AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Mastercard Inc. (NYSE:MA)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 27, 2023.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

Mastercard Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Turnover Ratios
Receivables turnover 17.51 14.32 8.97 5.64 6.10
Payables turnover 20.02 20.68 10.37 6.22 6.83
Working capital turnover 9.13 4.99 2.11 3.38 3.27
Average No. Days
Average receivable collection period 21 25 41 65 60
Average payables payment period 18 18 35 59 53

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


An analysis of the short-term activity ratios from 2018 to 2022 reveals a significant acceleration in operational efficiency and a strategic shift in the management of working capital. The overall trend indicates a move toward faster asset turnover and more rapid settlement of liabilities.

Receivables Management
A substantial increase in receivables turnover is observed, rising from 6.10 in 2018 to 17.51 by 2022. This upward trajectory corresponds directly with a sharp decline in the average receivable collection period, which fell from 60 days in 2018 to 21 days in 2022. This trend suggests a marked improvement in the efficiency of credit collection and a faster conversion of receivables into cash.
Payables Management
Payables turnover experienced a significant increase, particularly between 2020 and 2021, moving from 10.37 to 20.68 before stabilizing at 20.02 in 2022. Parallel to this, the average payables payment period decreased from 53 days in 2018 to 18 days in 2022. The data reflects a transition toward much faster payment of obligations to suppliers and vendors.
Working Capital Utilization
Working capital turnover exhibited volatility in the early period, dipping to 2.11 in 2020, followed by an aggressive expansion to 9.13 by 2022. This indicates that the company has significantly increased its ability to generate revenue relative to its investment in working capital, suggesting heightened operational leverage and efficiency in utilizing short-term assets and liabilities.

The synchronized reduction in both collection and payment periods suggests a tightened cash conversion cycle. The acceleration in both receivables and payables turnover indicates a highly liquid operational environment with an emphasis on rapid transaction velocity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

Mastercard Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net revenue 22,237 18,884 15,301 16,883 14,950
Settlement assets 1,270 1,319 1,706 2,995 2,452
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 17.51 14.32 8.97 5.64 6.10
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 5.87 5.74 — — —
Adobe Inc. 8.53 8.41 9.20 — —
AppLovin Corp. 4.01 5.43 — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 7.32 8.85 — — —
Datadog Inc. 4.19 3.83 — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 9.25 8.49 — — —
Intuit Inc. 28.53 24.64 — — —
Microsoft Corp. 4.48 4.42 — — —
Oracle Corp. 7.13 7.48 — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 7.38 8.08 — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 2.57 3.43 — — —
Salesforce Inc. 2.72 2.73 — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 4.20 4.24 — — —
Synopsys Inc. 6.38 7.40 4.72 — —
Workday Inc. 4.14 4.18 — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Software & Services 5.19 5.23 — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Information Technology 7.39 7.51 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net revenue ÷ Settlement assets
= 22,237 ÷ 1,270 = 17.51

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of operating activity between 2018 and 2022 reveals a significant improvement in asset utilization efficiency. While net revenue experienced a temporary contraction in 2020, the overall trajectory has been positive, characterized by a simultaneous reduction in settlement assets which has accelerated the turnover rate.

Net Revenue Performance
Net revenue grew from US$ 14,950 million in 2018 to US$ 22,237 million by 2022. A temporary decline occurred in 2020, with revenue falling to US$ 15,301 million, followed by a robust recovery in 2021 and continued expansion through 2022.
Settlement Assets Trend
A marked downward trend in settlement assets is observed starting after 2019. Following a peak of US$ 2,995 million in 2019, these assets declined steadily to US$ 1,270 million by 2022, indicating a reduction in the volume of capital held in settlement accounts.
Receivables Turnover Analysis
The receivables turnover ratio exhibits a substantial increase over the five-year period, rising from 6.10 in 2018 to 17.51 in 2022. After a slight dip to 5.64 in 2019, the ratio experienced an accelerated climb, reaching 8.97 in 2020, 14.32 in 2021, and peaking in 2022. This pattern indicates that the organization is generating significantly more revenue per unit of settlement assets, reflecting an increase in operational efficiency and a faster cycle of asset conversion.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

