Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
Between March 31, 2017, and March 31, 2022, a consistent expansion of the gross property, plant, and equipment (PPE) base was observed, increasing from approximately 2.45 billion USD to 3.42 billion USD. This growth reflects a sustained investment in capital assets, primarily driven by the acquisition of machinery and equipment.
- Composition of Gross Assets
- Machinery and equipment constitute the largest portion of the asset portfolio, showing a steady upward trajectory from 1.77 billion USD in 2017 to 2.47 billion USD in 2022. Building and building improvements also exhibited consistent growth, rising from 499.7 million USD to 674.4 million USD over the same period. Land holdings remained relatively stable, with a modest increase from 73.4 million USD to 88.2 million USD.
- Capital Investment Activity
- Projects in process remained largely stable between 100 million USD and 120 million USD from 2017 through 2021. However, a significant increase occurred in 2022, with the value rising to 182.4 million USD, suggesting an acceleration in new capital expenditures or the initiation of large-scale facility expansions toward the end of the analyzed period.
- Depreciation and Net Valuation
- Accumulated depreciation and amortization grew linearly from 1.77 billion USD in 2017 to 2.45 billion USD in 2022, consistent with the aging of a growing asset base. Consequently, the net PPE value experienced some volatility, peaking at 996.7 million USD in 2019 before declining to 854.7 million USD by 2021. A recovery was noted in 2022, with net PPE reaching 967.9 million USD, driven by the substantial increase in gross asset acquisitions during that fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
Analysis of asset age ratios indicates a pattern of periodic capital refreshment amidst a generally aging asset base. The average age ratio demonstrates a high level of depreciation across the observed period, generally fluctuating between 68% and 74%, which suggests that a substantial portion of the property, plant, and equipment is well into its useful life.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- The average age ratio remained relatively stable, peaking at 74.40% in 2021. A notable contraction occurred in 2019, where the ratio dropped to 68.09%, signaling a temporary reduction in the relative age of the asset portfolio, likely due to the integration of newer assets.
- Total Useful Life and Asset Age Correlation
- Fluctuations in the estimated total useful life are mirrored by changes in the estimated age since purchase. Significant reductions occurred in 2019 and 2022, where the estimated age dropped to 11 and 12 years, respectively. These dips suggest cycles of capital expenditure that lowered the weighted average age of the asset base.
- Estimated Remaining Life Stability
- The remaining useful life of the asset portfolio has remained remarkably consistent, oscillating narrowly between 4 and 6 years over the six-year period. This stability indicates a consistent replacement cycle or a standardized approach to determining the remaining utility of the equipment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation and amortization ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land)
= 100 × 2,448,700 ÷ (3,416,600 – 88,200) = 73.57%
The capital asset base reflects a consistent expansion in gross property, plant, and equipment, which increased from US$ 2,452,353 thousand in 2017 to US$ 3,416,600 thousand by 2022. This growth in gross assets is mirrored by a steady rise in accumulated depreciation and amortization, which climbed from US$ 1,769,015 thousand to US$ 2,448,700 thousand over the same six-year period, indicating a mature asset portfolio subject to continuous wear and tear.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- The average age ratio remained relatively high throughout the period, generally fluctuating between 68% and 74%. A notable decline occurred in 2019, where the ratio dropped to its lowest point of 68.09%. This downward movement suggests a period of significant capital investment in new assets, which effectively lowered the relative age of the total equipment pool. However, this trend was temporary, as the ratio ascended to 74.40% by 2021 before settling at 73.57% in 2022.
- Capital Investment and Asset Lifecycle
- The return of the average age ratio to levels exceeding 73% indicates that the pace of new asset acquisitions has not sufficiently offset the depreciation of older equipment since 2019. The proximity of the ratio to the mid-to-high 70s suggests that a substantial portion of the property, plant, and equipment is approaching the end of its estimated useful life, which may signal a future requirement for systemic capital reinvestment.
- Land Asset Stability
- Land holdings showed minimal volatility, increasing modestly from US$ 73,447 thousand in 2017 to US$ 88,200 thousand in 2022. Given that land is a non-depreciable asset, these figures provide a stable baseline but do not contribute to the fluctuations observed in the average age ratio of the depreciable asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense attributed to property, plant and equipment
= (3,416,600 – 88,200) ÷ 209,100 = 16
Analysis of property, plant and equipment indicates a period of consistent capital expansion paired with fluctuating asset valuation parameters between 2017 and 2022.
- Gross Asset Expansion
- Gross property, plant and equipment exhibited a steady upward trajectory, increasing from 2,452,353 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 3,416,600 thousand US dollars in 2022. This growth represents a total increase of approximately 39% over the six-year period. In contrast, land holdings remained relatively stable, rising modestly from 73,447 thousand US dollars to 88,200 thousand US dollars.
