Stock Analysis on Net

Ulta Beauty Inc. (NASDAQ:ULTA)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 24, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Ulta Beauty Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2023 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Initial observations reveal a substantial improvement followed by a considerable decline, and then a recovery, culminating in a peak by the final year. This analysis details the observed trends in net operating profit after taxes, cost of capital, invested capital, and ultimately, economic profit.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT experienced a marked increase from 2018 to 2019, growing from US$527,431 thousand to US$777,837 thousand. This growth continued modestly into 2020, reaching US$813,424 thousand. However, 2021 witnessed a dramatic decrease in NOPAT to US$242,025 thousand. A strong recovery was then observed in 2022, with NOPAT rising to US$1,087,749 thousand, and further increasing to US$1,347,343 thousand in 2023.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital generally trended upward throughout the period. It increased from 15.34% in 2018 to 16.29% in 2019, then decreased slightly to 15.66% in 2020. Subsequent years saw continued increases, reaching 16.58% in 2021, 16.84% in 2022, and peaking at 17.04% in 2023. This consistent rise suggests increasing financing costs or perceived risk.
Invested Capital
Invested capital initially increased from US$3,940,229 thousand in 2018 to US$4,338,625 thousand in 2019. A decrease was then observed in 2020, falling to US$3,966,351 thousand. It rose again in 2021 to US$4,184,136 thousand, before declining to US$3,684,509 thousand in 2022. Finally, invested capital increased to US$4,117,969 thousand in 2023.
Economic Profit
Economic profit began at a negative value of -US$77,142 thousand in 2018. A significant turnaround occurred in 2019, with economic profit becoming positive at US$71,140 thousand. This positive trend continued, reaching a peak of US$192,282 thousand in 2020. However, 2021 saw a substantial decline, resulting in a loss of -US$451,758 thousand. Economic profit recovered strongly in 2022 to US$467,283 thousand, and continued to improve in 2023, reaching US$645,612 thousand. The fluctuations in economic profit appear strongly correlated with the changes in NOPAT, while the increasing cost of capital exerts a moderating influence.

In summary, the period was characterized by volatility. While NOPAT and economic profit demonstrated a general upward trajectory over the entire timeframe, the significant dip in 2021 warrants further investigation. The consistent increase in the cost of capital suggests a growing challenge to maintaining profitability, despite the increases in NOPAT.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Ulta Beauty Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

5 2023 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2023 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.


The financial data indicates notable fluctuations and a general upward trend in both net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the analyzed periods.

Net Income
Net income began at 555,234 thousand US dollars in 2018 and displayed a steady increase through 2019 and 2020, reaching 705,945 thousand US dollars. However, there was a pronounced decline in the fiscal year ending January 2021, where net income dropped substantially to 175,835 thousand US dollars. This downturn was temporary as net income rebounded significantly in subsequent years, rising to 985,837 thousand US dollars in 2022 and further to 1,242,408 thousand US dollars in 2023, marking the highest value in the period reviewed.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
Similar to net income, NOPAT showed growth from 527,431 thousand US dollars in 2018 to a peak of 813,424 thousand US dollars in 2020. A sharp decrease followed in 2021, with NOPAT falling drastically to 242,025 thousand US dollars. After this significant dip, NOPAT recovered strongly, rising to 1,087,749 thousand US dollars in 2022 and reaching 1,347,343 thousand US dollars in 2023, surpassing all previous values.
Trend Analysis and Insights

Both net income and NOPAT exhibit similar movement patterns over the six-year period, with consistent growth from 2018 through 2020, a steep decline in 2021, and a robust recovery afterwards. The notable decline in 2021 could indicate extraordinary circumstances or operational challenges that impacted profitability. The subsequent recovery and surpassing of previous profit levels suggest effective management responses, possibly including operational improvements, cost controls, or strategic initiatives. The strong growth in the last two years positions the company at its highest profitability levels within the timeframe.


Cash Operating Taxes

Ulta Beauty Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).


Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes exhibited a fluctuating pattern over the analyzed periods. Beginning at 231,625 thousand USD in 2018, it decreased slightly in 2019 and 2020, settling near 200,000 thousand USD in both years. A notable decline occurred in 2021, with the provision dropping to 55,250 thousand USD. However, this was followed by a substantial increase in the subsequent years, reaching 309,992 thousand USD in 2022 and further rising to 401,136 thousand USD in 2023. This pattern suggests variability in taxable income or changes in tax rates or tax planning strategies during these years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes generally follow a trend similar to that of the provision for income taxes but with some distinct variations. Starting at 258,720 thousand USD in 2018, the value decreased sharply in 2019 to 166,502 thousand USD, before increasing again to 211,391 thousand USD in 2020. In 2021, there was a significant drop to 93,598 thousand USD, mirroring the decline observed in the provision for income taxes. Subsequently, cash operating taxes increased markedly to 348,456 thousand USD in 2022 and reached 398,271 thousand USD in 2023. The closeness in values between the two metrics in recent years implies a convergence of accounting provisions and actual cash outflows related to taxes.
Overall Trends and Insights
Both the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes show a pattern of declining values up to 2021 followed by sharp increases in 2022 and 2023. The substantial drop in 2021 for both metrics suggests an anomalous event or a shift in tax-related circumstances during that fiscal year. Post-2021 increases may indicate recovery or changes in earnings compositions, tax rates, or tax management approaches. The increasing proximity between the provision and the cash paid indicates improved alignment between accounting estimates and actual cash taxes paid in recent periods.

