Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).
1, 2 See details »
General Mills exhibits a pattern of relative stability in its operational cash generation, punctuated by a notable contraction in 2017 and a subsequent robust recovery. While net cash provided by operating activities remains consistent, the Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) shows a more aggressive upward trajectory toward the end of the analyzed period.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash provided by operating activities remained largely flat between 2014 and 2015, followed by a moderate increase in 2016 to 2,629,800 thousand USD. A contraction occurred in 2017, with values falling to 2,313,300 thousand USD, representing the lowest point in the observed period. A strong rebound was observed in 2018, reaching a peak of 2,841,000 thousand USD, before stabilizing at 2,807,000 thousand USD in 2019.
- FCFF Performance and Volatility
- FCFF followed a similar trajectory to operating cash flows but experienced a more significant decline in 2017, dropping to 1,839,865 thousand USD. However, the recovery phase was more pronounced, with FCFF increasing by approximately 31% in 2018 and further climbing to 2,695,575 thousand USD in 2019. This reflects a substantial overall increase compared to the 2014 value of 2,079,664 thousand USD.
- Capital Allocation and Efficiency
- The variance between operating cash flows and FCFF, which generally indicates capital expenditures, showed a marked decrease in 2019. The narrowing gap in the final year suggests a period of reduced capital investment or enhanced efficiency in converting operating cash into free cash flow for the firm, as the FCFF nearly converged with the net cash provided by operating activities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).
2 2019 Calculation
Cash interest payments, tax = Cash interest payments × EITR
= 500,100 × 18.10% = 90,518
3 2019 Calculation
Capitalized interest, tax = Capitalized interest × EITR
= 2,800 × 18.10% = 507
Analysis of the financial period reveals a significant shift in the cost of debt service and tax obligations. The most prominent trend is the steady reduction in the effective income tax rate, which coincided with a dramatic increase in net-of-tax cash interest payments toward the end of the observed period.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- A consistent downward trajectory is observed in the effective income tax rate, which remained stable at 33.30% through May 2015 before declining annually to 18.10% by May 2019. This represent a total reduction of 15.2 percentage points over the period, significantly altering the net cost of tax-deductible expenses.
- Cash Interest Payments, Net of Tax
- Cash interest payments remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2018, fluctuating within a narrow range between 192,296 and 203,635 thousand US dollars. However, a substantial spike occurred in May 2019, where payments increased to 409,582 thousand US dollars. This represents an increase of approximately 109% compared to the previous year, suggesting a significant expansion in gross debt obligations or a major refinancing event.
- Capitalized Interest, Net of Tax
- Capitalized interest remained a marginal component of the overall interest expense throughout the period. After peaking at 5,282 thousand US dollars in May 2016, a gradual decline is noted, reaching a period low of 2,293 thousand US dollars in May 2019. The low magnitude of these figures relative to cash payments indicates minimal investment in long-term assets requiring interest capitalization.
- Correlation Between Tax Rates and Interest Costs
- The surge in net-of-tax cash interest payments in 2019 occurred simultaneously with the lowest recorded effective income tax rate of 18.10%. Because interest payments are reported net of tax, the reduction in the tax shield (due to the lower EITR) compounds the impact of any increase in gross interest expenses, resulting in a higher net cash outflow.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 46,517,358) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 2,695,575) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 17.26 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Coca-Cola Co. | 66.03 |
| Mondelēz International Inc. | 30.28 |
| PepsiCo Inc. | 24.04 |
| Philip Morris International Inc. | 30.83 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| May 26, 2019 | May 27, 2018 | May 28, 2017 | May 29, 2016 | May 31, 2015 | May 25, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 45,968,119) | 42,033,361) | 40,796,369) | 50,623,631) | 43,168,268) | 40,882,674) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 2,695,575) | 2,418,881) | 1,839,865) | 2,110,494) | 2,049,637) | 2,079,664) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 17.05 | 17.38 | 22.17 | 23.99 | 21.06 | 19.66 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Mondelēz International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| PepsiCo Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Philip Morris International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).
3 2019 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 45,968,119 ÷ 2,695,575 = 17.05
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The valuation of the firm relative to its free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) exhibited a period of multiple expansion followed by a significant contraction between May 2014 and May 2019. While the enterprise value experienced volatility, the growth in cash flow generation during the latter years contributed to a lower valuation multiple, suggesting an improvement in cash flow efficiency relative to the company's total value.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- The enterprise value showed significant fluctuation, starting at US$ 40.88 billion in 2014 and reaching a peak of US$ 50.62 billion in 2016. A sharp correction occurred in 2017, with the value dropping to US$ 40.80 billion, followed by a steady recovery to US$ 45.97 billion by May 2019.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- Cash flow generation remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2016, hovering around the US$ 2 billion mark. After a decline to US$ 1.84 billion in 2017, FCFF entered a growth phase, increasing substantially to US$ 2.42 billion in 2018 and reaching a period high of US$ 2.70 billion in 2019.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Analysis
- The EV/FCFF ratio trended upward during the first three years, rising from 19.66 in 2014 to a peak of 23.99 in 2016, indicating a period where the market valuation grew faster than the firm's cash flow generation. However, from 2017 onward, the ratio declined steadily, reaching its lowest point of 17.05 in 2019. This compression of the multiple reflects a stronger alignment between the enterprise value and the underlying cash flow capacity of the business.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?