Profitability ratios measure the company ability to generate profitable sales from its resources (assets).
Paying user area
Try for free
General Mills Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to General Mills Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Profitability Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-02-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-08-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-22), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-23), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-08-24).
The analysis of the financial ratios over the observed periods reveals several notable trends and fluctuations in profitability and returns for the company.
- Gross Profit Margin
- The gross profit margin remained relatively stable, fluctuating modestly between approximately 33.6% and 35.7%. Initially, there was a slight downward drift in the earlier periods, followed by a gradual recovery peaking near the middle of the timeline. Toward the end, the margin settled around approximately 34.9%, indicating consistent efficiency in managing production costs relative to revenue.
- Operating Profit Margin
- The operating profit margin exhibited more variability. It started at about 15.6%, dipped to lows near 11.8%, and then generally trended upward, reaching a peak of nearly 16.9% in the final period. This pattern suggests some challenges in operating efficiency early on, followed by improvements potentially due to cost management or revenue growth, culminating in enhanced operational profitability.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin showed a tendency to improve over time with some volatility. Beginning near 9.6%, it experienced dips below 7% in some quarters but subsequently rose considerably, peaking at approximately 13.96% around early 2018. Though there was moderate decline afterward, the margin remained higher than the starting levels, ending near 12.6%, reflecting better overall profitability after expenses and taxes in later periods.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- Return on equity demonstrated significant growth and variability. Starting around 27.6%, it increased sharply at several intervals, reaching an apex exceeding 44% in early 2018. Despite some declines following this peak, ROE values remained above 22% throughout, suggesting effective utilization of shareholder equity to generate earnings and indicating strong profitability from the shareholders' perspective during the majority of the timeframe.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Return on assets showed a moderate upward trend initially, moving from about 7.3% to a peak near 9.8% midway through the period. However, after this peak, ROA declined noticeably to around 5.1%, before recovering slightly to approximately 7%. This pattern may reflect changes in asset efficiency or shifts in profit relative to the asset base, indicating some capacity challenges or asset base fluctuations impacting overall returns.
In summary, the company exhibited consistent gross profitability with operational and net margins improving over the course of the periods. Returns on equity grew significantly, highlighting strong financial leverage effectiveness, whereas returns on assets illustrated more variability, pointing to fluctuations in asset utilization efficiency. Overall, the financial metrics suggest an enhancement in profitability and shareholder value generation, tempered by some cyclical variations in operational efficiency and asset management.
Return on Sales
Return on Investment
Gross Profit Margin
| Nov 24, 2019 | Aug 25, 2019 | May 26, 2019 | Feb 24, 2019 | Nov 25, 2018 | Aug 26, 2018 | May 27, 2018 | Feb 25, 2018 | Nov 26, 2017 | Aug 27, 2017 | May 28, 2017 | Feb 26, 2017 | Nov 27, 2016 | Aug 28, 2016 | May 29, 2016 | Feb 28, 2016 | Nov 29, 2015 | Aug 30, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 22, 2015 | Nov 23, 2014 | Aug 24, 2014 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross margin | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross profit margin1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mondelēz International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PepsiCo Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philip Morris International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-02-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-08-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-22), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-23), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-08-24).
1 Q2 2020 Calculation
Gross profit margin = 100
× (Gross marginQ2 2020
+ Gross marginQ1 2020
+ Gross marginQ4 2019
+ Gross marginQ3 2019)
÷ (Net salesQ2 2020
+ Net salesQ1 2020
+ Net salesQ4 2019
+ Net salesQ3 2019)
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ ( + + + )
=
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial analysis reveals notable trends in the company's quarterly gross margin, net sales, and gross profit margin percentages over the observed period.
- Gross Margin
- The gross margin fluctuated throughout the quarters, with values ranging approximately between 1,250,000 and 1,570,000 US dollars in thousands. Peaks and troughs were observed, indicating periods of both strengthening and weakening profitability before considering other factors. Notably, the highest gross margin was recorded toward the end of the data range, suggesting an improvement in cost control or revenue quality. Meanwhile, some quarters exhibited declines that may possibly correspond with increased costs or pricing pressures.
