AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Colgate-Palmolive Co. (NYSE:CL)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since July 28, 2023.

Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)

Microsoft Excel

Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)

Colgate-Palmolive Co., FCFF calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net income attributable to Colgate-Palmolive Company 1,785 2,166 2,695 2,367 2,400
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 182 172 165 160 158
Net noncash charges 1,315 1,184 478 541 653
Cash effects of changes in assets and liabilities (726) (197) 381 65 (155)
Net cash provided by operations 2,556 3,325 3,719 3,133 3,056
Interest paid, net of tax1 112 147 147 142 148
Interest capitalized, net of tax2 4 2 1 1 2
Capital expenditures (696) (567) (410) (335) (436)
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) 1,975 2,907 3,457 2,940 2,769

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The financial trajectory from 2018 to 2022 is characterized by an initial period of growth followed by a significant contraction in cash generation. Both net cash provided by operations and free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) reached a peak in 2020 before experiencing a consecutive two-year decline.

Net Cash Provided by Operations
Operating cash flows demonstrated steady growth between 2018 and 2020, rising from US$ 3,056 million to a peak of US$ 3,719 million. A reversal occurred in 2021, with values dropping to US$ 3,325 million, and continuing downward to US$ 2,556 million by the end of 2022. This represents a cumulative decrease of approximately 31% from the 2020 peak.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
FCFF mirrored the overall trend of operating cash flows but exhibited greater volatility. After increasing from US$ 2,769 million in 2018 to US$ 3,457 million in 2020, FCFF declined to US$ 2,907 million in 2021 and further to US$ 1,975 million in 2022. The contraction from the 2020 peak to 2022 is approximately 43%, which is more severe than the decline observed in operating cash flows.
Capital Expenditure Impact
The widening divergence between net cash provided by operations and FCFF suggests an increase in capital expenditures. In 2018, the difference between these two metrics was US$ 287 million; by 2022, this gap expanded to US$ 581 million. This indicates that the erosion of FCFF in the final two years of the period was driven by a combination of reduced operating cash inflows and an increase in capital investments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Interest Paid, Net of Tax

Colgate-Palmolive Co., interest paid, net of tax calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
EITR1 26.10% 24.30% 21.60% 23.40% 23.90%
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Interest paid, before tax 151 194 188 185 194
Less: Interest paid, tax2 39 47 41 43 46
Interest paid, net of tax 112 147 147 142 148
Interest Costs Capitalized, Net of Tax
Interest capitalized, before tax 5 3 1 1 2
Less: Interest capitalized, tax3 1 1 — — —
Interest capitalized, net of tax 4 2 1 1 2

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Interest paid, tax = Interest paid × EITR
= 151 × 26.10% = 39

3 2022 Calculation
Interest capitalized, tax = Interest capitalized × EITR
= 5 × 26.10% = 1


The financial analysis of interest obligations and tax rates between 2018 and 2022 reveals a period of relative stability followed by a notable reduction in net interest expenditures in the final year. While the costs associated with interest paid remained consistent for the majority of the period, there was a simultaneous upward trend in the effective income tax rate during the latter years.

Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Between 2018 and 2021, net interest payments exhibited minimal variance, fluctuating within a narrow range between 142 million and 148 million US dollars. A significant shift occurred in 2022, where interest paid, net of tax, declined to 112 million US dollars, representing a 23.8% decrease relative to the 2021 level.
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
The EITR demonstrated a non-linear trend, initially decreasing from 23.90% in 2018 to a period low of 21.60% in 2020. Subsequently, the rate entered a growth phase, rising to 24.30% in 2021 and reaching a period peak of 26.10% in 2022.
Interest Capitalized, Net of Tax
Capitalized interest remained low throughout the five-year period, oscillating between 1 million and 2 million US dollars from 2018 to 2021. In 2022, this figure doubled to 4 million US dollars, marking the highest level of capitalized interest within the observed timeframe.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current

Colgate-Palmolive Co., current EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV) 70,910
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) 1,975
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF 35.90
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors1
Procter & Gamble Co. 25.24
EV/FCFF, Industry
Consumer Staples 46.14

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical

Colgate-Palmolive Co., historical EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)1 68,823 73,300 73,870 72,618 63,413
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 1,975 2,907 3,457 2,940 2,769
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF3 34.84 25.21 21.37 24.70 22.90
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors4
Procter & Gamble Co. 26.63 22.86 — — —
EV/FCFF, Industry
Consumer Staples 30.06 20.91 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 68,823 ÷ 1,975 = 34.84

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2018 and 2022 is characterized by a period of relative valuation stability followed by a significant expansion in the Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow to the Firm (EV/FCFF) multiple. The most notable trend is the divergence between the company's overall valuation and its cash flow generation capacity in the final year of the period.

Enterprise Value Trends
Enterprise value experienced an initial growth phase, rising from 63,413 million in 2018 to a peak of 73,870 million in 2020. This was followed by a period of stabilization in 2021 and a subsequent contraction to 68,823 million by December 31, 2022.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Dynamics
FCFF demonstrated an upward trend from 2018 to 2020, reaching a maximum of 3,457 million. A reversal occurred after 2020, with a decline to 2,907 million in 2021 and a sharp contraction to 1,975 million in 2022, representing a significant reduction in cash generation efficiency.
EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
The EV/FCFF ratio remained comparatively stable from 2018 to 2021, fluctuating between 21.37 and 25.21. However, the ratio increased sharply to 34.84 in 2022. This expansion is primarily driven by the substantial decrease in FCFF rather than a surge in enterprise value; the rate of cash flow decline significantly outpaced the decrease in the company's enterprise value, leading to a higher valuation multiple.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?