Liquidity ratios measure the company ability to meet its short-term obligations.
Liquidity Ratios (Summary)
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 3.26 | 3.26 | 3.94 | 2.14 | 3.00 | |
| Quick ratio | 2.17 | 2.20 | 2.73 | 1.41 | 2.14 | |
| Cash ratio | 1.15 | 1.33 | 2.23 | 0.72 | 1.37 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The liquidity position remains strong throughout the analyzed period, with all key metrics consistently indicating a high capacity to meet short-term obligations. A notable peak in liquidity occurred in 2020, followed by a period of stabilization through 2022.
- Current Ratio
- The current ratio exhibits significant strength, maintaining a value well above 2.0 across all years. After a decline from 3.00 in 2018 to 2.14 in 2019, the ratio peaked at 3.94 in 2020 before stabilizing at 3.26 for both 2021 and 2022. This suggests a robust cushion of current assets relative to current liabilities.
- Quick Ratio
- The quick ratio follows a trajectory similar to the current ratio, indicating that liquidity is not solely dependent on inventory. It reached a high of 2.73 in 2020 and concluded the period at 2.17 in 2022. The consistent gap between the current and quick ratios suggests that inventory represents a meaningful component of the overall current asset base.
- Cash Ratio
- The cash ratio demonstrates the highest volatility among the three metrics. A dip to 0.72 in 2019 indicates a temporary reliance on non-cash current assets for liability coverage. However, a sharp increase to 2.23 in 2020 signifies a substantial accumulation of cash and cash equivalents. By 2022, the ratio settled at 1.15, confirming that the entity can cover all current liabilities using only its most liquid assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Current Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Current assets | 2,899,658) | 1,711,291) | 1,719,341) | 932,763) | 678,113) | |
| Current liabilities | 889,717) | 525,181) | 436,099) | 436,714) | 225,718) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Current ratio1 | 3.26 | 3.26 | 3.94 | 2.14 | 3.00 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Current Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 2.36 | 2.02 | — | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 2.02 | 1.94 | 1.84 | — | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 2.16 | 2.54 | 3.00 | — | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 2.62 | 2.64 | 1.87 | — | — | |
| Intel Corp. | 1.57 | 2.10 | — | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 2.50 | 2.71 | — | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 2.69 | 3.30 | — | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | 1.80 | 1.50 | — | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 2.89 | 3.10 | — | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 6.65 | 4.09 | — | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 1.75 | 1.68 | 2.14 | — | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 4.70 | 5.33 | — | — | — | |
| Current Ratio, Sector | ||||||
| Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 2.33 | 2.45 | — | — | — | |
| Current Ratio, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | 1.37 | 1.55 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 2,899,658 ÷ 889,717 = 3.26
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The company has demonstrated a consistently strong liquidity profile between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a significant expansion of current assets and a robust ability to cover short-term obligations.
- Current Assets Growth
- A substantial upward trajectory is observed in current assets, which increased from US$ 678.1 million in 2018 to US$ 2.9 billion by the end of 2022. The most pronounced growth occurred between 2019 and 2020, during which assets increased by approximately 84%.
- Current Liabilities Evolution
- Current liabilities rose from US$ 225.7 million in 2018 to US$ 889.7 million in 2022. Although liabilities expanded nearly fourfold over the five-year period, the growth was offset by the more aggressive accumulation of current assets.
- Current Ratio Performance
- The current ratio remained well above the 2.0 threshold throughout the period, indicating a high margin of safety for meeting short-term debts. The ratio experienced volatility, dipping to 2.14 in 2019 before peaking at 3.94 in 2020. By 2021 and 2022, the ratio stabilized at 3.26, reflecting a consistent and disciplined approach to working capital management.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Quick Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 783,112) | 530,089) | 827,146) | 223,901) | 191,633) | |
| Marketable securities | 241,117) | 167,728) | 143,687) | 91,845) | 118,680) | |
| Trade receivables, net of allowances | 905,146) | 456,339) | 218,706) | 298,383) | 173,579) | |
| Total quick assets | 1,929,375) | 1,154,156) | 1,189,539) | 614,129) | 483,892) | |
| Current liabilities | 889,717) | 525,181) | 436,099) | 436,714) | 225,718) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Quick ratio1 | 2.17 | 2.20 | 2.73 | 1.41 | 2.14 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Quick Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.57 | 1.49 | — | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 1.34 | 1.24 | 1.31 | — | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 1.17 | 1.64 | 1.95 | — | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 2.18 | 2.27 | 1.56 | — | — | |
| Intel Corp. | 1.01 | 1.38 | — | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 1.57 | 1.81 | — | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 1.72 | 2.11 | — | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | 1.20 | 1.19 | — | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 1.92 | 2.17 | — | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 5.96 | 3.56 | — | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 1.01 | 1.34 | 1.75 | — | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 3.67 | 4.45 | — | — | — | |
| Quick Ratio, Sector | ||||||
| Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 1.62 | 1.78 | — | — | — | |
| Quick Ratio, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | 1.09 | 1.30 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 1,929,375 ÷ 889,717 = 2.17
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The organization's liquidity position between 2018 and 2022 is characterized by a significant expansion of both liquid assets and short-term obligations. Despite fluctuations in the quick ratio, the company maintained a consistent ability to cover its current liabilities using only its most liquid assets, with the ratio remaining well above the critical 1.0 threshold throughout the analyzed period.
