Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of short-term operating activity ratios between 2017 and 2021 reveals a consistent improvement in the efficiency of the cash conversion cycle, which decreased from 105 days to 87 days over the observed period.
- Asset Management Efficiency
- Receivables turnover demonstrated a steady upward trajectory, increasing from 6.45 in 2017 to 7.59 in 2021. This trend correlates with a reduction in the average receivable collection period, which fell from 57 days to 48 days, indicating more effective credit collection processes. Inventory turnover remained relatively stable, fluctuating between a peak of 4.15 in 2019 and a low of 3.77 in 2021, with the average inventory processing period maintaining a range between 88 and 97 days.
- Liability and Working Capital Management
- A distinct downward trend is observed in payables turnover, which declined from 8.23 in 2017 to 6.28 in 2021. This shift resulted in an extension of the average payables payment period from 44 days to 58 days, suggesting an increased reliance on supplier credit to fund operations. Working capital turnover exhibited significant volatility, peaking at 8.57 in 2019 before settling at 5.55 by the end of 2021.
- Operating and Cash Cycle Dynamics
- The operating cycle remained relatively constant, moving from 149 days in 2017 to 145 days in 2021. However, the cash conversion cycle saw a continuous decline throughout the five-year span. This compression was primarily driven by the synergy of accelerated receivable collections and the strategic extension of payment terms to creditors, thereby enhancing the overall liquidity profile of the operating cycle.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Inventory Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of sales | 18,795) | 16,605) | 17,136) | 16,682) | 16,001) | |
| Inventories | 4,985) | 4,239) | 4,134) | 4,366) | 4,034) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Inventory turnover1 | 3.77 | 3.92 | 4.15 | 3.82 | 3.97 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 0.75 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 2.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 4.48 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 3.40 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 4.29 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19.45 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 5.65 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 2.28 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 4.03 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventories
= 18,795 ÷ 4,985 = 3.77
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2017 to 2021 reveals a general increase in both the cost of sales and total inventory holdings, though the efficiency of inventory turnover experienced a gradual decline toward the end of the period.
- Cost of Sales Trends
- The cost of sales showed a steady upward trajectory from 2017 to 2019, rising from 16,001 million to 17,136 million. A temporary contraction occurred in 2020, with the figure dropping to 16,605 million, followed by a significant surge in 2021 to 18,795 million, marking the highest expenditure level in the five-year period.
- Inventory Asset Levels
- Inventory levels remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2020, fluctuating within a range of 4,034 million to 4,366 million. A sharp increase is observed in 2021, where inventories rose to 4,985 million, representing a substantial expansion of stock holdings compared to the preceding years.
- Inventory Turnover Efficiency
- The inventory turnover ratio exhibited volatility, peaking at 4.15 in 2019, indicating the highest level of operational efficiency in converting inventory into sales. Following this peak, the ratio declined to 3.92 in 2020 and further to 3.77 in 2021. This downward trend suggests that the growth in inventory assets outpaced the growth in the cost of sales toward the end of the analyzed period, resulting in a slower inventory replacement cycle.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Receivables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net sales | 35,355) | 32,184) | 32,136) | 32,765) | 31,657) | |
| Accounts receivable, net of allowances | 4,660) | 4,705) | 4,791) | 5,020) | 4,911) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Receivables turnover1 | 7.59 | 6.84 | 6.71 | 6.53 | 6.45 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 23.58 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 5.68 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 5.95 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 4.55 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 5.04 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 34.15 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 6.66 | — | — | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 7.57 | — | — | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 7.76 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Accounts receivable, net of allowances
= 35,355 ÷ 4,660 = 7.59
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of receivables turnover from 2017 to 2021 indicates a consistent improvement in the efficiency of the company's credit and collection processes.
- Receivables Turnover Trend
- A progressive increase in the receivables turnover ratio is observed, rising steadily from 6.45 in 2017 to 7.59 in 2021. This upward trajectory suggests a shortening of the average collection period and an enhanced ability to convert credit sales into cash over the five-year period.
- Relationship Between Sales and Receivables
- While net sales remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2020 before increasing to 35,355 million US$ in 2021, accounts receivable, net of allowances, exhibited a general downward trend following a peak in 2018. Net receivables decreased from 5,020 million US$ in 2018 to 4,660 million US$ in 2021.
- Operational Efficiency Insight
- The simultaneous increase in net sales and decrease in net receivables observed in 2021 contributed to a significant spike in the turnover ratio to 7.59. This divergence indicates an optimization of working capital management, as the company managed to grow its top-line revenue while reducing the total amount of outstanding credit extended to customers.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Payables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of sales | 18,795) | 16,605) | 17,136) | 16,682) | 16,001) | |
| Accounts payable | 2,994) | 2,561) | 2,228) | 2,266) | 1,945) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Payables turnover1 | 6.28 | 6.48 | 7.69 | 7.36 | 8.23 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 6.40 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 4.36 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 4.75 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 3.32 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 3.40 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 74.34 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 5.93 | — | — | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 5.60 | — | — | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 7.81 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Accounts payable
= 18,795 ÷ 2,994 = 6.28
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the short-term operating activity reveals a consistent downward trend in the payables turnover ratio over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021. The ratio declined from 8.23 in 2017 to 6.28 in 2021, indicating a reduction in the frequency with which the company settles its obligations to suppliers.
