Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

SolarEdge Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:SEDG)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 22, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check

Economic Profit

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial trajectory between 2018 and 2022 reveals a transition from value creation to significant value destruction. While operating profits remained positive throughout the period, the aggressive expansion of the invested capital base outpaced the growth in earnings, leading to a sustained negative economic profit starting in 2020.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT demonstrated volatility, with an initial increase from 203.9 million in 2018 to a peak of 279.0 million in 2019. A significant contraction occurred in 2020, with profit falling to 154.6 million, followed by a recovery and stabilization at approximately 250 million in 2021 and 2022. Despite this recovery, the NOPAT growth was insufficient to offset the rising capital charges.
Invested Capital Growth
A sharp upward trend in invested capital is evident, rising from 559.3 million in 2018 to 2.6 billion by 2022. The most substantial increase occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the capital base nearly doubled. This rapid expansion indicates a period of heavy investment that failed to generate proportional increases in operating profit.
Cost of Capital Stability
The cost of capital remained remarkably stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 20.05% and 21.27%. Because this rate remained constant, the deterioration in economic profit is attributable to the growth in the capital base and fluctuations in NOPAT rather than changes in the required rate of return.
Economic Profit Analysis
The company generated positive economic profit in 2018 and 2019, peaking at 85.4 million. However, a pivot to negative economic profit occurred in 2020 (-198.3 million), coinciding with the surge in invested capital. Although there was a partial improvement in 2021, the economic profit declined further to -279.5 million in 2022, signaling that the returns on invested capital have fallen well below the cost of capital.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues3
Increase (decrease) in warranty obligations4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expenses
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expenses
Tax benefit of interest expenses7
Adjusted interest expenses, after taxes8
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Interest income on marketable securities
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income9
Investment income, after taxes10
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenues.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in warranty obligations.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc..

6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expenses = Adjusted interest expenses × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc..

9 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
The net income exhibited growth from 2018 to 2019, increasing from approximately $128.8 million to $146.5 million. However, in 2020, net income slightly declined to about $140.3 million, indicating a minor setback. The figure rebounded in 2021 to reach a peak of approximately $169.2 million, representing the highest value in the five-year span. In contrast, 2022 saw a significant drop to around $93.8 million, a sharp decrease compared to the preceding year, signaling a potential issue or challenge impacting profitability in the most recent period.
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT showed notable volatility over the five years. Initially, it rose significantly from about $203.9 million in 2018 to nearly $279.0 million in 2019, demonstrating strong operational performance improvement. A substantial decline occurred in 2020, with NOPAT decreasing to approximately $154.6 million, indicating operational difficulties or increased expenses. Recovery was observed in 2021, with NOPAT climbing back to approximately $253.5 million, nearing prior peak levels. In 2022, NOPAT remained relatively stable, slightly decreasing to about $249.9 million, suggesting that operational efficiency was maintained despite fluctuations in net income.


Cash Operating Taxes

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Income taxes, net
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expenses
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


Income Taxes, Net
The net income taxes exhibit a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. Beginning at 9,077 thousand US dollars in 2018, there was a significant increase to 33,646 thousand US dollars in 2019. This was followed by a decline to 23,344 thousand US dollars in 2020 and a further decrease to 18,054 thousand US dollars in 2021. However, the figure surged noticeably in 2022 to 83,376 thousand US dollars, indicating a substantial rise compared to prior years.
Cash Operating Taxes
The cash operating taxes also show variability with a generally increasing trend. Starting at 15,810 thousand US dollars in 2018, the amount more than doubled to 40,084 thousand US dollars in 2019. There was a decrease to 28,279 thousand US dollars in 2020, followed by a slight increase to 31,486 thousand US dollars in 2021. In 2022, cash operating taxes rose sharply to 95,076 thousand US dollars, marking the highest value within the observed period.
Overall Insights
Both income taxes, net and cash operating taxes demonstrate significant volatility but ultimately culminate in marked increases in 2022. The spike in tax figures during 2022 could suggest improved profitability, changes in tax regulations, or accumulation of deferred tax liabilities. The patterns also indicate that cash operating taxes consistently remain higher than net income taxes, reflecting differences potentially due to timing and tax accounting adjustments.


Invested Capital

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Short-term finance lease liabilities
Convertible senior notes, net
Long-term finance lease liabilities
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Deferred revenues4
Warranty obligations5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Non-controlling interests
Adjusted total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Assets under construction and payments on account8
Marketable securities9
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenues.

5 Addition of warranty obligations.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity.

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of assets under construction and payments on account.