Mastercard Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net revenue 22,237 18,884 15,301 16,883 14,950
Settlement obligations 1,111 913 1,475 2,714 2,189
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 20.02 20.68 10.37 6.22 6.83
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 16.37 15.03 — — —
Adobe Inc. 5.71 5.98 5.63 — —
AppLovin Corp. 4.60 3.83 — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 7.89 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 14.77 9.27 — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 6.87 6.54 — — —
Intuit Inc. 3.26 2.70 — — —
Microsoft Corp. 3.30 3.44 — — —
Oracle Corp. 6.74 10.54 — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 9.12 4.53 — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 13.43 22.41 — — —
Salesforce Inc. — — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 5.74 15.20 — — —
Synopsys Inc. 28.30 31.44 26.49 — —
Workday Inc. 25.74 15.85 — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Software & Services 5.57 5.73 — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Information Technology 4.24 4.63 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Payables turnover = Net revenue ÷ Settlement obligations
= 22,237 ÷ 1,111 = 20.02

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a significant shift in the management of settlement obligations and their relationship to revenue between 2018 and 2022.

Net Revenue Trends
Net revenue exhibited an overall growth trajectory, increasing from US$ 14,950 million in 2018 to US$ 22,237 million by 2022. A temporary contraction was observed in 2020, where revenue decreased to US$ 15,301 million, followed by a period of accelerated growth in 2021 and 2022.
Settlement Obligations Dynamics
Settlement obligations reached a peak of US$ 2,714 million in 2019 before experiencing a sustained decline. This downward trend continued through 2021, reaching a minimum of US$ 913 million, before stabilizing slightly at US$ 1,111 million in 2022. The reduction in these obligations occurred despite the general increase in net revenue.
Payables Turnover Evolution
The payables turnover ratio demonstrated a substantial upward trend, rising from 6.83 in 2018 to 20.02 in 2022. A critical inflection point occurred after 2019, as the ratio climbed from 6.22 to 20.68 in 2021. This sharp increase reflects a significant acceleration in the rate at which settlement obligations are cleared, driven primarily by the reduction in the average balance of obligations relative to the scale of operations.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

Mastercard Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 16,606 16,949 19,113 16,902 16,171
Less: Current liabilities 14,171 13,162 11,847 11,904 11,593
Working capital 2,435 3,787 7,266 4,998 4,578
 
Net revenue 22,237 18,884 15,301 16,883 14,950
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 9.13 4.99 2.11 3.38 3.27
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 15.07 12.77 — — —
Adobe Inc. 20.28 9.09 4.89 — —
AppLovin Corp. 2.07 1.08 — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 9.92 4.01 — — —
Datadog Inc. 1.06 0.77 — — —
International Business Machines Corp. — — — — —
Intuit Inc. 8.98 3.85 — — —
Microsoft Corp. 2.66 1.76 — — —
Oracle Corp. 3.50 1.29 — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 0.78 0.70 — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. — — — — —
Salesforce Inc. 24.95 5.11 — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 11.16 21.76 — — —
Synopsys Inc. 21.34 10.65 9.00 — —
Workday Inc. 35.15 8.31 — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Software & Services 4.68 2.73 — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Information Technology 6.38 4.29 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net revenue ÷ Working capital
= 22,237 ÷ 2,435 = 9.13

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of operating activity between 2018 and 2022 reveals a significant increase in the efficiency of working capital utilization. While net revenue experienced an overall upward trajectory, the amount of working capital required to support these operations decreased substantially in the latter half of the observed period.

Net Revenue Trends
Revenue grew from 14,950 million USD in 2018 to 22,237 million USD in 2022. A temporary contraction occurred in 2020, where revenue fell to 15,301 million USD, followed by a period of accelerated growth in 2021 and 2022.
Working Capital Fluctuations
Working capital exhibited an initial expansion, peaking at 7,266 million USD in 2020. This trend reversed sharply thereafter, with values declining to 3,787 million USD in 2021 and further contracting to 2,435 million USD by the end of 2022.
Working Capital Turnover Performance
The turnover ratio demonstrates a volatile but ultimately ascending trend. After remaining stable between 3.27 and 3.38 from 2018 to 2019, the ratio declined to a minimum of 2.11 in 2020. This dip coincided with the peak in working capital and a concurrent decrease in revenue. From 2021 onward, the ratio increased rapidly, reaching 9.13 by 2022. This trajectory indicates a substantial improvement in operational efficiency, as the company generated significantly higher revenue relative to its investment in working capital.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