- Net Sales
- Net sales demonstrated variability with periodic decreases and increases, spanning from roughly 3,790,000 to 4,720,000 US dollars in thousands. The overall pattern reflects some seasonality or cyclicality in sales volume, with occasional upward movements followed by corrections. The company experienced intermittent contractions in net sales, which may warrant further investigation to understand market conditions, competitive dynamics, or internal factors affecting revenue generation.
- Gross Profit Margin Percentage
- The gross profit margin percentage fluctuated moderately within a range near 33.5% to 35.7%. This relative stability in the margin ratio indicates consistency in the relationship between cost of goods sold and revenues, although slight declines and recoveries were noted. Periods with lower gross profit margins could indicate rising input costs or pricing challenges, whereas increases suggest improved efficiency or enhanced pricing power.
Overall, the data illustrates a company experiencing both challenges and improvements in profitability and revenue over the given time frame. While net sales showed fluctuations potentially linked to market or operational factors, gross margin amounts and profit margins maintained a degree of resilience. The incremental increases in gross margin toward later periods may hint at better cost management or favorable sales mix, serving as positive indicators for ongoing financial health.
Operating Profit Margin
| Nov 24, 2019 | Aug 25, 2019 | May 26, 2019 | Feb 24, 2019 | Nov 25, 2018 | Aug 26, 2018 | May 27, 2018 | Feb 25, 2018 | Nov 26, 2017 | Aug 27, 2017 | May 28, 2017 | Feb 26, 2017 | Nov 27, 2016 | Aug 28, 2016 | May 29, 2016 | Feb 28, 2016 | Nov 29, 2015 | Aug 30, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 22, 2015 | Nov 23, 2014 | Aug 24, 2014 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating profit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating profit margin1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mondelēz International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PepsiCo Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philip Morris International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-02-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-08-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-22), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-23), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-08-24).
1 Q2 2020 Calculation
Operating profit margin = 100
× (Operating profitQ2 2020
+ Operating profitQ1 2020
+ Operating profitQ4 2019
+ Operating profitQ3 2019)
÷ (Net salesQ2 2020
+ Net salesQ1 2020
+ Net salesQ4 2019
+ Net salesQ3 2019)
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ ( + + + )
=
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data across multiple quarters reveals distinct trends in operating profit, net sales, and operating profit margin for the company.
- Operating Profit
- The operating profit exhibits considerable volatility throughout the observed periods. After an initial level near 557.5 million USD, there is a noticeable dip in May 2015 to approximately 423.6 million USD, followed by a peak in November 2015 reaching over 905.7 million USD. Subsequently, the operating profit fluctuates, with values generally ranging between approximately 532 million and 811 million USD. The data indicates several peaks and troughs but does reflect a recurrent ability to rebound after declines.
- Net Sales
- Net sales demonstrate moderate fluctuations but remain broadly within a range of about 3.8 billion to 4.7 billion USD. The sales peaked in November 2014 at around 4.71 billion USD before trending downward to lows near 3.79 billion in early 2017. After this low, net sales generally recover, hitting above 4.4 billion USD in late 2018 and again in late 2019. The trend reflects some cyclicality, with periods of decline often followed by recovery.
- Operating Profit Margin
- The operating profit margin shows a general pattern of improvement over the period. Starting at 15.61% in August 2014, the margin experienced a decline, reaching a low of approximately 11.78% by May 2015. Subsequently, the margin increased steadily, often staying in the range of 15% to nearly 17%. The highest observed margins occur from mid-2016 onwards, with a peak at 16.93% by the end of 2019. This upward trend in margin suggests enhanced operational efficiency or cost management despite fluctuations in absolute profit and sales volumes.
Overall, the data indicates that while net sales and operating profit experienced fluctuations over the quarters, the operating profit margin improved over time. This suggests the company became more efficient in generating profit from its sales, benefiting from operational improvements or cost controls that helped sustain profitability despite variable revenue levels.
