Stock Analysis on Net

3M Co. (NYSE:MMM)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 25, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

3M Co., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period between 2017 and 2021 demonstrates fluctuating financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited an initial increase, followed by a decline, and then a recovery. The cost of capital remained relatively stable, while invested capital showed a more substantial increase over the observed timeframe.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT increased from US$5,388 million in 2017 to US$5,630 million in 2018, representing a modest growth. A subsequent decrease was observed in 2019, with NOPAT falling to US$4,679 million. The year 2020 saw a recovery to US$5,797 million, and this upward trend continued into 2021, reaching US$6,058 million. This indicates a volatile period for core operational profitability.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital experienced a slight decrease from 15.19% in 2017 to 15.02% in 2018. It continued to decline to 14.00% in 2019 before increasing slightly to 14.19% in 2020 and 14.24% in 2021. These fluctuations were relatively small, suggesting a consistent, though not entirely static, cost of funding capital.
Invested Capital
Invested capital increased from US$32,308 million in 2017 to US$31,616 million in 2018, a slight decrease. A significant increase occurred in 2019, reaching US$38,698 million, and continued to rise in subsequent years, reaching US$38,880 million in 2020 and US$39,156 million in 2021. This suggests a growing capital base, potentially through investment in assets or acquisitions.
Economic Profit
Economic profit, a key indicator of value creation, was positive in 2017 and 2018, at US$482 million and US$883 million respectively. However, it turned negative in 2019, reaching -US$739 million. A return to positive economic profit was observed in 2020 at US$279 million, and further improvement occurred in 2021, reaching US$482 million. The fluctuations in economic profit closely mirror the changes in NOPAT, but are also influenced by the cost of capital and the level of invested capital. The negative economic profit in 2019 indicates that the company’s returns did not exceed its cost of capital during that year.

Overall, the period was characterized by volatility in profitability, coupled with a consistent increase in invested capital. While economic profit recovered in the later years of the period, the negative value in 2019 highlights a period where capital was not deployed effectively enough to generate returns exceeding its cost.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

3M Co., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net income attributable to 3M
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowances2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in product warranty liabilities4
Increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring action balances5
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents6
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability7
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense8
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes9
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income10
Investment income, after taxes11
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty liabilities.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring action balances.

6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to 3M.

7 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

8 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to 3M.

10 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net Income Attributable to 3M
The net income exhibits a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. Starting at 4,858 million USD in 2017, it increased to 5,349 million USD in 2018, indicating a positive growth. However, there was a decline in 2019, with net income falling to 4,570 million USD. This downward shift was followed by a recovery in 2020 and 2021, reaching 5,384 million USD and 5,921 million USD respectively, signaling an overall increasing trajectory towards the end of the period.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The NOPAT shows similar variability with a general upward movement. It rose from 5,388 million USD in 2017 to 5,630 million USD in 2018, before dropping to 4,679 million USD in 2019, reflecting a noticeable dip in operational profitability after taxes. Subsequently, NOPAT recovered significantly in 2020 and 2021, achieving 5,797 million USD and 6,058 million USD respectively. This rebound suggests improved operational efficiency and tax impact post-2019.
Overall Summary
Both the net income and NOPAT follow a similar pattern characterized by growth in the early years, a decline in 2019, and a strong rebound in the last two years. The dip in 2019 indicates potential challenges during that period, impacting both profitability and operational returns after taxes. The recovery phase through 2020 and 2021 suggests strategic or market conditions improving, leading to enhanced financial performance. The data implies resilience and a return to growth momentum after a temporary setback.

Cash Operating Taxes

3M Co., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of the provided financial data reveals a notable trend in the company's tax-related figures over a five-year period from 2017 to 2021.

Provision for Income Taxes

This figure shows a significant and consistent decline from 2017 through 2019, decreasing from US$2,679 million in 2017 to US$1,130 million in 2019. The trend then stabilizes somewhat in the following years, with a slight increase to US$1,318 million in 2020 before a marginal decrease to US$1,285 million in 2021.

Cash Operating Taxes

Cash operating taxes exhibit a similar downward pattern initially, falling from US$2,524 million in 2017 to US$1,349 million in 2019. After this period, the figure rises again in 2020 to US$1,585 million and remains relatively stable into 2021 at US$1,557 million. This suggests some recovery or stabilization in cash tax payments following the prior decline.

Overall, both provisions for income taxes and cash operating taxes experienced a marked reduction between 2017 and 2019. Subsequently, from 2020 onward, there appears to be a trend toward stabilization or slight recovery in tax-related expenses, although these amounts have not returned to the higher levels seen in 2017. This pattern could indicate changes in profitability, tax planning strategies, or tax law impacts over the examined period.


Invested Capital

3M Co., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
Current obligations of finance leases
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Finance leases, net of current obligations
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total 3M Company shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowances3
Deferred revenue4
Product warranty liabilities5
Accrued restructuring action balances6
Equity equivalents7
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax8
Noncontrolling interest
Adjusted total 3M Company shareholders’ equity
Construction in progress9
Marketable securities10
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of product warranty liabilities.

