Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

3M Co. (NYSE:MMM)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 25, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

3M Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 39.35% = 12.58% × 3.13
Dec 31, 2020 41.84% = 11.37% × 3.68
Dec 31, 2019 45.41% = 10.23% × 4.44
Dec 31, 2018 54.60% = 14.65% × 3.73
Dec 31, 2017 42.01% = 12.79% × 3.29

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of the two-component DuPont disaggregation reveals a period of volatility for Return on Equity (ROE) between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a significant peak in 2018 followed by a consistent downward trend.

Return on Assets (ROA)
Asset efficiency demonstrated a fluctuating pattern, peaking at 14.65% in 2018 before dropping to a five-year low of 10.23% in 2019. A recovery phase followed this decline, with ROA steadily increasing to 11.37% in 2020 and reaching 12.58% by the end of 2021, nearly returning to its 2017 baseline.
Financial Leverage
The leverage ratio increased progressively from 3.29 in 2017 to a peak of 4.44 in 2019, indicating an increased use of debt to finance assets. This trend reversed sharply after 2019, with leverage contracting to 3.68 in 2020 and further declining to 3.13 in 2021, the lowest level observed in the period.
Return on Equity (ROE) Synthesis
ROE peaked at 54.60% in 2018, driven by the simultaneous expansion of both ROA and financial leverage. Between 2019 and 2021, ROE declined steadily to 39.35%. This decrease was primarily driven by the reduction in financial leverage, which outweighed the modest gains in asset efficiency observed from 2020 through 2021.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

3M Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 39.35% = 16.75% × 0.75 × 3.13
Dec 31, 2020 41.84% = 16.73% × 0.68 × 3.68
Dec 31, 2019 45.41% = 14.22% × 0.72 × 4.44
Dec 31, 2018 54.60% = 16.33% × 0.90 × 3.73
Dec 31, 2017 42.01% = 15.35% × 0.83 × 3.29

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period, peaking at 54.60% in 2018 before entering a steady decline to 39.35% by the end of 2021. This overall downward trajectory in ROE since 2018 is the result of diverging trends among its three primary drivers: profitability, asset efficiency, and financial leverage.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability remained relatively stable with a slight upward bias. After a temporary dip to 14.22% in 2019, the margin recovered and reached its period high of 16.75% in 2021. This indicates that the company maintained a consistent ability to convert revenue into net income despite other fluctuating performance metrics.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization efficiency experienced a general decline. The ratio peaked at 0.90 in 2018 but dropped to a low of 0.68 in 2020. While there was a modest recovery to 0.75 in 2021, the turnover ratio remained below 2017 and 2018 levels, suggesting a decrease in the effectiveness of the asset base in generating sales.
Financial Leverage
The use of debt to amplify equity returns showed a bell-shaped trend. Leverage increased steadily from 3.29 in 2017 to a peak of 4.44 in 2019. Subsequently, a significant deleveraging process occurred, with the ratio falling to 3.13 by 2021, which is lower than the starting point of the analyzed period.

The peak ROE observed in 2018 was primarily driven by the combination of the highest asset turnover in the period and increasing financial leverage. In contrast, the subsequent compression of ROE between 2019 and 2021 was largely dictated by the reduction in financial leverage and a failure of asset turnover to return to 2018 levels. Consequently, the current ROE is supported more by stable profit margins than by aggressive financial gearing or high asset productivity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

3M Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 39.35% = 0.82 × 0.94 × 21.76% × 0.75 × 3.13
Dec 31, 2020 41.84% = 0.80 × 0.93 × 22.47% × 0.68 × 3.68
Dec 31, 2019 45.41% = 0.80 × 0.93 × 19.13% × 0.72 × 4.44
Dec 31, 2018 54.60% = 0.77 × 0.95 × 22.39% × 0.90 × 3.73
Dec 31, 2017 42.01% = 0.64 × 0.96 × 24.83% × 0.83 × 3.29

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited a peak of 54.60% in 2018 before entering a period of gradual decline, reaching 39.35% by the end of 2021. This overall trajectory was influenced by offsetting movements across operational efficiency, tax obligations, and financial structure.

Tax and Interest Burdens
The tax burden showed a consistent upward trend, increasing from 0.64 in 2017 to 0.82 in 2021. This progression indicates a reduction in the effective tax rate, which served as a positive driver for net income and helped mitigate declines in other areas. The interest burden remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating minimally between 0.93 and 0.96, suggesting a consistent capacity to service interest expenses relative to operating profits.
Operational Efficiency
Operating profitability, as measured by the EBIT margin, experienced a general decline from 24.83% in 2017 to 21.76% in 2021, with a notable trough of 19.13% in 2019. This suggests a contraction in core operational margins. Asset turnover also demonstrated instability, peaking at 0.90 in 2018 before falling to 0.75 in 2021, reflecting a decrease in the efficiency of asset utilization to generate sales.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage displayed significant volatility, rising from 3.29 in 2017 to a peak of 4.44 in 2019, then retreating to 3.13 by 2021. The sharp increase in leverage during 2019 acted as a mechanical boost to ROE, partially offsetting the simultaneous decline in EBIT margin and asset turnover. The subsequent reduction in leverage contributed to the downward pressure on ROE in the final two years of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