9 Subtraction of marketable securities.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibit a significant upward trend over the analyzed period. Starting from approximately 19.8 million in 2018, the figure more than doubles to around 42.4 million in 2019. This upward trajectory accelerates sharply in 2020, reaching approximately 647.4 million, followed by continued increases in 2021 and 2022 to roughly 715.6 million and 735.5 million, respectively. This pattern indicates an aggressive increase in debt and lease obligations, particularly notable between 2019 and 2020.
Total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity demonstrates consistent and robust growth throughout the period. It starts at approximately 562.4 million in 2018 and grows steadily year-over-year, reaching about 811.7 million in 2019 and 1.09 billion in 2020. The growth continues to strengthen, with equity reaching around 1.31 billion in 2021 and showing a substantial increase to approximately 2.18 billion in 2022. This indicates a strengthening equity base, which may reflect retained earnings growth, capital contributions, or a combination thereof.
Invested capital
Invested capital displays a marked upward movement over the observed years. Beginning at approximately 559.3 million in 2018, it rises sharply to about 909.8 million in 2019. The growth is especially pronounced in 2020, reaching approximately 1.73 billion. This figure remains relatively stable in 2021 at roughly 1.70 billion before surging again to approximately 2.61 billion in 2022. The overall increase in invested capital aligns with the increases observed in both debt and equity, suggesting expansion in the company’s capital base.
Summary of Trends
The data reveal a pattern of significant financial growth and expansion over the five-year period. Both debt and equity have increased substantially, with debt experiencing a very sharp rise from 2019 onwards. The growth in stockholders’ equity is steady and strong, culminating in a considerable increase in 2022. Correspondingly, invested capital has also significantly increased, reflecting the combined effects of higher equity and debt. The company appears to be leveraging additional debt alongside equity financing to support its investment growth, which may indicate strategic expansion efforts or increased operational scale.


Cost of Capital

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »



Economic Spread Ratio

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Applied Materials Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Lam Research Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2018 to 2022 indicates a transition from value creation to significant value destruction. While the company initially maintained positive economic returns, a substantial divergence emerged between the growth of the invested capital base and the ability to generate economic profit above the cost of capital.

Invested Capital Growth
A consistent and aggressive expansion of invested capital is observed, rising from US$ 559.3 million in 2018 to US$ 2.61 billion by 2022. The most significant increase occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the capital base nearly doubled, signaling an intensive period of investment or asset accumulation.
Economic Profit Volatility
Economic profit remained stable and positive through 2018 and 2019, at approximately US$ 85 million annually. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2020, with profit dropping to negative US$ 198.3 million. Despite a partial recovery in 2021 to negative US$ 87.4 million, the trend deteriorated further in 2022, reaching a five-year low of negative US$ 279.5 million.
Economic Spread Ratio Deterioration
The economic spread ratio reflects a severe decline in capital efficiency. Starting at a peak of 15.24% in 2018, the ratio contracted to 9.39% in 2019 before turning negative in 2020 (-11.43%). This negative spread indicates that the return on invested capital fell below the cost of capital. Although there was a marginal improvement in 2021 (-5.14%), the ratio declined again to -10.71% in 2022, confirming a sustained inability to generate returns that exceed the required cost of financing the expanded capital base.


Economic Profit Margin

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenues
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues
Adjusted revenues
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Applied Materials Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Lam Research Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance between 2018 and 2022 reveals a significant divergence between revenue growth and the creation of economic value. While the scale of operations expanded substantially, the ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital deteriorated, moving from a period of value creation to a sustained period of value destruction.

Economic Profit Trends
The period began with positive economic profit, remaining stable between 2018 and 2019 at approximately 85 million USD. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2020, with economic profit falling to negative 198.3 million USD. Although a partial recovery was observed in 2021, where losses narrowed to 87.4 million USD, the trend reversed again in 2022, reaching a five-year low of negative 279.5 million USD.
Adjusted Revenue Growth
Revenue exhibited a strong upward trajectory over the five-year period. Adjusted revenues increased from 978.2 million USD in 2018 to 3.15 billion USD by 2022. Despite a minor contraction in 2020, the overall trend demonstrates aggressive top-line expansion, with the 2022 revenue representing more than triple the volume recorded in 2018.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin reflects a decline in capital efficiency. A positive margin of 8.71% in 2018 compressed to 5.65% in 2019, despite revenue growth, indicating that the costs associated with expansion were beginning to outweigh the incremental gains. The margin transitioned into negative territory in 2020, reaching -13.79%. While the margin improved to -4.39% in 2021, it deteriorated again to -8.86% in 2022. This pattern suggests that the growth in adjusted revenues has not been accompanied by a proportional increase in operating returns, resulting in a failure to cover the implicit cost of capital during the latter three years of the period.