AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Kraft Foods Group Inc. (NASDAQ:KRFT)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 28, 2015.

Return on Capital (ROC)

Microsoft Excel

Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.


Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

Kraft Foods Group Inc., ROIC calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 989 3,734 2,340
Invested capital2 14,787 16,041 13,807
Performance Ratio
ROIC3 6.69% 23.28% 16.95%
Benchmarks
ROIC, Competitors4
lululemon athletica inc. — — —
Nike Inc. — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2014 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 989 ÷ 14,787 = 6.69%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The return on invested capital (ROIC) demonstrates significant volatility over the observed three-year period, characterized by a peak in 2013 followed by a substantial contraction in 2014.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A strong upward trend is observed between 2012 and 2013, with NOPAT increasing from 2,340 million US$ to 3,734 million US$. However, this growth was not sustained, as 2014 saw a sharp decline to 989 million US$, indicating a severe reduction in operating profitability.
Invested Capital
Invested capital grew from 13,807 million US$ in 2012 to 16,041 million US$ in 2013, representing an expansion of the capital base. In 2014, this figure decreased to 14,787 million US$, suggesting a moderate reduction in the resources deployed in the business.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
The ROIC rose from 16.95% in 2012 to 23.28% in 2013, reflecting an increase in the efficiency of capital deployment. This trend reversed sharply in 2014, with ROIC falling to 6.69%. The precipitous drop in the final year is primarily driven by the collapse in NOPAT, which significantly outweighed the slight decrease in invested capital.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Decomposition of ROIC

Kraft Foods Group Inc., decomposition of ROIC

Microsoft Excel
ROIC = OPM1 × TO2 × 1 – CTR3
Dec 27, 2014 6.69% = 10.37% × 1.23 × 52.37%
Dec 28, 2013 23.28% = 25.16% × 1.14 × 81.47%
Dec 29, 2012 16.95% = 15.15% × 1.33 × 84.25%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).

1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »

2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »

3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »


The return on invested capital (ROIC) exhibited significant volatility over the analyzed period, characterized by a peak in 2013 followed by a sharp contraction in 2014. This fluctuation reflects an inconsistent ability to generate returns from invested capital, primarily driven by shifts in operating profitability and tax efficiency rather than capital utilization.

Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
The operating profit margin demonstrated substantial volatility, increasing from 15.15% in 2012 to a peak of 25.16% in 2013, before declining sharply to 10.37% in 2014. This metric acted as the primary driver for the movement in ROIC, where the expansion in 2013 fueled a rise in overall returns and the subsequent collapse in 2014 precipitated a decline in profitability.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
Capital turnover remained relatively stable in comparison to other components. A slight decline was observed from 1.33 in 2012 to 1.14 in 2013, followed by a partial recovery to 1.23 in 2014. The lack of dramatic shifts in this ratio suggests that the volatility in ROIC was not a result of changes in asset efficiency or capital intensity.
Effective Cash Tax Rate Impact (1 – CTR)
The after-tax retention factor showed a consistent downward trend, falling from 84.25% in 2012 to 81.47% in 2013, and dropping precipitously to 52.37% in 2014. This decline indicates a significant increase in the effective cash tax burden, which served as a compounding negative factor that eroded the final return on capital in 2014.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
The cumulative effect of these components resulted in an ROIC that rose from 16.95% in 2012 to 23.28% in 2013, before falling to 6.69% in 2014. The severe drop in the final year is attributable to the simultaneous decline in both the operating profit margin and the after-tax retention rate.

In summary, the deterioration of ROIC in 2014 was the result of a synchronized decline in operating efficiency and tax advantages. While capital turnover remained steady, it was insufficient to offset the combined impact of shrinking margins and an increased effective tax rate.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

Kraft Foods Group Inc., OPM calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 989 3,734 2,340
Add: Cash operating taxes2 899 849 437
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 1,888 4,584 2,778
 
Net revenues 18,205 18,218 18,339
Profitability Ratio
OPM3 10.37% 25.16% 15.15%
Benchmarks
OPM, Competitors4
lululemon athletica inc. — — —
Nike Inc. — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2014 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × 1,888 ÷ 18,205 = 10.37%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operational performance between 2012 and 2014 reveals significant volatility in profitability metrics, contrasting with a stagnant revenue base.

