Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31).
The analysis of the presented financial ratios over the specified periods reveals several notable trends indicating fluctuations in profitability and leverage across time.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA demonstrates an initial upward trend beginning around early 2017, rising from approximately 8.25% to a peak around 13.74% in late 2018. This suggests improved efficiency in asset utilization during this period. However, starting in the 2019 fiscal year, ROA experiences volatility and a marked decline, even turning slightly negative in early 2020 (-0.04%). There is a modest recovery through 2021, reaching above 7%, but it again declines towards the end of 2021 and early 2022, with values dropping close to zero or slightly negative. Overall, the ROA indicates strong asset returns in the mid-period, followed by diminished asset productivity in the recent years covered.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage ratios hover mostly between 2.14 and 2.7 in the earlier data points, with a gradual decreasing trend from mid-2017 through early 2021. From 2021 onwards, there is an observable increase in leverage, with the ratio rising above 2.5 by the end of 2022, peaking near 2.92. This pattern suggests that the company initially reduced its reliance on debt or financial obligations relative to equity but later increased leverage, potentially to finance operations, acquisitions, or other capital needs. The rising leverage in later periods warrants attention as it implies higher financial risk.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The ROE follows a pattern similar to ROA in the early phases but with higher magnitude, reflecting the impact of leverage. It increases from around 22% in early 2017, peaking close to 29% by late 2018, indicating strong profitability and effective use of equity. Subsequently, a sharp decline occurs from 2019 into early 2020, with values falling below zero, reflecting possible net losses or impaired equity returns. Recovery attempts are seen in 2021 where ROE climbs to more than 15%, but this gain is not sustained, with declines resuming into 2022 where values again approach zero or dip negative. The ROE aligns with the observed volatility in ROA but shows amplified sensitivity likely due to changes in financial leverage.
In summary, the company's financial performance exhibited robust profitability and asset efficiency from 2017 through 2018, followed by a period of considerable instability and decreased returns on assets and equity. The leverage trend suggests initial deleveraging succeeded by increased financial risk exposure in the latter periods. These developments call for a cautious view of the company’s strategic and financial positioning, especially in the context of maintaining sustainable returns and managing debt levels effectively.
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31).
The analysis of the quarterly financial ratios reveals notable patterns and fluctuations over the periods observed.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin displays a generally ascending trend starting from 20.94% in early 2017, reaching a peak of 42.33% in May 2019. After this high point, a significant decline is visible, with margins dropping sharply to as low as -0.61% in May 2022. Minor recoveries are observed intermittently, but overall, this ratio exhibits high volatility, particularly after mid-2019, indicating fluctuations in profitability.
- Asset Turnover
- The asset turnover ratio demonstrates a moderate declining trend from 0.39 in early 2017 to around 0.28 in early 2019, signaling a decrease in efficiency at generating sales from assets. From this low point, the ratio stabilizes and gradually recovers, rising back to 0.39 by late 2022. This U-shaped trajectory suggests an initial reduction in asset utilization efficiency followed by a gradual improvement in recent quarters.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage ratios exhibit variations within a fairly narrow range across the observed quarters. Beginning near 2.7 in early 2017, the leverage decreases to approximately 2.08 by early 2021, implying a reduction in debt relative to equity. However, a subsequent increase is observed toward late 2022, with leverage climbing back to 2.92. These movements indicate shifting capital structure strategies, potentially reflecting changing risk tolerance or financing conditions.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- Return on equity mirrors the behaviour of net profit margin closely, initially rising from about 22.28% in early 2017 to highs near 29.37% at the end of 2018. Following this period, ROE declines markedly, dipping into negative territory at some points close to 2022, with slight rebounds thereafter. This trend indicates that equity profitability has been particularly sensitive to earnings volatility and operational performance during the observed timeframe.
Overall, the company experienced a period of strengthening profitability and equity returns until approximately 2019, followed by volatility and temporary losses in the subsequent years. Efficiency in asset use declined initially but showed recovery in the later periods. Financial leverage decreased steadily through to 2021, then increased again toward 2022, hinting at dynamic financial management in response to market or internal conditions.
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31).
The analysis reveals several noteworthy trends and fluctuations across the key financial ratios and margins over the observed periods.