6 Addition of accrued restructuring action balances.

7 Addition of equity equivalents to total 3M Company shareholders’ equity.

8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

9 Subtraction of construction in progress.

10 Subtraction of marketable securities.


Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total reported debt and leases increased notably from 15,091 million USD at the end of 2017 to 21,299 million USD by the end of 2019. However, a declining trend is observed afterward, with the total reducing to 19,775 million USD in 2020 and further to 18,317 million USD in 2021. This indicates an initial period of increased leverage followed by a consistent effort to reduce debt and lease obligations over the last two years.
Total 3M Company Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity showed a downward trend from 11,563 million USD in 2017 to 9,796 million USD in 2018, indicating a reduction in net assets during that period. From 2018 onwards, equity exhibited a recovery and growth, climbing to 10,063 million USD in 2019, then more significantly increasing to 12,867 million USD in 2020 and reaching 15,046 million USD in 2021. This reflects improving retained earnings or capital infusions contributing to the strengthening of the equity base over the latter years.
Invested Capital
Invested capital was relatively stable between 2017 and 2018, with marginal decrease from 32,308 million USD to 31,616 million USD. In 2019, a considerable increase occurred, bringing the invested capital to 38,698 million USD. This level was maintained with slight increments through 2020 and 2021, totaling 38,880 million USD and 39,156 million USD respectively. This pattern suggests significant new investments or assets acquisition in 2019, followed by stabilization of capital deployment in subsequent years.
Overall Insights
The combined analysis suggests a strategic shift over the reported period. After increasing debt levels through 2019, the company appears to focus on deleveraging in 2020 and 2021, coinciding with rising shareholders' equity and steady invested capital. This could imply improved profitability, asset management, or capital restructuring efforts enhancing the company's financial stability and reducing reliance on borrowed funds.

Cost of Capital

3M Co., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

3M Co., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The period under review demonstrates fluctuating economic performance. Economic profit exhibited volatility, moving from positive values in 2017 and 2018 to a substantial loss in 2019, followed by recovery in 2020 and 2021. Invested capital generally increased over the five-year period, although a slight decrease was noted between 2017 and 2018. The economic spread ratio, a key indicator of value creation, mirrored the profit fluctuations, showing a marked decline in 2019 before partially recovering in subsequent years.

Economic Profit
Economic profit began at US$482 million in 2017, increased significantly to US$883 million in 2018, then experienced a considerable decline, resulting in a loss of US$739 million in 2019. A recovery was observed in 2020, with economic profit reaching US$279 million, and further improvement occurred in 2021, returning to US$482 million. This suggests a period of profitability followed by significant challenges, and then a partial rebound.
Invested Capital
Invested capital decreased from US$32,308 million in 2017 to US$31,616 million in 2018. Subsequently, it increased steadily over the remaining period, reaching US$38,698 million in 2019, US$38,880 million in 2020, and US$39,156 million in 2021. The consistent growth in invested capital from 2019 onwards, despite the profit volatility, indicates continued investment in the business.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio began at 1.49% in 2017 and rose to 2.79% in 2018, indicating increasing value creation relative to invested capital. A substantial decrease was then observed in 2019, with the ratio falling to -1.91%, signifying a destruction of value. The ratio partially recovered to 0.72% in 2020 and further improved to 1.23% in 2021, but remained below the levels seen in 2017 and 2018. This pattern closely follows the fluctuations in economic profit, confirming the relationship between profitability and value creation.

Overall, the analysis reveals a period of initial strong economic performance, followed by a significant downturn in 2019, and a subsequent, though incomplete, recovery. The increasing invested capital suggests ongoing strategic initiatives, while the economic spread ratio highlights the challenges in translating those investments into consistent value creation.


Economic Profit Margin

3M Co., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
 
Net sales
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2017 and 2021. Initial positive values transitioned to a substantial loss before recovering, demonstrating volatility in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital.

Economic Profit Margin Trend
The economic profit margin began at 1.52% in 2017, increasing to a peak of 2.69% in 2018. This indicates improving profitability relative to capital employed during this period. However, a significant decline occurred in 2019, resulting in a negative margin of -2.31%. This suggests that the company’s operating profits were insufficient to cover its cost of capital. A partial recovery was observed in 2020, with the margin reaching 0.87%, followed by a further improvement to 1.36% in 2021. While positive, the 2021 margin remained below the 2018 high.
Relationship to Adjusted Net Sales
Adjusted net sales demonstrated a generally upward trend over the period, increasing from US$31,641 million in 2017 to US$35,386 million in 2021. Despite this sales growth, the economic profit margin did not consistently benefit. The substantial decline in margin in 2019 occurred alongside a slight decrease in adjusted net sales, suggesting that factors beyond revenue volume, such as increased costs or capital charges, significantly impacted profitability. The margin improvement in 2020 and 2021 coincided with increases in adjusted net sales, indicating a positive correlation, but the margin did not return to its previous peak despite higher sales.

The economic profit figures themselves mirror the margin trends. Positive economic profit was recorded in 2017, 2018, 2020, and 2021, while a substantial economic loss was experienced in 2019. The magnitude of the loss in 2019 (-US$739 million) was considerably larger than the positive profits in other years, highlighting the severity of the underperformance during that period.

Overall Assessment
The period under review was characterized by inconsistent economic profitability. While the company demonstrated an ability to generate economic profit in several years, the significant loss in 2019 and the failure to consistently achieve the margin levels seen in 2018 suggest potential challenges in maintaining a sustainable competitive advantage and effectively managing capital allocation.