Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
An analysis of the financial results from 2018 to 2023 reveals a general upward trajectory in profitability, characterized by a severe temporary contraction in 2021 followed by a rapid expansion to record levels.
- EBITDA Performance and Volatility
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization grew steadily from 1.04 billion USD in 2018 to 1.20 billion USD in 2020. A sharp decline occurred in the period ending January 30, 2021, where EBITDA fell to 528.86 million USD. This contraction was followed by a strong recovery, with values surging to 1.56 billion USD in 2022 and peaking at 1.88 billion USD in 2023.
- Operating Structure and Interest Expense
- A consistent identity between Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and Earnings before tax (EBT) is observed across all reported periods. This indicates that interest expenses were negligible or non-existent throughout the analyzed timeframe, meaning the operating profit was not diminished by debt servicing costs.
- Correlation Between EBITDA and Net Income
- Net income followed the same directional trends as EBITDA, although the magnitude of the 2021 decline was more severe. While EBITDA decreased by approximately 56% in 2021 relative to the prior year, net income experienced a steeper drop of roughly 75%, suggesting that the impact of non-operating expenses or tax structures amplified the reduction in bottom-line profitability during the downturn.
- Depreciation and Amortization Trends
- The difference between EBITDA and EBIT reveals that depreciation and amortization expenses remained relatively stable, fluctuating between approximately 241 million USD and 297 million USD. The relative stability of these non-cash charges indicates that capital expenditure cycles did not vary drastically in proportion to the volatility of the operating earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 20,073,042) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 1,884,916) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.65 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Amazon.com Inc. | 16.76 |
| Home Depot Inc. | 15.80 |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 13.20 |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 16.88 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 25.95 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Consumer Discretionary | 26.41 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Jan 28, 2023 | Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 25,061,395) | 20,241,372) | 15,984,243) | 9,320,863) | 20,013,289) | 11,990,299) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 1,884,916) | 1,564,289) | 528,857) | 1,201,749) | 1,138,613) | 1,039,572) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 13.30 | 12.94 | 30.22 | 7.76 | 17.58 | 11.53 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 19.88 | 28.04 | 21.27 | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 12.29 | 14.08 | 16.53 | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 11.98 | 12.43 | 14.41 | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 15.36 | 13.00 | 65.35 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 17.44 | 20.13 | 20.16 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 18.33 | 20.01 | 21.51 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
3 2023 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 25,061,395 ÷ 1,884,916 = 13.30
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from February 2018 to January 2023 reflects significant volatility in both market valuation and operational earnings, characterized by a sharp disruption during the 2020-2021 period followed by a robust recovery and stabilization.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- Enterprise Value exhibited substantial fluctuations over the analyzed period. After an initial increase to 20.01 billion USD in February 2019, a significant contraction occurred in February 2020, with the value dropping to 9.32 billion USD. Subsequently, a consistent upward trend was observed, with EV reaching a period peak of 25.06 billion USD by January 2023.
- EBITDA Performance
- Operational earnings showed steady growth from 1.04 billion USD in 2018 to a peak of 1.20 billion USD in February 2020. A severe contraction followed, with EBITDA falling to 528.86 million USD by January 2021. However, a strong recovery was recorded in the following two years, with EBITDA increasing to 1.56 billion USD in 2022 and further rising to 1.88 billion USD by January 2023.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The EV/EBITDA ratio experienced extreme variance, indicating shifting market sentiment and operational stability. The ratio reached a critical peak of 30.22 in January 2021, a result of the Enterprise Value recovering more rapidly than the operational earnings. Following this spike, the multiple underwent a significant correction, normalizing to 12.94 in January 2022 and stabilizing at 13.30 in January 2023. This suggests that by the end of the period, the company's valuation returned to a more sustainable alignment with its cash flow generation capabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?