Net Profit Margin
| Nov 24, 2019 | Aug 25, 2019 | May 26, 2019 | Feb 24, 2019 | Nov 25, 2018 | Aug 26, 2018 | May 27, 2018 | Feb 25, 2018 | Nov 26, 2017 | Aug 27, 2017 | May 28, 2017 | Feb 26, 2017 | Nov 27, 2016 | Aug 28, 2016 | May 29, 2016 | Feb 28, 2016 | Nov 29, 2015 | Aug 30, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 22, 2015 | Nov 23, 2014 | Aug 24, 2014 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to General Mills | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net profit margin1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mondelēz International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PepsiCo Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philip Morris International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-02-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-08-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-22), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-23), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-08-24).
1 Q2 2020 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100
× (Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ2 2020
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ1 2020
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ4 2019
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ3 2019)
÷ (Net salesQ2 2020
+ Net salesQ1 2020
+ Net salesQ4 2019
+ Net salesQ3 2019)
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ ( + + + )
=
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The quarterly financial data demonstrates notable fluctuations in the company's key performance indicators over the observed periods.
- Net Earnings
- The net earnings attributable to the company display significant variability. Initially, net earnings maintain a relatively stable range around 340,000 US$ thousands, followed by a sharp dip to approximately 186,800 US$ thousands in the quarter ending May 31, 2015. Subsequently, a recovery is evident with peaks reaching as high as 941,400 US$ thousands in the first quarter of 2018. Despite this peak, subsequent quarters show a cycle of declines and rises, with values generally fluctuating between 350,000 and 580,000 US$ thousands towards the end of the period.
- Net Sales
- Net sales figures reveal a downward trend from mid-2014 through the early parts of 2017, decreasing from above 4.7 billion US$ to a low near 3.8 billion US$. This decline is followed by an increase into 2018 and 2019, where sales surpass 4.4 billion US$ in some quarters. Despite mid-period fluctuations, the latter quarters reflect a rebound in sales volumes, though not consistently above the levels seen at the start of the period.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin percentages exhibit a generally increasing trajectory over time. Starting from a lower level under 10% in mid-2014, margins decrease to a trough near 6.93% in May 2015 but then climb steadily, consistently exceeding 10% from mid-2016 onwards. A notable peak occurs at around 13.96% in early 2018. A slight reduction is observed towards early 2019, though margins remain above 9%, concluding the period on an upward note near 12.62%. This improvement suggests enhanced profitability relative to sales despite the fluctuations in sales and earnings.
Overall, the data indicates resilience in profitability with periods of volatility in earnings and sales. The rising net profit margins towards the end of the period could imply improved operational efficiency or favorable cost management. However, the variability in net earnings and sales suggests the company experienced cyclical challenges or external factors affecting revenue streams during the timeframe.
Return on Equity (ROE)
| Nov 24, 2019 | Aug 25, 2019 | May 26, 2019 | Feb 24, 2019 | Nov 25, 2018 | Aug 26, 2018 | May 27, 2018 | Feb 25, 2018 | Nov 26, 2017 | Aug 27, 2017 | May 28, 2017 | Feb 26, 2017 | Nov 27, 2016 | Aug 28, 2016 | May 29, 2016 | Feb 28, 2016 | Nov 29, 2015 | Aug 30, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 22, 2015 | Nov 23, 2014 | Aug 24, 2014 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to General Mills | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROE1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROE, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mondelēz International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PepsiCo Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philip Morris International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-02-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-08-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-22), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-23), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-08-24).
1 Q2 2020 Calculation
ROE = 100
× (Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ2 2020
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ1 2020
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ4 2019
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ3 2019)
÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Net Earnings
- Net earnings attributable to General Mills show noticeable fluctuations across the reported quarters. Early periods reveal earnings generally ranging between approximately 340,000 to 530,000 thousand US dollars, with a significant spike to 941,400 thousand US dollars in February 2018. This spike is an outlier compared to other quarters. Following this peak, earnings return to a range between roughly 340,000 and 580,000 thousand US dollars. Overall, earnings demonstrate variability but also periodic growth phases, especially noticeable around late 2017 to early 2018.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders’ equity experiences a downward trend from August 2014 to November 2016, decreasing from over 6.2 million to approximately 4.18 million thousand US dollars. Post this decline, equity values begin a recovery, steadily increasing from late 2016 onward, reaching about 7.7 million thousand US dollars by November 2019. This pattern indicates an initial contraction followed by a sustained expansion in equity levels.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The ROE percentage starts relatively high around 27-28% in 2014 and shows a general upward trend through mid-2017, reaching over 44% in February 2018. After this peak, ROE declines gradually towards 22% in early 2019 but then shows a modest recovery to approximately 27% by the end of the period. The ROE trend aligns approximately with net earnings fluctuations, with a notable peak coinciding with the extraordinary earnings reported in early 2018, and subsequent moderation in later quarters.
