Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by a period of steady expansion, a severe contraction in 2020, and a subsequent partial recovery in cash generation capabilities.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash provided by operating activities experienced consistent growth from 2017 to 2019, increasing from 5,148 million US$ to a peak of 8,425 million US$. This positive trend was sharply reversed in 2020, when operating cash flow fell to a deficit of 3,793 million US$. By 2021, a significant recovery was observed, with operating cash flow returning to a positive 3,264 million US$, although this remained substantially lower than the 2019 peak.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Analysis
- FCFF exhibited higher volatility than operating cash flow throughout the period. Between 2017 and 2019, FCFF grew from 1,251 million US$ to 3,209 million US$. In 2020, the metric collapsed to negative 5,468 million US$, representing a deeper decline than that seen in operating activities. In 2021, FCFF returned to positive territory, though it reached only 25 million US$, indicating a near break-even state.
- Cash Flow Divergence and Investment Implications
- A critical divergence is evident in 2021; while operating cash flow recovered to 3,264 million US$, the FCFF remained marginal at 25 million US$. This disparity suggests that nearly all cash generated from operations was redirected toward capital expenditures or other firm-level investments, significantly limiting the residual cash available to the firm's providers of capital during the recovery year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2 2021 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= 1,506 × 29.80% = 449
Between 2017 and 2021, there is a significant and accelerating increase in the cash paid for interest, net of tax. This metric rose steadily in the early part of the period before experiencing exponential growth during 2020 and 2021.
- Interest Expenditure Trends
- Cash paid for interest, net of tax, increased from 255 million US dollars in 2017 to 1,057 million US dollars in 2021. The most pronounced growth occurred between 2019 and 2021, where the amount nearly tripled from 370 million to over 1 billion US dollars. This trajectory indicates a substantial expansion of the debt burden or a significant increase in the cost of borrowing during the latter years of the period.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Fluctuations
- The EITR exhibited a general downward trend from 2017 (34.60%) through 2020 (20.50%), representing a total reduction of 14.1 percentage points. This decline was followed by a sharp reversal in 2021, with the rate rising to 29.80%.
The correlation between these two metrics indicates that while the tax shield provided by interest expenses was diminished as the EITR fell through 2020, the absolute volume of cash required for interest payments grew regardless of the tax environment. By 2021, the simultaneous increase in both the interest paid and the effective tax rate suggests a heightened financial pressure regarding debt servicing costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 34,645) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 25) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 1,374.13 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| FedEx Corp. | 14.63 |
| Uber Technologies Inc. | 14.35 |
| Union Pacific Corp. | 31.09 |
| United Airlines Holdings Inc. | 12.74 |
| United Parcel Service Inc. | 19.63 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Transportation | 25.50 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Industrials | 39.87 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 42,689) | 42,686) | 46,127) | 42,684) | 43,987) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 25) | (5,468) | 3,209) | 2,038) | 1,251) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 1,693.21 | — | 14.37 | 20.94 | 35.16 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| FedEx Corp. | 18.72 | — | — | — | — | |
| Uber Technologies Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Union Pacific Corp. | 26.41 | — | — | — | — | |
| United Airlines Holdings Inc. | 79.24 | — | — | — | — | |
| United Parcel Service Inc. | 16.98 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Transportation | 24.82 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 28.81 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 42,689 ÷ 25 = 1,693.21
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the financial data reveals a period of significant volatility in cash flow generation contrasted against a relatively stable enterprise valuation. While the enterprise value remained within a consistent range between 2017 and 2021, the free cash flow to the firm experienced extreme fluctuations, leading to highly erratic valuation multiples.
- Enterprise Value Stability
- The enterprise value exhibited minimal variance over the five-year period, maintaining a range between 42,684 million and 46,127 million. A slight peak occurred in 2019, followed by a return to levels near 42,689 million by 2021, suggesting that the market's overall valuation of the firm's core assets and capital structure remained largely unchanged despite operational shocks.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- A strong growth trend in FCFF was observed from 2017 to 2019, with values increasing from 1,251 million to 3,209 million. This trajectory was sharply reversed in 2020, when FCFF plummeted to a negative 5,468 million. A marginal recovery was noted in 2021, although the figure remained near break-even at 25 million, representing a significant departure from pre-2020 levels.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- From 2017 to 2019, the EV/FCFF ratio showed a consistent downward trend, decreasing from 35.16 to 14.37. This indicates that the firm was generating increasing amounts of free cash flow relative to its enterprise value, suggesting improving operational efficiency. However, the ratio became non-calculable in 2020 due to negative cash flows. In 2021, the ratio spiked to 1,693.21, a mathematical result of the minimal positive FCFF against a stable enterprise value, rendering the ratio an unreliable metric for valuation during the recovery phase.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?