Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
Analysis of short-term activity ratios reveals a consistent improvement in operational efficiency and inventory management over the three-year period ending December 27, 2014. The overall trend indicates a contraction in the time required to convert resources into cash, reflecting optimized internal processes.
- Inventory Efficiency
- A steady upward trend is observed in inventory turnover, which increased from 6.48 in 2012 to 7.53 in 2014. This improvement is mirrored by the average inventory processing period, which decreased from 56 days to 48 days, indicating a more rapid movement of goods and reduced holding times.
- Receivables Management
- Receivables turnover remained relatively stable across the period, ranging between 16.84 and 17.38. Consequently, the average receivable collection period showed negligible variance, holding steady at approximately 21 to 22 days, which suggests a consistent and disciplined credit collection policy.
- Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
- The operating cycle demonstrates a continuous downward trend, shortening from 78 days in 2012 to 70 days in 2014. The cash conversion cycle followed a similar trajectory of improvement, dropping from 33 days in 2012 to 28 days in 2014, although it reached its most efficient point of 23 days in 2013.
- Payables and Working Capital Dynamics
- The average payables payment period fluctuated, extending to 50 days in 2013 before contracting to 42 days in 2014. A significant anomaly is noted in the working capital turnover, which rose sharply from 12.16 in 2013 to 1,011.39 in 2014, suggesting a drastic reduction in net working capital that significantly amplified the turnover ratio in the final year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Inventory Turnover
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||
| Cost of sales | 13,360) | 11,395) | 12,499) | |
| Inventories | 1,775) | 1,616) | 1,928) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||
| Inventory turnover1 | 7.53 | 7.05 | 6.48 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventories
= 13,360 ÷ 1,775 = 7.53
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the operating activity ratios reveals a consistent improvement in inventory management efficiency between 2012 and 2014. The steady increase in the inventory turnover ratio indicates an enhanced ability to manage stock levels relative to the cost of goods sold over the observed period.
- Inventory Turnover Trend
- The inventory turnover ratio exhibited a continuous upward trajectory, rising from 6.48 in 2012 to 7.05 in 2013, and reaching 7.53 by 2014. This progression suggests a reduction in the average duration that inventory remains in stock before being sold, which typically reflects improved operational efficiency or more precise demand forecasting.
- Relationship Between Cost of Sales and Inventory Levels
- In 2013, a simultaneous decrease in both cost of sales and total inventories was observed. However, the reduction in inventory levels outpaced the decline in cost of sales, which contributed to the increase in the turnover ratio. By 2014, the cost of sales grew to 13,360 million USD, while inventory levels increased more moderately to 1,775 million USD. This divergence—where the volume of goods sold grew faster than the stock held—further accelerated the turnover rate to its period high.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Receivables Turnover
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||
| Net revenues | 18,205) | 18,218) | 18,339) | |
| Receivables, net of allowances | 1,080) | 1,048) | 1,089) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||
| Receivables turnover1 | 16.86 | 17.38 | 16.84 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net revenues ÷ Receivables, net of allowances
= 18,205 ÷ 1,080 = 16.86
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the short-term operating activity between 2012 and 2014 reveals a high degree of stability in the management of receivables relative to net revenues.
- Revenue Trends
- Net revenues remained consistently stable over the three-year period, showing a marginal decline from US$ 18,339 million in 2012 to US$ 18,205 million in 2014.
- Receivables Volume
- Net receivables exhibited minimal fluctuation, decreasing from US$ 1,089 million in 2012 to US$ 1,048 million in 2013, before returning to US$ 1,080 million in 2014.
- Receivables Turnover Performance
- The receivables turnover ratio demonstrates strong and consistent collection efficiency. The ratio increased from 16.84 in 2012 to a peak of 17.38 in 2013, before moderating to 16.86 in 2014. This pattern indicates a steady ability to convert credit sales into cash, with the 2013 peak reflecting a temporary optimization in the collection cycle driven by a decrease in the net receivables balance during that period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Payables Turnover
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||
| Cost of sales | 13,360) | 11,395) | 12,499) | |
| Accounts payable | 1,537) | 1,548) | 1,556) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||
| Payables turnover1 | 8.69 | 7.36 | 8.03 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Accounts payable
= 13,360 ÷ 1,537 = 8.69
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of payables turnover reveals a fluctuating trend over the three-year period from 2012 to 2014, characterized by a dip in 2013 followed by a significant increase in 2014.
