Stock Analysis on Net

3M Co. (NYSE:MMM)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 25, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

3M Co., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial data over the five-year period reveals several notable trends in key performance indicators.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT experienced a fluctuating trend, beginning at $5,388 million in 2017 and increasing slightly to $5,630 million in 2018. However, there was a significant decrease in 2019 to $4,679 million. Following this dip, NOPAT recovered, rising to $5,797 million in 2020 and further to $6,058 million in 2021, representing the highest value in the observed period.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital showed a general declining trend from 13.06% in 2017 to 12.08% in 2019. This was followed by a slight increase to 12.24% in 2020 and a marginal rise to 12.28% in 2021. Overall, the cost of capital decreased over the period but stabilized around the mid-12% range in the last two years.
Invested Capital
Invested capital remained relatively stable from 2017 to 2018, with values close to $32,308 million and $31,616 million, respectively. A notable increase occurred in 2019, reaching $38,698 million, which was maintained at approximately $38,880 million in 2020 and slightly increased to $39,156 million in 2021. This indicates a significant increase in invested capital starting in 2019, sustained throughout subsequent years.
Economic Profit
Economic profit showed considerable variability, beginning at $1,170 million in 2017 and increasing to a peak of $1,543 million in 2018. A sharp decline occurred in 2019, dropping to $5 million, essentially breaking even. Recovery was observed in 2020, with economic profit rising to $1,039 million and further improvement to $1,251 million in 2021. Despite the recovery, economic profit in 2021 remained slightly below the 2018 peak.

In summary, the company experienced variability in profitability measures, with a marked dip in 2019 followed by recovery in subsequent years. The cost of capital diminished initially but stabilized thereafter. Meanwhile, invested capital surged significantly starting in 2019 and remained elevated. Economic profit mirrored NOPAT's patterns, showing sensitivity to operational performance and invested capital changes during the period.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

3M Co., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net income attributable to 3M
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowances2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in product warranty liabilities4
Increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring action balances5
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents6
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability7
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense8
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes9
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income10
Investment income, after taxes11
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty liabilities.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring action balances.

6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to 3M.

7 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

8 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to 3M.

10 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net Income Attributable to 3M
The net income exhibits a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. Starting at 4,858 million USD in 2017, it increased to 5,349 million USD in 2018, indicating a positive growth. However, there was a decline in 2019, with net income falling to 4,570 million USD. This downward shift was followed by a recovery in 2020 and 2021, reaching 5,384 million USD and 5,921 million USD respectively, signaling an overall increasing trajectory towards the end of the period.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The NOPAT shows similar variability with a general upward movement. It rose from 5,388 million USD in 2017 to 5,630 million USD in 2018, before dropping to 4,679 million USD in 2019, reflecting a noticeable dip in operational profitability after taxes. Subsequently, NOPAT recovered significantly in 2020 and 2021, achieving 5,797 million USD and 6,058 million USD respectively. This rebound suggests improved operational efficiency and tax impact post-2019.
Overall Summary
Both the net income and NOPAT follow a similar pattern characterized by growth in the early years, a decline in 2019, and a strong rebound in the last two years. The dip in 2019 indicates potential challenges during that period, impacting both profitability and operational returns after taxes. The recovery phase through 2020 and 2021 suggests strategic or market conditions improving, leading to enhanced financial performance. The data implies resilience and a return to growth momentum after a temporary setback.

Cash Operating Taxes

3M Co., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of the provided financial data reveals a notable trend in the company's tax-related figures over a five-year period from 2017 to 2021.

Provision for Income Taxes

This figure shows a significant and consistent decline from 2017 through 2019, decreasing from US$2,679 million in 2017 to US$1,130 million in 2019. The trend then stabilizes somewhat in the following years, with a slight increase to US$1,318 million in 2020 before a marginal decrease to US$1,285 million in 2021.

Cash Operating Taxes

Cash operating taxes exhibit a similar downward pattern initially, falling from US$2,524 million in 2017 to US$1,349 million in 2019. After this period, the figure rises again in 2020 to US$1,585 million and remains relatively stable into 2021 at US$1,557 million. This suggests some recovery or stabilization in cash tax payments following the prior decline.

Overall, both provisions for income taxes and cash operating taxes experienced a marked reduction between 2017 and 2019. Subsequently, from 2020 onward, there appears to be a trend toward stabilization or slight recovery in tax-related expenses, although these amounts have not returned to the higher levels seen in 2017. This pattern could indicate changes in profitability, tax planning strategies, or tax law impacts over the examined period.


