Calculation
| P/BV | = | Share price1, 2, 3 | ÷ | Book value per share1 (BVPS) | BVPS1 | = | Total Yahoo! Inc. stockholders’ equity1 (in thousands) |
÷ | No. shares of common stock outstanding2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2017 | 1.42 | = | 46.24 | ÷ | 32.46 | 32.46 | = | 31,049,283 | ÷ | 956,487,217 | |
| Feb 29, 2016 | 1.04 | = | 31.79 | ÷ | 30.68 | 30.68 | = | 29,043,537 | ÷ | 946,811,547 | |
| Feb 27, 2015 | 1.07 | = | 44.28 | ÷ | 41.39 | 41.39 | = | 38,741,837 | ÷ | 936,120,954 | |
| Feb 28, 2014 | 2.99 | = | 38.67 | ÷ | 12.95 | 12.95 | = | 13,074,909 | ÷ | 1,009,392,339 | |
| Mar 1, 2013 | 1.66 | = | 21.94 | ÷ | 13.22 | 13.22 | = | 14,560,200 | ÷ | 1,101,295,389 | |
| Feb 29, 2012 | 1.44 | = | 14.83 | ÷ | 10.33 | 10.33 | = | 12,541,067 | ÷ | 1,213,749,472 | |
| Feb 28, 2011 | 1.71 | = | 16.40 | ÷ | 9.59 | 9.59 | = | 12,558,129 | ÷ | 1,309,412,235 | |
| Feb 26, 2010 | 1.72 | = | 15.31 | ÷ | 8.92 | 8.92 | = | 12,493,320 | ÷ | 1,400,201,879 | |
| Feb 27, 2009 | 1.64 | = | 13.23 | ÷ | 8.07 | 8.07 | = | 11,250,942 | ÷ | 1,394,201,105 | |
| Feb 27, 2008 | 3.98 | = | 28.37 | ÷ | 7.13 | 7.13 | = | 9,532,831 | ÷ | 1,337,165,049 | |
| Feb 23, 2007 | 4.75 | = | 32.10 | ÷ | 6.75 | 6.75 | = | 9,160,610 | ÷ | 1,356,539,645 | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | 5.21 | = | 31.45 | ÷ | 6.04 | 6.04 | = | 8,566,415 | ÷ | 1,417,852,971 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
1 US$
2 Data adjusted for splits and stock dividends.
3 Closing price as at the filing date of Yahoo! Inc. Annual Report.
The Price to Book Value (P/BV) ratio exhibited a significant overall contraction between 2006 and 2017, signaling a transition from a high-growth market valuation to a value-based assessment. A pronounced decline is observed starting from a peak of 5.21 in March 2006, with a sharp correction occurring between February 2008 and February 2009, where the ratio dropped from 3.98 to 1.64.
- Valuation Multiples and Market Sentiment
- The P/BV ratio trend indicates a long-term compression of the premium paid over net asset value. After the 2009 decline, the ratio remained largely suppressed, fluctuating between 1.44 and 1.72 for several years. Although a temporary spike to 2.99 occurred in February 2014, the ratio returned to near-parity levels by 2015, reaching a period low of 1.04 in February 2016.
- Book Value per Share (BVPS) Progression
- A consistent upward trend in Book Value per Share was maintained from 2006 through 2014, growing from 6.04 to 12.95. A significant capital structure shift or accounting adjustment is evident in February 2015, where BVPS surged to 41.39. This substantial increase in book value served as a primary driver for the P/BV ratio dropping to 1.07, as the growth in book value outpaced the growth in share price during that interval.
