EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Total Asset Turnover since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial analysis for the period ending February 2022 reveals a consistent inability to generate positive economic profit, indicating a sustained period of value destruction. Throughout the observed timeframe, the company failed to earn a return on invested capital that exceeded its cost of capital, resulting in negative economic profit in every reported year.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A volatile and overall downward trajectory is evident in NOPAT. While the period began with a significant positive value of 935,216 thousand US$ in February 2017, profitability declined sharply, turning negative by March 2019. Despite a brief recovery to 98,133 thousand US$ in February 2021, the figure returned to a negative position of 301,295 thousand US$ by February 2022, reflecting instability in core operating performance.
- Invested Capital
- There is a persistent and linear contraction in invested capital. The capital base decreased from 6,680,896 thousand US$ in February 2017 to 3,288,320 thousand US$ in February 2022. This steady reduction suggests a significant downsizing of the asset base or a systematic divestment of capital over the six-year period.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited fluctuation without a definitive long-term trend. It peaked at 16.18% in February 2017 and reached its lowest point of 8.33% in February 2020. The variability in this percentage indicates changing risk profiles or market conditions affecting the required rate of return.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remained negative across all reporting dates, confirming that the company did not achieve a competitive return on its investments. The most severe value destruction occurred between March 2019 and February 2020, where economic profit reached its lowest point at -947,567 thousand US$. Although there was a partial narrowing of the loss in February 2021, the trend returned to a significant deficit of 650,045 thousand US$ by February 2022.
The correlation between declining invested capital and fluctuating NOPAT suggests that reducing the capital base was insufficient to offset the operational losses. The persistent negative economic profit demonstrates that the company's operating returns were consistently lower than the cost of the capital employed to generate those returns.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrual for severance and related costs.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings (loss).
4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net = Adjusted interest expense, net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings (loss).
- Net Earnings (Loss)
-
The net earnings demonstrate a declining trend over the observed periods. The company reported positive earnings in 2017 and 2018, with figures of approximately $685 million and $425 million respectively. However, from 2019 onwards, the net earnings turned negative, with losses deepening each year. The largest loss was recorded in 2020 at around $614 million, followed by losses of approximately $151 million in 2021 and $560 million in 2022. This pattern indicates a significant deterioration in profitability beginning in 2019.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
The NOPAT values show a similar trajectory to net earnings. Positive and relatively strong NOPAT were recorded in 2017 and 2018, amounting to approximately $935 million and $735 million respectively. In 2019, NOPAT dropped sharply to a negative value of about $83 million, continuing the downward trend into 2020 with a significant loss of roughly $523 million. An improvement was noted in 2021 when NOPAT turned positive again at approximately $98 million, but this was not sustained, as 2022 saw a return to negative territory with a loss nearing $301 million. These fluctuations highlight instability in operational profitability and challenges in maintaining post-tax operating profits.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
The analysis of the financial data reveals several notable trends in the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes over the examined periods.
- Provision (benefit) for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes demonstrates significant fluctuations and a downward trend from 2017 through 2021, followed by an upward reversal in 2022. Initially, there was a substantial provision of $380,547 thousand in 2017, which decreased to $270,802 thousand in 2018. In the subsequent years, this provision shifted into negative territory, reflecting income tax benefits rather than expenses, with -$19,385 thousand in 2019, further deepening to -$185,989 thousand in 2021. However, in 2022, there was a sudden reversal with the provision increasing to a positive figure of $86,967 thousand. This shift indicates considerable volatility in the company's tax-related expenses and potential fluctuations in profitability or tax strategies.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes exhibit a pronounced downward trajectory with considerable variability. Beginning at $355,672 thousand in 2017, cash taxes paid plummeted to $161,195 thousand in 2018 and further declined to $126,720 thousand in 2019. The downward movement continues sharply in 2020 and 2021, reaching negative values of -$294,013 thousand and -$3,389 thousand, respectively. The negative values during these recent years suggest significant tax refunds or reductions, possibly related to tax credits, loss carrybacks, or adjustments in cash tax payments. The sharp decline and negative amounts indicate irregular tax cash flows, which could reflect tax planning measures or operational challenges affecting taxable income.
