AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

General Mills Inc. (NYSE:GIS)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since December 18, 2019.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

General Mills Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 7.12 6.28 6.78 7.59 7.58 7.40
Receivables turnover 10.04 9.35 10.92 12.17 12.71 12.07
Payables turnover 3.89 3.76 4.74 5.24 6.94 7.16
Working capital turnover — — — — — —
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 51 58 54 48 48 49
Add: Average receivable collection period 36 39 33 30 29 30
Operating cycle 87 97 87 78 77 79
Less: Average payables payment period 94 97 77 70 53 51
Cash conversion cycle -7 0 10 8 24 28

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).


An analysis of short-term operating activity ratios from 2014 to 2019 reveals a strategic shift in working capital management. The most significant trend is the aggressive extension of the payables payment period, which has transitioned the company from a positive cash conversion cycle to a negative one, effectively utilizing supplier financing to fund operations.

Inventory Efficiency
Inventory turnover remained relatively stable through 2016 at approximately 7.40 to 7.59, followed by a decline to a low of 6.28 in 2018 before recovering to 7.12 in 2019. This fluctuation is reflected in the average inventory processing period, which increased from 49 days in 2014 to a peak of 58 days in 2018, suggesting a temporary reduction in inventory movement speed during that period.
Receivables Management
A gradual deterioration in receivables turnover is observed, declining from 12.07 in 2014 to 10.04 in 2019. This trend is corroborated by the average receivable collection period, which extended from 30 days to 36 days. The peak collection period of 39 days in 2018 indicates a period of reduced efficiency in converting credit sales into cash.
Payables and Operating Cycle
The payables turnover ratio exhibits a consistent downward trend, falling from 7.16 in 2014 to 3.89 in 2019. This corresponds to a substantial increase in the average payables payment period, which grew from 51 days to 94 days. While the operating cycle expanded from 79 days to 87 days due to slower inventory and receivable turnover, the extension of payment terms to suppliers far outpaced these increases.
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)
The interaction of the aforementioned ratios resulted in a dramatic compression of the cash conversion cycle. The CCC decreased from 28 days in 2014 to 8 days in 2016, eventually reaching a negative value of -7 days by 2019. This negative cycle indicates that the company is able to sell its inventory and collect receivables before its obligations to suppliers become due, thereby enhancing short-term liquidity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

General Mills Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Cost of sales 11,108,400 10,312,900 10,056,000 10,733,600 11,681,100 11,539,800
Inventories 1,559,300 1,642,200 1,483,600 1,413,700 1,540,900 1,559,400
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 7.12 6.28 6.78 7.59 7.58 7.40
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventories
= 11,108,400 ÷ 1,559,300 = 7.12

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity between May 2014 and May 2019 reveals a period of fluctuating inventory efficiency. While the inventory turnover ratio remained relatively stable during the first three years, a notable decline occurred between 2016 and 2018, followed by a recovery in the final year of the period.

Cost of Sales Trends
Cost of sales exhibited a general downward trend from a peak of 11.68 billion US$ in 2015 to a period low of 10.06 billion US$ in 2017. This trend reversed in the subsequent two years, with costs rising to 11.11 billion US$ by May 2019, indicating a resurgence in sales volume or an increase in production costs.
Inventory Level Management
Inventory levels remained relatively consistent throughout the six-year period, fluctuating between 1.41 billion US$ and 1.64 billion US$. A low point was reached in 2016, followed by a steady increase that peaked in 2018 at 1.64 billion US$ before contracting to 1.56 billion US$ in 2019.
Inventory Turnover Analysis
The inventory turnover ratio demonstrated stability from 2014 to 2016, maintaining values between 7.40 and 7.59. A contraction followed, with the ratio reaching its lowest point of 6.28 in May 2018. This deterioration in efficiency was driven by the simultaneous decrease in cost of sales and the increase in inventory holdings. A recovery to 7.12 was observed in May 2019, resulting from an increase in cost of sales paired with a reduction in inventory levels, suggesting an improvement in the speed of inventory liquidation.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

General Mills Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net sales 16,865,200 15,740,400 15,619,800 16,563,100 17,630,300 17,909,600
Receivables 1,679,700 1,684,200 1,430,100 1,360,800 1,386,700 1,483,600
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 10.04 9.35 10.92 12.17 12.71 12.07
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Receivables
= 16,865,200 ÷ 1,679,700 = 10.04

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from May 2014 to May 2019 reflects a period of volatility in both top-line revenue and the efficiency of credit collection. An initial decline in net sales was accompanied by a subsequent increase in accounts receivable, leading to a notable compression of the receivables turnover ratio during the mid-to-late period of the analysis.

