AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Raytheon Co. (NYSE:RTN)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 12, 2020.

Analysis of Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Microsoft Excel

Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill

Raytheon Co., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted

Raytheon Co., adjustments to financial statements

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Adjustment to Total Assets
Total assets (as reported) 34,566 31,864 30,860 30,052 29,281
Less: Goodwill 14,882 14,864 14,871 14,788 14,731
Total assets (adjusted) 19,684 17,000 15,989 15,264 14,550
Adjustment to Total Raytheon Company Stockholders’ Equity
Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity (as reported) 12,223 11,472 9,963 10,066 10,128
Less: Goodwill 14,882 14,864 14,871 14,788 14,731
Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity (adjusted) (2,659) (3,392) (4,908) (4,722) (4,603)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The removal of goodwill and intangible assets from the balance sheet reveals a significant divergence between the reported financial position and the underlying tangible asset base. While total assets grew steadily from 2015 to 2019, a substantial portion of this value is attributed to non-physical assets, which fundamentally alters the interpretation of the company's solvency and equity structure.

Asset Composition and Growth Trends
Reported total assets increased from 29,281 million US dollars in 2015 to 34,566 million US dollars in 2019. During the same period, adjusted total assets rose from 14,550 million US dollars to 19,684 million US dollars. The consistent gap between these two figures indicates that goodwill and intangible assets represent approximately 43% to 50% of the total asset base throughout the five-year period, suggesting a heavy reliance on acquired intangible value.
Tangible Net Worth Analysis
A stark contrast is observed between reported and adjusted stockholders' equity. While reported equity remained positive and increased from 10,128 million US dollars in 2015 to 12,223 million US dollars in 2019, the adjusted equity remained negative for the entire duration. The adjusted equity started at negative 4,603 million US dollars in 2015 and improved to negative 2,659 million US dollars by 2019.
Structural Financial Implications
The persistence of negative adjusted equity demonstrates that the company's reported equity is entirely dependent on the valuation of intangible assets. Although the tangible deficit improved by approximately 1,944 million US dollars between 2015 and 2019, the company effectively operates with negative tangible net worth, meaning its physical assets are insufficient to cover its total liabilities without the inclusion of goodwill and other intangible items.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)

Raytheon Co., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted

Raytheon Co., adjusted financial ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Total Asset Turnover
Reported total asset turnover 0.84 0.85 0.82 0.80 0.79
Adjusted total asset turnover 1.48 1.59 1.59 1.58 1.60
Financial Leverage
Reported financial leverage 2.83 2.78 3.10 2.99 2.89
Adjusted financial leverage — — — — —
Return on Equity (ROE)
Reported ROE 27.35% 25.36% 20.32% 21.97% 20.48%
Adjusted ROE — — — — —
Return on Assets (ROA)
Reported ROA 9.67% 9.13% 6.56% 7.36% 7.08%
Adjusted ROA 16.98% 17.11% 12.66% 14.49% 14.25%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The adjustment of financial ratios to remove the impact of goodwill and intangible assets reveals a significant difference between reported performance and the underlying efficiency of tangible assets. The removal of these assets consistently results in higher efficiency and profitability metrics, indicating that a substantial portion of the total asset base is comprised of non-physical assets.

Total Asset Turnover
A substantial variance is observed between reported and adjusted total asset turnover throughout the five-year period. While the reported ratio shows a slight improvement from 0.79 in 2015 to 0.84 in 2019, the adjusted ratio is significantly higher, starting at 1.60 in 2015 and ending at 1.48 in 2019. This suggests that the tangible assets are utilized much more intensively to generate revenue than the total asset base would imply. The gradual decline in the adjusted ratio from 2015 to 2019 indicates a slight decrease in the efficiency of tangible asset utilization over time, contrasting with the slight improvement seen in the reported figures.
Return on Assets (ROA)
The impact of goodwill and intangible assets is most pronounced in the Return on Assets. Reported ROA exhibits an upward trend, increasing from 7.08% in 2015 to 9.67% in 2019, despite a dip to 6.56% in 2017. The adjusted ROA consistently doubles the reported figures, rising from 14.25% in 2015 to 16.98% in 2019. The parallel movement between reported and adjusted ROA confirms that while the overall profitability relative to assets is improving, the reported figure is heavily suppressed by the valuation of intangible assets.
Profitability and Leverage Trends
Reported Return on Equity (ROE) demonstrates a strong and steady increase, moving from 20.48% in 2015 to 27.35% in 2019, reflecting enhanced shareholder returns. Reported financial leverage remained relatively stable, fluctuating between a low of 2.78 in 2018 and a high of 3.10 in 2017. The combination of rising ROE and stable leverage suggests that the growth in equity returns is driven primarily by improved operational profitability rather than increased financial risk.

