Stock Analysis on Net

SolarEdge Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:SEDG)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 22, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The net operating profit after taxes demonstrates notable fluctuations over the five-year period. Initially, there is an increase from approximately 204 million USD in 2018 to about 279 million USD in 2019, indicating improved operational efficiency or higher profitability. However, in 2020, a significant decline to approximately 155 million USD occurs, possibly reflecting heightened expenses or revenue challenges during that year. In 2021 and 2022, NOPAT rebounds to values close to 254 million USD and 250 million USD, respectively, suggesting partial recovery though it does not surpass the peak observed in 2019.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital remains relatively stable across all years, hovering around 17% to 18%. The data shows a slight decrease from 17.98% in 2018 to 16.99% in 2021, followed by a minor increase to 17.19% in 2022. This stability suggests consistent financing conditions or risk profile, with no marked changes in the company’s capital costs over the analyzed period.
Invested Capital
There is a significant upward trend in invested capital, which grows steadily from approximately 559 million USD in 2018 to nearly 2.61 billion USD by the end of 2022. The most pronounced increase occurs between 2019 and 2020, more than doubling the invested capital. Despite a slight decline from 2020 to 2021, the overall trend remains strongly positive, indicating substantial increases in the company’s asset base or capital allocations during this period.
Economic Profit
Economic profit data reveals a concerning trend. Initially, from 2018 to 2019, economic profit is positive and increasing, rising from roughly 103 million USD to 115 million USD, which correlates with the increase in NOPAT during this time. However, from 2020 onwards, economic profit turns negative and continues to decline further into negative territory through 2021 and 2022, reaching approximately -199 million USD. This negative trend despite recovering NOPAT suggests that the returns on invested capital are insufficient to cover the cost of capital, possibly due to the rapid increase in invested capital outpacing profit generation.
Summary
Overall, while the company experienced growth in operating profits and a stable cost of capital, the substantial increase in invested capital has not been matched by proportional returns. This has led to negative economic profits in recent years, indicating value destruction from an economic perspective. The company’s capital investments might be generating suboptimal returns, warranting further investigation into asset utilization and investment efficiency going forward.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues3
Increase (decrease) in warranty obligations4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expenses
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expenses
Tax benefit of interest expenses7
Adjusted interest expenses, after taxes8
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Interest income on marketable securities
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income9
Investment income, after taxes10
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenues.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in warranty obligations.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc..

6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expenses = Adjusted interest expenses × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc..

9 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
The net income exhibited growth from 2018 to 2019, increasing from approximately $128.8 million to $146.5 million. However, in 2020, net income slightly declined to about $140.3 million, indicating a minor setback. The figure rebounded in 2021 to reach a peak of approximately $169.2 million, representing the highest value in the five-year span. In contrast, 2022 saw a significant drop to around $93.8 million, a sharp decrease compared to the preceding year, signaling a potential issue or challenge impacting profitability in the most recent period.
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT showed notable volatility over the five years. Initially, it rose significantly from about $203.9 million in 2018 to nearly $279.0 million in 2019, demonstrating strong operational performance improvement. A substantial decline occurred in 2020, with NOPAT decreasing to approximately $154.6 million, indicating operational difficulties or increased expenses. Recovery was observed in 2021, with NOPAT climbing back to approximately $253.5 million, nearing prior peak levels. In 2022, NOPAT remained relatively stable, slightly decreasing to about $249.9 million, suggesting that operational efficiency was maintained despite fluctuations in net income.

Cash Operating Taxes

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Income taxes, net
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expenses
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


Income Taxes, Net
The net income taxes exhibit a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. Beginning at 9,077 thousand US dollars in 2018, there was a significant increase to 33,646 thousand US dollars in 2019. This was followed by a decline to 23,344 thousand US dollars in 2020 and a further decrease to 18,054 thousand US dollars in 2021. However, the figure surged noticeably in 2022 to 83,376 thousand US dollars, indicating a substantial rise compared to prior years.
Cash Operating Taxes
The cash operating taxes also show variability with a generally increasing trend. Starting at 15,810 thousand US dollars in 2018, the amount more than doubled to 40,084 thousand US dollars in 2019. There was a decrease to 28,279 thousand US dollars in 2020, followed by a slight increase to 31,486 thousand US dollars in 2021. In 2022, cash operating taxes rose sharply to 95,076 thousand US dollars, marking the highest value within the observed period.
Overall Insights
Both income taxes, net and cash operating taxes demonstrate significant volatility but ultimately culminate in marked increases in 2022. The spike in tax figures during 2022 could suggest improved profitability, changes in tax regulations, or accumulation of deferred tax liabilities. The patterns also indicate that cash operating taxes consistently remain higher than net income taxes, reflecting differences potentially due to timing and tax accounting adjustments.

Invested Capital

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Short-term finance lease liabilities
Convertible senior notes, net
Long-term finance lease liabilities
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Deferred revenues4
Warranty obligations5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Non-controlling interests
Adjusted total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Assets under construction and payments on account8
Marketable securities9
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenues.

