Calculation
| Current ratio | = | Current assets1 | ÷ | Current liabilities1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 | 6.31 | = | 8,126,160) | ÷ | 1,287,424) | 
| Dec 31, 2015 | 5.88 | = | 7,507,319) | ÷ | 1,277,380) | 
| Dec 31, 2014 | 2.14 | = | 9,699,107) | ÷ | 4,528,581) | 
| Dec 31, 2013 | 3.75 | = | 5,025,857) | ÷ | 1,340,312) | 
| Dec 31, 2012 | 4.38 | = | 5,652,713) | ÷ | 1,290,232) | 
| Dec 31, 2011 | 2.86 | = | 3,452,536) | ÷ | 1,207,361) | 
| Dec 31, 2010 | 2.67 | = | 4,345,548) | ÷ | 1,625,872) | 
| Dec 31, 2009 | 2.67 | = | 4,594,772) | ÷ | 1,717,728) | 
| Dec 31, 2008 | 2.78 | = | 4,745,498) | ÷ | 1,705,015) | 
| Dec 31, 2007 | 1.41 | = | 3,237,722) | ÷ | 2,300,448) | 
| Dec 31, 2006 | 2.54 | = | 3,750,142) | ÷ | 1,473,994) | 
| Dec 31, 2005 | 2.86 | = | 3,449,533) | ÷ | 1,204,052) | 
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
- Current Assets
 - Current assets fluctuated over the reported periods, starting at approximately $3.45 billion in 2005. There was a slight increase in 2006 followed by a decrease in 2007. A notable rise occurred in 2008, peaking around $4.75 billion, before slightly declining through 2011. From 2012 onwards, current assets increased significantly, reaching nearly $9.7 billion in 2014, and then slightly decreasing again but remaining elevated above $8 billion by 2016.
 - Current Liabilities
 - Current liabilities exhibited a generally upward trend from 2005 to 2007, increasing from approximately $1.2 billion to $2.3 billion. In 2008, there was a decline, and liabilities then stabilized around $1.6 billion through 2010. Another decline occurred in 2011, with liabilities remaining relatively stable near $1.3 billion through 2013. A significant spike in 2014 to over $4.5 billion was observed, followed by a return to a lower level around $1.3 billion for 2015 and 2016.
 - Current Ratio
 - The current ratio showed considerable variability across the years. It declined from 2.86 in 2005 to 1.41 in 2007, indicating a reduction in liquidity during that period. Subsequently, the ratio recovered strongly, reaching 2.78 in 2008 and maintaining a range around 2.67 to 2.86 through 2011. From 2012 onwards, the current ratio increased substantially, peaking at 6.31 in 2016. This indicates a marked improvement in short-term liquidity and the ability to cover current liabilities with current assets over the latter years.
 - Summary of Trends and Insights
 - Over the reviewed period, the company experienced notable fluctuations in both current assets and liabilities. After an initial period of instability through 2007, assets displayed a robust upward trend beginning in 2012, coinciding with a significant improvement in liquidity ratios. The spike in current liabilities in 2014 appears to be an anomaly relative to adjacent years, possibly due to one-time or extraordinary events, but was quickly normalized. The current ratio’s strong increase in the latter years suggests enhanced short-term financial health, with assets increasingly exceeding liabilities, thereby potentially improving the company's operational flexibility and risk position.
