Adjusted Financial Ratios (Summary)
3M Co., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a period of stability followed by a notable contraction in 2019, with a subsequent recovery through 2021. A consistent pattern is observed across efficiency, solvency, and profitability metrics, all of which reached a local minimum or peak in 2019 before trending back toward or exceeding baseline levels.
- Asset Efficiency
- Adjusted total asset turnover exhibited a peak of 0.88 in 2018 before declining to a low of 0.69 in 2020. A moderate recovery was observed in 2021, with the ratio rising to 0.76, indicating a fluctuating ability to generate sales from the asset base.
- Liquidity Position
- The adjusted current ratio remained generally strong, staying above 1.80 for most of the period. A significant temporary decline occurred in 2019, where the ratio fell to 1.49, before rebounding to 2.04 in 2020 and stabilizing at 1.83 in 2021.
- Solvency and Leverage
- A marked increase in financial risk was evident in 2019, as adjusted debt to equity peaked at 1.99 and adjusted financial leverage reached 4.14. Following this peak, there was a consistent deleveraging trend; by 2021, the adjusted debt to equity ratio fell to 1.16 and adjusted financial leverage decreased to 2.95, both of which are lower than 2017 levels.
- Profitability and Returns
- Profitability metrics experienced a sharp V-shaped trajectory. The adjusted net profit margin dropped from 16.83% in 2018 to 12.35% in 2019, before climbing to a period high of 18.79% in 2021. Similarly, adjusted return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA) both saw significant dips in 2019, reaching 36.83% and 8.91% respectively, before recovering to 42.02% and 14.25% by the end of 2021.
Overall, the analysis indicates that while 2019 represented a period of increased leverage and diminished profitability, the subsequent years show a successful correction in the capital structure and a restoration of profit margins and asset returns.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 35,355 ÷ 47,072 = 0.75
2 Adjusted net sales. See details »
3 Adjusted total assets. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted total asset turnover = Adjusted net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 35,386 ÷ 46,680 = 0.76
The analysis of asset utilization efficiency from 2017 to 2021 reveals a fluctuating trend in the adjusted total asset turnover ratio, characterized by an initial peak, a subsequent decline, and a recent recovery.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover Trend
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio reached a period high of 0.88 in 2018 before experiencing a downward trajectory, reaching a low of 0.69 in 2020. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, with the ratio increasing to 0.76.
- Asset Base Expansion and Efficiency
- The decline in turnover between 2018 and 2020 is primarily attributable to a significant expansion of the adjusted total asset base, which grew from 37,230 million USD in 2018 to 46,706 million USD in 2020. During this period, adjusted net sales remained relatively stagnant, moving from 32,869 million USD to 32,252 million USD, which effectively diluted the asset turnover efficiency.
- Revenue Growth Impact in 2021
- The improvement in the ratio to 0.76 in 2021 was driven by a substantial increase in adjusted net sales to 35,386 million USD. Because the adjusted total asset base remained stable at 46,680 million USD, the growth in sales directly contributed to a higher turnover ratio, indicating improved revenue generation from the current asset levels.
- Correlation Between Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A high degree of correlation is observed between reported and adjusted figures across the five-year period. The adjusted total asset turnover ratio closely mirrors the reported ratio, suggesting that the adjustments made to net sales and total assets do not fundamentally change the narrative regarding the company's operational efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 15,403 ÷ 9,035 = 1.70
2 Adjusted current assets. See details »
3 Adjusted current liabilities. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Adjusted current liabilities
= 15,592 ÷ 8,506 = 1.83
Liquidity trends from 2017 to 2021 demonstrate a consistent ability to cover short-term obligations, with the adjusted current ratio remaining above 1.40 throughout the analyzed period. The adjustments applied to current assets and liabilities consistently result in a higher liquidity metric compared to reported figures, suggesting that the operational liquidity position is stronger than the raw reported data indicates.
