EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Economic Profit
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= 498,399 – 16.13% × 20,491,900 = -2,806,590
The analysis of economic profit between February 2017 and February 2022 reveals a challenging period of value creation, characterized by significant volatility in operating performance and a recurring inability to exceed the cost of capital. Economic profit remained negative for five of the six years analyzed, indicating that the returns generated from invested capital were generally insufficient to cover the required rate of return.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited extreme fluctuations throughout the period. After steady growth from 2017 to a peak of US$ 4,189,068 thousand in February 2019, the figure collapsed to a negative US$ 778,137 thousand in February 2020. While a recovery was observed in February 2021 with a return to US$ 2,686,552 thousand, this momentum was not sustained, falling sharply to US$ 498,399 thousand by February 2022.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 14.03% and 16.13%. A slight upward trend is observed toward the end of the period, reaching its highest point of 16.13% in February 2022, which increased the threshold required for the company to achieve positive economic profit.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital saw a significant expansion phase, rising from US$ 17,413,511 thousand in 2017 to a peak of US$ 24,890,124 thousand in February 2019. Following this peak, a consistent downward trend occurred, with invested capital reducing to US$ 20,491,900 thousand by February 2022, suggesting a contraction in the asset base or a strategic divestment of capital.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit was negative for the majority of the period, with the most severe deficit occurring in February 2020 at negative US$ 3,835,793 thousand. The only instance of positive economic value addition occurred in February 2019, where a surge in NOPAT outweighed the cost of the expanded invested capital base. The return to a deeply negative economic profit of negative US$ 2,806,590 thousand in February 2022 highlights a misalignment between the operating returns and the cost of financing the remaining invested capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to CBI.
4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= 537,700 × 3.00% = 16,131
5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= 372,531 × 21.00% = 78,232
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to CBI.
- Net Income (Loss) Attributable to CBI
- The net income attributable to the company showed a significant upward trend from 2017 to 2019, increasing from approximately 1.54 billion USD to nearly 3.44 billion USD. This represents a robust growth phase over these three years. However, there was a sharp reversal in 2020, with the company reporting a net loss of about 11.8 million USD. Following this loss, the company returned to profitability in 2021 with nearly 2 billion USD in net income. Yet in 2022, the net income again declined into negative territory, recording a loss of approximately 40.4 million USD. Overall, the data reflects considerable volatility in net income performance, especially post-2019, indicating potential challenges during and after the 2020 period.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The net operating profit after taxes demonstrated growth from 2017 through 2019, climbing from roughly 1.89 billion USD to over 4.18 billion USD, nearly doubling during this period. This aligns with the increase in net income, indicating strong operational profitability. However, in 2020, NOPAT sharply declined into a significant negative value of approximately 778 million USD, suggesting operational difficulties or extraordinary charges impacting earnings. A recovery occurred in 2021, with NOPAT rising to about 2.69 billion USD, though this was substantially below the 2019 peak. The 2022 figure decreased again to around 498 million USD, highlighting ongoing instability in operating performance after 2019.
- Overall Financial Trends
- Both net income and net operating profit after taxes exhibited strong growth trends over the initial three-year period, reflecting an expanding and profitable operational phase. The year 2020 marked a critical inflection point, with both metrics showing significant downturns, possibly linked to external disruptions or internal challenges. Although there was a partial rebound in 2021, the company did not regain the peak levels seen in 2019. The subsequent decline in 2022 suggests persistent difficulties in returning to prior performance levels. The volatility captured in these key profitability measures indicates that while the company experienced robust growth earlier, it faced substantial headwinds beginning in 2020, which have had a lasting impact on financial performance.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28).
- Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
- The income tax provision fluctuates significantly over the periods analyzed. In the year ending February 28, 2017, the provision was substantially high at 554,200 thousand US dollars. This value sharply decreased to 11,900 thousand US dollars in the following year, indicating a substantial reduction in tax expense or a change in tax strategy. In the year ending February 28, 2019, the provision rose again markedly to 685,900 thousand US dollars, reflecting a possible increase in taxable income or changes in tax regulations.
- Notably, in the year ending February 29, 2020, there is a negative provision of -966,600 thousand US dollars, suggesting a significant tax benefit or perhaps a reversal of previous tax liabilities. Following this, the provision returned to positive figures in the subsequent years, with 511,100 thousand US dollars in 2021 and a decline to 309,400 thousand US dollars in 2022. The fluctuation highlights varying tax impacts on earnings, potentially influenced by operational performance, tax planning, or extraordinary items during these periods.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes exhibit a general declining trend from 2017 through 2021. Starting at 547,177 thousand US dollars in the year ending February 28, 2017, the cash taxes increased slightly to 553,637 thousand US dollars in 2018, indicating stable or increased tax payments at a cash level. From 2019 onward, a steady decrease is observed with payments dropping to 339,562 thousand US dollars, then continuing to 281,244 thousand US dollars in 2020, and further down to 259,325 thousand US dollars in 2021, which may reflect decreased taxable income or improved tax efficiency.