- Tax Burden
- This ratio shows considerable volatility, with early values around 0.73 to 0.8 indicating typical tax retention levels. A marked spike appears in May 2020 at 13.04, followed by missing data and then a sharp decline into negative values by mid-2022, suggesting unusual tax circumstances or potentially non-recurring tax credits or adjustments during these periods.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden remains relatively stable between 0.86 and 0.92 up to late 2019, reflecting a consistent level of interest expense relative to operating earnings. However, a steep drop occurs in the early 2020 periods, reaching as low as 0.12, before recovering moderately but remaining below earlier levels, suggesting increased interest expenses or lower earnings before interest during that timeframe.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin shows a general upward trend from 33% in mid-2016 to a peak above 55% by mid-2018, indicating improving operational efficiency or higher profitability. This strong performance reverses markedly entering 2020, with margins turning negative and hitting lows near -6.59%, likely reflecting significant operational challenges. Margins recover somewhat in 2021 but remain well below previous highs, stabilized around 7% to 23% by late 2022.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover gradually declines from 0.39 in 2016 to a low near 0.28 by late 2018 and 2019, showing reduced efficiency in generating sales per asset. From 2020 onward, a modest recovery is seen, edging back toward 0.39 by the end of 2022, which may suggest improved asset utilization or sales growth relative to asset base.
- Financial Leverage
- This ratio remains within a relatively narrow band, between approximately 2.14 and 2.7 during the earlier years, indicating stable use of debt relative to equity. However, there is a gradual increase from 2.3 in early 2020 to around 2.92 by late 2022, implying augmented leverage which could correspond to additional borrowing or a reduction in equity.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE moves in line with profitability trends, initially fluctuating around 21% to 29% from 2016 through 2019. This performance plummets near zero and even dips slightly negative in early 2020, consistent with operational and profitability distress during that period. Recovery follows, with ROE reaching around 14% in 2021 before declining again toward single digits or near zero in 2022, indicating ongoing challenges in generating shareholder returns.
Overall, the data reflects a strong operating and profitability environment from 2016 to 2018, followed by a pronounced downturn in 2020, indicative of significant financial stress or external adversity affecting earnings, tax, and interest burdens. Subsequent periods show partial recovery in operational efficiency and profitability, albeit with increased financial leverage and continued variability in returns to equity holders. These patterns suggest a business experiencing disruption followed by efforts to stabilize and improve financial performance.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31).
The analysis of the quarterly financial data reveals several notable trends in profitability and operational efficiency metrics over the observed periods.
- Net Profit Margin (%)
- Initially, starting from May 31, 2016, data is not available. From February 28, 2017, there is a generally upward trajectory observed reaching a peak of 42.33% around May 31, 2019. This indicates a period of increasing profitability relative to revenue. However, a sharp decline follows, with margins plunging to negative territory by November 30, 2019 (-0.14%) and persisting near zero in early 2020. Post this decline, there is a gradual recovery through 2021 with margins rising back up to approximately 23.51%, though variability remains, with subsequent periods showing dips back towards near zero and slight negatives before improving again in late 2022.
- Asset Turnover (ratio)
- Over the quarter periods, asset turnover exhibits a slight downward trend starting near 0.39 in early periods on and after February 28, 2017, declining to a low around 0.28 by late 2018 and early 2019. However, beginning in 2020, the ratio stabilizes and then experiences a recovery, rising back to 0.39 by late 2022. This suggests that the efficiency in using assets to generate sales reduced for a period but improved in more recent quarters.
- Return on Assets (ROA) (%)
- ROA trends mirror those of net profit margin, starting from 8.25% in early 2017 and improving gradually to a peak of approximately 13.74% in late 2018. This indicates effective asset utilization contributing to earnings during this period. Subsequently, the metric declines sharply to near zero and into negative values around late 2019 to early 2020. A recovery phase is visible afterward with ROA increasing to about 7.37% in late 2021. This is followed by fluctuations and a slight decrease towards mid-2022. The ROA trend confirms a period of profitability stress impacting asset returns with some recovery observed in recent quarters.
In summary, the data indicates a strong performance phase up to early 2019 with improvement in profitability and asset utilization. This is followed by a significant downturn coinciding with late 2019 and early 2020 periods, with negative net margins and returns on assets, possibly reflective of external challenges or operational difficulties. Since mid-2020, there has been a partial recovery in profitability and asset efficiency, though metrics remain volatile and have not consistently returned to prior peak levels. Overall, the metrics reflect a cycle of growth, disruption, and gradual recovery in the company's financial performance across the analyzed quarters.
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31).
The analysis of the quarterly financial data reveals several notable trends in key financial ratios over the observed periods. The data covers multiple years, showing fluctuations across various measures such as tax burden, interest burden, EBIT margin, asset turnover, and return on assets (ROA).
