EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Ulta Beauty Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2008
- Current Ratio since 2008
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Ulta Beauty Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jan 28, 2023 | Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2023 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period between February 2018 and January 2023 demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Initial years exhibited negative economic profit, followed by positive values, and then a return to negative performance before concluding with substantial positive economic profit in the most recent periods.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased substantially from 2018 to 2019, reaching US$777.837 thousand. It experienced a modest increase in 2020, but then declined dramatically in 2021 to US$242.025 thousand. A strong recovery occurred in 2022, with NOPAT rising to US$1,087.749 thousand, and continued to increase in 2023 to US$1,347.343 thousand. This indicates a volatile period with a strong recent upward trend.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital generally increased over the observed period, moving from 17.79% in 2018 to 19.73% in 2023. The increases were not consistent year-over-year, but the overall trend is upward, suggesting increasing financing costs or perceived risk.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital showed an initial increase from 2018 to 2019, followed by a decrease in 2020. It then increased again in 2021 before decreasing in 2022. A final increase was observed in 2023, bringing the invested capital to US$4,117.969 thousand. The fluctuations suggest changes in capital allocation strategies or asset base.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative in 2018 and 2019, at -US$173.532 thousand and -US$41.533 thousand respectively. A positive economic profit of US$96.626 thousand was recorded in 2020, but this was followed by a significant negative value of -US$560.470 thousand in 2021. Economic profit rebounded strongly in 2022 to US$369.615 thousand and continued to improve in 2023, reaching US$534.871 thousand. The trend suggests a period of underperformance followed by substantial improvement in value creation.
The substantial increase in economic profit in 2022 and 2023 appears to be driven by a combination of increased NOPAT and relatively stable invested capital, despite a rising cost of capital. The significant decline in economic profit in 2021, coinciding with a substantial drop in NOPAT, warrants further investigation.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
5 2023 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2023 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
The financial data indicates notable fluctuations and a general upward trend in both net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the analyzed periods.
- Net Income
- Net income began at 555,234 thousand US dollars in 2018 and displayed a steady increase through 2019 and 2020, reaching 705,945 thousand US dollars. However, there was a pronounced decline in the fiscal year ending January 2021, where net income dropped substantially to 175,835 thousand US dollars. This downturn was temporary as net income rebounded significantly in subsequent years, rising to 985,837 thousand US dollars in 2022 and further to 1,242,408 thousand US dollars in 2023, marking the highest value in the period reviewed.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- Similar to net income, NOPAT showed growth from 527,431 thousand US dollars in 2018 to a peak of 813,424 thousand US dollars in 2020. A sharp decrease followed in 2021, with NOPAT falling drastically to 242,025 thousand US dollars. After this significant dip, NOPAT recovered strongly, rising to 1,087,749 thousand US dollars in 2022 and reaching 1,347,343 thousand US dollars in 2023, surpassing all previous values.
- Trend Analysis and Insights
-
Both net income and NOPAT exhibit similar movement patterns over the six-year period, with consistent growth from 2018 through 2020, a steep decline in 2021, and a robust recovery afterwards. The notable decline in 2021 could indicate extraordinary circumstances or operational challenges that impacted profitability. The subsequent recovery and surpassing of previous profit levels suggest effective management responses, possibly including operational improvements, cost controls, or strategic initiatives. The strong growth in the last two years positions the company at its highest profitability levels within the timeframe.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
- Provision for Income Taxes
- The provision for income taxes exhibited a fluctuating pattern over the analyzed periods. Beginning at 231,625 thousand USD in 2018, it decreased slightly in 2019 and 2020, settling near 200,000 thousand USD in both years. A notable decline occurred in 2021, with the provision dropping to 55,250 thousand USD. However, this was followed by a substantial increase in the subsequent years, reaching 309,992 thousand USD in 2022 and further rising to 401,136 thousand USD in 2023. This pattern suggests variability in taxable income or changes in tax rates or tax planning strategies during these years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes generally follow a trend similar to that of the provision for income taxes but with some distinct variations. Starting at 258,720 thousand USD in 2018, the value decreased sharply in 2019 to 166,502 thousand USD, before increasing again to 211,391 thousand USD in 2020. In 2021, there was a significant drop to 93,598 thousand USD, mirroring the decline observed in the provision for income taxes. Subsequently, cash operating taxes increased markedly to 348,456 thousand USD in 2022 and reached 398,271 thousand USD in 2023. The closeness in values between the two metrics in recent years implies a convergence of accounting provisions and actual cash outflows related to taxes.
- Overall Trends and Insights
- Both the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes show a pattern of declining values up to 2021 followed by sharp increases in 2022 and 2023. The substantial drop in 2021 for both metrics suggests an anomalous event or a shift in tax-related circumstances during that fiscal year. Post-2021 increases may indicate recovery or changes in earnings compositions, tax rates, or tax management approaches. The increasing proximity between the provision and the cash paid indicates improved alignment between accounting estimates and actual cash taxes paid in recent periods.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction-in-progress.