- Payables Turnover Ratio Trends
- The turnover ratio decreased from 8.03 in 2012 to 7.36 in 2013, before rising to its highest point of 8.69 in 2014. This indicates that the company accelerated its payment frequency to suppliers in 2014 compared to the preceding two years.
- Cost of Sales Influence
- The fluctuations in the turnover ratio correlate closely with changes in the cost of sales. A reduction in cost of sales to 11,395 million US dollars in 2013 contributed to the lower turnover rate, while a substantial increase to 13,360 million US dollars in 2014 drove the ratio upward.
- Accounts Payable Stability
- Accounts payable remained remarkably stable across the period, with a slight downward trajectory from 1,556 million US dollars in 2012 to 1,537 million US dollars in 2014. The consistency of this balance suggests that changes in the turnover ratio were driven primarily by operational volume (cost of sales) rather than significant shifts in credit terms or supplier financing strategies.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Working Capital Turnover
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||
| Current assets | 4,791) | 4,908) | 4,823) | |
| Less: Current liabilities | 4,773) | 3,410) | 3,606) | |
| Working capital | 18) | 1,498) | 1,217) | |
| Net revenues | 18,205) | 18,218) | 18,339) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||
| Working capital turnover1 | 1,011.39 | 12.16 | 15.07 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net revenues ÷ Working capital
= 18,205 ÷ 18 = 1,011.39
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between 2012 and 2014 is characterized by consistent revenue generation contrasted with extreme volatility in short-term asset and liability management.
- Net Revenues
- Revenues remained stable throughout the analyzed period, with a marginal decline from 18,339 million US$ in 2012 to 18,205 million US$ in 2014, indicating a steady but stagnant top-line performance.
- Working Capital Trends
- A significant shift in liquidity is evident. Working capital initially grew from 1,217 million US$ in 2012 to 1,498 million US$ in 2013, before collapsing to 18 million US$ in 2014. This precipitous reduction suggests a drastic change in the company's balance sheet structure or a strategic effort to minimize net current assets.
- Working Capital Turnover
- The turnover ratio experienced an anomalous surge in the final year. After a moderate decrease from 15.07 in 2012 to 12.16 in 2013, the ratio spiked to 1,011.39 in 2014. This extreme value is a direct mathematical result of the collapse in working capital relative to stable revenues, indicating that the company generated substantial sales with nearly zero net investment in operating liquidity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Inventory Processing Period
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||
| Inventory turnover | 7.53 | 7.05 | 6.48 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | 48 | 52 | 56 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 7.53 = 48
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a consistent improvement in inventory management efficiency over the three-year period ending December 27, 2014. There is a clear correlation between the increase in turnover rates and the reduction in the time required to process inventory, suggesting optimized supply chain operations or increased demand for products.
- Inventory Turnover
- A steady upward trend is observed in the inventory turnover ratio, which rose from 6.48 in 2012 to 7.05 in 2013, and further increased to 7.53 by 2014. This progression signifies that the company is managing its stock more effectively, cycling through its inventory more frequently each year.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The average inventory processing period shows a corresponding decline, dropping from 56 days in 2012 to 52 days in 2013, and reaching 48 days by 2014. This reduction of eight days over the analyzed period demonstrates an acceleration in the movement of goods from acquisition to sale, thereby reducing the amount of working capital tied up in non-liquid assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Receivable Collection Period
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||
| Receivables turnover | 16.86 | 17.38 | 16.84 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | 22 | 21 | 22 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 16.86 = 22
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The efficiency of the credit collection process remained remarkably stable between December 2012 and December 2014. The minimal fluctuations in activity ratios indicate a consistent credit policy and a highly predictable payment cycle from customers.
