Stock Analysis on Net

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (NASDAQ:BBBY)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since September 30, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Feb 26, 2022 Feb 27, 2021 Feb 29, 2020 Mar 2, 2019 Mar 3, 2018 Feb 25, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial performance from February 2017 to February 2022 is characterized by consistent value destruction, as evidenced by negative economic profit in every reporting period. The organization failed to generate operating returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital, resulting in a persistent erosion of shareholder wealth.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A volatile and generally declining trend is observed in operating profitability. While the period began with a positive NOPAT of 935,216 thousand USD in 2017, earnings plummeted to negative 83,311 thousand USD by 2019 and reached a low of negative 522,990 thousand USD in 2020. Although a marginal recovery occurred in 2021 with a positive result of 98,133 thousand USD, the trend reversed in 2022, ending at negative 301,295 thousand USD.
Invested Capital
There is a steady and significant contraction in the capital base. Invested capital decreased from 6,680,896 thousand USD in 2017 to 3,288,320 thousand USD in 2022. This represents a reduction of approximately 50% over the six-year period, indicating a substantial downsizing of the asset base or an aggressive reduction in capital employed.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital exhibited fluctuations, starting at a peak of 16.18% in 2017 and reaching a minimum of 8.33% in 2020. Despite these variations, the cost of capital remained relatively high, further compounding the difficulty of achieving a positive economic profit given the declining NOPAT.
Economic Profit
Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire analysis period, signifying that the return on invested capital was consistently lower than the cost of capital. The most severe value destruction occurred between 2019 and 2020, with losses peaking at 947,620 thousand USD. The persistence of negative economic profit, ending at negative 650,101 thousand USD in 2022, confirms a systemic inability to create economic value.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Feb 26, 2022 Feb 27, 2021 Feb 29, 2020 Mar 2, 2019 Mar 3, 2018 Feb 25, 2017
Net earnings (loss)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in accrual for severance and related costs2
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents3
Interest expense, net
Interest expense, operating lease liability4
Adjusted interest expense, net
Tax benefit of interest expense, net5
Adjusted interest expense, net, after taxes6
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrual for severance and related costs.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings (loss).

4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net = Adjusted interest expense, net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings (loss).


Net Earnings (Loss)

The net earnings demonstrate a declining trend over the observed periods. The company reported positive earnings in 2017 and 2018, with figures of approximately $685 million and $425 million respectively. However, from 2019 onwards, the net earnings turned negative, with losses deepening each year. The largest loss was recorded in 2020 at around $614 million, followed by losses of approximately $151 million in 2021 and $560 million in 2022. This pattern indicates a significant deterioration in profitability beginning in 2019.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)

The NOPAT values show a similar trajectory to net earnings. Positive and relatively strong NOPAT were recorded in 2017 and 2018, amounting to approximately $935 million and $735 million respectively. In 2019, NOPAT dropped sharply to a negative value of about $83 million, continuing the downward trend into 2020 with a significant loss of roughly $523 million. An improvement was noted in 2021 when NOPAT turned positive again at approximately $98 million, but this was not sustained, as 2022 saw a return to negative territory with a loss nearing $301 million. These fluctuations highlight instability in operational profitability and challenges in maintaining post-tax operating profits.


Cash Operating Taxes

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Feb 26, 2022 Feb 27, 2021 Feb 29, 2020 Mar 2, 2019 Mar 3, 2018 Feb 25, 2017
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense, net
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).


The analysis of the financial data reveals several notable trends in the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes over the examined periods.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes
The provision for income taxes demonstrates significant fluctuations and a downward trend from 2017 through 2021, followed by an upward reversal in 2022. Initially, there was a substantial provision of $380,547 thousand in 2017, which decreased to $270,802 thousand in 2018. In the subsequent years, this provision shifted into negative territory, reflecting income tax benefits rather than expenses, with -$19,385 thousand in 2019, further deepening to -$185,989 thousand in 2021. However, in 2022, there was a sudden reversal with the provision increasing to a positive figure of $86,967 thousand. This shift indicates considerable volatility in the company's tax-related expenses and potential fluctuations in profitability or tax strategies.
Cash operating taxes
Cash operating taxes exhibit a pronounced downward trajectory with considerable variability. Beginning at $355,672 thousand in 2017, cash taxes paid plummeted to $161,195 thousand in 2018 and further declined to $126,720 thousand in 2019. The downward movement continues sharply in 2020 and 2021, reaching negative values of -$294,013 thousand and -$3,389 thousand, respectively. The negative values during these recent years suggest significant tax refunds or reductions, possibly related to tax credits, loss carrybacks, or adjustments in cash tax payments. The sharp decline and negative amounts indicate irregular tax cash flows, which could reflect tax planning measures or operational challenges affecting taxable income.

Overall, both income tax provisions and cash operating taxes indicate a period of decreasing tax expenses followed by irregularities and eventual volatility in recent years. These patterns might be linked to changes in profitability, tax laws, or strategic financial management, warranting further detailed investigation into underlying causes and potential impacts on the company's financial position.


