EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
SolarEdge Technologies Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2015
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2015
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to SolarEdge Technologies Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The analysis of economic profit reveals a significant transition from value creation to value destruction between 2018 and 2022. While the company maintained positive net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) throughout the period, the rapid expansion of the invested capital base outpaced the growth of operating returns, resulting in a sustained negative economic profit starting in 2020.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited volatility over the five-year period. After an initial increase from 203.9 million in 2018 to 279.0 million in 2019, a sharp decline occurred in 2020, with profits falling to 154.6 million. A recovery followed in 2021 and 2022, where NOPAT stabilized at approximately 250 million. Despite these fluctuations, the operating profit did not grow at a rate sufficient to support the company's increasing capital requirements.
- Invested Capital Expansion
- A consistent and aggressive upward trend in invested capital is observed. The capital base grew from 559.3 million in 2018 to 2.61 billion by the end of 2022, representing nearly a five-fold increase. The most substantial jumps occurred between 2019 and 2020 and again between 2021 and 2022, indicating heavy investment in assets or working capital to support growth.
- Cost of Capital Stability
- The cost of capital remained remarkably stable throughout the period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 19.95% and 21.17%. This high cost of capital established a demanding hurdle rate for the company's investments, meaning a significant amount of NOPAT was required simply to cover the cost of the capital employed.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit shifted from positive territory in 2018 and 2019 to deep deficits in the subsequent years. In 2018 and 2019, the company generated positive economic profit of approximately 86 million per year. However, as invested capital surged, the capital charge exceeded NOPAT, leading to an economic loss of 196.5 million in 2020. Although there was a partial recovery in 2021, the economic profit declined further to -276.8 million in 2022, indicating that the returns on the expanded capital base are currently insufficient to meet the required cost of capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenues.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in warranty obligations.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc..
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expenses = Adjusted interest expenses × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc..
9 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
- The net income exhibited growth from 2018 to 2019, increasing from approximately $128.8 million to $146.5 million. However, in 2020, net income slightly declined to about $140.3 million, indicating a minor setback. The figure rebounded in 2021 to reach a peak of approximately $169.2 million, representing the highest value in the five-year span. In contrast, 2022 saw a significant drop to around $93.8 million, a sharp decrease compared to the preceding year, signaling a potential issue or challenge impacting profitability in the most recent period.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT showed notable volatility over the five years. Initially, it rose significantly from about $203.9 million in 2018 to nearly $279.0 million in 2019, demonstrating strong operational performance improvement. A substantial decline occurred in 2020, with NOPAT decreasing to approximately $154.6 million, indicating operational difficulties or increased expenses. Recovery was observed in 2021, with NOPAT climbing back to approximately $253.5 million, nearing prior peak levels. In 2022, NOPAT remained relatively stable, slightly decreasing to about $249.9 million, suggesting that operational efficiency was maintained despite fluctuations in net income.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Income Taxes, Net
- The net income taxes exhibit a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. Beginning at 9,077 thousand US dollars in 2018, there was a significant increase to 33,646 thousand US dollars in 2019. This was followed by a decline to 23,344 thousand US dollars in 2020 and a further decrease to 18,054 thousand US dollars in 2021. However, the figure surged noticeably in 2022 to 83,376 thousand US dollars, indicating a substantial rise compared to prior years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- The cash operating taxes also show variability with a generally increasing trend. Starting at 15,810 thousand US dollars in 2018, the amount more than doubled to 40,084 thousand US dollars in 2019. There was a decrease to 28,279 thousand US dollars in 2020, followed by a slight increase to 31,486 thousand US dollars in 2021. In 2022, cash operating taxes rose sharply to 95,076 thousand US dollars, marking the highest value within the observed period.
- Overall Insights
- Both income taxes, net and cash operating taxes demonstrate significant volatility but ultimately culminate in marked increases in 2022. The spike in tax figures during 2022 could suggest improved profitability, changes in tax regulations, or accumulation of deferred tax liabilities. The patterns also indicate that cash operating taxes consistently remain higher than net income taxes, reflecting differences potentially due to timing and tax accounting adjustments.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenues.
5 Addition of warranty obligations.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of assets under construction and payments on account.
9 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases exhibit a significant upward trend over the analyzed period. Starting from approximately 19.8 million in 2018, the figure more than doubles to around 42.4 million in 2019. This upward trajectory accelerates sharply in 2020, reaching approximately 647.4 million, followed by continued increases in 2021 and 2022 to roughly 715.6 million and 735.5 million, respectively. This pattern indicates an aggressive increase in debt and lease obligations, particularly notable between 2019 and 2020.