- In the year ending February 28, 2022, there is an increase in cash taxes paid to 302,832 thousand US dollars, suggesting a rebound or change in tax obligations compared to the previous declining trend. This may be indicative of increased earnings or alterations in tax policies impacting the cash tax outflows. Overall, cash operating taxes show more stability and less volatility compared to the income tax provision figures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of deferred revenue.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to total CBI stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction in progres.
- Total reported debt & leases
- Over the six-year period, total reported debt and leases exhibited substantial fluctuations. From 2017 to 2019, there was a notable increase, rising from approximately 9.63 billion to 14.07 billion USD. This peak was followed by a reduction in 2020 to around 12.75 billion USD, then a further decline in the subsequent years, reaching approximately 10.95 billion USD by 2022. The initial growth phase indicates a possible expansion or increased leverage, while the later decrease may suggest debt repayments or restructuring efforts.
- Total CBI stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity demonstrated a generally upward trajectory from 2017 through 2021. Beginning at roughly 6.89 billion USD in 2017, equity increased steadily, reaching a peak of about 13.60 billion USD in 2021. However, in 2022, there was a decline to approximately 11.73 billion USD. This trend suggests an overall strengthening of the equity base over most of the period, with a partial reversal in the most recent year, which could reflect asset revaluations, dividend payments, or other equity-affecting transactions.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital rose significantly from 2017 to 2019, increasing from roughly 17.41 billion USD to 24.89 billion USD. Subsequently, there was a decline in 2020 to approximately 21.79 billion USD, followed by further decreases to about 21.24 billion USD in 2021 and 20.49 billion USD in 2022. This pattern indicates an initial phase of capital expansion, possibly linked to investments or acquisitions, followed by a contraction phase, which may reflect divestitures, asset impairments, or reduced capital expenditures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Cost of Capital
Constellation Brands Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 47,846,762) | 47,846,762) | ÷ | 59,052,762) | = | 0.81 | 0.81 | × | 19.24% | = | 15.59% | ||
| Total borrowings3 | 10,668,300) | 10,668,300) | ÷ | 59,052,762) | = | 0.18 | 0.18 | × | 3.60% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.51% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 537,700) | 537,700) | ÷ | 59,052,762) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 3.00% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.02% | ||
| Total: | 59,052,762) | 1.00 | 16.13% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 46,238,745) | 46,238,745) | ÷ | 58,359,545) | = | 0.79 | 0.79 | × | 19.24% | = | 15.25% | ||
| Total borrowings3 | 11,580,900) | 11,580,900) | ÷ | 58,359,545) | = | 0.20 | 0.20 | × | 3.68% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.58% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 539,900) | 539,900) | ÷ | 58,359,545) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 3.20% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.02% | ||
| Total: | 58,359,545) | 1.00 | 15.85% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 29,508,508) | 29,508,508) | ÷ | 43,243,508) | = | 0.68 | 0.68 | × | 19.24% | = | 13.13% | ||
| Total borrowings3 | 13,174,800) | 13,174,800) | ÷ | 43,243,508) | = | 0.30 | 0.30 | × | 3.59% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.86% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 560,200) | 560,200) | ÷ | 43,243,508) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 3.50% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.04% | ||
| Total: | 43,243,508) | 1.00 | 14.03% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 39,701,259) | 39,701,259) | ÷ | 53,711,683) | = | 0.74 | 0.74 | × | 19.24% | = | 14.22% | ||
| Total borrowings3 | 13,560,000) | 13,560,000) | ÷ | 53,711,683) | = | 0.25 | 0.25 | × | 3.67% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.73% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 450,424) | 450,424) | ÷ | 53,711,683) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 3.67% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.02% | ||
| Total: | 53,711,683) | 1.00 | 14.98% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 43,687,019) | 43,687,019) | ÷ | 54,284,486) | = | 0.80 | 0.80 | × | 19.24% | = | 15.49% | ||
| Total borrowings3 | 10,145,200) | 10,145,200) | ÷ | 54,284,486) | = | 0.19 | 0.19 | × | 3.43% × (1 – 32.70%) | = | 0.43% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 452,267) | 452,267) | ÷ | 54,284,486) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 3.43% × (1 – 32.70%) | = | 0.02% | ||
| Total: | 54,284,486) | 1.00 | 15.94% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 33,322,598) | 33,322,598) | ÷ | 43,169,910) | = | 0.77 | 0.77 | × | 19.24% | = | 14.85% | ||
| Total borrowings3 | 9,452,000) | 9,452,000) | ÷ | 43,169,910) | = | 0.22 | 0.22 | × | 3.63% × (1 – 35.00%) | = | 0.52% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 395,311) | 395,311) | ÷ | 43,169,910) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 3.63% × (1 – 35.00%) | = | 0.02% | ||