Net Sales Performance
Net sales exhibited a downward trajectory from May 2014, decreasing from US$ 17.9 billion to a low of US$ 15.6 billion in May 2017. A recovery phase followed this trough, with sales rising to US$ 16.9 billion by May 2019.
Receivables Management
Accounts receivable remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2016, fluctuating between US$ 1.36 billion and US$ 1.48 billion. However, a significant upward trend occurred between May 2017 and May 2018, where balances rose to US$ 1.68 billion, indicating an increase in the volume of outstanding customer obligations.
Receivables Turnover Analysis
The receivables turnover ratio peaked at 12.71 in May 2015 before entering a consistent decline, reaching a minimum of 9.35 in May 2018. This downward trend indicates a reduction in the efficiency of converting receivables into cash relative to sales. The deterioration was most acute in 2018, when the combination of lower sales and higher receivables created a peak in the collection cycle. A marginal recovery to 10.04 was observed in May 2019, primarily driven by the resurgence in net sales while receivable levels remained stagnant.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

General Mills Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Cost of sales 11,108,400 10,312,900 10,056,000 10,733,600 11,681,100 11,539,800
Accounts payable 2,854,100 2,746,200 2,119,800 2,046,500 1,684,000 1,611,300
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 3.89 3.76 4.74 5.24 6.94 7.16
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Accounts payable
= 11,108,400 ÷ 2,854,100 = 3.89

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


A significant downward trend in payables turnover is observed between May 2014 and May 2019, indicating a substantial increase in the average time required to settle obligations with suppliers. The turnover ratio declined from 7.16 in 2014 to 3.89 in 2019, representing a marked reduction in the frequency of payment cycles over the five-year period.

Payables Turnover Analysis
The payables turnover ratio experienced a consistent decline from 2014 through 2018, falling from 7.16 to a low of 3.76. This downward trajectory suggests a strategic shift toward extending payment terms or a growing reliance on supplier credit to manage working capital. A slight recovery occurred in 2019, with the ratio increasing marginally to 3.89, though it remained significantly below the levels recorded at the start of the analysis period.
Accounts Payable Growth
A steady and continuous increase in accounts payable is evident, rising from 1,611,300 thousand US dollars in 2014 to 2,854,100 thousand US dollars in 2019. This growth in liabilities occurred independently of the fluctuations in cost of sales, contributing directly to the decline in the turnover ratio. The most pronounced increase occurred between 2017 and 2018, where balances grew by approximately 626,400 thousand US dollars.
Cost of Sales Relationship
Cost of sales exhibited volatility during the period, peaking in 2015 at 11,681,100 thousand US dollars before dipping to a low of 10,056,000 thousand US dollars in 2017. Despite the subsequent rise to 11,108,400 thousand US dollars by 2019, the total cost of sales did not keep pace with the expansion of accounts payable. The divergence between stagnant or fluctuating procurement costs and rising payables confirms that the slowing turnover was driven by an increase in the balance of unpaid obligations rather than a surge in purchasing volume.

Overall, the financial evidence points to a widening gap between the acquisition of goods and the settlement of the associated debts. This trend suggests a more aggressive approach to managing short-term liquidity by delaying payments to vendors, effectively using accounts payable as a source of interest-free financing.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

General Mills Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Current assets 4,186,500 4,123,700 4,061,400 3,937,200 3,785,700 4,393,500
Less: Current liabilities 7,087,100 7,341,900 5,330,800 5,014,700 4,890,100 5,423,500
Working capital (2,900,600) (3,218,200) (1,269,400) (1,077,500) (1,104,400) (1,030,000)
 
Net sales 16,865,200 15,740,400 15,619,800 16,563,100 17,630,300 17,909,600
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 — — — — — —
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 16,865,200 ÷ -2,900,600 = —

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial metrics from 2014 to 2019 reveals a consistent pattern of negative working capital coupled with fluctuating net sales. This configuration indicates a strategic operational approach where current liabilities exceed current assets, effectively utilizing supplier financing to support business operations.