Invested Capital

3M Co., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
Current obligations of finance leases
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Finance leases, net of current obligations
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total 3M Company shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowances3
Deferred revenue4
Product warranty liabilities5
Accrued restructuring action balances6
Equity equivalents7
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax8
Noncontrolling interest
Adjusted total 3M Company shareholders’ equity
Construction in progress9
Marketable securities10
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of product warranty liabilities.

6 Addition of accrued restructuring action balances.

7 Addition of equity equivalents to total 3M Company shareholders’ equity.

8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

9 Subtraction of construction in progress.

10 Subtraction of marketable securities.


Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total reported debt and leases increased notably from 15,091 million USD at the end of 2017 to 21,299 million USD by the end of 2019. However, a declining trend is observed afterward, with the total reducing to 19,775 million USD in 2020 and further to 18,317 million USD in 2021. This indicates an initial period of increased leverage followed by a consistent effort to reduce debt and lease obligations over the last two years.
Total 3M Company Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity showed a downward trend from 11,563 million USD in 2017 to 9,796 million USD in 2018, indicating a reduction in net assets during that period. From 2018 onwards, equity exhibited a recovery and growth, climbing to 10,063 million USD in 2019, then more significantly increasing to 12,867 million USD in 2020 and reaching 15,046 million USD in 2021. This reflects improving retained earnings or capital infusions contributing to the strengthening of the equity base over the latter years.
Invested Capital
Invested capital was relatively stable between 2017 and 2018, with marginal decrease from 32,308 million USD to 31,616 million USD. In 2019, a considerable increase occurred, bringing the invested capital to 38,698 million USD. This level was maintained with slight increments through 2020 and 2021, totaling 38,880 million USD and 39,156 million USD respectively. This pattern suggests significant new investments or assets acquisition in 2019, followed by stabilization of capital deployment in subsequent years.
Overall Insights
The combined analysis suggests a strategic shift over the reported period. After increasing debt levels through 2019, the company appears to focus on deleveraging in 2020 and 2021, coinciding with rising shareholders' equity and steady invested capital. This could imply improved profitability, asset management, or capital restructuring efforts enhancing the company's financial stability and reducing reliance on borrowed funds.

Cost of Capital

3M Co., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

3M Co., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Economic Profit
The economic profit displayed significant fluctuation over the observed years. Starting at $1,170 million in 2017, it increased to $1,543 million in 2018. However, it sharply declined to a minimal $5 million in 2019 before rebounding to $1,039 million in 2020 and further growing to $1,251 million in 2021. This suggests volatility in the company's profitability relative to its invested capital during this period.
Invested Capital
The invested capital showed a generally upward trend with some variability. It decreased slightly from $32,308 million in 2017 to $31,616 million in 2018, then increased notably to $38,698 million in 2019. The capital remained relatively stable around $38,880 million in 2020 and $39,156 million in 2021. This overall increase indicates growing investment in operations or assets over the five-year span.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio, reflecting the difference between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital, varied considerably. It started at 3.62% in 2017, rising to a peak of 4.88% in 2018. In 2019, it dropped sharply to near zero at 0.01%, mirroring the sharp decline in economic profit. The ratio recovered to 2.67% in 2020 and improved further to 3.19% in 2021, indicating a gradual restoration of the company's value creation over the cost of capital.
Overall Insights
The data depicts a period of recovery following a challenging year in 2019, during which both economic profit and economic spread ratio were severely impacted despite an increase in invested capital. The subsequent years show a recovery trajectory in profitability and economic spread alongside stable invested capital levels. The fluctuations highlight the company's sensitivity to operational or market factors influencing profitability during this timeframe.

Economic Profit Margin

3M Co., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
 
Net sales
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Economic Profit
The economic profit demonstrated variability over the five-year period. It increased from 1170 million US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 1543 million US dollars in 2018, followed by a dramatic decline to only 5 million US dollars in 2019. Subsequently, economic profit rebounded to 1039 million US dollars in 2020 and increased further to 1251 million US dollars in 2021. This pattern indicates a significant disruption in 2019, with a strong recovery in the following two years.
Adjusted Net Sales
Adjusted net sales exhibited a generally increasing trend over the five years. Sales rose from 31641 million US dollars in 2017 to 32869 million US dollars in 2018. There was a slight decrease in 2019 to 31949 million US dollars, followed by a modest increase to 32252 million US dollars in 2020, and a more substantial rise to 35386 million US dollars in 2021. Overall, sales showed resilience and growth despite minor fluctuations.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin followed a pattern similar to that of economic profit. It improved from 3.7% in 2017 to 4.7% in 2018 but plummeted to nearly zero at 0.02% in 2019. The margin then recovered to 3.22% in 2020 and improved slightly to 3.53% in 2021. This indicates that profitability, relative to sales, was severely impacted in 2019 but showed a strong rebound in subsequent years.