Liquidity ratios measure the company ability to meet its short-term obligations.
Liquidity Ratios (Summary)
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 6.31 | 5.88 | 2.14 | 3.75 | 4.38 | |
| Quick ratio | 6.14 | 5.41 | 1.99 | 3.27 | 4.02 | |
| Cash ratio | 5.30 | 4.59 | 1.77 | 2.54 | 3.24 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The liquidity position between 2012 and 2016 exhibited a distinct cyclical pattern, characterized by a steady decline in liquidity ratios through 2014 followed by a substantial recovery and expansion in 2015 and 2016.
- Current Ratio
- A downward trend was observed from 2012 to 2014, with the ratio decreasing from 4.38 to a period low of 2.14. This decline was reversed sharply in 2015, when the ratio rose to 5.88, eventually reaching 6.31 by the end of 2016.
- Quick Ratio
- The quick ratio mirrored the trajectory of the current ratio, falling from 4.02 in 2012 to 1.99 in 2014. A significant recovery followed, with the ratio increasing to 5.41 in 2015 and concluding the period at 6.14 in 2016.
- Cash Ratio
- The cash ratio followed a similar pattern, declining from 3.24 in 2012 to 1.77 in 2014. A substantial increase was recorded in the subsequent two years, rising to 4.59 in 2015 and peaking at 5.30 in 2016.
The marginal variance between the current, quick, and cash ratios across all five years indicates that the vast majority of current assets consist of cash and cash equivalents, with minimal reliance on inventory or other less liquid current assets to meet short-term obligations. The significant surge in all three metrics after 2014 reflects a transition toward an exceptionally high liquidity posture, suggesting either a substantial accumulation of cash reserves or a strategic reduction in current liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Current Ratio
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Current assets | 8,126,160) | 7,507,319) | 9,699,107) | 5,025,857) | 5,652,713) | |
| Current liabilities | 1,287,424) | 1,277,380) | 4,528,581) | 1,340,312) | 1,290,232) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Current ratio1 | 6.31 | 5.88 | 2.14 | 3.75 | 4.38 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Current Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 8,126,160 ÷ 1,287,424 = 6.31
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity position exhibited significant volatility between 2012 and 2016, although the company maintained a current ratio well above the standard benchmark of 1.0 throughout the entire period, indicating a consistent ability to cover short-term obligations.
- Current Ratio Trend Analysis
- The current ratio followed a U-shaped trajectory, starting at 4.38 in 2012 and declining to a period low of 2.14 in 2014. Following this dip, a sharp recovery occurred, with the ratio climbing to 5.88 in 2015 and reaching a peak of 6.31 by the end of 2016.
- Impact of 2014 Balance Sheet Expansion
- A notable anomaly occurred in 2014, where both current assets and current liabilities saw substantial increases. Current assets reached a peak of US$ 9,699,107 thousand, while current liabilities surged to US$ 4,528,581 thousand. Because the growth in liabilities outpaced the growth in assets proportionally, the current ratio was compressed to its lowest point in the five-year sequence.
- Liquidity Optimization (2015-2016)
- A significant strengthening of the liquidity profile is observed in the final two years. In 2015, current liabilities were reduced by approximately 72% compared to the previous year, falling to US$ 1,277,380 thousand. This drastic reduction in short-term obligations, coupled with current assets remaining above US$ 7.5 billion, resulted in a rapid expansion of the current ratio. By 2016, the ratio reached 6.31, suggesting an exceptionally conservative liquidity posture with high asset coverage.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Quick Ratio
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,119,469) | 1,631,911) | 2,667,916) | 2,077,590) | 2,667,778) | |
| Short-term marketable securities | 5,700,925) | 4,225,112) | 5,327,412) | 1,330,304) | 1,516,175) | |
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance | 1,084,267) | 1,047,504) | 1,032,704) | 979,559) | 1,008,448) | |
| Total quick assets | 7,904,661) | 6,904,527) | 9,028,032) | 4,387,453) | 5,192,401) | |
| Current liabilities | 1,287,424) | 1,277,380) | 4,528,581) | 1,340,312) | 1,290,232) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Quick ratio1 | 6.14 | 5.41 | 1.99 | 3.27 | 4.02 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Quick Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 7,904,661 ÷ 1,287,424 = 6.14
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the liquidity position between 2012 and 2016 reveals a fluctuating but generally strong capacity to meet short-term obligations. The quick ratio experienced a period of decline through 2014 before rebounding significantly in the subsequent two years.
- Quick Asset and Liability Dynamics
- Total quick assets exhibited significant volatility, peaking at US$ 9,028,032 thousand in 2014. Current liabilities remained relatively stable around the US$ 1.3 billion mark, with the exception of 2014, where they increased sharply to US$ 4,528,581 thousand. This synchronized spike in both assets and liabilities during 2014 suggests a substantial short-term financial event or a strategic shift in funding.
- Quick Ratio Trend Analysis
- The quick ratio declined from 4.02 in 2012 to a period low of 1.99 in 2014. This downward trend was primarily driven by the disproportionate increase in current liabilities relative to the growth in quick assets during the 2014 fiscal year. A sharp reversal occurred in 2015, as current liabilities returned to historical norms while quick assets remained elevated, resulting in a ratio increase to 5.41.
- Liquidity Position Conclusion
- By December 31, 2016, the quick ratio reached its peak for the observed period at 6.14. Throughout the five-year window, the ratio consistently remained well above 1.0, indicating that the entity maintained a robust liquidity cushion and possessed more than sufficient liquid assets to cover all current liabilities without relying on the sale of inventory.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Ratio
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,119,469) | 1,631,911) | 2,667,916) | 2,077,590) | 2,667,778) | |
| Short-term marketable securities | 5,700,925) | 4,225,112) | 5,327,412) | 1,330,304) | 1,516,175) | |
| Total cash assets | 6,820,394) | 5,857,023) | 7,995,328) | 3,407,894) | 4,183,953) | |
| Current liabilities | 1,287,424) | 1,277,380) | 4,528,581) | 1,340,312) | 1,290,232) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash ratio1 | 5.30 | 4.59 | 1.77 | 2.54 | 3.24 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 6,820,394 ÷ 1,287,424 = 5.30
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the cash ratio from 2012 to 2016 reveals a period of volatility in both cash holdings and short-term obligations, culminating in a highly liquid financial position by the end of the observed period.
- Cash Ratio Trajectory
- A declining trend in the cash ratio is observed between 2012 and 2014, where the value decreased from 3.24 to a period low of 1.77. This trend was abruptly reversed in 2015, with the ratio rising to 4.59, and continued to climb to 5.30 by December 31, 2016.
- Analysis of Cash Assets and Liabilities
- Total cash assets experienced significant fluctuations, peaking at approximately $7.99 billion in 2014. This peak coincided with a substantial spike in current liabilities, which increased to $4.53 billion in 2014 from $1.34 billion in 2013, thereby exerting downward pressure on the cash ratio. Following this period, current liabilities returned to levels near $1.29 billion by 2016, while cash assets remained robust at $6.82 billion, resulting in the observed ratio expansion.
- Liquidity Position Assessment
- The cash ratio remained consistently above 1.0 throughout the five-year window, demonstrating that cash assets were always sufficient to cover current liabilities in full. The progression to a ratio of 5.30 by 2016 indicates an exceptionally strong liquidity posture, suggesting that the organization held cash reserves more than five times the amount of its immediate financial obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?