EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Colgate-Palmolive Co. pages available for free this week:
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Colgate-Palmolive Co. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates fluctuating financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited initial growth followed by a consistent decline, while invested capital generally increased throughout the period. The cost of capital remained relatively stable. Consequently, economic profit decreased over the five years.
- NOPAT Trend
- Net operating profit after taxes began at US$2,711 million in 2018, decreased to US$2,572 million in 2019, and then increased to US$2,814 million in 2020. A subsequent decline was observed in 2021, falling to US$2,361 million, and continued in 2022 to US$2,048 million. This indicates a weakening operational profitability towards the end of the analyzed timeframe.
- Cost of Capital Stability
- The cost of capital remained consistently around 10%, fluctuating between 10.18% and 10.36% over the five-year period. This suggests that the company’s financing costs were relatively stable, and external factors influencing the cost of capital did not significantly impact the business during this time.
- Invested Capital Growth
- Invested capital showed an increasing trend, rising from US$11,791 million in 2018 to US$14,460 million in 2022. The largest increase occurred between 2018 and 2019, with a subsequent, more moderate growth rate in the following years. This suggests continued investment in the business, potentially through capital expenditures or acquisitions.
- Economic Profit Decline
- Economic profit, the key metric reflecting value creation, decreased consistently from US$1,489 million in 2018 to US$575 million in 2022. This decline is attributable to the combination of decreasing NOPAT and increasing invested capital, despite the stable cost of capital. The diminishing economic profit indicates a reduced ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.
In summary, while the company continued to invest in its operations, its ability to translate those investments into economic profit diminished over the period. The declining NOPAT is a primary driver of this trend, suggesting potential challenges in maintaining profitability in the face of growing capital employed.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts and estimated returns.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring accrual.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Colgate-Palmolive Company.
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Colgate-Palmolive Company.
9 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The analysis of financial data over the five-year period reveals several noteworthy trends concerning profitability metrics.
- Net Income Attributable to Colgate-Palmolive Company
- This metric experienced a slight decline from 2018 to 2019, decreasing from 2400 million USD to 2367 million USD. In 2020, there was a significant increase to 2695 million USD, indicating a strong performance during that year. However, the subsequent years showed a downward trend, with net income falling to 2166 million USD in 2021 and further to 1785 million USD in 2022. This decline over the last two years suggests challenges affecting profitability.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT figures followed a somewhat similar pattern. Initially, NOPAT decreased from 2711 million USD in 2018 to 2572 million USD in 2019. It then rose to 2814 million USD in 2020, reaching its peak in the observed period. Afterward, there was a decline to 2361 million USD in 2021, followed by a further decrease to 2048 million USD in 2022. While the drop in NOPAT is less steep compared to net income, the downward trajectory indicates a reduction in operating profitability post-2020.
Overall, the data suggests that both net income and net operating profit after taxes peaked in 2020 but have since faced a decline, with 2022 figures lower than those in 2018. The trends could imply external or internal factors negatively impacting earnings and operating efficiency in the latter years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial data indicates a declining trend in the provision for income taxes over the five-year period. Starting at 906 million US dollars in 2018, there is a consistent decrease each year, reaching 693 million US dollars by the end of 2022. This suggests an overall reduction in the income tax obligations recorded, which could be indicative of changes in profitability, tax planning strategies, or tax rates applicable to the company.
Conversely, cash operating taxes show a more fluctuating pattern. From 887 million US dollars in 2018, the figure increases to a peak of 970 million US dollars in 2020, followed by a decline to 812 million US dollars in 2021. In 2022, cash operating taxes rise again to 892 million US dollars. The variation in cash operating tax payments as compared to the steady decline in provision for income taxes suggests differences in timing, tax payments, or adjustments in deferred tax accounts.
- Provision for Income Taxes:
- Decreased steadily from 906 million in 2018 to 693 million in 2022, indicating a potential decline in taxable income or changes in tax strategy.
- Cash Operating Taxes:
- Show volatility with a peak in 2020 (970 million), followed by a decline and a subsequent increase in 2022 (892 million), reflecting variability in actual cash tax payments.