Overall, both income tax provisions and cash operating taxes indicate a period of decreasing tax expenses followed by irregularities and eventual volatility in recent years. These patterns might be linked to changes in profitability, tax laws, or strategic financial management, warranting further detailed investigation into underlying causes and potential impacts on the company's financial position.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of accrual for severance and related costs.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of investment securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases exhibit a general downward trend over the analyzed period. Beginning at approximately $4.2 billion in early 2017, the figure decreases gradually to about $3.8 billion by early 2019. There is a slight uptick in early 2020 to around $3.9 billion, followed by a more pronounced decline to just over $3 billion by early 2021, after which it stabilizes near $3.07 billion in early 2022. This trend indicates a significant reduction in the company's indebtedness and lease obligations over the six-year span.
- Shareholders’ equity
- Shareholders’ equity shows a marked downward trajectory throughout the period. Starting at approximately $2.7 billion in early 2017, it experiences moderate fluctuations but declines substantially after 2019. The equity falls sharply from about $2.56 billion in 2019 to roughly $1.76 billion in early 2020, followed by a further decline to approximately $1.28 billion in early 2021. By early 2022, equity dwindles considerably to about $174 million. This significant erosion suggests ongoing losses or other factors negatively impacting retained earnings and overall net asset value.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital declines steadily over the analyzed period, beginning at roughly $6.7 billion in early 2017 and decreasing consistently year-over-year. By early 2020, invested capital stands near $5.1 billion, continuing to diminish to approximately $4.3 billion in early 2021, and further down to nearly $3.3 billion in early 2022. This consistent reduction reflects a contraction in the company’s total capital employed, which aligns with decreases in both shareholders’ equity and debt levels.
Cost of Capital
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 32.66%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 32.66%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long term debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 0.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 0.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long term debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2022 indicates a persistent state of value destruction, characterized by negative economic profit and a consistently negative economic spread ratio. While there was a brief period of relative stabilization in 2018, the subsequent years show a significant deterioration in the ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire observed period, signifying that the company failed to create shareholder value. After a notable improvement in 2018, where losses narrowed to 3.9 million USD, a sharp decline occurred in 2019 and 2020, with the latter reaching a peak deficit of approximately 947.6 million USD. Despite a partial recovery in 2021, economic profit fell again to 650 million USD by 2022.
- Invested Capital
- A consistent downward trend in invested capital is observed, decreasing from approximately 6.68 billion USD in 2017 to 3.29 billion USD in 2022. This sustained reduction of over 50% of the capital base suggests a significant contraction in the scale of operations or a systematic liquidation of assets over the six-year period.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio reinforces the trend of value erosion, remaining negative across all reported years. The ratio reached its highest point in 2018 at -0.06%, nearly breaking even. However, the ratio deteriorated sharply thereafter, hitting -18.60% in 2020 and reaching its lowest point of -19.77% in 2022. This indicates a widening gap between the return on invested capital and the company's cost of capital, confirming that the business became increasingly inefficient at utilizing its remaining assets to generate value.
Economic Profit Margin
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net sales | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from February 2017 to February 2022 is characterized by a persistent failure to generate positive economic value. Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire six-year period, indicating that the returns generated by the company were consistently insufficient to cover its cost of capital, resulting in continuous value destruction.
- Net Sales Trajectory
- Revenue peaked in March 2018 at 12.35 billion US$, followed by a steady and accelerating decline. By February 2022, net sales had fallen to 7.87 billion US$, representing a significant contraction in the top-line revenue base over the latter half of the period.
- Economic Profit Volatility
- Economic profit exhibited extreme fluctuations. A notable recovery occurred in March 2018, where losses narrowed to 3.91 million US$. However, this was followed by a severe deterioration, with losses expanding to a peak of 947.57 million US$ by February 2020. Although there was a partial recovery in February 2021, the trend reversed again by February 2022, with losses widening to 650.05 million US$.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin reflects a deepening inefficiency in capital utilization. After nearly reaching a break-even point of -0.03% in March 2018, the margin plummeted to -6.24% in 2019 and reached its lowest point of -8.49% in February 2020. The closing margin of -8.26% in February 2022 confirms a sustained inability to align operational returns with the required cost of capital.