- Overall Financial Insights
- The data reflects a period of volatility in net earnings with a conspicuous peak in early 2018, which also corresponds with the highest ROE observed. The company’s stockholders’ equity initially contracted for over two years, suggesting possible share buybacks, dividend payments exceeding earnings, or losses not detailed here. However, equity levels have since recovered and surpassed prior levels, indicating capital inflows, retained earnings growth, or asset revaluation. The ROE pattern corroborates the fluctuations in profitability and shareholder value generation, signifying phases of both strong and moderate performance.
Return on Assets (ROA)
| Nov 24, 2019 | Aug 25, 2019 | May 26, 2019 | Feb 24, 2019 | Nov 25, 2018 | Aug 26, 2018 | May 27, 2018 | Feb 25, 2018 | Nov 26, 2017 | Aug 27, 2017 | May 28, 2017 | Feb 26, 2017 | Nov 27, 2016 | Aug 28, 2016 | May 29, 2016 | Feb 28, 2016 | Nov 29, 2015 | Aug 30, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 22, 2015 | Nov 23, 2014 | Aug 24, 2014 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings attributable to General Mills | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROA1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROA, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mondelēz International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PepsiCo Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philip Morris International Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-02-24), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-25), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-26), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-08-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-22), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-23), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-08-24).
1 Q2 2020 Calculation
ROA = 100
× (Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ2 2020
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ1 2020
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ4 2019
+ Net earnings attributable to General MillsQ3 2019)
÷ Total assets
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Net Earnings Attributable to General Mills
-
Net earnings demonstrated a fluctuating but overall upward trend over the observed periods. Initial figures were around 345,200 thousand USD in August 2014, showing some variability quarter to quarter. A notable peak occurred in February 2018, reaching 941,400 thousand USD, significantly higher than previous quarters. Following this peak, net earnings declined but remained relatively elevated compared to the early periods, with figures ranging between approximately 340,000 and 580,800 thousand USD in the later quarters.
- Total Assets
-
Total assets showed moderate fluctuations through most of the timeline, staying between approximately 21.5 billion and 23.5 billion USD until early 2018. Beginning in the period corresponding to May 2018, there was a marked increase in total assets, jumping to over 30 billion USD and maintaining this elevated level through the last quarters observed, indicating a substantial asset base expansion.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
-
Return on assets (ROA) exhibited variability across quarters but generally remained within the range of approximately 5% to 9.8%. ROA was lower in the earlier periods, mostly oscillating around 6-7%, with the highest value appearing in February 2018, coinciding with the peak in net earnings, reaching nearly 9.83%. After this peak, ROA experienced a downward shift, falling to around 5% in early 2019 but recovered somewhat in subsequent quarters, ending near 7%.
- Summary of Patterns and Insights
-
The quarterly financial data reveals a considerable growth in net earnings culminating in an exceptional spike in early 2018, which aligns temporally with a rise in ROA to its peak value. This suggests an improvement in operational efficiency and profitability during that period. The significant increase in total assets beginning mid-2018 indicates strategic asset growth or acquisition activity, which, while augmenting the asset base, corresponded with a moderation in ROA, reflecting the integration or capitalization effects on returns.
Overall, the company maintained a solid performance with fluctuating but generally positive profitability metrics, alongside a substantial increase in total resources employed. The temporal alignment between earnings peak and ROA suggests effective asset utilization during strong earnings periods, while the asset growth phase may point to investment in capacity or other strategic initiatives that caused short-term dilution in returns but potentially set the stage for longer-term growth.