- Adjusted Current Ratio Variance
- A consistent positive variance is observed between the reported and adjusted current ratios. In 2018, the adjusted current ratio peaked at 2.08 relative to a reported 1.89. This pattern confirms that the adjustments systematically increase the current ratio across all five years, indicating a more favorable liquidity profile after adjustments.
- Volatility and Trend Analysis
- A notable decline in liquidity occurred in 2019, with the adjusted current ratio dropping to its period low of 1.49. This contraction was driven by a simultaneous decrease in adjusted current assets to 13,132 million US$ and a significant increase in adjusted current liabilities to 8,792 million US$. A strong recovery followed in 2020, where the adjusted current ratio rose to 2.04.
- Recent Asset and Liability Dynamics
- Between 2020 and 2021, a modest reduction in the liquidity ratio is observed. Although adjusted current assets grew from 15,215 million US$ to 15,592 million US$, this increase was outweighed by a rise in adjusted current liabilities, which climbed from 7,450 million US$ to 8,506 million US$. Consequently, the adjusted current ratio declined from 2.04 to 1.83.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Debt to Equity
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Total 3M Company shareholders’ equity
= 17,463 ÷ 15,046 = 1.16
2 Adjusted total debt. See details »
3 Adjusted total equity. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted debt to equity = Adjusted total debt ÷ Adjusted total equity
= 18,317 ÷ 15,827 = 1.16
The financial leverage profile between 2017 and 2021 exhibits a cyclical pattern, characterized by a significant increase in leverage peaking in 2019, followed by a consistent deleveraging trend through 2021.
- Adjusted Total Debt Trends
- Adjusted total debt increased from US$ 15,091 million in 2017 to a peak of US$ 21,299 million in 2019. Following this peak, a downward trend is observed, with debt levels reducing to US$ 19,775 million in 2020 and further declining to US$ 18,317 million by the end of 2021.
- Adjusted Total Equity Trends
- Adjusted total equity experienced a contraction from US$ 12,137 million in 2017 to US$ 10,646 million in 2018. From 2019 onward, a steady growth trajectory is evident, with equity expanding to US$ 13,303 million in 2020 and reaching US$ 15,827 million in 2021.
- Adjusted Debt to Equity Ratio Analysis
- The adjusted debt to equity ratio rose from 1.24 in 2017 to a high of 1.99 in 2019, reflecting an increased reliance on borrowed capital relative to shareholder funds. This trend reversed after 2019, as the ratio fell to 1.49 in 2020 and continued to decrease to 1.16 in 2021, bringing the leverage ratio to its lowest point within the five-year period.
The convergence of declining adjusted total debt and increasing adjusted total equity after 2019 contributed to a significant improvement in the company's solvency position. By December 31, 2021, the adjusted debt to equity ratio of 1.16 indicates a more conservative capital structure compared to the peak leverage observed in 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Debt to Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= 17,463 ÷ 32,509 = 0.54
2 Adjusted total debt. See details »
3 Adjusted total capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted debt to capital = Adjusted total debt ÷ Adjusted total capital
= 18,317 ÷ 34,144 = 0.54
An analysis of the financial structure between 2017 and 2021 reveals a cyclical pattern in leverage, characterized by a significant peak in 2019 followed by a period of steady deleveraging. The adjusted debt to capital ratio mirrors the reported ratio exactly across the five-year period, indicating that the adjustments applied to total debt and total capital are proportional.
- Debt Obligations
- Adjusted total debt experienced a substantial increase from 15,091 million US$ in 2017 to a peak of 21,299 million US$ in 2019. Following this peak, a downward trend is observed, with debt decreasing to 19,775 million US$ in 2020 and further to 18,317 million US$ by the end of 2021.
- Capital Base Growth
- Adjusted total capital exhibited a general upward trajectory over the analyzed period. After a slight dip between 2017 and 2018, adjusted capital rose consistently from 26,360 million US$ in 2018 to 34,144 million US$ in 2021. The expansion of the capital base continued even as total debt was being reduced in the latter two years.