Overall, the analysis demonstrates that the exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets provides a more optimistic view of operational efficiency and asset productivity. The consistent gap between reported and adjusted metrics indicates that the company's balance sheet is heavily weighted toward intangible valuations, which masks the higher performance levels of the tangible asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Total Asset Turnover

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales 29,176 27,058 25,348 24,069 23,247
Total assets 34,566 31,864 30,860 30,052 29,281
Activity Ratio
Total asset turnover1 0.84 0.85 0.82 0.80 0.79
Adjusted for Goodwill
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales 29,176 27,058 25,348 24,069 23,247
Adjusted total assets 19,684 17,000 15,989 15,264 14,550
Activity Ratio
Adjusted total asset turnover2 1.48 1.59 1.59 1.58 1.60

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 29,176 ÷ 34,566 = 0.84

2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 29,176 ÷ 19,684 = 1.48


The analysis of asset utilization from 2015 to 2019 reveals a substantial divergence between reported and adjusted asset metrics. Reported total assets increased steadily from US$ 29,281 million in 2015 to US$ 34,566 million by 2019. Similarly, adjusted total assets grew from US$ 14,550 million to US$ 19,684 million over the same period. The persistent and significant gap between these two figures indicates that a large portion of the balance sheet is comprised of goodwill and intangible assets, which effectively halves the asset base when excluded for efficiency analysis.

Reported Total Asset Turnover
A gradual improvement in reported asset turnover is observed from 2015 to 2018, with the ratio rising from 0.79 to 0.85. This upward trend suggests a marginal increase in the efficiency with which the total asset base was used to generate revenue. A slight contraction occurred in 2019, where the ratio declined to 0.84, coinciding with the largest single-year increase in reported total assets.
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
The adjusted turnover ratio, which excludes the impact of goodwill and intangibles, is significantly higher than the reported ratio, peaking at 1.60 in 2015. The ratio remained relatively stable between 1.58 and 1.60 from 2015 through 2018. However, a pronounced decline to 1.48 is noted in 2019. This suggests that the growth in adjusted total assets during the final year of the period was not matched by a proportional increase in revenue, resulting in a decrease in the productivity of the company's tangible operating assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Leverage

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Total assets 34,566 31,864 30,860 30,052 29,281
Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity 12,223 11,472 9,963 10,066 10,128
Solvency Ratio
Financial leverage1 2.83 2.78 3.10 2.99 2.89
Adjusted for Goodwill
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted total assets 19,684 17,000 15,989 15,264 14,550
Adjusted total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity (2,659) (3,392) (4,908) (4,722) (4,603)
Solvency Ratio
Adjusted financial leverage2 — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity
= 34,566 ÷ 12,223 = 2.83

2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity
= 19,684 ÷ -2,659 = —


An analysis of the balance sheet composition between 2015 and 2019 reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted financial metrics, primarily driven by the presence of goodwill and intangible assets.

Asset Growth and Composition
Reported total assets increased steadily from US$ 29,281 million in 2015 to US$ 34,566 million in 2019. During the same period, adjusted total assets grew from US$ 14,550 million to US$ 19,684 million. This indicates that while the tangible asset base expanded consistently, a substantial portion of the total asset value remains tied to intangible components.
Equity Analysis and Tangibility
A critical disparity is observed between reported and adjusted stockholders' equity. While reported equity remained positive and relatively stable, ranging from US$ 9,963 million to US$ 12,223 million, adjusted stockholders' equity was negative for the entire five-year period. This negative tangible net worth reached its lowest point in 2017 at negative US$ 4,908 million before trending upward to negative US$ 2,659 million by 2019, confirming that the value of goodwill and intangible assets consistently exceeded the total reported equity.
Financial Leverage Dynamics
The reported financial leverage ratio exhibited moderate stability, fluctuating between a low of 2.78 in 2018 and a peak of 3.10 in 2017. In contrast, the adjusted financial leverage—calculated by dividing adjusted assets by adjusted equity—shows a divergent and more volatile trend. The adjusted leverage ratio moved from -3.16 in 2015 to -7.40 in 2019. This increasing negative magnitude is a result of the adjusted asset base growing while the adjusted equity deficit narrowed, highlighting a significant reliance on intangible asset valuations to support the reported capital structure.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Raytheon Company 3,343 2,909 2,024 2,211 2,074
Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity 12,223 11,472 9,963 10,066 10,128
Profitability Ratio
ROE1 27.35% 25.36% 20.32% 21.97% 20.48%
Adjusted for Goodwill
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Raytheon Company 3,343 2,909 2,024 2,211 2,074
Adjusted total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity (2,659) (3,392) (4,908) (4,722) (4,603)
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROE2 — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Raytheon Company ÷ Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 3,343 ÷ 12,223 = 27.35%