- Receivables Turnover
- The turnover ratio exhibited a slight increase from 16.84 in 2012 to 17.38 in 2013, before returning to 16.86 in 2014. This suggests that the company consistently converts its receivables into cash approximately 17 times per year, reflecting a steady operational rhythm in managing short-term credit.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period remained virtually unchanged, fluctuating by only one day over the three-year period. The period moved from 22 days in 2012 to 21 days in 2013, and returned to 22 days by 2014. This stability demonstrates an effective management of accounts receivable and a low variance in the timing of cash inflows from credit sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Cycle
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||
| Average inventory processing period | 48 | 52 | 56 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 22 | 21 | 22 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||
| Operating cycle1 | 70 | 73 | 78 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 48 + 22 = 70
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operational efficiency of the working capital cycle shows a consistent improvement from 2012 through 2014. The overall operating cycle decreased steadily, shortening from 78 days to 70 days over the observed three-year period, which indicates a more rapid conversion of resources into cash.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- A clear downward trend is observed in the time required to process inventory. The period decreased from 56 days in 2012 to 52 days in 2013, and further to 48 days in 2014. This reduction of eight days over the period suggests enhanced efficiency in inventory management and a faster turnover of goods.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection of receivables remained highly stable throughout the period. The duration fluctuated minimally, moving from 22 days in 2012 to 21 days in 2013, and returning to 22 days in 2014. This consistency reflects a disciplined credit policy and a steady rate of payment from customers.
- Operating Cycle Integration
- The reduction in the total operating cycle is primarily driven by the gains in inventory processing efficiency rather than changes in receivable collections. Because the collection period remained constant, the 8-day improvement in the total operating cycle is directly attributable to the 8-day reduction in the inventory processing period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Payables Payment Period
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||
| Payables turnover | 8.69 | 7.36 | 8.03 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||
| Average payables payment period1 | 42 | 50 | 45 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 8.69 = 42
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the accounts payable activity from 2012 to 2014 reveals fluctuations in the timing of supplier payments and overall turnover efficiency. The period is characterized by a temporary expansion of the payment cycle in 2013, followed by a significant contraction in 2014.
- Payables Turnover
- The turnover ratio experienced a decline from 8.03 in 2012 to 7.36 in 2013, indicating a slower rate of payment relative to purchases. However, this trend reversed in 2014, with the ratio increasing to 8.69, the highest level within the observed three-year period, suggesting an acceleration in the frequency of payable settlements.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The average time taken to settle obligations rose from 45 days in 2012 to 50 days in 2013, representing an extension of the credit period utilized from suppliers. By 2014, the payment period decreased to 42 days, marking the shortest settlement window in the analysis and aligning with the increased turnover efficiency observed in the same year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Conversion Cycle
| Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||
| Average inventory processing period | 48 | 52 | 56 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 22 | 21 | 22 | |
| Average payables payment period | 42 | 50 | 45 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | 28 | 23 | 33 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).
1 2014 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 48 + 22 – 42 = 28
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The cash conversion cycle exhibits an overall downward trend from 2012 to 2014, indicating a general improvement in the efficiency of working capital management. Although a slight increase occurred between 2013 and 2014, the cycle remained significantly shorter than the initial 33-day period recorded in 2012.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- A consistent improvement in inventory management is observed, with the processing period declining steadily from 56 days in 2012 to 48 days in 2014. This reduction suggests an increase in inventory turnover efficiency and a decrease in the time capital remains tied up in stock.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection of receivables remained highly stable throughout the analyzed period, fluctuating marginally between 21 and 22 days. This stability indicates a consistent credit policy and predictable payment behavior from customers.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- Payment terms for payables showed volatility, increasing from 45 days in 2012 to a peak of 50 days in 2013, before decreasing to 42 days in 2014. The extension of payment terms in 2013 contributed to a temporary reduction in the cash conversion cycle, while the subsequent acceleration of payments in 2014 exerted upward pressure on the cycle.
- Cash Conversion Cycle Synthesis
- The cash conversion cycle decreased from 33 days to 23 days in 2013, driven by a combination of faster inventory turnover and extended payables. The slight increase to 28 days in 2014 was primarily a result of the shortened payables payment period, which offset the continued gains made in inventory processing efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?