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio shows some variability. Initially, it remains relatively stable around 0.73 to 0.99 from early 2017 through mid-2018. There is a sharp spike to 13.04 in Nov 2019, which is an outlier and likely reflects an extraordinary event or accounting adjustment. After this, the ratio returns close to prior levels but demonstrates increased volatility, including negative values in mid-2022 (-0.2 and -0.15), indicating potential tax credits or other tax impacts reducing the burden below zero. Overall, the tax burden does not show a clear upward or downward trend but indicates sporadic fluctuations and some unusual values.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden ratio remains fairly consistent, generally hovering between 0.82 and 0.91 throughout most periods, which suggests a steady management of interest expenses in relation to earnings before interest and taxes. An abrupt decline occurs around Nov 2019 to Feb 2020 (dropping to as low as 0.12), which may signal highly reduced interest costs or increased interest income temporarily. It partially recovers afterward but experiences additional dips towards mid-2022, reflecting some instability in interest-related expenses or income during those periods.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin displays considerable volatility. From 2016 through early 2019, it generally trends upward, reaching a peak of over 55% in May 2019. However, starting mid-2019, it declines sharply, even entering negative territory around Nov 2019 and Feb 2020, indicating operating losses during that phase. Subsequently, the margin recovers partially but remains lower and more erratic, oscillating mostly between 7% and 34% from 2021 onward. This suggests periods of profitability interspersed with operating challenges or market disruptions.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover gradually declines from about 0.39 in early periods to a low near 0.28 by late 2018, indicating reduced efficiency in using assets to generate revenue during that time. Afterward, there is a slow improvement, returning to about 0.39 by late 2022. This pattern may imply some initial operational inefficiencies or asset growth not immediately translating to revenue, followed by gradual recovery in asset utilization.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- ROA follows a trajectory similar to EBIT margin and asset turnover. It rises steadily from 8.25% early on to a peak near 13.74% by late 2018, denoting improved overall profitability relative to asset base. However, from mid-2019, ROA declines sharply, even touching small negative values around Nov 2019 and early 2020, aligning with the period of negative EBIT margin. The ratio then shows partial recovery but remains subdued with occasional negative instances, highlighting fluctuating profitability and some operational or market difficulties in recent quarters.
In summary, the financial ratios indicate a period of growth and improving profitability and efficiency up to late 2018. This is followed by marked instability and decline in operating performance and profitability through 2019 into early 2020, likely reflecting adverse business conditions. Post-2020, the company shows signs of gradual operational recovery in asset turnover and profitability metrics but with persistent volatility and less robust margins than the earlier growth phase. The tax and interest burdens show some irregularities and variability, which may be influenced by tax events, changing interest expenses, or financial structuring across the periods.
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31).
The financial data over the analyzed periods reveal several notable trends across key profitability and burden ratios.
- Tax Burden Ratio
- The tax burden ratio exhibits considerable volatility during the periods observed. From values between 0.73 and 1.1 in earlier years, there is an exceptionally high spike to 13.04, indicating an anomaly or extraordinary event. Subsequently, the ratio declines sharply and fluctuates, turning negative in two consecutive periods, which may imply tax credits, losses carryforward, or accounting adjustments. More recently, values stabilize closer to around 0.7 to 0.8, but the overall variability suggests inconsistent tax impact on earnings.
- Interest Burden Ratio
- The interest burden ratio remains relatively stable in the range of approximately 0.86 to 0.92 for most of the periods through 2019. A notable drop occurs in late 2019 and early 2020, with values hitting a low of 0.12, indicating a sharp decrease in interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes or an irregular event affecting interest burden. This is followed by a moderate recovery and further fluctuations ranging between 0.42 and 0.87, implying some pressures or changes in financing costs or debt levels over subsequent periods.
- EBIT Margin (% )
- The EBIT margin shows a generally upward trend from 2016 through early 2019, reaching peaks exceeding 50%, which suggests improving operational efficiency or pricing power. However, a sharp decline ensues in 2019 and 2020, with margins turning negative in two quarters, indicative of operational challenges, increased costs, or disruptions possibly linked to external factors. The margin partially recovers in later periods but remains below prior highs, indicating ongoing volatility in operating profitability.
- Net Profit Margin (% )
- Net profit margin follows a pattern roughly consistent with EBIT margin, increasing steadily from around 21% to above 40% in earlier years. Subsequently, it declines significantly through 2019 to 2020, reaching slightly negative territory in a couple of quarters, which aligns with operational difficulties or increased non-operational expenses. Following this period, net margin shows recovery but remains volatile and generally lower than the prior peak periods, indicating fluctuating bottom-line profitability.
In summary, the company has experienced periods of strong profitability improvements, reflected in rising EBIT and net profit margins up to early 2019. Nonetheless, the subsequent downturn with negative margins and unstable tax and interest burdens suggests operational and financial challenges. The recovery trend noted in later quarters indicates some resilience, but ongoing variability in key financial ratios points to persistent volatility and uncertainty in profitability and cost management.