2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Raytheon Company ÷ Adjusted total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 3,343 ÷ -2,659 = —


An analysis of the financial position from 2015 to 2019 reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted equity metrics. While reported stockholders' equity exhibited a general upward trend, adjusted stockholders' equity remained negative throughout the entire five-year period, suggesting that the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets substantially offsets the tangible equity base.

Reported Stockholders' Equity
A growth trend is observed, with equity increasing from US$ 10,128 million in 2015 to US$ 12,223 million by 2019. Despite a marginal decline between 2015 and 2017, the figures surged after 2017, indicating an expansion of the reported capital base.
Adjusted Stockholders' Equity
The adjusted equity remained consistently negative, starting at negative US$ 4,603 million in 2015. However, a steady improvement is noted as the negative balance narrowed to negative US$ 2,659 million by 2019. This trend indicates a reduction in the gap between reported equity and the adjustments made for intangible assets over time.
Reported Return on Equity (ROE)
The reported ROE demonstrated consistent growth, rising from 20.48% in 2015 to 27.35% in 2019. This progression suggests an increasing efficiency in generating profit relative to the reported equity investment.

The contrast between the positive reported ROE and the negative adjusted equity indicates that the reported performance metrics are heavily influenced by the presence of goodwill and intangible assets. The narrowing of the negative adjusted equity suggests a gradual strengthening of the tangible equity position relative to these asset adjustments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Raytheon Company 3,343 2,909 2,024 2,211 2,074
Total assets 34,566 31,864 30,860 30,052 29,281
Profitability Ratio
ROA1 9.67% 9.13% 6.56% 7.36% 7.08%
Adjusted for Goodwill
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Raytheon Company 3,343 2,909 2,024 2,211 2,074
Adjusted total assets 19,684 17,000 15,989 15,264 14,550
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROA2 16.98% 17.11% 12.66% 14.49% 14.25%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Raytheon Company ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 3,343 ÷ 34,566 = 9.67%

2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Raytheon Company ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 3,343 ÷ 19,684 = 16.98%


A consistent upward trend in both reported and adjusted total assets is observed between 2015 and 2019. The significant variance between these two figures indicates a substantial presence of goodwill and intangible assets on the balance sheet, which effectively reduces the asset base by approximately 43% to 50% when these items are excluded for the purpose of calculating the adjusted return on assets.

Total Asset Growth
Reported total assets increased from 29,281 million US$ in 2015 to 34,566 million US$ in 2019. During the same period, adjusted total assets grew from 14,550 million US$ to 19,684 million US$. This steady expansion of the asset base suggests ongoing investment and growth, with the adjusted asset base showing a marked increase in the final year of the period.
Reported Return on Assets (ROA)
The reported ROA exhibited moderate volatility, starting at 7.08% in 2015, experiencing a decline to 6.56% in 2017, and subsequently recovering to reach 9.67% by 2019. This trajectory indicates a general improvement in the efficiency of overall asset utilization over the five-year span, despite the 2017 downturn.
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
The adjusted ROA consistently remained significantly higher than the reported ROA throughout the period. Starting at 14.25% in 2015, the adjusted ROA reached a peak of 17.11% in 2018 before settling at 16.98% in 2019. The substantial premium of the adjusted ROA over the reported figure highlights that the core operational assets are generating returns at a rate nearly double that of the total asset base.
Comparative Performance Correlation
A strong correlation is observed between reported and adjusted ROA trends, as both metrics mirrored each other's fluctuations, particularly the dip in 2017 and the subsequent surge in 2018. The persistence of the wide gap between the two metrics confirms that the dilution of the ROA is primarily driven by the weight of intangible assets and goodwill rather than operational inefficiencies.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?