Mastercard Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 17.51 14.32 8.97 5.64 6.10
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 21 25 41 65 60
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 62 64 — — —
Adobe Inc. 43 43 40 — —
AppLovin Corp. 91 67 — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 50 41 — — —
Datadog Inc. 87 95 — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 39 43 — — —
Intuit Inc. 13 15 — — —
Microsoft Corp. 81 83 — — —
Oracle Corp. 51 49 — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 49 45 — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 142 106 — — —
Salesforce Inc. 134 134 — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 87 86 — — —
Synopsys Inc. 57 49 77 — —
Workday Inc. 88 87 — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Software & Services 70 70 — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Information Technology 49 49 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 17.51 = 21

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity ratios indicates a substantial improvement in the efficiency of receivable management from 2018 through 2022. After a minor decline in performance during 2019, a strong and consistent trend toward accelerated capital recovery emerged, significantly enhancing the operational liquidity position.

Receivables Turnover
A marked upward trend is observed in the receivables turnover ratio, which rose from 6.10 in 2018 to 17.51 by the end of 2022. This progression indicates a higher frequency of receivable conversions into cash, with the most aggressive growth occurring between 2020 and 2022.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average period required to collect outstanding receivables experienced a significant reduction, falling from 60 days in 2018 to 21 days in 2022. A peak of 65 days was recorded in 2019, followed by a sharp contraction to 41 days in 2020 and a further decline to 21 days by 2022. This trend suggests a tightening of credit terms or a substantial increase in the effectiveness of collection processes.
Operational Correlation
An inverse correlation is evident between the increasing turnover ratio and the decreasing collection period. The acceleration in turnover from 8.97 in 2020 to 17.51 in 2022 corresponds directly with the reduction of the collection cycle by 20 days over the same period, reflecting optimized working capital management and improved cash flow velocity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

Mastercard Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 20.02 20.68 10.37 6.22 6.83
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 18 18 35 59 53
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Accenture PLC 22 24 — — —
Adobe Inc. 64 61 65 — —
AppLovin Corp. 79 95 — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 46 — — — —
Datadog Inc. 25 39 — — —
International Business Machines Corp. 53 56 — — —
Intuit Inc. 112 135 — — —
Microsoft Corp. 111 106 — — —
Oracle Corp. 54 35 — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. 40 81 — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 27 16 — — —
Salesforce Inc. — — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. 64 24 — — —
Synopsys Inc. 13 12 14 — —
Workday Inc. 14 23 — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Software & Services 66 64 — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Information Technology 86 79 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 20.02 = 18

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operational activity ratios indicates a significant shift in the management of accounts payable between 2018 and 2022. There is a clear trend toward accelerating the settlement of short-term obligations, characterized by a substantial increase in turnover and a corresponding decrease in the payment cycle duration.

Payables Turnover
The turnover ratio exhibited a strong upward trajectory over the observed period. Following a marginal decrease from 6.83 in 2018 to 6.22 in 2019, the ratio rose to 10.37 in 2020 and surged to 20.68 by 2021, eventually stabilizing at 20.02 in 2022. This trend signifies a marked increase in the frequency with which the company clears its obligations to creditors.
Average Payables Payment Period
A distinct downward trend is observed in the average number of days required to settle payables. After reaching a peak of 59 days in 2019, the payment period declined sharply to 35 days in 2020 and further contracted to 18 days in 2021, where it remained constant through 2022. The transition from a peak of 59 days to 18 days indicates a strategic or operational shift toward significantly faster supplier payments.

The inverse relationship between the rising turnover ratio and the falling payment period suggests a fundamental change in working capital management. The drastic reduction in the payment cycle between 2019 and 2021 implies an increase in the velocity of cash outflows to suppliers, which may be attributed to improved liquidity or a strategic decision to optimize supplier relationships. The stabilization of the payment period at 18 days in 2021 and 2022 indicates that a new operational baseline for creditor settlement has been established.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?