- Depreciation Expense Patterns
- Depreciation expenses grew from 122,900 thousand US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 209,100 thousand US dollars in 2022. The expenditure did not follow a linear path, showing a significant spike in 2019 to 180,600 thousand US dollars, followed by a two-year period of slight decline before rising sharply in the final year of the analyzed period.
- Useful Life Volatility
- The estimated total useful life of assets shows significant variability, ranging from 16 to 21 years. After reaching a peak of 21 years in 2018, the estimate dropped sharply to 16 years in 2019. A subsequent gradual increase reached 19 years by 2021, only to return to 16 years by 2022. This instability suggests periodic reassessments of asset longevity, potentially driven by technological obsolescence or shifts in the composition of acquired assets.
- Interdependence of Asset Life and Depreciation
- An inverse correlation is observable between the estimated useful life and depreciation expenses. The years reporting the shortest estimated useful life (16 years in 2019 and 2022) correspond with the highest levels of depreciation expense. This indicates that the reduction in estimated asset longevity has served as a primary driver for accelerating depreciation charges.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation and amortization ÷ Depreciation expense attributed to property, plant and equipment
= 2,448,700 ÷ 209,100 = 12
The financial data indicates a consistent growth in the total accumulated depreciation and amortization from 2017 to 2022, suggesting a steady aging of the asset base and a continuous recognition of asset consumption over time. The total accumulated amount rose from approximately 1.77 billion USD in 2017 to 2.45 billion USD by 2022, representing a cumulative increase of roughly 38%.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- A linear upward trajectory is observed in accumulated depreciation and amortization. The consistent year-over-year increases reflect the ongoing allocation of cost for property, plant, and equipment, confirming that the company maintains a significant long-term asset base.
- Depreciation Expense Volatility
- Annual depreciation expenses exhibit fluctuations rather than a steady climb. A notable increase occurred in 2019, where expenses rose to 180.6 million USD from 123.7 million USD in the prior year. After a slight decline between 2020 and 2021, expenses peaked in 2022 at 209.1 million USD. These spikes typically correlate with the acquisition of new capital assets or changes in depreciation schedules.
- Asset Age and Replacement Cycles
- The average time elapsed since purchase provides insight into the modernization of the asset pool. The age of assets increased to 15 years in 2018 but dropped sharply to 11 years in 2019. This reduction in estimated age coincides with the spike in depreciation expense for that period, indicating a significant investment in new equipment. A similar pattern is evident in 2022, where the elapsed time decreased to 12 years following a period of increase, further suggesting a cycle of capital reinvestment to refresh the operational infrastructure.
The inverse relationship between the average time elapsed since purchase and the annual depreciation expense suggests that the company periodically engages in capital expenditure cycles to modernize its property, plant, and equipment. The reduction in asset age in 2019 and 2022 serves as a proxy for the acquisition of newer, more efficient assets, which subsequently drives higher periodic depreciation charges.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense attributed to property, plant and equipment
= (967,900 – 88,200) ÷ 209,100 = 4
Analysis of the property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) reveals a general expansion of the asset base over the six-year period ending March 31, 2022, characterized by a correlation between total asset value and annual depreciation expenses.
- Net Property, Plant, and Equipment Trends
- Net PP&E grew from 683.3 million US dollars in 2017 to 967.9 million US dollars in 2022. A peak was observed in 2019 at 996.7 million US dollars, followed by a moderate decline through 2021, before a recovery in 2022. This pattern suggests a period of intensive capital investment followed by a phase of asset aging or divestment, and a subsequent return to investment.
- Depreciation Expense Analysis
- Annual depreciation expenses exhibited a general upward trajectory, rising from 122.9 million US dollars in 2017 to 209.1 million US dollars in 2022. The most pronounced increase occurred between 2018 and 2019, where expenses rose by approximately 46%, aligning with the peak in net PP&E and suggesting the integration of significant new capital assets into the production environment.
- Estimated Remaining Life of Assets
- The estimated remaining useful life of PP&E has remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 4 and 6 years. After peaking at 6 years in 2018, the estimate held constant at 5 years from 2019 through 2021, before declining to 4 years in 2022. This narrow range indicates a consistent capital replacement cycle and a standardized approach to asset depreciation.
- Land Valuation Stability
- Land holdings remained the most stable component of the asset base, increasing marginally from 73.4 million US dollars in 2017 to 88.2 million US dollars in 2022. The limited growth in land value relative to the total PP&E increase confirms that capital expenditures are primarily directed toward machinery and equipment rather than real estate expansion.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?