Paying user area
Try for free
Microchip Technology Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Total Asset Turnover since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Microchip Technology Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
The financial data demonstrates a consistent and notable upward trend in both net cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) over the six-year period ending March 31, 2022.
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- This figure exhibits steady growth year-over-year, increasing from approximately $1.05 billion in 2017 to $2.84 billion in 2022. The progression reflects an overall strengthening in the firm’s core operating cash generation capabilities. Although there is a slight dip in 2020 compared to 2019, the subsequent years show a robust recovery and significant acceleration in cash inflows.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- FCFF follows a similar increasing pattern, moving from around $975 million in 2017 to approximately $2.65 billion in 2022. The steady rise in FCFF indicates the company’s growing ability to generate cash after accounting for capital expenditures. This is a positive signal of improved operational efficiency and financial health. Temporary fluctuations in growth rates, such as the smaller incremental increase in 2020, are mitigated by strong increases in the following years.
In summary, both operating cash flow and free cash flow measures point to enhanced liquidity and cash generation strength. The growth trends suggest effective management of operations and capital investments, supporting the firm’s capacity to fund growth, reduce debt, or return value to shareholders.
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
2 2022 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= × =
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Trend
- The effective income tax rate experienced significant fluctuation over the analyzed period. In the year ending March 31, 2017, the rate was 35%. This sharply increased to 65.36% in the following year, suggesting an unusual tax expense or adjustment occurred during that period. Subsequently, the tax rate stabilized at 21% for three consecutive years ending in 2019, 2020, and 2021, indicating a return to a more typical tax environment. In the final year ending March 31, 2022, the effective tax rate decreased to 13.29%, which may imply a reduction in taxable income, the utilization of tax credits, or favorable tax planning outcomes.
- Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Tax Trend
- Cash outflows related to interest payments, net of tax, have displayed an overall upward trajectory with notable volatility. Data begins in 2018 with a payment of $29,548 thousand, which rose substantially to $274,841 thousand in 2019. This peak was maintained with a marginal increase to $280,608 thousand in 2020. After 2020, there is a clear downward trend, with payments decreasing to $209,666 thousand in 2021 and further to $180,183 thousand in 2022. The peak levels during 2019-2020 could reflect increased debt levels or higher interest rates, while the subsequent decline may suggest debt reduction, refinancing, or lower borrowing costs.
- Overall Insights
- The financial indicators reveal notable variability particularly in tax effectiveness and interest-related cash flows. The spike and subsequent normalization of the effective tax rate suggest extraordinary tax incidents followed by stabilized tax efficiency. The interest payments data imply substantial changes in debt financing strategies or interest expense management, with a peak period around 2019-2020 followed by efforts to reduce interest outflows. These patterns could reflect broader strategic financial decisions or responses to external economic factors affecting taxation and capital structure.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
Enterprise value (EV) | |
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | |
Valuation Ratio | |
EV/FCFF | |
Benchmarks | |
EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | |
Analog Devices Inc. | |
Applied Materials Inc. | |
Broadcom Inc. | |
Intel Corp. | |
KLA Corp. | |
Lam Research Corp. | |
Micron Technology Inc. | |
NVIDIA Corp. | |
Qualcomm Inc. | |
Texas Instruments Inc. | |
EV/FCFF, Sector | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | |
EV/FCFF, Industry | |
Information Technology |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
Mar 31, 2022 | Mar 31, 2021 | Mar 31, 2020 | Mar 31, 2019 | Mar 31, 2018 | Mar 31, 2017 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
Enterprise value (EV)1 | |||||||
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | |||||||
Valuation Ratio | |||||||
EV/FCFF3 | |||||||
Benchmarks | |||||||
EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | |||||||
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | |||||||
Analog Devices Inc. | |||||||
Applied Materials Inc. | |||||||
Broadcom Inc. | |||||||
Intel Corp. | |||||||
KLA Corp. | |||||||
Lam Research Corp. | |||||||
Micron Technology Inc. | |||||||
NVIDIA Corp. | |||||||
Qualcomm Inc. | |||||||
Texas Instruments Inc. | |||||||
EV/FCFF, Sector | |||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | |||||||
EV/FCFF, Industry | |||||||
Information Technology |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- The enterprise value displayed a generally increasing trend from March 31, 2017, to March 31, 2021, rising from approximately $20.58 billion to nearly $47.58 billion. However, in the subsequent year ending March 31, 2022, the value declined to about $44.34 billion, indicating a reversal after a period of steady growth.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- Free cash flow to the firm showed consistent growth across all reported periods, increasing from roughly $0.97 billion in 2017 to $2.65 billion in 2022. This continuous upward movement suggests strengthening operating cash flow generation capability over the years.
- EV/FCFF Ratio
- The EV/FCFF ratio generally decreased from 21.11 in 2017 to a low of 16.71 in 2022, with a notable exception in 2021 when the ratio peaked sharply at 23.4. This spike in 2021 may reflect a disproportionate increase in enterprise value relative to free cash flow, possibly indicating market valuation adjustments or temporary fluctuations in cash flow generation. The overall downward trend in the ratio over the longer term implies improved valuation efficiency, where the firm's enterprise value is increasingly supported by its free cash flow.