Invested Capital

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Feb 26, 2022 Feb 27, 2021 Feb 29, 2020 Mar 2, 2019 Mar 3, 2018 Feb 25, 2017
Current finance lease liabilities
Noncurrent finance lease liabilities
Long term debt
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Accrual for severance and related costs3
Equity equivalents4
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax5
Adjusted shareholders’ equity
Investment securities6
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of accrual for severance and related costs.

4 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.

5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

6 Subtraction of investment securities.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibit a general downward trend over the analyzed period. Beginning at approximately $4.2 billion in early 2017, the figure decreases gradually to about $3.8 billion by early 2019. There is a slight uptick in early 2020 to around $3.9 billion, followed by a more pronounced decline to just over $3 billion by early 2021, after which it stabilizes near $3.07 billion in early 2022. This trend indicates a significant reduction in the company's indebtedness and lease obligations over the six-year span.
Shareholders’ equity
Shareholders’ equity shows a marked downward trajectory throughout the period. Starting at approximately $2.7 billion in early 2017, it experiences moderate fluctuations but declines substantially after 2019. The equity falls sharply from about $2.56 billion in 2019 to roughly $1.76 billion in early 2020, followed by a further decline to approximately $1.28 billion in early 2021. By early 2022, equity dwindles considerably to about $174 million. This significant erosion suggests ongoing losses or other factors negatively impacting retained earnings and overall net asset value.
Invested capital
Invested capital declines steadily over the analyzed period, beginning at roughly $6.7 billion in early 2017 and decreasing consistently year-over-year. By early 2020, invested capital stands near $5.1 billion, continuing to diminish to approximately $4.3 billion in early 2021, and further down to nearly $3.3 billion in early 2022. This consistent reduction reflects a contraction in the company’s total capital employed, which aligns with decreases in both shareholders’ equity and debt levels.

Cost of Capital

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 32.66%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 32.66%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 0.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 0.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Feb 26, 2022 Feb 27, 2021 Feb 29, 2020 Mar 2, 2019 Mar 3, 2018 Feb 25, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance over the six-year period indicates a consistent failure to generate economic value, characterized by persistent negative economic profit and a significant contraction in the invested capital base. The overall trend reflects a sustained period of value destruction where the returns on capital failed to meet the cost of capital.

Economic Profit
Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire observation period. While a near-breakeven point was approached in March 2018 with a loss of 4,044 thousand US$, this was followed by a sharp deterioration. Losses intensified significantly in March 2019 and February 2020, with the latter recording the period's lowest point at -947,620 thousand US$. Despite a partial recovery in February 2021, the trend returned to a downward trajectory by February 2022.
Invested Capital
A steady and continuous decline in invested capital is observed. From a peak of 6,680,896 thousand US$ in February 2017, the capital base decreased every subsequent year, ending at 3,288,320 thousand US$ in February 2022. This represents a reduction of approximately 50.7% over the period, suggesting a systemic contraction of the company's asset base or a deliberate reduction in invested resources.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio remained negative across all periods, confirming that the return on invested capital was consistently below the cost of capital. The ratio exhibited significant volatility, moving from -2.18% in 2017 to a near-neutral -0.06% in 2018, before plunging to -18.60% by February 2020. Although a temporary improvement to -11.85% occurred in February 2021, the ratio reached its most critical level of -19.77% in February 2022, indicating an acceleration in value destruction relative to the remaining invested capital.

Economic Profit Margin

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Feb 26, 2022 Feb 27, 2021 Feb 29, 2020 Mar 2, 2019 Mar 3, 2018 Feb 25, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance from February 2017 to February 2022 reveals a consistent inability to generate positive economic value. The company operated with a negative economic profit throughout the entire period, indicating that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed.

Net Sales Performance
A general downward trajectory in revenue is observed following a peak in March 2018. Net sales declined from 12.35 billion USD in 2018 to 7.87 billion USD by February 2022. This represents a significant erosion of the top line, particularly accelerating between 2020 and 2022.
Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained in negative territory for all six reported years. While there was a notable improvement in March 2018, where the loss narrowed to 4.04 million USD, this was followed by a sharp deterioration. The most severe losses occurred in February 2020, with an economic profit of negative 947.62 million USD. Despite a partial recovery in 2021, the figure declined again to negative 650.10 million USD by 2022.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin mirrors the volatility and decline of the absolute economic profit. After reaching a near-breakeven point of -0.03% in 2018, the margin deteriorated significantly to -8.49% in 2020. Although the margin improved to -5.47% in 2021, it widened again to -8.26% in 2022. The widening of this negative margin, coupled with falling sales, suggests an intensifying failure to create economic value relative to the scale of operations.

The convergence of declining net sales and persistently negative economic profit margins indicates a sustained period of value destruction. The inability to return to the near-breakeven state observed in 2018 suggests structural challenges in achieving a return on capital that exceeds the required threshold.