Stock Analysis on Net

Applied Materials Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAT)

$24.99

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

Applied Materials Inc., EBITDA calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Oct 26, 2025 Oct 27, 2024 Oct 29, 2023 Oct 30, 2022 Oct 31, 2021 Oct 25, 2020
Net income
Add: Income tax expense
Earnings before tax (EBT)
Add: Interest expense
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT)
Add: Depreciation and amortization
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-10-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-10-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-10-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-10-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-10-25).


The financial data reveals a generally positive trend in profitability and operational earnings over the six-year period inspected. Each key earnings metric demonstrates consistent growth, albeit with some variations in the growth rate.

Net Income
Starting from 3,619 million US dollars in 2020, net income increased significantly to 7,177 million by 2024, showing steady annual growth. However, a slight decline is observed in 2025, where net income decreased to 6,998 million. This suggests a peak in profitability in 2024 followed by a modest reduction.
Earnings Before Tax (EBT)
EBT exhibits a sustained upward trajectory, rising from 4,166 million in 2020 to 9,271 million in 2025. The growth appears relatively steady, with no observed declines, indicating increased pre-tax profitability and possibly improved operational efficiency or reduced non-operating expenses over time.
Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)
EBIT also shows consistent improvement throughout the period, moving from 4,406 million in 2020 to 9,540 million by 2025. The pattern mirrors that of EBT, signaling steady operational performance and effective cost management impacting operating income positively.
Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA)
EBITDA follows a similar ascending pattern, increasing from 4,782 million in 2020 to 9,975 million in 2025. The continued growth in EBITDA suggests enhanced earnings before non-cash expenses, possibly reflecting greater operational cash flow generation capacity and solid business fundamentals.

Overall, the data indicates consistent and robust growth in profitability with all four earnings measures approximately doubling or more over the time span of six years. The slight drop in net income in the final year warrants attention to factors such as increased expenses, taxation, or non-operational impacts, but the continued rise in EBT and EBIT through 2025 suggests underlying operational strength remains intact.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current

Applied Materials Inc., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors1
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Lam Research Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.
EV/EBITDA, Sector
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
EV/EBITDA, Industry
Information Technology

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-10-26).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical

Applied Materials Inc., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Oct 26, 2025 Oct 27, 2024 Oct 29, 2023 Oct 30, 2022 Oct 31, 2021 Oct 25, 2020
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)1
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA3
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors4
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Analog Devices Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
Intel Corp.
KLA Corp.
Lam Research Corp.
Micron Technology Inc.
NVIDIA Corp.
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments Inc.
EV/EBITDA, Sector
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
EV/EBITDA, Industry
Information Technology

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-10-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-10-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-10-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-10-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-10-25).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2025 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Enterprise Value (EV)
The enterprise value exhibited notable fluctuations over the analyzed periods. Beginning at approximately $80.4 billion, it increased sharply to nearly $130 billion in the subsequent year. This was followed by a decline to around $91.3 billion, before surging again to roughly $133.4 billion and maintaining a similar level the next year. A significant rise was observed in the latest period, reaching over $203.5 billion, indicating a strong growth in market valuation or increased capital deployment.
Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA)
The EBITDA showed a consistent upward trend throughout the periods under review. Starting from about $4.8 billion, it grew steadily each year, reaching nearly $10 billion by the last period. This steady increase points to improving operational performance and enhanced earnings capacity before accounting for capital structure and non-cash charges.
EV/EBITDA Ratio
The EV/EBITDA ratio demonstrated moderate variability, reflecting changes in both enterprise value and EBITDA over time. Initially, the ratio was around 16.8, slightly increasing to 17.5 in the following year, which suggests a modest expansion in valuation multiples relative to earnings. This ratio then dropped significantly to 11.0, indicating the company was valued more conservatively compared to its earnings at that point. Subsequently, the ratio increased again to approximately 15.8 and 15.3 in the following years, before reaching 20.4 in the most recent period. The rising ratio suggests increasing investor optimism or higher growth expectations, despite the steady growth in EBITDA.