Stock Analysis on Net

Ulta Beauty Inc. (NASDAQ:ULTA)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 24, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Ulta Beauty Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2023 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial data reveals several noteworthy trends over the analyzed periods. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) generally increased over the years with some fluctuation, starting from approximately $527 million in early 2018 and rising to about $1.35 billion by early 2023. However, there was a marked decline in 2021, where NOPAT dropped to nearly $242 million, before rebounding substantially in the subsequent two years.

The cost of capital exhibited a gradual upward trend during the same timeframe, increasing from around 14.86% in 2018 to 16.51% in 2023. This upward movement suggests a slightly rising hurdle rate for investment returns, potentially reflecting changing market conditions or company risk profile.

Invested capital fluctuated moderately, with an initial growth from roughly $3.94 billion in 2018 to approximately $4.34 billion in 2019, followed by a decrease in 2020 and 2022, and a subsequent recovery to about $4.12 billion in 2023. These variations indicate adjustments in the company's asset base or capital structure over the period.

Economic profit, which accounts for the cost of capital and invested capital relative to NOPAT, shows significant variability. It started negative in 2018 at around -$58 million, turned positive in 2019 and 2020 reaching over $211 million, then sharply declined to a negative $430 million in 2021. This negative peak aligns with the decline in NOPAT during the same year. Economic profit again improved strongly in 2022 and 2023, reaching positive values of approximately $487 million and $667 million, respectively, suggesting enhanced value creation in the later years despite the higher cost of capital.

Overall, the data points to a period of operational challenges around 2021, likely impacting profitability and economic profit negatively. The subsequent recovery is robust, with improved profitability and economic profit margins. The increasing cost of capital throughout the period implies that the company needed to generate more value to surpass rising capital costs, which it managed successfully post-2021. Fluctuations in invested capital reflect ongoing investment activity and capital management efforts.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
General upward trend with a significant dip in 2021, followed by strong recovery.
Cost of Capital
Gradual increase across the years, indicating rising investment return requirements.
Invested Capital
Moderate fluctuation with initial growth, mid-period decline, and late-period recovery.
Economic Profit
Variable performance with negative profit in 2018 and 2021, positive and growing profitability thereafter.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Ulta Beauty Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

5 2023 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2023 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.


The financial data indicates notable fluctuations and a general upward trend in both net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the analyzed periods.

Net Income
Net income began at 555,234 thousand US dollars in 2018 and displayed a steady increase through 2019 and 2020, reaching 705,945 thousand US dollars. However, there was a pronounced decline in the fiscal year ending January 2021, where net income dropped substantially to 175,835 thousand US dollars. This downturn was temporary as net income rebounded significantly in subsequent years, rising to 985,837 thousand US dollars in 2022 and further to 1,242,408 thousand US dollars in 2023, marking the highest value in the period reviewed.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
Similar to net income, NOPAT showed growth from 527,431 thousand US dollars in 2018 to a peak of 813,424 thousand US dollars in 2020. A sharp decrease followed in 2021, with NOPAT falling drastically to 242,025 thousand US dollars. After this significant dip, NOPAT recovered strongly, rising to 1,087,749 thousand US dollars in 2022 and reaching 1,347,343 thousand US dollars in 2023, surpassing all previous values.
Trend Analysis and Insights

Both net income and NOPAT exhibit similar movement patterns over the six-year period, with consistent growth from 2018 through 2020, a steep decline in 2021, and a robust recovery afterwards. The notable decline in 2021 could indicate extraordinary circumstances or operational challenges that impacted profitability. The subsequent recovery and surpassing of previous profit levels suggest effective management responses, possibly including operational improvements, cost controls, or strategic initiatives. The strong growth in the last two years positions the company at its highest profitability levels within the timeframe.


Cash Operating Taxes

Ulta Beauty Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).


Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes exhibited a fluctuating pattern over the analyzed periods. Beginning at 231,625 thousand USD in 2018, it decreased slightly in 2019 and 2020, settling near 200,000 thousand USD in both years. A notable decline occurred in 2021, with the provision dropping to 55,250 thousand USD. However, this was followed by a substantial increase in the subsequent years, reaching 309,992 thousand USD in 2022 and further rising to 401,136 thousand USD in 2023. This pattern suggests variability in taxable income or changes in tax rates or tax planning strategies during these years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes generally follow a trend similar to that of the provision for income taxes but with some distinct variations. Starting at 258,720 thousand USD in 2018, the value decreased sharply in 2019 to 166,502 thousand USD, before increasing again to 211,391 thousand USD in 2020. In 2021, there was a significant drop to 93,598 thousand USD, mirroring the decline observed in the provision for income taxes. Subsequently, cash operating taxes increased markedly to 348,456 thousand USD in 2022 and reached 398,271 thousand USD in 2023. The closeness in values between the two metrics in recent years implies a convergence of accounting provisions and actual cash outflows related to taxes.
Overall Trends and Insights
Both the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes show a pattern of declining values up to 2021 followed by sharp increases in 2022 and 2023. The substantial drop in 2021 for both metrics suggests an anomalous event or a shift in tax-related circumstances during that fiscal year. Post-2021 increases may indicate recovery or changes in earnings compositions, tax rates, or tax management approaches. The increasing proximity between the provision and the cash paid indicates improved alignment between accounting estimates and actual cash taxes paid in recent periods.