 
Comparison to Competitors
| Yahoo! Inc. | Accenture PLC | Adobe Inc. | AppLovin Corp. | Cadence Design Systems Inc. | CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | Datadog Inc. | International Business Machines Corp. | Intuit Inc. | Microsoft Corp. | Oracle Corp. | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Palo Alto Networks Inc. | Salesforce Inc. | ServiceNow Inc. | Synopsys Inc. | Workday Inc. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 | 6.31 | 1.35 | 2.08 | — | 1.20 | — | — | 1.21 | 0.72 | 2.35 | 3.74 | — | 2.03 | 0.77 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 2.56 | 
| Dec 31, 2015 | 5.88 | 1.36 | 2.18 | — | 1.80 | — | — | 1.24 | 1.47 | 2.50 | 4.13 | — | 1.04 | 0.81 | 1.48 | 0.99 | 3.29 | 
| Dec 31, 2014 | 2.14 | 1.46 | 1.85 | — | 1.33 | — | — | 1.25 | 1.84 | 2.50 | 3.35 | — | 2.75 | 0.67 | 1.79 | 1.09 | 4.80 | 
| Dec 31, 2013 | 3.75 | 1.45 | 2.65 | — | 1.06 | — | — | 1.28 | 1.87 | 2.71 | 3.24 | — | 2.57 | 0.69 | 2.43 | 1.18 | 3.47 | 
| Dec 31, 2012 | 4.38 | 1.55 | 3.41 | — | 1.14 | — | — | 1.13 | 1.20 | 2.60 | 2.60 | — | 3.13 | 0.72 | 1.99 | 0.91 | — | 
| Dec 31, 2011 | 2.86 | 1.45 | 3.02 | — | 1.05 | — | — | 1.21 | 1.25 | 2.60 | 2.76 | — | — | 0.84 | — | 1.33 | — | 
| Dec 31, 2010 | 2.67 | 1.46 | 3.01 | — | 1.26 | — | — | 1.19 | 1.88 | 2.13 | 1.84 | — | — | 1.88 | — | 1.35 | — | 
| Dec 31, 2009 | 2.67 | 1.46 | 2.93 | — | 2.14 | — | — | 1.36 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 2.03 | — | — | 1.39 | — | 1.80 | — | 
| Dec 31, 2008 | 2.78 | 1.34 | 3.59 | — | 1.69 | — | — | 1.15 | 1.21 | 1.45 | 1.81 | — | — | 1.22 | — | 1.45 | — | 
| Dec 31, 2007 | 1.41 | 1.14 | 3.02 | — | 1.95 | — | — | 1.20 | 1.68 | 1.69 | 1.37 | — | — | 1.11 | — | 1.29 | — | 
| Dec 31, 2006 | 2.54 | 1.26 | 4.26 | — | 2.39 | — | — | 1.11 | 1.79 | 2.18 | 1.73 | — | — | 1.29 | — | 1.03 | — | 
| Dec 31, 2005 | 2.86 | 1.37 | 4.18 | — | 2.11 | — | — | 1.30 | 1.61 | 2.89 | 1.05 | — | — | 1.36 | — | 1.16 | — | 
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
Comparison to Sector (Software & Services)
| Yahoo! Inc. | Software & Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 | 6.31 | 2.03 | 
| Dec 31, 2015 | 5.88 | 2.15 | 
| Dec 31, 2014 | 2.14 | 2.01 | 
| Dec 31, 2013 | 3.75 | 2.04 | 
| Dec 31, 2012 | 4.38 | 1.84 | 
| Dec 31, 2011 | 2.86 | 1.87 | 
| Dec 31, 2010 | 2.67 | 1.61 | 
| Dec 31, 2009 | 2.67 | 1.62 | 
| Dec 31, 2008 | 2.78 | 1.36 | 
| Dec 31, 2007 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 
| Dec 31, 2006 | 2.54 | 1.53 | 
| Dec 31, 2005 | 2.86 | 1.70 | 
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
Comparison to Industry (Information Technology)
| Yahoo! Inc. | Information Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 | 6.31 | 2.01 | 
| Dec 31, 2015 | 5.88 | 2.03 | 
| Dec 31, 2014 | 2.14 | 1.97 | 
| Dec 31, 2013 | 3.75 | 2.20 | 
| Dec 31, 2012 | 4.38 | 2.07 | 
| Dec 31, 2011 | 2.86 | 2.11 | 
| Dec 31, 2010 | 2.67 | 2.01 | 
| Dec 31, 2009 | 2.67 | 2.03 | 
| Dec 31, 2008 | 2.78 | 1.80 | 
| Dec 31, 2007 | 1.41 | 1.79 | 
| Dec 31, 2006 | 2.54 | 1.85 | 
| Dec 31, 2005 | 2.86 | 2.01 | 
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).