- Quick Asset Trajectory
- Total quick assets demonstrated substantial growth, increasing from US$ 483.9 million in 2018 to US$ 1.93 billion by December 31, 2022. The most significant surge occurred between 2019 and 2020, where assets nearly doubled, indicating a period of aggressive liquidity accumulation.
- Current Liabilities Trend
- Current liabilities rose from US$ 225.7 million in 2018 to US$ 889.7 million in 2022. This growth reflects an increase in short-term financial obligations, with a particularly sharp increase observed between 2021 and 2022, where liabilities grew by approximately 69%.
- Quick Ratio Analysis
- The quick ratio exhibited volatility, starting at 2.14 in 2018 and declining to 1.41 in 2019 due to liabilities growing at a faster rate than quick assets. A sharp correction occurred in 2020, leading to a peak ratio of 2.73. In the subsequent two years, the ratio stabilized, closing at 2.17 in 2022. This suggests that while the scale of operations and obligations expanded, the company effectively managed its liquid reserves to maintain a consistent safety margin.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 783,112) | 530,089) | 827,146) | 223,901) | 191,633) | |
| Marketable securities | 241,117) | 167,728) | 143,687) | 91,845) | 118,680) | |
| Total cash assets | 1,024,229) | 697,817) | 970,833) | 315,746) | 310,313) | |
| Current liabilities | 889,717) | 525,181) | 436,099) | 436,714) | 225,718) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash ratio1 | 1.15 | 1.33 | 2.23 | 0.72 | 1.37 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 0.92 | 0.85 | — | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.77 | — | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 0.35 | 0.86 | 1.29 | — | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 1.76 | 1.94 | 1.20 | — | — | |
| Intel Corp. | 0.88 | 1.03 | — | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 0.94 | 1.19 | — | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 0.77 | 1.25 | — | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | 0.44 | 0.69 | — | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 1.24 | 1.34 | — | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 4.89 | 2.95 | — | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 0.54 | 1.04 | 1.29 | — | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 3.04 | 3.79 | — | — | — | |
| Cash Ratio, Sector | ||||||
| Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 1.14 | 1.29 | — | — | — | |
| Cash Ratio, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | 0.67 | 0.89 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 1,024,229 ÷ 889,717 = 1.15
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An evaluation of the liquidity position from 2018 to 2022 reveals a volatile but generally strong cash posture. While the cash ratio experienced significant fluctuations, the organization concluded the period with a capacity to cover all current liabilities using only its most liquid assets.
- Total Cash Assets
- Cash holdings demonstrated a strong upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 310.3 million in 2018 to US$ 1,024.2 million by 2022. A substantial increase was observed in 2020, followed by a moderate contraction in 2021 before reaching a period peak in 2022.
- Current Liabilities
- Short-term obligations grew consistently over the five-year window. Liabilities rose from US$ 225.7 million in 2018 to US$ 889.7 million in 2022, representing a significant expansion of the short-term debt and accruals profile.
- Cash Ratio Fluctuations
- The cash ratio exhibited an irregular pattern, starting at 1.37 in 2018 and dropping to a period low of 0.72 in 2019, indicating a temporary phase where cash alone was insufficient to cover current liabilities. A sharp recovery occurred in 2020, with the ratio peaking at 2.23. Despite a downward trend from 2020 to 2022, the ratio remained above 1.0, ending at 1.15.
The relationship between cash growth and liability expansion suggests a strategic accumulation of liquidity to offset the rising trend in current obligations. Although the 2019 dip indicated a momentary tightening of liquidity, the subsequent increase in cash assets effectively buffered the organization against the substantial increase in liability load observed by the end of 2022.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?