EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Microchip Technology Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Total Asset Turnover since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Microchip Technology Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Mar 31, 2022 | Mar 31, 2021 | Mar 31, 2020 | Mar 31, 2019 | Mar 31, 2018 | Mar 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The analysis of economic profit reveals a consistent period of value destruction, as the company failed to generate a net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) sufficient to cover its cost of capital throughout the six-year period. Despite this, a significant trend toward recovery is evident by the end of the observed timeframe.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited significant volatility with a strong overall growth trajectory. After an initial increase from 180,568 thousand in 2017 to 695,844 thousand in 2019, a contraction occurred in 2020. However, a substantial surge was recorded in 2022, with NOPAT reaching 1,620,172 thousand, representing the highest operational profitability in the period analyzed.
- Invested Capital Trends
- The capital base underwent a dramatic expansion in 2019, increasing from 5,149,468 thousand to 14,715,398 thousand. This peak was followed by a consistent four-year decline, with invested capital reducing to 11,963,600 thousand by March 31, 2022. This suggests a strategic shift toward capital optimization or a reduction in the asset base following a period of heavy investment.
- Cost of Capital Stability
- The cost of capital remained relatively high and stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 16.36% and 20.43%. The highest cost of capital was observed in 2022 at 20.43%, indicating a stringent requirement for returns on invested capital to achieve positive economic value added.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit remained negative for the entire duration, indicating that the return on invested capital did not exceed the cost of capital. The deficit widened significantly between 2019 and 2021, reaching a low of -2,027,343 thousand in 2021, coinciding with the period of high invested capital and moderate NOPAT. A sharp reversal occurred in 2022, where economic profit improved to -824,147 thousand, driven by the simultaneous surge in NOPAT and the continued reduction of the invested capital base.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for expected credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in liability for restructuring and other exit costs.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
9 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
11 Elimination of discontinued operations.
- Net Income Trend
- The net income demonstrated a generally upward trajectory over the analyzed periods, beginning at 164,639 thousand US dollars in 2017. A significant rise is observed in 2018 and 2019, reaching 255,400 and 355,900 thousand US dollars respectively. The upward trend continues sharply in 2020, peaking at 570,600 thousand US dollars. There is a decline in 2021 to 349,400 thousand US dollars, followed by a substantial increase in 2022, culminating at 1,285,500 thousand US dollars. This pattern indicates volatility but overall strong growth, with the most notable surge occurring in the latest year observed.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trend
- NOPAT experienced substantial growth from 2017 through 2019, starting at 180,568 thousand US dollars and peaking at 695,844 thousand US dollars in 2019. However, a notable decrease occurred in 2020, dropping to 455,414 thousand US dollars. Subsequently, there is a modest recovery in 2021 to 488,868 thousand US dollars before a dramatic increase in 2022, reaching 1,620,172 thousand US dollars. The pattern highlights a peak in 2019, a decline amid challenging circumstances possibly in 2020, followed by remarkable recovery and growth in the most recent period.
- Comparative Insights
- Both net income and NOPAT demonstrate corresponding overall trends with initial growth, a dip around 2020, and a strong rebound by 2022. The magnitude of increase in 2022 is particularly pronounced for both metrics, suggesting enhanced operational efficiency and profitability. The divergence in the rates of increase across years reveals the company’s sensitivity to economic or operational factors but an overall ability to recover and expand profitability substantially.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
- Income Tax Provision (Benefit) Trend
- The income tax provision displayed considerable volatility over the six-year period. A negative provision (benefit) was recorded in 2017 at -80,805 thousand USD, indicating a tax benefit rather than an expense. This shifted drastically to a positive tax provision of 481,900 thousand USD in 2018, suggesting a significant tax expense that year. A subsequent return to a tax benefit occurred in 2019 and 2020 with -151,400 and -420,200 thousand USD respectively. These years indicate substantial tax recoveries or credits. In 2021, the provision nearly neutralized with a small negative amount of -9,900 thousand USD, followed by an increase to a substantial tax expense of 197,000 thousand USD in 2022. Overall, the pattern reflects considerable fluctuations in taxable income, tax planning activities, or tax law impacts affecting the tax responsibility.
- Cash Operating Taxes Trend
- Cash operating taxes increased steadily during the period analyzed, showing a general upward trend. Beginning at 98,396 thousand USD in 2017, cash taxes paid more than quintupled by 2018 to 492,538 thousand USD, which may point to increased taxable profitability or changes in tax payment timing. However, 2019 shows a sharp drop to 17,593 thousand USD, representing a significant decrease in actual tax cash outflows. The subsequent years demonstrate recovery and growth in cash taxes paid, with amounts rising to 175,290 in 2020, then further to 205,150 in 2021, and reaching 244,410 thousand USD in 2022. This progressive increase suggests stronger cash tax payments, potentially aligned with growing earnings or changes in tax management strategies.
- Comparative Insights Between Income Tax Provision and Cash Taxes
- The divergence between income tax provision and cash operating taxes is notable. While provisions fluctuate between benefits and expenses, cash taxes exhibit a more consistent upward trend after 2019. The discrepancies likely reflect timing differences between accounting tax expenses and actual cash payments, deferred tax assets or liabilities, or adjustments related to tax credits or incentives. The years with tax benefits in provisions often correspond with lower cash taxes, highlighting the complexity of the tax position and cash flow impacts. The overall data suggests the company navigates fluctuating taxable income levels and tax obligations, influencing both reported tax expenses and actual cash tax payments distinctly over the period.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of liability for restructuring and other exit costs.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of projects in process.