- Total SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity demonstrates consistent and robust growth throughout the period. It starts at approximately 562.4 million in 2018 and grows steadily year-over-year, reaching about 811.7 million in 2019 and 1.09 billion in 2020. The growth continues to strengthen, with equity reaching around 1.31 billion in 2021 and showing a substantial increase to approximately 2.18 billion in 2022. This indicates a strengthening equity base, which may reflect retained earnings growth, capital contributions, or a combination thereof.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital displays a marked upward movement over the observed years. Beginning at approximately 559.3 million in 2018, it rises sharply to about 909.8 million in 2019. The growth is especially pronounced in 2020, reaching approximately 1.73 billion. This figure remains relatively stable in 2021 at roughly 1.70 billion before surging again to approximately 2.61 billion in 2022. The overall increase in invested capital aligns with the increases observed in both debt and equity, suggesting expansion in the company’s capital base.
- Summary of Trends
- The data reveal a pattern of significant financial growth and expansion over the five-year period. Both debt and equity have increased substantially, with debt experiencing a very sharp rise from 2019 onwards. The growth in stockholders’ equity is steady and strong, culminating in a considerable increase in 2022. Correspondingly, invested capital has also significantly increased, reflecting the combined effects of higher equity and debt. The company appears to be leveraging additional debt alongside equity financing to support its investment growth, which may indicate strategic expansion efforts or increased operational scale.
Cost of Capital
SolarEdge Technologies Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Convertible senior notes and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | ||||||
| Analog Devices Inc. | ||||||
| Applied Materials Inc. | ||||||
| Broadcom Inc. | ||||||
| Intel Corp. | ||||||
| KLA Corp. | ||||||
| Lam Research Corp. | ||||||
| Micron Technology Inc. | ||||||
| NVIDIA Corp. | ||||||
| Qualcomm Inc. | ||||||
| Texas Instruments Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
A significant transition in economic performance is evident between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a shift from value creation to sustained value destruction. The financial trajectory indicates that while the organization initially generated returns exceeding its cost of capital, it entered a period of economic deficit starting in 2020.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- Economic profit remained positive and stable during 2018 and 2019, with values of 85.8 million and 86.4 million US dollars, respectively. A sharp reversal occurred in 2020, as economic profit dropped to negative 196.5 million US dollars. Although a moderate improvement was noted in 2021, the deficit expanded to its lowest point of negative 276.8 million US dollars by the end of 2022.
- Invested Capital Trends
- A continuous and substantial increase in invested capital is observed throughout the period. The capital base grew from 559.3 million US dollars in 2018 to 2.6 billion US dollars in 2022. This growth reflects an aggressive expansion of the resource base, which, however, failed to yield a corresponding increase in economic profit.
- Economic Spread Ratio Performance
- The economic spread ratio shows a marked decline, starting at 15.34% in 2018 and falling to 9.50% in 2019. The ratio entered negative territory in 2020 at negative 11.33%, indicating that the return on invested capital was insufficient to cover the cost of capital. Following a slight recovery to negative 5.04% in 2021, the ratio declined again to negative 10.61% in 2022, confirming a persistent inability to generate a positive economic spread.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenues | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues | ||||||
| Adjusted revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | ||||||
| Analog Devices Inc. | ||||||
| Applied Materials Inc. | ||||||
| Broadcom Inc. | ||||||
| Intel Corp. | ||||||
| KLA Corp. | ||||||
| Lam Research Corp. | ||||||
| Micron Technology Inc. | ||||||
| NVIDIA Corp. | ||||||
| Qualcomm Inc. | ||||||
| Texas Instruments Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the economic performance from 2018 to 2022 reveals a significant divergence between revenue growth and economic value creation. While the company experienced substantial expansion in its top-line figures, this growth did not translate into positive economic profit, resulting in a transition from value creation to consistent value destruction over the analyzed period.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained positive and stable between 2018 and 2019, peaking at 86,420 thousand US dollars in 2019. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2020, with the figure dropping to negative 196,525 thousand US dollars. Despite a partial recovery in 2021, the economic profit declined further in 2022 to negative 276,818 thousand US dollars, indicating that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of capital.
- Adjusted Revenue Growth
- A strong upward trajectory is observed in adjusted revenues, which grew from 978,246 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 3,154,511 thousand US dollars by 2022. This represents a more than threefold increase in scale over five years, with only a minor contraction observed in 2020. The data indicates a successful expansion of market presence and sales volume.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin exhibits high volatility and an overall negative shift. Starting at 8.77% in 2018, the margin compressed to 5.72% in 2019 before plunging to its lowest point of negative 13.66% in 2020. Although the margin improved to negative 4.30% in 2021, it deteriorated again to negative 8.78% in 2022. This pattern suggests that the costs associated with scaling the business and the capital charges have outpaced the operating gains derived from increased revenues.
The overall financial trajectory suggests a period of aggressive scaling that has negatively impacted economic efficiency. The persistent negative economic profit margins from 2020 onward indicate that the company's expansion has not been value-accretive, as the capital employed is not generating returns above the required threshold.