EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
IQVIA Holdings Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2013
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2013
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2013
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to IQVIA Holdings Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibits fluctuation, it does not sufficiently offset the cost of capital applied to the invested capital base, resulting in an economic loss each year.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased from US$444 million in 2018 to US$449 million in 2019, representing a modest gain. A significant increase is then observed in 2020, reaching US$718 million, followed by a substantial rise to US$1,678 million in 2021. However, NOPAT decreased in 2022 to US$1,268 million, indicating a decline from the prior year’s peak. Despite these fluctuations, NOPAT remains positive throughout the analyzed period.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital shows a gradual increasing trend over the five-year period. Starting at 16.66% in 2018, it rose to 17.89% in 2022. This consistent increase in the cost of capital contributes to the persistent negative economic profit.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased throughout the period, moving from US$20,458 million in 2018 to US$21,926 million in 2022. The increase in invested capital, coupled with a rising cost of capital, exacerbates the economic loss.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remains negative across all years examined. The magnitude of the loss decreased from US$2,965 million in 2018 to US$2,083 million in 2021, coinciding with the peak in NOPAT. However, economic profit worsened again in 2022, reaching US$2,654 million, due to the combination of declining NOPAT and a continued increase in the cost of capital. The trend suggests that while operational profitability improved in certain years, it has not been sufficient to generate returns exceeding the cost of the capital employed.
In summary, the organization consistently destroys economic value as indicated by the negative economic profit. While NOPAT experienced growth during the period, it was insufficient to overcome the increasing cost of capital applied to a growing invested capital base.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in unearned income.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring reserve.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to IQVIA Holdings Inc..
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to IQVIA Holdings Inc..
9 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income Attributable to IQVIA Holdings Inc.
- The net income exhibited a fluctuating trend over the reviewed period. Starting at 259 million US dollars in 2018, there was a decline to 191 million in 2019. This was followed by an increase to 279 million in 2020. The year 2021 marked a significant spike in net income, reaching 966 million, the highest during the period. In 2022, net income continued to rise, although at a slower pace, reaching 1,091 million US dollars.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT showed a general upward trajectory with some variability. It started at 444 million US dollars in 2018 and remained relatively stable in 2019 with a marginal increase to 449 million. A more pronounced growth occurred in 2020, with NOPAT rising to 718 million. In 2021, the figure more than doubled compared to the previous year, reaching 1,678 million. However, in 2022, NOPAT decreased to 1,268 million, reflecting a contraction compared to 2021 but remaining significantly higher than the values before 2021.
- Overall Observations
- The data indicates that both net income and NOPAT experienced substantial growth particularly in 2021. However, while net income maintained an upward trend into 2022, NOPAT showed a decrease in the last year. This divergence may suggest changes in operational efficiency or tax impact in the most recent period. The significant increase in 2021 could be indicative of strong operational performance or other one-time factors contributing to profitability during that year.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The analysis of the income tax expense and cash operating taxes over the five-year period reveals a clear upward trend for both financial items.
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense exhibited fluctuations in the initial years but showed a significant increase toward the end of the period. Starting at 59 million USD in 2018, the expense nearly doubled in 2019 to 116 million USD, then decreased to 72 million USD in 2020. However, there was a notable rise in subsequent years, reaching 163 million USD in 2021 and peaking at 260 million USD by the end of 2022. This pattern indicates increasing tax liabilities, especially in the last two years under review.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes also followed an upward trajectory, albeit with more stability year-over-year. From 340 million USD in 2018, the amount increased modestly to 356 million USD in 2019, followed by a slight dip to 334 million USD in 2020. Afterwards, there was a steady increase, with cash taxes rising to 390 million USD in 2021 and further climbing to 469 million USD in 2022. This steady growth highlights increasing cash tax payments, which may reflect higher taxable income or changes in tax legislation or business operations.
Overall, both the income tax expense and cash operating taxes have trended upward over the five-year span, with the largest increases occurring in the most recent years. This suggests a rising tax burden, which could impact net profitability and cash flows. The disparity between the income tax expense and cash operating taxes in absolute terms may also suggest timing differences or adjustments in deferred tax accounting.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of unearned income.
