit margin, reflecting enhanced overall asset profitability.

Summary of Financial Trends

The company exhibits improving profitability and return measures over the analyzed quarters. Net profit margin and ROA both demonstrate a clear upward trend, signaling growth in earnings relative to sales and asset base respectively. Asset turnover remains stable, indicating that efficiency in asset use is maintained. Together, these trends suggest strengthened financial performance driven largely by increased profitability rather than changes in asset utilization.


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Raytheon Co., decomposition of ROA (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2019 = × × ×
Sep 29, 2019 = × × ×
Jun 30, 2019 = × × ×
Mar 31, 2019 = × × ×
Dec 31, 2018 = × × ×
Sep 30, 2018 = × × ×
Jul 1, 2018 = × × ×
Apr 1, 2018 = × × ×
Dec 31, 2017 = × × ×
Oct 1, 2017 = × × ×
Jul 2, 2017 = × × ×
Apr 2, 2017 = × × ×
Dec 31, 2016 = × × ×
Oct 2, 2016 = × × ×
Jul 3, 2016 = × × ×
Apr 3, 2016 = × × ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).


Tax Burden
The tax burden ratio exhibited a general declining trend from early 2016 through the end of 2017, decreasing from 0.75 to a low of 0.64 by December 2017. Following this period, the ratio increased notably throughout 2018, peaking at 0.92 by the end of the year and remaining elevated close to this level into 2019, indicating a higher proportion of earnings retained after taxes during the latter periods.
Interest Burden
The interest burden ratio remained relatively stable and high over the entire period analyzed, fluctuating narrowly between 0.92 and 0.96. This stability suggests consistent management of interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), with a slight improvement observed toward the end of 2019.
EBIT Margin
The EBIT margin demonstrated a moderately positive trend overall. Starting at approximately 12% in early 2016, it increased gradually to a level above 14% by the fourth quarter of 2019. Despite minor fluctuations, this incremental improvement reflects enhanced operating profitability over the periods reviewed.
Asset Turnover
Asset turnover showed minimal variation, maintaining a range between 0.80 and 0.88. Initial stability around 0.82 was observed until late 2017, followed by a slight increase reaching about 0.88 in late 2018, then a modest decline in 2019. This suggests relatively steady efficiency in asset utilization to generate revenue, with only marginal improvements.
Return on Assets (ROA)
ROA displayed an overall upward trajectory, rising from roughly 6.8% at the beginning of 2016 to a peak exceeding 10% by late 2019. Some volatility occurred, particularly a noticeable increase during 2018 and early 2019, which coincides with the improvements in EBIT margin and steady asset turnover. The increase in ROA indicates more effective management of assets to generate net income over time.

Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Raytheon Co., decomposition of net profit margin ratio (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Dec 31, 2019 = × ×
Sep 29, 2019 = × ×
Jun 30, 2019 = × ×
Mar 31, 2019 = × ×
Dec 31, 2018 = × ×
Sep 30, 2018 = × ×
Jul 1, 2018 = × ×
Apr 1, 2018 = × ×
Dec 31, 2017 = × ×
Oct 1, 2017 = × ×
Jul 2, 2017 = × ×
Apr 2, 2017 = × ×
Dec 31, 2016 = × ×
Oct 2, 2016 = × ×
Jul 3, 2016 = × ×
Apr 3, 2016 = × ×

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).


The financial data demonstrates several notable trends over the observed periods, revealing changes in the company’s profitability and expenses management.

Tax Burden
The tax burden ratio shows a general declining trend from the first quarter of 2016 (0.75) through the end of 2017, reaching a low of 0.64 in December 2017. However, starting in early 2018, there is a marked increase, peaking at 0.92 in the first two quarters of 2019 before slightly declining to 0.84 by the end of 2019. This indicates periods of fluctuating effective tax rates that may have influenced net profitability.
Interest Burden
This ratio remains relatively stable and consistently high throughout all quarters, fluctuating narrowly between 0.92 and 0.96. This stability suggests consistent management of interest-related expenses, indicating that interest costs have not significantly impacted operating income.
EBIT Margin
The EBIT margin shows a generally positive but modest upward trend from approximately 12% to over 14% across the entire timeframe. There is some volatility within quarters but the margin increases steadily, highlighting improving operational efficiency and earnings before interest and taxes.
Net Profit Margin
Net profit margin exhibits variability but an overall increase over the periods analyzed. Beginning near 8%, it dips and recovers through 2017 and then climbs steadily from 2018 onwards, reaching above 11% by late 2019. This upward movement indicates improved bottom-line profitability, likely influenced by the operational gains shown in the EBIT margin as well as fluctuations in tax burden.

In summary, the data reflects a company managing its core operations with improving efficiency, as evidenced by rising EBIT margins. The interest burden remains stable, limiting financial expense volatility. The fluctuating tax burden introduces variability in net outcomes, yet net profit margins show a positive trajectory, reflecting enhanced overall profitability toward the end of the period.