3M Co., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 12.58% = 16.75% × 0.75
Dec 31, 2020 11.37% = 16.73% × 0.68
Dec 31, 2019 10.23% = 14.22% × 0.72
Dec 31, 2018 14.65% = 16.33% × 0.90
Dec 31, 2017 12.79% = 15.35% × 0.83

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a volatile trajectory between 2017 and 2021, peaking at 14.65% in 2018 before experiencing a significant contraction to 10.23% in 2019. A subsequent recovery trend is observed, with the metric rising to 12.58% by the end of 2021. The two-component disaggregation indicates that this volatility was driven by diverging trends in profitability and asset efficiency.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability remained relatively stable with a general upward bias over the five-year period. After a dip to 14.22% in 2019, the net profit margin recovered strongly, reaching its period high of 16.75% in 2021. This suggests a consistent ability to manage costs and maintain pricing power despite fluctuations in overall asset returns.
Asset Turnover
Asset efficiency showed a more pronounced downward trend. Following a peak ratio of 0.90 in 2018, the turnover ratio declined to 0.68 by 2020. While a slight recovery to 0.75 occurred in 2021, the turnover ratio remained below 2017 and 2018 levels, indicating a decrease in the efficiency of assets in generating sales.
Synthesis of ROA Drivers
The analysis reveals that the decline in ROA observed in 2019 and 2020 was primarily attributable to the erosion of asset turnover rather than a failure in profit margins. The recovery of ROA toward the end of the period was facilitated by the simultaneous expansion of the net profit margin and a modest improvement in asset utilization. Consequently, the net profit margin acted as a stabilizing force, while asset turnover served as the primary driver of volatility.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

3M Co., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 12.58% = 0.82 × 0.94 × 21.76% × 0.75
Dec 31, 2020 11.37% = 0.80 × 0.93 × 22.47% × 0.68
Dec 31, 2019 10.23% = 0.80 × 0.93 × 19.13% × 0.72
Dec 31, 2018 14.65% = 0.77 × 0.95 × 22.39% × 0.90
Dec 31, 2017 12.79% = 0.64 × 0.96 × 24.83% × 0.83

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited notable volatility between 2017 and 2021, reaching a peak of 14.65% in 2018 before declining to a period low of 10.23% in 2019. A recovery phase followed, with ROA climbing to 12.58% by the end of 2021. This fluctuation is the result of interacting shifts in operational profitability, asset efficiency, and tax obligations.

Tax Burden
A consistent upward trend is observed in the tax burden ratio, which rose from 0.64 in 2017 to 0.82 in 2021. This steady increase indicates a reduction in the effective tax rate, which served as a positive driver for net income and helped offset declines in other performance metrics during the period.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained relatively stable, fluctuating minimally between a high of 0.96 in 2017 and a low of 0.93 in 2019 and 2020. This stability suggests that the cost of debt service relative to operating income remained constant, exerting a negligible influence on the overall volatility of ROA.
EBIT Margin
Operating profitability experienced a significant contraction, falling from 24.83% in 2017 to a trough of 19.13% in 2019. While a partial recovery occurred in 2020 at 22.47%, the margin ended the period at 21.76%. The decline in 2019 was a primary contributor to the synchronized drop in overall return on assets.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization showed a general downward trajectory after peaking at 0.90 in 2018. Efficiency dropped to 0.68 by 2020, reflecting a diminished ability to generate revenue from the asset base. Although a slight recovery to 0.75 was noted in 2021, the turnover ratio remained below 2017 and 2018 levels, acting as a persistent drag on ROA.

In summary, the recovery of ROA toward the end of the period was primarily supported by improved tax efficiency and a modest rebound in asset turnover, despite operating margins remaining below their 2017 peak.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

3M Co., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Dec 31, 2021 16.75% = 0.82 × 0.94 × 21.76%
Dec 31, 2020 16.73% = 0.80 × 0.93 × 22.47%
Dec 31, 2019 14.22% = 0.80 × 0.93 × 19.13%
Dec 31, 2018 16.33% = 0.77 × 0.95 × 22.39%
Dec 31, 2017 15.35% = 0.64 × 0.96 × 24.83%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The net profit margin exhibited a general upward trajectory over the five-year period, rising from 15.35% in 2017 to 16.75% in 2021. While a notable contraction occurred in 2019, with the margin dipping to 14.22%, the subsequent recovery in 2020 and 2021 indicates a strengthening of the bottom-line result.

Tax Burden
A significant and consistent upward trend is observed in the tax burden ratio, which increased from 0.64 in 2017 to 0.82 in 2021. This improvement indicates that a larger portion of pre-tax income was retained as net income, suggesting that tax efficiencies played a primary role in supporting the growth of the net profit margin despite fluctuations in operating performance.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained highly stable throughout the analyzed period, with values ranging narrowly between 0.93 and 0.96. This stability suggests that interest expenses had a minimal and consistent impact on the conversion of operating profit to net income, indicating a well-managed or static debt service requirement.
EBIT Margin
Operating profitability demonstrated higher volatility compared to the net profit margin. A downward trend was evident from 2017 to 2019, where the EBIT margin fell from 24.83% to a period low of 19.13%. Although the margin rebounded to 22.47% in 2020 and settled at 21.76% in 2021, it did not return to its 2017 peak. This divergence suggests that the overall increase in net profit margin was driven more by the improved tax burden than by gains in operating efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?