Revenue Stability
Net revenues remained nearly constant over the observed three-year period, moving from 18,339 million US dollars in 2012 to 18,205 million US dollars in 2014. This minimal variance indicates a lack of significant top-line growth or contraction.
Operating Profit Margin Fluctuations
The operating profit margin experienced a sharp increase from 15.15% in 2012 to a peak of 25.16% in 2013. However, this expansion was reversed by 2014, when the margin declined to 10.37%, representing a significant contraction in operational efficiency.
Net Operating Profit Trends
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) mirrored the margin trend, rising from 2,778 million US dollars in 2012 to 4,584 million US dollars in 2013, before falling sharply to 1,888 million US dollars in 2014. Because this decline occurred while revenues remained stable, the results suggest a substantial increase in operating costs or a decrease in operational leverage during the 2014 fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Turnover of Capital (TO)

Kraft Foods Group Inc., TO calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net revenues 18,205 18,218 18,339
Invested capital1 14,787 16,041 13,807
Efficiency Ratio
TO2 1.23 1.14 1.33
Benchmarks
TO, Competitors3
lululemon athletica inc. — — —
Nike Inc. — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).

1 Invested capital. See details »

2 2014 Calculation
TO = Net revenues ÷ Invested capital
= 18,205 ÷ 14,787 = 1.23

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of capital efficiency over the three-year period from 2012 to 2014 reveals a period of stagnation in revenue generation coupled with volatility in the invested capital base, resulting in a fluctuating turnover of capital ratio.

Net Revenue Trends
Net revenues remained nearly stagnant throughout the observed period. A slight decline is noted from US$ 18,339 million in 2012 to US$ 18,205 million by 2014. This lack of top-line growth indicates a plateau in sales volume or pricing power during this timeframe.
Invested Capital Volatility
The invested capital experienced significant fluctuations. There was a substantial increase in 2013, rising to US$ 16,041 million from US$ 13,807 million in 2012. This was followed by a reduction to US$ 14,787 million in 2014, although the capital base remained higher than the 2012 level.
Turnover of Capital Performance
The turnover of capital ratio reflects the impact of the varying capital base against flat revenues. The ratio declined from 1.33 in 2012 to 1.14 in 2013, coinciding with the spike in invested capital. A partial recovery to 1.23 was observed in 2014, driven primarily by the reduction in invested capital rather than an increase in revenue. This suggests that the improvement in capital efficiency in the final year was achieved through capital optimization or divestment rather than operational growth.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)

Kraft Foods Group Inc., CTR calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 989 3,734 2,340
Add: Cash operating taxes2 899 849 437
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 1,888 4,584 2,778
Tax Rate
CTR3 47.63% 18.53% 15.75%
Benchmarks
CTR, Competitors4
lululemon athletica inc. — — —
Nike Inc. — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2014 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 899 ÷ 1,888 = 47.63%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


A significant upward trend in the effective cash tax rate (CTR) is observed over the analyzed three-year period, culminating in a sharp increase by the end of 2014. While the tax rate remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2013, the final year shows a substantial spike that coincides with a contraction in operating profitability.

Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
Operating profitability exhibited high volatility, increasing from 2,778 million US dollars in 2012 to a peak of 4,584 million US dollars in 2013, before declining sharply to 1,888 million US dollars in 2014.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash tax outflows demonstrated a consistent year-over-year increase, rising from 437 million US dollars in 2012 to 849 million US dollars in 2013, and reaching 899 million US dollars in 2014.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Interpretation
The CTR rose from 15.75% in 2012 to 18.53% in 2013, and subsequently surged to 47.63% in 2014. This dramatic escalation in the final year is primarily attributed to the inverse relationship between declining NOPBT and rising cash operating taxes, which substantially compressed the ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?