Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
The financial trajectory from 2017 to 2022 is characterized by a consistent and substantial expansion in core operational profitability. The steady climb in EBITDA suggests a robust capacity to generate cash flow from operations, contrasting with significant volatility observed in net earnings and tax-related figures.
- EBITDA Growth Trajectory
- A strong upward trend is evident, with EBITDA increasing from 705.3 million in 2017 to 2.88 billion in 2022. A particularly sharp acceleration occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the value more than doubled. Following a period of relative stability between 2018 and 2021, a second major surge was recorded in 2022, representing a growth of approximately 55% over the preceding year.
- Operational Expenses and Non-Cash Impacts
- The widening gap between EBIT and EBITDA indicates an increase in non-cash expenses, specifically depreciation and amortization. By 2022, the difference between these two metrics reached approximately 1.14 billion, suggesting intensive capital expenditure or the amortization of acquired intangible assets, which lowered the EBIT relative to the cash-flow potential represented by EBITDA.
- Bottom-Line Volatility and Non-Operating Influence
- While operational metrics showed steady growth, Net Income and Earnings Before Tax (EBT) exhibited significant instability. In 2019 and 2020, Net Income exceeded EBT, indicating the impact of non-operating income or significant tax credits. This divergence suggests that bottom-line profitability was influenced by factors outside of core operations until 2022, when all earnings levels—EBIT, EBT, and Net Income—synchronized to reach their highest points in the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 53,673,187) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 2,883,000) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.62 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 128.33 |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 42.25 |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 32.89 |
| Broadcom Inc. | 49.79 |
| Intel Corp. | 35.05 |
| KLA Corp. | 33.17 |
| Lam Research Corp. | 35.57 |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | 49.01 |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 9.82 |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 35.53 |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 13.07 |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 35.42 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 88.27 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Information Technology | 54.14 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Mar 31, 2022 | Mar 31, 2021 | Mar 31, 2020 | Mar 31, 2019 | Mar 31, 2018 | Mar 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 44,336,602) | 47,583,914) | 30,624,300) | 29,229,042) | 22,683,106) | 20,577,617) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 2,883,000) | 1,849,700) | 1,863,300) | 1,583,800) | 1,552,200) | 705,341) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 15.38 | 25.73 | 16.44 | 18.46 | 14.61 | 29.17 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 22.63 | 34.19 | — | — | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 16.23 | 38.55 | 23.61 | — | — | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 11.04 | 17.54 | 16.82 | — | — | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 13.54 | 19.72 | 18.89 | — | — | — | |
| Intel Corp. | 6.20 | 6.02 | — | — | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 14.97 | 19.26 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 11.36 | 16.94 | — | — | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | 65.75 | 84.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 3.26 | 6.05 | — | — | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 57.58 | 58.98 | — | — | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 7.84 | 12.76 | 19.49 | — | — | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 14.69 | 15.54 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |||||||
| Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 14.87 | 15.76 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |||||||
| Information Technology | 18.32 | 20.52 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 44,336,602 ÷ 2,883,000 = 15.38
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between March 2017 and March 2022 is characterized by substantial growth in both Enterprise Value (EV) and EBITDA, although the disproportionate growth rates between these two metrics resulted in significant volatility in the EV/EBITDA multiple.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- A consistent upward trend in Enterprise Value is observed for most of the period, rising from approximately 20.58 billion USD in 2017 to a peak of 47.58 billion USD in 2021. This represents more than a doubling of the enterprise valuation within four years. A slight contraction occurred in 2022, with the value receding to 44.34 billion USD.
- EBITDA Performance
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization showed strong growth, particularly between 2017 and 2018, where EBITDA more than doubled from 705.34 million USD to 1.55 billion USD. Following a period of steady incremental growth through 2021, a significant surge was recorded in 2022, with EBITDA reaching 2.88 billion USD, the highest level in the analyzed period.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The EV/EBITDA ratio exhibited high volatility, fluctuating between a high of 29.17 in 2017 and a low of 14.61 in 2018. A notable valuation spike occurred in 2021, where the ratio reached 25.73, indicating that the growth in Enterprise Value significantly outpaced the growth in EBITDA during that fiscal year. However, by March 2022, the ratio compressed sharply to 15.38, driven by the substantial increase in EBITDA which aligned the valuation more closely with operational earnings.
Overall, the data indicates a pattern where periods of rapid valuation expansion were eventually offset by strong operational earnings growth, leading to a normalization of the EV/EBITDA multiple by the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?