9 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments and marketable equity securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The reported debt and lease obligations exhibit a significant fluctuation over the analyzed periods. From March 2017 to March 2018, debt slightly increased from approximately 3.03 billion to 3.13 billion US dollars. This was followed by a sharp escalation in March 2019, where debt surged to nearly 10.45 billion, representing a more than threefold increase compared to the previous year. Subsequently, the total debt began a steady decline, reducing to approximately 9.62 billion in 2020, then to 9.07 billion in 2021, and further down to about 7.85 billion by March 2022. Overall, while there was a remarkable spike in debt in 2019, the trend after that showed a consistent effort toward debt reduction.
- Stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity showed a general upward trend with some modest fluctuations. Starting at around 3.27 billion in 2017, it remained relatively stable in 2018. In 2019, equity rose considerably to approximately 5.29 billion, continuing to increase slightly to about 5.59 billion in 2020. However, in 2021 equity decreased marginally to about 5.34 billion, before rising again to roughly 5.89 billion by 2022. This pattern suggests a broadly positive movement in equity with minor year-to-year variability.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital showed dynamic changes across the years analyzed. The figure decreased from approximately 6.09 billion in 2017 to around 5.15 billion in 2018. Then, a sharp increase occurred in 2019, where invested capital grew to nearly 14.72 billion, closely aligned with the spike seen in total debt and leases, possibly indicating increased borrowing or capital infusion. Following this peak, invested capital declined steadily over the next three years, dropping to about 13.73 billion in 2020, 12.64 billion in 2021, and further down to approximately 11.96 billion in 2022. This gradual reduction after the 2019 peak may reflect strategic asset sales, debt repayment, or operational adjustments.
Cost of Capital
Microchip Technology Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and Credit Facility3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and Credit Facility. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and Credit Facility3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and Credit Facility. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and Credit Facility3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and Credit Facility. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and Credit Facility3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and Credit Facility. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and Credit Facility3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 31.55%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 31.55%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and Credit Facility. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and Credit Facility3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and Credit Facility. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Mar 31, 2022 | Mar 31, 2021 | Mar 31, 2020 | Mar 31, 2019 | Mar 31, 2018 | Mar 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | |||||||
| Analog Devices Inc. | |||||||
| Applied Materials Inc. | |||||||
| Broadcom Inc. | |||||||
| Intel Corp. | |||||||
| KLA Corp. | |||||||
| Lam Research Corp. | |||||||
| Micron Technology Inc. | |||||||
| NVIDIA Corp. | |||||||
| Qualcomm Inc. | |||||||
| Texas Instruments Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the economic value added metrics from 2017 to 2022 reveals a persistent trend of negative economic profit, indicating that the returns generated did not exceed the company's cost of capital during this period. However, the data shows a significant improvement in the final year of the sequence.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire six-year period. After an initial improvement in 2018, the deficit widened significantly, reaching a peak loss of -2.03 billion USD by March 31, 2021. A substantial recovery is observed in 2022, with the economic profit narrowing to -824.15 million USD, the highest value recorded in the provided timeframe.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- A dramatic shift in the capital base occurred in 2019, where invested capital jumped from 5.15 billion USD to 14.72 billion USD. Following this expansion, a consistent downward trend in invested capital is observed over the subsequent three years, decreasing to 11.96 billion USD by March 31, 2022.
- Economic Spread Ratio Performance
- The economic spread ratio reflects a consistent negative spread, confirming that the cost of capital exceeded the return on invested capital. The ratio showed instability between 2017 and 2021, fluctuating between -11.49% and -16.77%. A marked improvement occurred in 2022, as the ratio rose to -6.89%, suggesting a narrowing of the gap between actual returns and the required return on capital.
Economic Profit Margin
| Mar 31, 2022 | Mar 31, 2021 | Mar 31, 2020 | Mar 31, 2019 | Mar 31, 2018 | Mar 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net sales | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted net sales | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | |||||||
| Analog Devices Inc. | |||||||
| Applied Materials Inc. | |||||||
| Broadcom Inc. | |||||||
| Intel Corp. | |||||||
| KLA Corp. | |||||||
| Lam Research Corp. | |||||||
| Micron Technology Inc. | |||||||
| NVIDIA Corp. | |||||||
| Qualcomm Inc. | |||||||
| Texas Instruments Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic performance from March 31, 2017, to March 31, 2022, reveals a persistent inability to generate positive economic profit, although a significant recovery trend emerged in the final year of the period. While adjusted net sales expanded consistently, the returns failed to exceed the cost of capital across all reported years.
- Economic Profit Trajectory
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the observed period, indicating that the entity did not create value above its cost of capital. After a temporary improvement in 2018, a pronounced downward trend occurred between 2019 and 2021, with the deficit peaking at approximately 2.03 billion US dollars in 2021. A sharp reversal was observed in 2022, where the economic profit deficit narrowed significantly to 824.15 million US dollars.
- Adjusted Net Sales Performance
- A consistent upward trend in adjusted net sales was observed, growing from 3.41 billion US dollars in 2017 to 6.94 billion US dollars by 2022. This represents a substantial increase in operational scale, though the growth in sales did not immediately translate into positive economic value added.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin exhibited high volatility while remaining consistently negative. The margin improved from -29.95% in 2017 to -14.86% in 2018, before deteriorating further to a low of -37.28% in 2021. The period concluded with a notable recovery in 2022, as the margin rose to -11.88%, marking the most favorable efficiency level relative to the cost of capital within the analyzed timeframe.