- Cost of Sales Trends
- The cost of sales generally increased from 16,001 million USD in 2017 to 18,795 million USD in 2021. Although a slight decrease was noted in 2020, the overall trajectory indicates an expansion in procurement volume or an increase in the cost of raw materials and production.
- Accounts Payable Growth
- A steady increase in accounts payable is observed, rising from 1,945 million USD in 2017 to 2,994 million USD in 2021. This growth suggests a higher volume of credit purchases or a deliberate extension of the payment window offered by vendors.
- Payables Turnover Analysis
- The decline in the turnover ratio is a result of the growth in accounts payable outpacing the growth in the cost of sales. The transition from a ratio of 8.23 to 6.28 signifies that the company is taking longer to pay its creditors. This pattern typically indicates an improvement in cash flow management by leveraging supplier credit to fund operations, although it may also reflect changing terms negotiated with trade partners.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Working Capital Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Current assets | 15,403) | 14,982) | 12,971) | 13,709) | 14,277) | |
| Less: Current liabilities | 9,035) | 7,948) | 9,222) | 7,244) | 7,687) | |
| Working capital | 6,368) | 7,034) | 3,749) | 6,465) | 6,590) | |
| Net sales | 35,355) | 32,184) | 32,136) | 32,765) | 31,657) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Working capital turnover1 | 5.55 | 4.58 | 8.57 | 5.07 | 4.80 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 2.34 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 3.54 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 65.65 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 4.94 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 5.86 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 11.52 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 9.75 | — | — | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 5.01 | — | — | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 6.90 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 35,355 ÷ 6,368 = 5.55
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals significant volatility in working capital management and its subsequent impact on the efficiency of asset utilization between 2017 and 2021. While net sales remained relatively stable for the majority of the period, the working capital turnover ratio experienced a sharp deviation in 2019, followed by a correction in 2020.
- Working Capital Volatility
- Working capital remained consistent between 2017 and 2018, hovering around 6.5 billion USD. A substantial contraction occurred in 2019, with working capital falling to 3,749 million USD. This was followed by a rapid increase in 2020 to 7,034 million USD, the highest level in the observed period, before stabilizing at 6,368 million USD in 2021.
- Net Sales Performance
- Net sales demonstrated a general upward trend, increasing from 31,657 million USD in 2017 to a peak of 35,355 million USD in 2021. The growth was gradual between 2017 and 2020, with a more pronounced acceleration occurring in the final year of the analysis.
- Working Capital Turnover Interpretation
- The turnover ratio exhibits an inverse relationship with the fluctuations in working capital. A peak efficiency ratio of 8.57 was recorded in 2019, driven not by a surge in sales, but by the significant reduction in the working capital base. The ratio subsequently declined to 4.58 in 2020 as working capital expanded. By 2021, the ratio improved to 5.55, supported by the highest recorded net sales and a normalized level of working capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Inventory Processing Period
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Inventory turnover | 3.77 | 3.92 | 4.15 | 3.82 | 3.97 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | 97 | 93 | 88 | 96 | 92 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 486 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 144 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 82 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 107 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 85 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 65 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 160 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 91 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.77 = 97
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a period of relative stability in inventory management, characterized by minor fluctuations in turnover efficiency and processing timelines between 2017 and 2021.
- Inventory Turnover
- The inventory turnover ratio demonstrated a non-linear trend, peaking in 2019 at 4.15 before declining to 3.77 by the end of 2021. This downward trajectory from the 2019 peak suggests a reduction in the frequency with which inventory is sold and replaced over the final two years of the analyzed period.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The processing period fluctuated in inverse correlation with turnover, reaching its most efficient point in 2019 with a duration of 88 days. Subsequently, the period increased to 93 days in 2020 and further to 97 days in 2021, representing the longest duration of inventory holding within the five-year window.
Overall, the increase in the average inventory processing period from 88 to 97 days between 2019 and 2021 reflects a gradual deceleration in operating efficiency. This pattern indicates that inventory remained in the system longer during the latter part of the period, which may suggest a misalignment between production levels and market demand or a strategic increase in safety stock.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Receivable Collection Period
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Receivables turnover | 7.59 | 6.84 | 6.71 | 6.53 | 6.45 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | 48 | 53 | 54 | 56 | 57 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 15 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 64 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 61 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 80 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 72 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 11 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 55 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 48 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 47 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 7.59 = 48
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a consistent improvement in credit management and collection efficiency from 2017 through 2021. A clear inverse correlation exists between the turnover ratio and the collection period, indicating a streamlined process in converting receivables into cash.
