Stock Analysis on Net

SolarEdge Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:SEDG)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 22, 2023.

Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF) 

Microsoft Excel

Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., FCFF calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net income attributable to SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 93,779 169,170 140,322 146,549 128,833
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests (1,592) (787)
Net noncash charges 317,211 163,145 104,618 89,477 37,937
Changes in assets and liabilities (379,706) (118,186) (22,285) 24,566 23,096
Net cash provided by operating activities 31,284 214,129 222,655 259,000 189,079
Interest expenses, net of tax1 6,104 9,641 8,683 4,731 2,999
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (169,341) (149,251) (126,790) (72,562) (38,608)
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) (131,953) 74,519 104,548 191,169 153,470

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The financial data indicates notable fluctuations in the cash flow metrics over the five-year period ending in 2022.

Net cash provided by operating activities

This measure showed an overall upward trend from 2018 through 2019, increasing from approximately $189 million to $259 million. However, in subsequent years, a declining pattern emerged, with values falling to about $223 million in 2020 and further to roughly $214 million in 2021. The most significant decline occurred in 2022, when net cash from operating activities sharply dropped to approximately $31 million, indicating a substantial reduction in operational cash generation capacity.

Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)

FCFF followed a similar pattern to operating cash flow initially, rising from $153 million in 2018 to about $191 million in 2019. After 2019, there was a consistent decline, with FCFF decreasing to roughly $105 million in 2020 and then to $74 million in 2021. In 2022, FCFF turned negative, reaching approximately -$132 million. This shift to negative free cash flow suggests increased capital expenditures or other uses of cash surpassing operating cash inflows, potentially indicating investment in growth or challenges in cash management.

In summary, both key cash flow indicators demonstrate a peak around 2019, followed by a downward trajectory, culminating in a steep decline in 2022. The transition to negative free cash flow in the latest period warrants further exploration to understand the underlying causes and implications for the firm’s financial health.


Interest Paid, Net of Tax

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., interest paid, net of tax calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
EITR1 47.10% 9.60% 14.20% 18.80% 6.60%
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Interest expenses, before tax 11,538 10,665 10,120 5,826 3,211
Less: Interest expenses, tax2 5,434 1,024 1,437 1,095 212
Interest expenses, net of tax 6,104 9,641 8,683 4,731 2,999

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Interest expenses, tax = Interest expenses × EITR
= 11,538 × 47.10% = 5,434


Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
The effective income tax rate exhibited notable variability over the five-year period. Beginning at a low of 6.6% in 2018, the rate increased significantly to 18.8% in 2019. This was followed by a moderate decrease to 14.2% in 2020 and further decline to 9.6% in 2021. However, in 2022, there was a substantial increase to 47.1%, representing the highest rate recorded in the observed period. This sharp rise in 2022 indicates a significant change in the company's tax burden or tax strategy compared to prior years.
Interest Expenses, Net of Tax
Interest expenses, net of tax, showed an overall increasing trend from 2018 to 2021, rising from $2,999 thousand in 2018 to a peak of $9,641 thousand in 2021. This increase suggests growing debt levels or higher borrowing costs during these years. In 2022, interest expenses decreased to $6,104 thousand, indicating a reduction of approximately 36.7% from the previous year. This decline may reflect changes in debt structure, refinancing, or improved interest rates.

Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., current EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV) 13,622,712
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) (131,953)
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors1
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 104.78
Analog Devices Inc. 37.31
Applied Materials Inc. 17.34
Broadcom Inc. 82.61
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp. 32.99
Lam Research Corp. 26.76
Micron Technology Inc. 311.39
NVIDIA Corp. 70.16
Qualcomm Inc. 14.72
Texas Instruments Inc. 86.98
EV/FCFF, Sector
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment 143.32
EV/FCFF, Industry
Information Technology 60.20

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical

SolarEdge Technologies Inc., historical EV/FCFF calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV)1 16,251,983 12,963,187 16,239,122 5,888,095 1,695,011
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 (131,953) 74,519 104,548 191,169 153,470
Valuation Ratio
EV/FCFF3 173.96 155.33 30.80 11.04
Benchmarks
EV/FCFF, Competitors4
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 38.82 43.41 126.98
Analog Devices Inc. 23.12 39.16 27.12 21.67
Applied Materials Inc. 19.06 26.22 22.52 18.91
Broadcom Inc. 14.74 19.47 16.54 15.04
Intel Corp. 16.94 11.08
KLA Corp. 19.05 26.29 18.70
Lam Research Corp. 24.08 24.40 26.78
Micron Technology Inc. 16.58 28.79 188.88 13.85
NVIDIA Corp. 78.06 69.50 41.66
Qualcomm Inc. 18.18 17.47 30.89 14.91
Texas Instruments Inc. 27.02 24.20 27.67
EV/FCFF, Sector
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment 34.98 26.15 21.95
EV/FCFF, Industry
Information Technology 26.35 27.35 23.73

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 16,251,983 ÷ -131,953 =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Enterprise Value (EV)
The enterprise value shows a significant overall upward trend from 2018 to 2022. Starting at approximately $1.7 billion in 2018, it climbed sharply to nearly $5.9 billion in 2019 and further surged to over $16.2 billion by 2020. Although there was a decline in 2021 to about $12.96 billion, the value rebounded again in 2022 to $16.25 billion, indicating substantial volatility but general growth over the five-year period.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
The free cash flow to the firm demonstrated a declining trend throughout the period. Beginning with a positive $153 million in 2018, it increased moderately in 2019 to $191 million but then declined sharply in subsequent years. In 2020, FCFF dropped to about $105 million, decreased further to $74.5 million in 2021, and turned negative in 2022 with a value of -$132 million. This trend reflects a deteriorating cash generation capability at the firm level over time.
EV/FCFF Ratio
The EV/FCFF ratio exhibits a pronounced upward trajectory from 2018 to 2021, highlighting increased valuation relative to free cash flow. The ratio escalated from 11.04 in 2018 to 30.8 in 2019 and then surged dramatically to 155.33 in 2020 and further to 173.96 in 2021. The absence of this ratio for 2022 is likely due to the negative FCFF, which renders the ratio undefined or meaningless. The rapidly rising ratio up to 2021 suggests that the firm's valuation grew at a much faster pace than its free cash flow generation, indicating potential market optimism or overvaluation risk.