Invested Capital

Ulta Beauty Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
Deferred revenue4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction-in-progress7
Short-term investments8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of construction-in-progress.

8 Subtraction of short-term investments.


The financial data reveals several noteworthy trends in the capital structure over the examined periods.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
This metric showed an overall declining trend from fiscal year 2018 to 2022, decreasing from approximately $2.23 billion to around $1.85 billion. However, in fiscal year 2023, there was a slight increase to about $1.90 billion, interrupting the prior downward trend. This suggests a cautious approach to debt management, with some recent increased leverage or lease obligations.
Stockholders’ Equity
Equity exhibited a generally upward trajectory from 2018 through 2021, growing from about $1.77 billion to nearly $2.00 billion. In 2022, stockholders’ equity experienced a significant reduction to approximately $1.54 billion, followed by a recovery in 2023, reaching nearly $1.96 billion. This dip in 2022 may indicate a notable event affecting retained earnings or equity accounts, such as a large dividend payment, share buyback, or an extraordinary loss, subsequently corrected the following year.
Invested Capital
Invested capital fluctuated throughout the period but showed no consistent upward or downward pattern. It increased sharply from 2018 to 2019, rising from roughly $3.94 billion to $4.34 billion, then declined substantially in 2020 to about $3.97 billion. A modest increase followed in 2021, reaching around $4.18 billion, which was then outweighed by a decrease in 2022 to approximately $3.68 billion. The last data point in 2023 reveals a rebound to about $4.12 billion. These variations indicate changes in capital deployment, possibly due to acquisitions, asset purchases, divestitures, or working capital fluctuations.

In summary, the data suggests a dynamic capital structure, characterized by controlled debt levels with slight recent growth, fluctuating equity impacted notably in 2022, and variable invested capital reflecting ongoing adjustments in asset base or financing strategies. This overall pattern denotes responsiveness to changing financial conditions and strategic capital management.


Cost of Capital

Ulta Beauty Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Operating lease liability3 ÷ = × × (1 – 33.70%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Ulta Beauty Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2023 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Economic Profit
The economic profit demonstrates significant volatility over the analyzed periods. It started with a negative value of -58,108 thousand US dollars in the first year, turned positive and showed a strong upward trend in the following years, reaching 211,171 thousand US dollars by 2020. However, in 2021 there was a marked downturn with a steep negative dip to -430,290 thousand US dollars. This was followed by a sharp recovery in the last two years, culminating in a peak of 667,480 thousand US dollars in 2023.
Invested Capital
Invested capital shows a fluctuating pattern without a clear directional trend. It increased from 3,940,229 thousand US dollars in 2018 to a peak of approximately 4,338,625 thousand US dollars in 2019, then declined to 3,686,509 thousand US dollars in 2022 before rising again to 4,117,969 thousand US dollars in 2023. These movements suggest dynamic investment levels that may be responsive to operational or strategic adjustments.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio follows a pattern akin to economic profit but in percentage terms. It was negative in the first year (-1.47%) but turned positive and increased steadily, peaking at 5.32% in 2020. There was a significant negative dip to -10.28% in 2021, corresponding to the drop in economic profit, followed by a strong rebound to 13.21% and further improvement to 16.21% in the latest year. The increasing ratio in recent years indicates enhanced efficiency in generating returns above the cost of capital.

Economic Profit Margin

Ulta Beauty Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 28, 2023 Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Net sales
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2023 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's performance over the six-year period.

Economic Profit
The economic profit shows considerable volatility across the years. It started with a negative value of -58,108 thousand USD in 2018, transitioning to positive territory at 93,389 thousand USD in 2019 and increasing significantly to 211,171 thousand USD in 2020. However, there was a sharp decline in 2021, with economic profit plunging to -430,290 thousand USD, indicating a substantial economic loss for that year. Following this downturn, the economic profit rebounded strongly to 486,570 thousand USD in 2022 and further increased to 667,480 thousand USD in 2023, marking a strong recovery and growth phase.
Adjusted Net Sales
Adjusted net sales exhibited a generally upward trajectory over the period with some fluctuation. Sales increased from approximately 5.88 billion USD in 2018 to a peak of about 7.44 billion USD in 2020. This was followed by a decline in 2021 to around 6.19 billion USD, which corresponds with the dip observed in economic profit for the same year. Subsequently, sales rose sharply in 2022, reaching approximately 8.71 billion USD, and continued growing to over 10.25 billion USD in 2023, demonstrating strong sales growth and expansion.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin mirrored the trends seen in economic profit, reflecting fluctuations in profitability relative to sales. The margin started slightly negative at -0.99% in 2018, improved to positive figures in 2019 (1.37%) and 2020 (2.84%), suggesting increased efficiency and profitability. Nonetheless, 2021 saw a marked decline to -6.95%, indicating significant unprofitability. Following this low point, the margin recovered to 5.59% in 2022 and further improved to 6.51% in 2023, highlighting restored and enhanced profitability levels.

Overall, the analysis indicates a pattern of initial growth and profitability improvements up to 2020, a substantial setback in 2021 likely due to extraordinary factors affecting both profit and sales, and a robust recovery in the subsequent two years characterized by notable increases in both economic profit and adjusted net sales, as well as strengthening profit margins.