- Receivables Turnover
- A steady upward trajectory is observed in the receivables turnover ratio, which increased from 6.45 in 2017 to 7.59 by the end of 2021. This growth represents a continuous enhancement in the frequency with which the company collects its average receivables balance relative to credit sales. The most significant acceleration occurred between 2020 and 2021, where the ratio rose from 6.84 to 7.59.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The average period required to collect receivables demonstrates a consistent decline over the five-year period. The collection cycle shortened from 57 days in 2017 to 48 days in 2021. This downward trend reflects a reduction in the time capital remains tied up in outstanding customer invoices, thereby improving the company's overall liquidity position.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Cycle
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 97 | 93 | 88 | 96 | 92 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 48 | 53 | 54 | 56 | 57 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Operating cycle1 | 145 | 146 | 142 | 152 | 149 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 501 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 208 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 143 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 187 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 157 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 30 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 120 | — | — | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 208 | — | — | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 138 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 97 + 48 = 145
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the operating cycle from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of relative stability in the total time required to convert inventory into cash, characterized by opposing trends between inventory management and receivable collections.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The duration required to process inventory demonstrates a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. After an initial increase to 96 days in 2018, the period dropped to a low of 88 days in 2019. However, a consistent upward trajectory followed, culminating in 97 days by the end of 2021. This suggests a gradual increase in the time capital is tied up in inventory.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- A consistent and linear improvement is observed in the collection of receivables. The period decreased every year, moving from 57 days in 2017 to 48 days in 2021. This trend indicates enhanced efficiency in credit control and an accelerated conversion of accounts receivable into liquid cash.
- Operating Cycle
- The total operating cycle remained relatively constant, fluctuating between a high of 152 days in 2018 and a low of 142 days in 2019, ending at 145 days in 2021. The stability of the overall cycle is a result of the offsetting effects between the lengthening inventory processing period and the shortening receivable collection period; the gains in collection efficiency have largely mitigated the slower inventory turnover.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Payables Payment Period
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Payables turnover | 6.28 | 6.48 | 7.69 | 7.36 | 8.23 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average payables payment period1 | 58 | 56 | 47 | 50 | 44 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 57 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 84 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 77 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 110 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 107 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 5 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 62 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 65 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 47 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 6.28 = 58
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent trend toward extended payment cycles for obligations to suppliers. There is a clear inverse relationship between the payables turnover ratio and the average payables payment period, both of which indicate a shift in the management of current liabilities.
- Payables Turnover
- A general downward trajectory is observed in the payables turnover ratio, which declined from 8.23 in 2017 to 6.28 by 2021. Despite a marginal recovery in 2019, the overall decline suggests a slower frequency of settling accounts payable relative to the volume of purchases.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The average time required to settle payables increased from 44 days in 2017 to 58 days in 2021. While a slight contraction occurred in 2019, reducing the period to 47 days, a notable extension occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the period rose to 56 days and peaked at 58 days in 2021.
- Cash Flow and Liquidity Implications
- The expansion of the payment period by 14 days over the analyzed timeframe indicates an increased reliance on trade credit. This trend typically results in the preservation of cash on hand by delaying outflows, effectively utilizing supplier financing to support short-term liquidity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Conversion Cycle
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 97 | 93 | 88 | 96 | 92 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 48 | 53 | 54 | 56 | 57 | |
| Average payables payment period | 58 | 56 | 47 | 50 | 44 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | 87 | 90 | 95 | 102 | 105 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 444 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 124 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 66 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 77 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 50 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 25 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 58 | — | — | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 143 | — | — | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 91 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 97 + 48 – 58 = 87
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2017 and 2021, a consistent reduction in the cash conversion cycle is observed, with the duration decreasing from 105 days to 87 days. This downward trend indicates a steady improvement in working capital efficiency and an acceleration in the speed at which cash is recovered from investments in operating cycles.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- Inventory turnover remained relatively stable throughout the period, though it exhibited some volatility. The processing period started at 92 days in 2017, peaked at 97 days in 2021, and reached a low of 88 days in 2019. This suggests that inventory management has remained consistent and was not the primary driver of the overall change in the cash conversion cycle.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- A continuous improvement in the collection of receivables is evident. The period declined steadily from 57 days in 2017 to 48 days in 2021. This trend reflects increased efficiency in credit management and a faster conversion of accounts receivable into liquid cash.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The period for settling obligations to suppliers shifted upward, moving from 44 days in 2017 to 58 days in 2021. This extension of the payment period indicates a strategic increase in the use of trade credit, allowing for the retention of cash for longer durations.
- Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)
- The overall reduction of 18 days in the CCC over five years is the result of synergistic effects between the receivable and payable cycles. The acceleration of cash inflows from customers and the deceleration of cash outflows to suppliers more than offset the slight increase in the inventory processing period, leading to a more optimized liquidity position.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?