Working Capital Trends
The working capital position remained negative throughout the six-year period. Between May 2014 and May 2017, the deficit was relatively stable, ranging from -1.03 billion to -1.27 billion. A significant shift occurred in May 2018, when the negative working capital widened substantially to -3.22 billion. A slight moderation followed in May 2019, with the figure adjusting to -2.90 billion, although it remained significantly lower than the levels observed in the early part of the period.
Net Sales Performance
Net sales experienced a gradual decline from 17.91 billion in 2014 to a period low of 15.62 billion in 2017. Following this trough, a recovery trend was observed, with sales increasing to 15.74 billion in 2018 and reaching 16.87 billion by May 2019.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio is consistently negative, reflecting the company's reliance on a negative working capital cycle. The absolute value of the turnover ratio showed a marked decrease over time, falling from approximately 17.39 in 2014 to 4.89 in 2018. This contraction was primarily driven by the sharp increase in negative working capital during 2018 rather than sales performance. By 2019, the ratio shifted to approximately -5.81, indicating a slight realignment as net sales grew while the working capital deficit narrowed marginally.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

General Mills Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 7.12 6.28 6.78 7.59 7.58 7.40
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 51 58 54 48 48 49
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 7.12 = 51

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a period of fluctuation in inventory management efficiency between 2014 and 2019. The relationship between turnover rates and processing time demonstrates a cyclical pattern, characterized by initial stability, a subsequent decline in efficiency, and a partial recovery in the final year of the period.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibited a slight upward trend between 2014 and 2016, peaking at 7.59. A notable contraction followed over the next two years, with the ratio declining to 6.78 in 2017 and reaching a period low of 6.28 by May 2018. A reversal of this trend occurred in 2019, as the ratio increased to 7.12, indicating an improvement in the speed of inventory liquidation.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The processing period moved inversely to the turnover ratio, reflecting the time required to convert inventory into sales. After maintaining a low of 48 days from 2015 to 2016, the processing cycle lengthened to 54 days in 2017 and peaked at 58 days in 2018. This extension suggests a decrease in operational efficiency and a slower movement of goods. By 2019, the processing period was reduced to 51 days, aligning with the recovery observed in the turnover ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

General Mills Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 10.04 9.35 10.92 12.17 12.71 12.07
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 36 39 33 30 29 30
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 10.04 = 36

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios reveals a period of relative stability in credit management followed by a decline in efficiency that peaked in 2018, with a subsequent modest recovery in 2019.

Receivables Turnover
A peak turnover ratio of 12.71 was achieved in 2015, indicating a high frequency of receivable conversion. However, a consistent downward trend followed, with the ratio falling to 9.35 by 2018. A slight reversal in this trend occurred in 2019, as the ratio improved to 10.04, suggesting a marginal recovery in the efficiency of collecting outstanding credits.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period remained efficient and stable between 2014 and 2016, fluctuating between 29 and 30 days. Starting in 2017, a noticeable increase in the time required to collect payments was observed, rising to 33 days and reaching a maximum of 39 days in 2018. This represents a significant extension of the collection window from the 2015 low. The period subsequently decreased to 36 days in 2019, indicating a slight improvement in cash flow velocity.
Operational Efficiency Implications
The inverse relationship between the turnover ratio and the collection period highlights a degradation in the speed of credit recovery between 2016 and 2018. The extension of the collection cycle suggests potential changes in credit terms offered to customers or a decrease in the effectiveness of collection procedures during that period, which momentarily constrained the conversion of receivables into cash.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

General Mills Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 51 58 54 48 48 49
Average receivable collection period 36 39 33 30 29 30
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 87 97 87 78 77 79
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 51 + 36 = 87