8 Subtraction of short-term investments.
The financial data reveals several noteworthy trends in the capital structure over the examined periods.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- This metric showed an overall declining trend from fiscal year 2018 to 2022, decreasing from approximately $2.23 billion to around $1.85 billion. However, in fiscal year 2023, there was a slight increase to about $1.90 billion, interrupting the prior downward trend. This suggests a cautious approach to debt management, with some recent increased leverage or lease obligations.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Equity exhibited a generally upward trajectory from 2018 through 2021, growing from about $1.77 billion to nearly $2.00 billion. In 2022, stockholders’ equity experienced a significant reduction to approximately $1.54 billion, followed by a recovery in 2023, reaching nearly $1.96 billion. This dip in 2022 may indicate a notable event affecting retained earnings or equity accounts, such as a large dividend payment, share buyback, or an extraordinary loss, subsequently corrected the following year.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital fluctuated throughout the period but showed no consistent upward or downward pattern. It increased sharply from 2018 to 2019, rising from roughly $3.94 billion to $4.34 billion, then declined substantially in 2020 to about $3.97 billion. A modest increase followed in 2021, reaching around $4.18 billion, which was then outweighed by a decrease in 2022 to approximately $3.68 billion. The last data point in 2023 reveals a rebound to about $4.12 billion. These variations indicate changes in capital deployment, possibly due to acquisitions, asset purchases, divestitures, or working capital fluctuations.
In summary, the data suggests a dynamic capital structure, characterized by controlled debt levels with slight recent growth, fluctuating equity impacted notably in 2022, and variable invested capital reflecting ongoing adjustments in asset base or financing strategies. This overall pattern denotes responsiveness to changing financial conditions and strategic capital management.
Cost of Capital
Ulta Beauty Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jan 28, 2023 | Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2023 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio demonstrates significant fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative, the ratio transitioned to positive values before experiencing another substantial decline, ultimately recovering and increasing through the most recent period. This suggests a dynamic relationship between the company’s profitability and the capital employed to generate it.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- In February 2018, the economic spread ratio was -4.40%. This indicates that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital. A notable improvement occurred by February 2019, with the ratio increasing to -0.96%, suggesting a narrowing gap between returns and costs. The ratio turned positive in February 2020, reaching 2.44%, signifying that returns exceeded costs. However, a significant downturn followed in January 2021, with the ratio plummeting to -13.40%, representing a substantial underperformance relative to the cost of capital. The trend reversed again in January 2022, with the ratio rising sharply to 10.03%, and continued its upward trajectory to 12.99% in January 2023, indicating a strong positive economic spread.
The economic spread ratio’s volatility correlates with fluctuations in economic profit. The largest negative economic profit in the series occurred in January 2021, coinciding with the lowest economic spread ratio. Conversely, the highest economic profit occurred in January 2023, aligning with the highest economic spread ratio. This relationship highlights the direct impact of profitability on the economic spread.
- Invested Capital Relationship
- Invested capital generally remained relatively stable, with a peak in February 2019 and a decrease in January 2022. The fluctuations in the economic spread ratio were not directly proportional to changes in invested capital, suggesting that shifts in profitability were the primary driver of the observed trends. While invested capital decreased in January 2022, the economic spread ratio increased significantly, indicating improved efficiency in capital utilization.
The substantial improvement in the economic spread ratio in the latter years of the period suggests enhanced value creation. The company appears to have become more effective at generating returns above its cost of capital, particularly in the most recent two years. Continued monitoring of this ratio is recommended to assess the sustainability of this positive trend.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jan 28, 2023 | Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net sales | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted net sales | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2023 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative, it transitioned to positive territory before experiencing another substantial decline, ultimately recovering and demonstrating consistent growth in the most recent years.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In February 2018, the economic profit margin stood at -2.95%. This figure improved to -0.61% by February 2019, indicating a reduction in the economic loss. A significant shift occurred by February 2020, with the margin turning positive at 1.30%. However, this positive trend was short-lived, as the margin plummeted to -9.06% in January 2021. Subsequent years witnessed a strong recovery, with the margin increasing to 4.24% in January 2022 and further to 5.22% in January 2023. This represents the highest margin observed within the analyzed timeframe.
The economic profit margin’s movement appears closely linked to the fluctuations in economic profit. The substantial negative economic profit in 2018 and 2021 directly correlate with the lowest economic profit margins during those periods. Conversely, positive economic profit in 2020, 2022, and 2023 aligns with positive and increasing economic profit margins.
- Relationship to Adjusted Net Sales
- Adjusted net sales generally increased throughout the period, except for a decrease between February 2020 and January 2021. While increasing sales typically contribute to improved profitability, the economic profit margin demonstrates that sales growth alone does not guarantee economic value creation. The significant drop in the margin in January 2021 occurred despite a decrease in sales from the prior year, suggesting that factors beyond revenue, such as cost of capital or operational expenses, played a crucial role in the economic profit decline.
The recent trend of increasing economic profit margin, coupled with rising adjusted net sales, suggests improved efficiency in generating economic profit. The company appears to be more effectively converting sales into economic value as evidenced by the margin’s performance in the latest two years.