- Comparison and Implications:
- The contrasting trends between provision and cash operating taxes may suggest the presence of timing differences, deferred tax assets or liabilities adjustments, or shifts in tax planning measures affecting reported versus paid taxes.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of restructuring accrual.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Colgate-Palmolive Company shareholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
An analysis of the financial data over the five-year period reveals several notable trends in the company's debt, equity, and invested capital.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- This metric exhibited an overall increasing trend from 2018 to 2022. The reported debt rose from $6,986 million in 2018 to $9,271 million in 2022. Although there was a slight dip in 2020 and 2021, the general direction is upward, suggesting a growing reliance on debt financing over the period.
- Total Shareholders’ Equity
- This item showed significant volatility with a generally low base and fluctuating values. Starting at a negative value of -$102 million in 2018, equity improved considerably to reach $743 million in 2020, followed by a decline in the subsequent years, falling to $401 million by the end of 2022. This indicates volatility in the company's net assets and potentially some financial or operational challenges affecting retained earnings or other equity components.
- Invested Capital
- The invested capital demonstrated a steady increase from $11,791 million in 2018 to $14,460 million in 2022. Although minor fluctuations occurred between 2020 and 2021, the trend reflects continued growth in the capital invested in the company's operations, which could be related to expansions, acquisitions, or reinvestment into company assets.
Overall, the company appears to have increased its financial leverage, as evidenced by rising debt levels coupled with relatively stagnant or decreasing equity values. The growth in invested capital suggests ongoing investment in operations despite the fluctuating equity position.
Cost of Capital
Colgate-Palmolive Co., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited a declining trend over the five-year period. While economic profit fluctuated, the invested capital generally increased, contributing to the observed changes in the economic spread ratio.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio decreased from 12.63% in 2018 to 3.98% in 2022. A significant drop occurred between 2018 and 2019, falling to 8.37%. The ratio recovered somewhat in 2020 to 10.00%, but then continued its downward trajectory, reaching its lowest point in 2022. This indicates a diminishing ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit began at US$1,489 million in 2018, decreased to US$1,159 million in 2019, and then increased to US$1,395 million in 2020. A subsequent decline to US$976 million occurred in 2021, followed by a further decrease to US$575 million in 2022. The fluctuations in economic profit, while present, do not fully explain the consistent decline in the economic spread ratio.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrated an overall increasing trend, rising from US$11,791 million in 2018 to US$14,460 million in 2022. The largest increase was observed between 2018 and 2019, with a rise to US$13,859 million. While there was a slight decrease in 2021, the capital base continued to grow in subsequent periods. The growth in invested capital, coupled with the fluctuating economic profit, likely contributed to the decreasing economic spread ratio.
The combination of a generally increasing invested capital base and fluctuating, ultimately declining, economic profit resulted in a consistent decrease in the economic spread ratio. This suggests that the company’s ability to generate returns on its invested capital diminished over the observed period.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited a declining trend over the five-year period. While economic profit fluctuated, the consistent increase in net sales alongside the decreasing economic profit margin suggests a weakening relationship between sales and value creation.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin decreased steadily from 9.58% in 2018 to 3.20% in 2022. This indicates that for each dollar of net sales, the company generated progressively less economic profit. The most significant decline occurred between 2021 and 2022, with a decrease of 2.4 percentage points.
Economic profit itself showed variability. It peaked at US$1,489 million in 2018, decreased to US$976 million in 2021, and further declined to US$575 million in 2022. This suggests that while the company remained profitable in economic terms, its ability to generate profit relative to its capital employed diminished over time.
- Net Sales
- Net sales demonstrated consistent growth, increasing from US$15,544 million in 2018 to US$17,967 million in 2022. This positive trend in revenue was not sufficient to offset the decline in economic profit margin, indicating potential issues with cost management, capital efficiency, or pricing strategies.
The combined trend of increasing net sales and decreasing economic profit margin warrants further investigation. A deeper analysis of the components of economic profit – net operating profit after tax and the cost of capital – is recommended to pinpoint the drivers of this performance.