AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 9, 2017.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

Microsoft Excel

Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

Yahoo! Inc., EBITDA calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Net income (loss) attributable to Yahoo! Inc. (214,321) (4,359,082) 7,521,731 1,366,281 3,945,479
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 4,858 7,975 10,411 10,285 5,123
Add: Income tax expense (126,228) (89,598) 4,038,102 153,392 1,940,043
Earnings before tax (EBT) (335,691) (4,440,705) 11,570,244 1,529,958 5,890,645
Add: Interest expense 73,783 71,865 68,851 14,319 9,297
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) (261,908) (4,368,840) 11,639,095 1,544,277 5,899,942
Add: Depreciation 407,341 472,894 475,031 532,485 549,235
Add: Amortization of intangible assets 100,214 136,719 131,537 96,518 105,366
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 245,647 (3,759,227) 12,245,663 2,173,280 6,554,543

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


The financial performance from 2012 through 2016 is characterized by extreme volatility across all profitability metrics, with a pronounced cycle of growth, collapse, and marginal recovery.

EBITDA Trend Analysis
A significant fluctuation in EBITDA is observed over the five-year period. Following a decline from 6.55 billion USD in 2012 to 2.17 billion USD in 2013, there was a substantial surge in 2014, reaching a peak of 12.25 billion USD. This peak was followed by a severe downturn in 2015, where EBITDA plummeted to a negative 3.76 billion USD, before returning to a marginally positive 245.65 million USD by the end of 2016.
Operational Profitability and Non-Cash Expenses
A consistent gap exists between EBIT and EBITDA, indicating significant non-cash charges related to depreciation and amortization. In 2016, this divergence is particularly noteworthy; while EBITDA returned to positive territory, both EBIT and Earnings Before Tax (EBT) remained negative. This suggests that the recovery in EBITDA was not driven by a return to operational profitability, but rather by the accounting treatment of non-cash expenses relative to operating losses.
Net Income Correlation
Net income patterns closely mirror the volatility of EBITDA, particularly during the 2014 peak and the 2015 contraction. The transition from a net income of 7.52 billion USD in 2014 to a net loss of 4.36 billion USD in 2015 represents a critical shift in the company's financial position, aligning with the collapse seen in the EBITDA figures during the same timeframe.
Recovery Analysis
The results for 2016 indicate a stabilizing trend. Although the EBITDA of 245.65 million USD is significantly lower than the levels seen between 2012 and 2014, it represents a successful pivot away from the deep deficits experienced in 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current

Yahoo! Inc., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV) 41,958,614
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 245,647
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA 170.81
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors1
Accenture PLC 11.68
Adobe Inc. 9.81
AppLovin Corp. 21.15
Cadence Design Systems Inc. 48.08
Datadog Inc. 331.59
International Business Machines Corp. 16.59
Intuit Inc. 13.45
Microsoft Corp. 20.03
Oracle Corp. 14.40
Palantir Technologies Inc. 241.54
Palo Alto Networks Inc. 203.74
Salesforce Inc. 14.27
ServiceNow Inc. 35.79
Synopsys Inc. 39.69
Workday Inc. 31.42

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical

Yahoo! Inc., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV)1 38,765,313 25,544,484 34,717,286 36,835,581 20,060,871
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 245,647 (3,759,227) 12,245,663 2,173,280 6,554,543
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA3 157.81 — 2.84 16.95 3.06
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors4
Accenture PLC — — — — —
Adobe Inc. — — — — —
AppLovin Corp. — — — — —
Cadence Design Systems Inc. — — — — —
Datadog Inc. — — — — —
International Business Machines Corp. — — — — —
Intuit Inc. — — — — —
Microsoft Corp. — — — — —
Oracle Corp. — — — — —
Palantir Technologies Inc. — — — — —
Palo Alto Networks Inc. — — — — —
Salesforce Inc. — — — — —
ServiceNow Inc. — — — — —
Synopsys Inc. — — — — —
Workday Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2016 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 38,765,313 ÷ 245,647 = 157.81

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial period between 2012 and 2016 is characterized by extreme volatility in operational profitability and inconsistent valuation trends. While the enterprise value generally increased over the long term, the underlying earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization experienced severe fluctuations, including a transition into negative territory.

Enterprise Value Trends
The enterprise value demonstrated a non-linear growth pattern, rising from approximately $20.06 billion in 2012 to a peak of $38.77 billion in 2016. A significant contraction is observed in 2015, where the value dropped to $25.54 billion before rebounding sharply in the final year of the period.
EBITDA Performance
Operational earnings showed substantial instability. A decline from $6.55 billion in 2012 to $2.17 billion in 2013 was followed by a sharp increase to $12.25 billion in 2014. This peak was immediately followed by a collapse in 2015, resulting in a negative EBITDA of -$3.76 billion. By 2016, earnings returned to a positive but marginal level of $245.65 million.
EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
The EV/EBITDA ratio reflects the instability of the company's cash flow relative to its valuation. In 2012 and 2014, the ratios were relatively low at 3.06 and 2.84 respectively, indicating periods where the enterprise value was well-supported by earnings. However, the ratio spiked to 16.95 in 2013 and reached an outlier level of 157.81 in 2016. The 2016 ratio indicates a profound disconnect between the market valuation and actual operational performance, as the enterprise value remained high while EBITDA plummeted to near-zero levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?