- Leverage Ratio Trends
- The adjusted debt to capital ratio rose from 0.55 in 2017 to 0.67 in 2019, signifying an increase in financial leverage. This trend reversed after 2019, with the ratio falling to 0.60 in 2020 and reaching a period low of 0.54 in 2021. This final value indicates a return to a capital structure with lower relative debt than that observed at the start of the five-year period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total 3M Company shareholders’ equity
= 47,072 ÷ 15,046 = 3.13
2 Adjusted total assets. See details »
3 Adjusted total equity. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total equity
= 46,680 ÷ 15,827 = 2.95
Between 2017 and 2021, the financial structure exhibited a cyclical trend in leverage, characterized by a peak in 2019 followed by a period of deleveraging. While total assets and equity grew over the five-year horizon, the proportion of debt relative to equity fluctuated, resulting in a lower overall leverage position by the end of the period than at its peak.
- Asset and Equity Dynamics
- Total assets demonstrated a general upward trajectory, rising from 37,987 million US$ in 2017 to 47,072 million US$ in 2021. The most significant expansion occurred between 2018 and 2019, where reported assets increased by approximately 21.6%. Shareholders' equity experienced a decline in 2018 but subsequently entered a period of sustained growth, increasing from 9,796 million US$ in 2018 to 15,046 million US$ by 2021.
- Adjusted Financial Leverage Trends
- Adjusted financial leverage followed a bell-shaped curve over the analyzed period. The ratio rose from 3.18 in 2017 to a peak of 4.14 in 2019, indicating an increase in the company's reliance on leverage during that interval. Following the 2019 peak, a consistent downward trend is observed, with the ratio declining to 3.51 in 2020 and further decreasing to 2.95 in 2021, representing the lowest leverage level in the five-year series.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A consistent variance is observed between reported and adjusted financial leverage, with adjusted figures remaining lower than reported figures in every year. For example, in 2019, the reported leverage reached 4.44 while the adjusted leverage was 4.14. By 2021, the reported leverage stood at 3.13 compared to the adjusted leverage of 2.95. This indicates that the adjustments applied to total assets and total equity systematically reduce the calculated leverage ratio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net income attributable to 3M ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 5,921 ÷ 35,355 = 16.75%
2 Adjusted net income including noncontrolling interest. See details »
3 Adjusted net sales. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income including noncontrolling interest ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × 6,650 ÷ 35,386 = 18.79%
The adjusted net profit margin exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a sharp contraction in 2019 followed by a strong recovery and expansion in the subsequent two years.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trend
- The adjusted net profit margin began at 17.16% in 2017 and remained relatively stable through 2018 at 16.83%. A substantial decline occurred in 2019, where the margin dropped to a period low of 12.35%. However, a robust recovery followed, with the margin increasing to 18.17% in 2020 and reaching a peak of 18.79% by December 31, 2021.
- Correlation between Adjusted Net Income and Sales
- Adjusted net sales remained consistent between 2017 and 2020, fluctuating within a narrow range of approximately 31.6 billion to 32.8 billion US dollars. The decline in the 2019 margin was driven primarily by a drop in adjusted net income to 3.945 billion US dollars despite stable sales. In 2021, profitability improved alongside a notable increase in adjusted net sales to 35.386 billion US dollars, contributing to the highest adjusted net income in the period at 6.650 billion US dollars.
- Variance between Reported and Adjusted Margins
- A divergence between reported and adjusted profitability is evident throughout the period. While the adjusted net profit margin typically exceeded the reported margin, the 2019 fiscal year presented an anomaly where the reported margin of 14.22% was higher than the adjusted margin of 12.35%. By 2021, the gap widened again, with the adjusted margin of 18.79% surpassing the reported margin of 16.75%, indicating that adjustments for non-recurring items significantly enhanced the perceived underlying profitability of the operations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to 3M ÷ Total 3M Company shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 5,921 ÷ 15,046 = 39.35%
2 Adjusted net income including noncontrolling interest. See details »
3 Adjusted total equity. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income including noncontrolling interest ÷ Adjusted total equity
= 100 × 6,650 ÷ 15,827 = 42.02%
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by fluctuating profitability and a general expansion of the equity base. While net income and equity levels generally trended upward toward the end of the period, the return on equity metrics exhibited significant volatility, particularly between 2018 and 2020.