5 Addition of warranty obligations.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity.

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of assets under construction and payments on account.

9 Subtraction of marketable securities.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibit a significant upward trend over the analyzed period. Starting from approximately 19.8 million in 2018, the figure more than doubles to around 42.4 million in 2019. This upward trajectory accelerates sharply in 2020, reaching approximately 647.4 million, followed by continued increases in 2021 and 2022 to roughly 715.6 million and 735.5 million, respectively. This pattern indicates an aggressive increase in debt and lease obligations, particularly notable between 2019 and 2020.
Total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity demonstrates consistent and robust growth throughout the period. It starts at approximately 562.4 million in 2018 and grows steadily year-over-year, reaching about 811.7 million in 2019 and 1.09 billion in 2020. The growth continues to strengthen, with equity reaching around 1.31 billion in 2021 and showing a substantial increase to approximately 2.18 billion in 2022. This indicates a strengthening equity base, which may reflect retained earnings growth, capital contributions, or a combination thereof.
Invested capital
Invested capital displays a marked upward movement over the observed years. Beginning at approximately 559.3 million in 2018, it rises sharply to about 909.8 million in 2019. The growth is especially pronounced in 2020, reaching approximately 1.73 billion. This figure remains relatively stable in 2021 at roughly 1.70 billion before surging again to approximately 2.61 billion in 2022. The overall increase in invested capital aligns with the increases observed in both debt and equity, suggesting expansion in the company’s capital base.
Summary of Trends
The data reveal a pattern of significant financial growth and expansion over the five-year period. Both debt and equity have increased substantially, with debt experiencing a very sharp rise from 2019 onwards. The growth in stockholders’ equity is steady and strong, culminating in a considerable increase in 2022. Correspondingly, invested capital has also significantly increased, reflecting the combined effects of higher equity and debt. The company appears to be leveraging additional debt alongside equity financing to support its investment growth, which may indicate strategic expansion efforts or increased operational scale.

Cost of Capital

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Applied Materials Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Lam Research Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the company's economic performance and capital investment over the analyzed period.

Economic Profit
There was a positive economic profit in 2018 and 2019, with values of approximately $103.4 million and $115.0 million respectively, indicating profitability during these years. However, a sharp decline occurred starting in 2020, moving into negative territory with a loss of about $144.6 million. This negative trend continued through 2021 and 2022, with the economic loss reducing but remaining substantial at roughly $35.4 million and $198.7 million respectively, suggesting challenges in generating economic value during these later years.
Invested Capital
The invested capital showed a steady increase over the period analyzed. It rose from approximately $559.3 million in 2018 to about $909.8 million in 2019. A significant jump occurred in 2020, almost doubling the invested capital to around $1.73 billion. Although there was a slight decline in 2021 to about $1.70 billion, the capital investment surged again in 2022, reaching approximately $2.61 billion. This increase indicates a substantial expansion in the base of assets or resources employed by the company.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio mirrored the movement of economic profit, starting at a high level of 18.48% in 2018 and decreasing to 12.64% in 2019. It sharply deteriorated in 2020 to -8.33%, turning negative and indicating that the company's return on invested capital fell below its cost of capital. The ratio remained negative in the subsequent years, with values of -2.08% in 2021 and -7.62% in 2022, reflecting ongoing challenges in generating returns above the cost of capital despite the increase in invested capital.

In summary, while the company considerably increased its invested capital over the five-year period, this was accompanied by deteriorating economic profit and increasingly negative economic spread ratios from 2020 onward. This pattern suggests difficulties in achieving adequate returns on the higher capital base, resulting in economic losses and strained profitability metrics during the latter part of the period.


Economic Profit Margin

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenues
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues
Adjusted revenues
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Applied Materials Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Lam Research Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Revenue Trends
The adjusted revenues of the company exhibit a strong upward trajectory over the five-year period. Starting at approximately 978 million US dollars in 2018, revenues increased significantly each year, reaching over 3.15 billion US dollars by 2022. This represents more than a threefold increase in sales over the observed timeframe, indicating robust top-line growth.
Profitability and Economic Profit
The economic profit values demonstrate a declining and fluctuating pattern contrary to the revenue growth. Initially, the company generated positive economic profits of about 103 million US dollars in 2018 and 115 million in 2019. However, beginning in 2020, the economic profit turned negative and remained so through 2022, with a low point near -198 million US dollars in 2022. This shift signals increasing difficulties in generating value above the cost of capital despite rising revenues.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin mirrors the trend in economic profit, showing a decline from 10.57% in 2018 to a negative 6.3% by 2022. The margin decreased steadily after 2019, turning negative in 2020 and deteriorating further through the subsequent years. This indicates that the company's profitability relative to its revenues has worsened, reflecting declining efficiency or increased costs outpacing revenue gains.
Overall Insights
The data reflects a scenario where rapid revenue growth has not translated into sustained economic profitability. The company appears to be facing margin pressures or elevated costs that have eroded its ability to generate positive economic profit despite expansion in sales. This divergence calls for a closer examination of cost structures, pricing strategies, or investment returns to reverse the negative economic profit trends.