| Total: | 43,169,910) | 1.00 | 15.39% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Feb 28, 2022 | Feb 28, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Feb 28, 2019 | Feb 28, 2018 | Feb 28, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | (2,806,590) | (679,564) | (3,835,793) | 460,229) | (820,075) | (786,625) | |
| Invested capital2 | 20,491,900) | 21,239,800) | 21,790,300) | 24,890,124) | 18,550,367) | 17,413,511) | |
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | -13.70% | -3.20% | -17.60% | 1.85% | -4.42% | -4.52% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | 3.86% | 5.39% | — | — | — | — | |
| Mondelēz International Inc. | -3.75% | -0.75% | — | — | — | — | |
| PepsiCo Inc. | 4.37% | 4.92% | — | — | — | — | |
| Philip Morris International Inc. | 11.92% | 26.26% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × -2,806,590 ÷ 20,491,900 = -13.70%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of value creation metrics indicates a predominantly negative trend in economic performance over the observed six-year period. The entity struggled to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital in most fiscal years, resulting in consistent value destruction, with only one exception during the period.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit exhibited significant volatility and remained negative for five of the six years. A brief period of value creation occurred in February 2019, where economic profit reached a positive 460,229 thousand US$. However, this was followed by a sharp decline in February 2020, reaching a nadir of negative 3,835,793 thousand US$. Although a partial recovery was noted in 2021, the profit fell again to negative 2,806,590 thousand US$ by February 2022.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- Invested capital showed an initial upward trend, peaking at 24,890,124 thousand US$ in February 2019. Following this peak, a steady contraction in the capital base is observed, with invested capital decreasing annually to 20,491,900 thousand US$ by February 2022. This reduction in invested capital did not correlate with a sustained improvement in economic profit.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio mirrored the volatility of the economic profit, serving as a key indicator of the gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital. The ratio transitioned from a negative 4.52% in 2017 to a positive 1.85% in 2019, marking the only period of positive spread. This was immediately followed by a severe contraction to negative 17.60% in 2020. While the ratio improved to negative 3.20% in 2021, it deteriorated again to negative 13.70% by February 2022, underscoring a persistent inability to maintain a positive spread.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Economic Profit Margin
| Feb 28, 2022 | Feb 28, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Feb 28, 2019 | Feb 28, 2018 | Feb 28, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | (2,806,590) | (679,564) | (3,835,793) | 460,229) | (820,075) | (786,625) | |
| Net sales | 8,820,700) | 8,614,900) | 8,343,500) | 8,116,000) | 7,585,000) | 7,331,500) | |
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 118,300) | —) | —) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Adjusted net sales | 8,939,000) | 8,614,900) | 8,343,500) | 8,116,000) | 7,585,000) | 7,331,500) | |
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | -31.40% | -7.89% | -45.97% | 5.67% | -10.81% | -10.73% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | 7.17% | 11.19% | — | — | — | — | |
| Mondelēz International Inc. | -7.61% | -1.60% | — | — | — | — | |
| PepsiCo Inc. | 3.51% | 4.33% | — | — | — | — | |
| Philip Morris International Inc. | 17.78% | 24.38% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × -2,806,590 ÷ 8,939,000 = -31.40%
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance between February 2017 and February 2022 is characterized by a consistent growth in top-line revenue contrasted with significant volatility and a general inability to maintain positive economic value added. While sales expanded steadily throughout the period, economic profit remained negative in five of the six fiscal years analyzed, indicating that the returns generated were frequently insufficient to cover the company's cost of capital.
- Adjusted Net Sales Trend
- A consistent upward trajectory is observed in adjusted net sales, which grew from 7.33 billion US dollars in 2017 to 8.94 billion US dollars in 2022. This represents a steady expansion of the revenue base, suggesting successful market penetration or pricing strategies over the six-year period.
- Economic Profit Volatility
- Economic profit exhibited extreme fluctuations. After initial losses in 2017 and 2018, a positive peak was reached in February 2019 with an economic profit of 460.23 million US dollars. However, this was followed by a severe decline in February 2020, where economic profit dropped to negative 3.84 billion US dollars. Although a partial recovery occurred in 2021, the figure plummeted again to negative 2.81 billion US dollars by February 2022.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin reflects the instability of value creation relative to sales. The margin remained negative and stable around -10% to -11% in 2017 and 2018, before swinging to a positive 5.67% in 2019. The most significant deterioration occurred in 2020, with the margin collapsing to -45.97%. Despite a correction to -7.89% in 2021, the margin widened again to -31.40% in 2022, highlighting a disconnect between revenue growth and the ability to generate economic surplus.
AI Ask an analyst for more