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An evaluation of the short-term operating activity ratios between 2014 and 2019 reveals a period of relative stability followed by a notable expansion and subsequent contraction of the operating cycle. The overall duration required to convert inventory into cash experienced a significant increase toward the latter half of the period, peaking in May 2018 before returning to levels observed in 2017.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory processing remained consistent between 48 and 49 days from 2014 to 2016. An upward trend occurred thereafter, with the period extending to 54 days in 2017 and reaching a peak of 58 days in 2018. This indicates a slowing of inventory turnover during this window, although a correction to 51 days was recorded by May 2019.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period demonstrated high stability from 2014 to 2016, fluctuating only between 29 and 30 days. A gradual increase was observed starting in 2017, peaking at 39 days in 2018, which suggests a deceleration in the collection of accounts receivable. The period improved slightly to 36 days in 2019, though it remained above the early period baseline.
Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle remained stable at approximately 77 to 79 days during the first three years. The combined effect of slower inventory turnover and delayed receivable collections led to a peak of 97 days in 2018, marking the longest duration in the analyzed period. The cycle subsequently contracted to 87 days in 2019, aligning with the figure reported in 2017.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

General Mills Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 3.89 3.76 4.74 5.24 6.94 7.16
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 94 97 77 70 53 51
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.89 = 94

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the short-term operating activity ratios reveals a consistent shift in the management of accounts payable over the six-year period ending May 26, 2019. There is a clear inverse correlation between the payables turnover ratio and the average payables payment period, indicating a strategic or operational extension of the time taken to settle obligations with suppliers.

Payables Turnover Ratio
A sustained downward trend is observed in the payables turnover ratio, which declined from 7.16 in 2014 to a low of 3.76 in 2018. While a marginal increase to 3.89 occurred in 2019, the overall trajectory indicates a significant reduction in the frequency with which the company settles its average accounts payable balance during the fiscal year.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment period experienced a substantial increase, rising from 51 days in 2014 to 97 days in 2018. This represents a nearly 90% increase in the duration of the payment cycle over four years. A slight contraction to 94 days was recorded in 2019, suggesting a stabilization of payment terms at a significantly higher level than the 2014-2015 baseline.

The expansion of the payment period from 51 to 94 days suggests an improvement in the company's cash conversion cycle by delaying cash outflows. This trend implies either a successful negotiation of more favorable credit terms with suppliers or a deliberate management decision to utilize trade credit as a source of short-term financing to preserve liquidity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

General Mills Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
May 26, 2019 May 27, 2018 May 28, 2017 May 29, 2016 May 31, 2015 May 25, 2014
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 51 58 54 48 48 49
Average receivable collection period 36 39 33 30 29 30
Average payables payment period 94 97 77 70 53 51
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 -7 0 10 8 24 28
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Coca-Cola Co. — — — — — —
Mondelēz International Inc. — — — — — —
PepsiCo Inc. — — — — — —
Philip Morris International Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-05-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-05-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-05-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-05-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-05-25).

1 2019 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 51 + 36 – 94 = -7

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The cash conversion cycle exhibits a significant downward trajectory over the analyzed period, transitioning from a positive 28 days in 2014 to a negative 7 days by 2019. This shift indicates a substantial improvement in the timing of cash flows, where the company effectively generates cash from sales before the settlement of obligations to suppliers.

Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2016, fluctuating around 48 to 49 days. A moderate increase occurred between 2017 and 2018, peaking at 58 days, before declining to 51 days in 2019. This suggests a period of slightly slower inventory turnover followed by a partial recovery in efficiency.
Receivable Collection Period
A gradual upward trend is observed in the receivable collection period, which rose from 30 days in 2014 to a peak of 39 days in 2018, ending at 36 days in 2019. This indicates a slight lengthening of the time required to collect payments from customers, which typically exerts upward pressure on the cash conversion cycle.
Payables Payment Period
The most prominent trend is the substantial expansion of the average payables payment period. Starting at 51 days in 2014, this period increased consistently and sharply, reaching 97 days in 2018 and remaining high at 94 days in 2019. This aggressive extension of payment terms to suppliers acted as the primary catalyst for the reduction of the overall cash conversion cycle.
Cash Conversion Cycle Integration
The overall reduction in the cash conversion cycle was driven by the strategic extension of payables, which more than offset the marginal increases in inventory processing and receivable collection times. The transition to a negative cash conversion cycle by 2019 suggests that the company has achieved a highly efficient liquidity position, utilizing supplier financing to fund operating activities.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?