5 Addition of restructuring reserve.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to equity attributable to IQVIA Holdings Inc.’s stockholders.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
-
The total reported debt and leases show a general increasing trend over the observed period. Starting at 11,620 million US dollars at the end of 2018, the amount increased steadily, reaching 13,351 million US dollars by the end of 2022. Despite a slight decrease in 2021 compared to 2020, the overall trajectory indicates a rising debt and lease liability commitment.
- Equity attributable to IQVIA Holdings Inc.’s stockholders
-
Equity attributable to the company’s stockholders exhibits a declining pattern through the period. Beginning at 6,714 million US dollars in 2018, equity decreased to 6,003 million in 2019 and remained relatively flat through 2020 and 2021 around the 6,000 million mark. By the end of 2022, equity further dropped to 5,765 million dollars. This downward trend suggests a reduction in net assets available to shareholders over these years.
- Invested capital
-
Invested capital shows a modest but consistent upward trend from 20,458 million US dollars at the end of 2018 to 21,926 million US dollars by the end of 2022. This increase is gradual and steady, reflecting a growth in the total sources of funding, including both debt and equity, utilized by the company in its operations.
Cost of Capital
IQVIA Holdings Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The period between 2018 and 2022 demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit, alongside increasing invested capital. This results in consistently negative economic spread ratios throughout the observed timeframe. While the magnitude of the economic profit losses fluctuates, the overall trend indicates a persistent inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit exhibits substantial negative values each year. From 2018 to 2021, the negative economic profit decreased from US$2,965 million to US$2,083 million, suggesting some improvement in profitability relative to capital employed. However, in 2022, economic profit worsened to US$2,654 million, reversing the prior year’s positive trend.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital shows a generally increasing trend over the five-year period, rising from US$20,458 million in 2018 to US$21,926 million in 2022. This indicates a continued investment in the business, despite the consistent negative economic profit. The increase in invested capital, coupled with negative economic profit, likely contributes to the sustained negative economic spread ratios.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio remains negative throughout the period, ranging from -14.49% to -9.80%. The ratio demonstrates a slight improvement from 2018 (-14.49%) to 2021 (-9.80%), mirroring the trend in economic profit. However, the ratio deteriorated in 2022, reaching -12.11%, indicating a reduced spread between return on capital and the cost of capital. The consistent negativity suggests that the company’s investments are not generating sufficient returns to cover their cost.
In summary, the analysis reveals a pattern of increasing investment alongside persistent negative economic profit, resulting in consistently negative economic spread ratios. While a brief period of improvement was observed between 2018 and 2021, the 2022 results indicate a reversal of that trend, suggesting ongoing challenges in generating value for investors.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenues | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in unearned income | ||||||
| Adjusted revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | ||||||
| Amgen Inc. | ||||||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | ||||||
| Danaher Corp. | ||||||
| Eli Lilly & Co. | ||||||
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | ||||||
| Johnson & Johnson | ||||||
| Merck & Co. Inc. | ||||||
| Pfizer Inc. | ||||||
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | ||||||
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited a generally improving trend from 2018 to 2021, followed by a deterioration in the most recent period. While remaining negative throughout the observed timeframe, the magnitude of the loss decreased before increasing again in 2022. This suggests fluctuations in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin began at -28.42% in 2018 and demonstrated a consistent, albeit gradual, improvement through 2021, reaching -14.42%. This indicates a lessening of the economic loss relative to revenue. However, in 2022, the margin worsened to -18.45%, reversing the prior positive trend. This recent shift warrants further investigation.
- Relationship to Adjusted Revenues
- Adjusted revenues increased from US$10,434 million in 2018 to US$14,447 million in 2021, coinciding with the improvement in the economic profit margin. The slight decrease in adjusted revenues to US$14,382 million in 2022 may have contributed to the subsequent decline in the economic profit margin, although the primary driver appears to be an increase in the economic loss itself.
- Economic Profit
- The absolute value of economic profit decreased from US$2,965 million in 2018 to US$2,083 million in 2021, aligning with the improving margin. However, economic profit increased to US$2,654 million in 2022, indicating a larger economic loss despite relatively stable revenues. This suggests that the cost of capital may have increased, or that operational efficiency declined, offsetting the revenue base.
Overall, the observed pattern suggests a period of improving economic performance followed by a recent setback. The reversal in the economic profit margin in 2022, despite near-constant revenues, signals a potential issue with profitability relative to the company’s capital costs and requires further scrutiny.