Invested Capital

Ulta Beauty Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Deferred revenue4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction-in-progress7
Short-term investments8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of construction-in-progress.

8 Subtraction of short-term investments.


The financial data reveals several noteworthy trends in the capital structure over the examined periods.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
This metric showed an overall declining trend from fiscal year 2018 to 2022, decreasing from approximately $2.23 billion to around $1.85 billion. However, in fiscal year 2023, there was a slight increase to about $1.90 billion, interrupting the prior downward trend. This suggests a cautious approach to debt management, with some recent increased leverage or lease obligations.
Stockholders’ Equity
Equity exhibited a generally upward trajectory from 2018 through 2021, growing from about $1.77 billion to nearly $2.00 billion. In 2022, stockholders’ equity experienced a significant reduction to approximately $1.54 billion, followed by a recovery in 2023, reaching nearly $1.96 billion. This dip in 2022 may indicate a notable event affecting retained earnings or equity accounts, such as a large dividend payment, share buyback, or an extraordinary loss, subsequently corrected the following year.
Invested Capital
Invested capital fluctuated throughout the period but showed no consistent upward or downward pattern. It increased sharply from 2018 to 2019, rising from roughly $3.94 billion to $4.34 billion, then declined substantially in 2020 to about $3.97 billion. A modest increase followed in 2021, reaching around $4.18 billion, which was then outweighed by a decrease in 2022 to approximately $3.68 billion. The last data point in 2023 reveals a rebound to about $4.12 billion. These variations indicate changes in capital deployment, possibly due to acquisitions, asset purchases, divestitures, or working capital fluctuations.

In summary, the data suggests a dynamic capital structure, characterized by controlled debt levels with slight recent growth, fluctuating equity impacted notably in 2022, and variable invested capital reflecting ongoing adjustments in asset base or financing strategies. This overall pattern denotes responsiveness to changing financial conditions and strategic capital management.


Cost of Capital

Ulta Beauty Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 33.70%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Ulta Beauty Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2023 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio demonstrates significant fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative in 2018, it transitioned to positive values, peaking in 2023. This suggests a changing relationship between the returns generated from invested capital and the cost of that capital.

Economic Spread Ratio Trend
The economic spread ratio began at -1.96% in 2018, indicating that returns generated from invested capital were less than the cost of that capital. A substantial improvement occurred in 2019, with the ratio rising to 1.64%, signifying a positive spread. This positive trend continued through 2020, reaching 4.85%, and further strengthened in 2022 to 12.68%. The ratio reached its highest point in 2023 at 15.68%, demonstrating a considerable increase in the difference between returns and the cost of capital.

A notable dip occurred in 2021, with the economic spread ratio falling to -10.80%. This represents a significant reversal from the preceding positive trends and suggests a period where the cost of capital exceeded the returns generated. However, the subsequent recovery in 2022 and 2023 indicates a restoration of profitability relative to invested capital.

Relationship to Economic Profit
The fluctuations in the economic spread ratio correlate with the trends in economic profit. The negative economic spread ratio in 2018 and 2021 aligns with periods of negative economic profit. Conversely, positive economic spread ratios in 2019, 2020, 2022, and 2023 correspond with positive economic profit values. This suggests a strong link between the efficiency of capital allocation and overall profitability.

The invested capital figures show some variability, decreasing in 2022 before increasing again in 2023. However, the economic spread ratio’s movement appears to be more directly influenced by the changes in economic profit than by shifts in the total invested capital.


Economic Profit Margin

Ulta Beauty Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Net sales
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2023 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative in 2018, it transitioned to positive territory and demonstrated growth through 2020 before experiencing a significant decline in 2021. Subsequent years, 2022 and 2023, showed a recovery and continued positive trend.

Economic Profit Margin Trend
In 2018, the economic profit margin stood at -1.31%, indicating that the company’s economic profit was negative relative to its adjusted net sales. A substantial improvement was noted in 2019, with the margin increasing to 1.05%. This positive trend continued into 2020, reaching a peak of 2.59%.
However, 2021 witnessed a sharp reversal, with the economic profit margin plummeting to -7.30%. This represents the most significant negative margin within the analyzed timeframe. The margin rebounded strongly in 2022, reaching 5.36%, and further increased to 6.30% in 2023, signifying a return to profitability and improved economic performance.

The economic profit itself mirrors the trend observed in the economic profit margin. A substantial loss was recorded in 2018, followed by increasing profits in 2019 and 2020. The largest loss occurred in 2021, with subsequent years showing a return to positive economic profit, culminating in the highest value in 2023.

Relationship between Economic Profit and Adjusted Net Sales
Adjusted net sales generally increased throughout the period, with the exception of a decrease in 2021. The economic profit margin’s volatility suggests that changes in economic profit were not solely driven by sales fluctuations. The significant decline in margin in 2021, despite a decrease in sales, indicates that factors beyond revenue, such as cost of capital or operational expenses, played a crucial role in the reduced economic profitability.
The positive correlation between increasing economic profit margin and increasing economic profit in 2022 and 2023, alongside rising adjusted net sales, suggests improved efficiency and economic value creation during those years.

Overall, the analysis reveals a period of fluctuating economic performance. While the company demonstrated an ability to generate economic profit, its consistency was impacted by external or internal factors that caused significant variations in the economic profit margin.