- Correlation Between Share Price and Book Value
- The relationship between share price and book value shifted over the analyzed period. In the early years, share price volatility dominated the P/BV ratio. However, in the final years of the analysis, specifically between 2015 and 2017, the share price and book value moved more closely in tandem. Despite the share price reaching its highest point of 46.24 in March 2017, the P/BV ratio remained low at 1.42, confirming that the market valuation had become fundamentally tied to the company's asset base rather than speculative growth expectations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Comparison to Competitors
| Yahoo! Inc. | Accenture PLC | Adobe Inc. | AppLovin Corp. | Cadence Design Systems Inc. | Datadog Inc. | International Business Machines Corp. | Intuit Inc. | Microsoft Corp. | Oracle Corp. | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Palo Alto Networks Inc. | Salesforce Inc. | ServiceNow Inc. | Synopsys Inc. | Workday Inc. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2017 | 1.42 | 9.83 | 7.37 | — | 11.10 | — | 9.30 | 24.96 | 6.08 | 3.49 | — | 16.91 | 9.45 | 37.73 | 2.81 | 12.36 |
| Feb 29, 2016 | 1.04 | 11.33 | 6.35 | — | 4.61 | — | 8.92 | 10.00 | 4.66 | 3.66 | — | 32.11 | 10.57 | 15.42 | 2.20 | 13.98 |
| Feb 27, 2015 | 1.07 | 8.96 | 5.26 | — | 4.06 | — | 13.73 | 7.79 | 3.96 | 3.82 | — | 16.81 | 12.79 | 26.77 | 2.12 | 14.17 |
| Feb 28, 2014 | 2.99 | 10.06 | 4.49 | — | 3.74 | — | 8.37 | 5.28 | 3.36 | 3.13 | — | 12.19 | 11.74 | 24.35 | 2.19 | 17.51 |
| Mar 1, 2013 | 1.66 | 11.05 | 2.84 | — | 4.38 | — | 11.77 | 6.46 | 3.68 | 3.11 | — | 19.49 | 12.73 | 19.86 | 1.93 | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | 1.44 | 10.33 | 2.66 | — | 7.87 | — | 11.39 | 5.46 | 4.07 | 4.12 | — | — | 12.71 | — | 1.84 | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | 1.71 | 11.06 | 3.29 | — | 9.33 | — | 8.57 | 5.05 | 4.84 | 3.52 | — | — | 9.19 | — | 1.93 | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | 1.72 | 9.61 | 3.68 | — | 14.21 | — | 7.26 | 3.50 | 5.36 | 4.29 | — | — | 5.65 | — | 1.71 | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | 1.64 | 9.15 | 2.34 | — | 10.30 | — | 8.61 | 4.76 | 6.47 | 4.66 | — | — | 15.76 | — | 1.68 | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | 3.98 | 14.69 | 4.24 | — | 1.49 | — | 5.56 | 4.74 | 33.73 | 5.96 | — | — | 17.53 | — | 2.67 | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | 4.75 | 13.85 | 4.39 | — | 3.45 | — | 4.96 | 6.56 | 19.86 | 5.28 | — | — | 21.98 | — | 3.34 | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | 5.21 | 13.33 | 12.48 | — | 2.78 | — | 3.80 | 4.73 | 17.90 | 6.31 | — | — | 10.50 | — | 2.57 | — |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
Comparison to Sector (Software & Services)
| Yahoo! Inc. | Software & Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2017 | 1.42 | 6.29 |
| Feb 29, 2016 | 1.04 | 5.39 |
| Feb 27, 2015 | 1.07 | 5.16 |
| Feb 28, 2014 | 2.99 | 4.47 |
| Mar 1, 2013 | 1.66 | 4.89 |
| Feb 29, 2012 | 1.44 | 5.40 |
| Feb 28, 2011 | 1.71 | 5.32 |
| Feb 26, 2010 | 1.72 | 5.46 |
| Feb 27, 2009 | 1.64 | 6.11 |
| Feb 27, 2008 | 3.98 | 15.50 |
| Feb 23, 2007 | 4.75 | 11.43 |
| Mar 3, 2006 | 5.21 | 11.13 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
Comparison to Industry (Information Technology)
| Yahoo! Inc. | Information Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2017 | 1.42 | 4.53 |
| Feb 29, 2016 | 1.04 | 4.30 |
| Feb 27, 2015 | 1.07 | 4.36 |
| Feb 28, 2014 | 2.99 | 3.50 |
| Mar 1, 2013 | 1.66 | 3.75 |
| Feb 29, 2012 | 1.44 | 3.98 |
| Feb 28, 2011 | 1.71 | 4.16 |
| Feb 26, 2010 | 1.72 | 4.31 |
| Feb 27, 2009 | 1.64 | 4.00 |
| Feb 27, 2008 | 3.98 | 8.64 |
| Feb 23, 2007 | 4.75 | 7.24 |
| Mar 3, 2006 | 5.21 | 7.40 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).