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE) Trends
- Adjusted ROE peaked in 2018 at 51.95% before experiencing a sharp decline to 36.83% in 2019. A recovery followed in 2020 and 2021, with the ratio stabilizing at 44.05% and 42.02%, respectively. This volatility indicates a period of instability in earnings relative to the equity base during the 2019 fiscal year.
- Net Income Analysis
- Adjusted net income remained consistently higher than reported net income in four of the five years analyzed. A notable contraction occurred in 2019, where adjusted net income dropped to 3,945 million US$, the lowest point in the series. However, a strong recovery was observed by 2021, reaching a peak of 6,650 million US$, suggesting a restoration of operational profitability.
- Equity Base Expansion
- Total shareholders' equity, both reported and adjusted, demonstrated an upward trajectory from 2019 through 2021. Adjusted total equity grew from 10,711 million US$ in 2019 to 15,827 million US$ by 2021. The growth in the equity denominator contributed to the gradual moderation of the ROE percentages in the final two years, despite the increase in absolute net income.
- Reported vs. Adjusted Performance
- The variance between reported and adjusted ROE shifted over the period. In 2017, adjusted ROE was higher than reported ROE (44.75% vs 42.01%). By 2021, this relationship inverted, with reported ROE at 39.35% and adjusted ROE at 42.02%. The proximity of these two figures in the later years suggests a convergence between adjusted and reported financial results.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to 3M ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 5,921 ÷ 47,072 = 12.58%
2 Adjusted net income including noncontrolling interest. See details »
3 Adjusted total assets. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income including noncontrolling interest ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 6,650 ÷ 46,680 = 14.25%
The analysis of the financial performance from 2017 through 2021 reveals a period of volatility in asset utilization efficiency, characterized by a significant decline in 2019 followed by a steady recovery. Both reported and adjusted return on assets (ROA) followed a similar trajectory, peaking in 2018 before experiencing a sharp contraction and subsequent rebound.
- Adjusted ROA Trend Analysis
- Adjusted ROA demonstrated a fluctuating pattern, beginning at 14.05% in 2017 and rising slightly to 14.86% in 2018. A substantial decline occurred in 2019, where the ratio dropped to its lowest point of 8.91%. However, a recovery phase ensued, with the ratio increasing to 12.55% in 2020 and reaching 14.25% by the end of 2021, effectively returning to levels seen at the start of the period.
- Impact of Asset Expansion
- A notable increase in the asset base occurred between 2018 and 2019, with adjusted total assets rising from 37,230 million US$ to 44,299 million US$. This expansion in the denominator, coupled with a decrease in adjusted net income to 3,945 million US$ in the same year, served as the primary driver for the contraction in the adjusted ROA during 2019.
- Comparative Analysis of Reported vs. Adjusted Metrics
- In most years, adjusted ROA remained higher than reported ROA, suggesting that adjustments to net income generally improved the perceived efficiency of asset usage. For instance, in 2021, adjusted ROA was 14.25% compared to a reported ROA of 12.58%. The sole exception occurred in 2019, when adjusted ROA (8.91%) fell below reported ROA (10.23%), reflecting a period where adjusted net income was lower than reported net income.
- Net Income and Asset Correlation
- The recovery in ROA observed in 2020 and 2021 was driven by strong growth in adjusted net income, which rose from 3,945 million US$ in 2019 to 6,650 million US$ in 2021. This growth in earnings outpaced the relatively stable growth in adjusted total assets, which remained constant at approximately 46,680 million US$ between 2020 and 2021, thereby enhancing the overall return on assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?