Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
A significant and sustained deterioration in profitability is observed across all measured earnings metrics from February 2017 through February 2022. The company transitioned from a period of strong positive earnings to a state of recurring losses, characterized by extreme volatility in the latter half of the period.
- EBITDA Performance Trend
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) experienced a severe decline, falling from a peak of US$ 1,426,124 thousand in 2017 to a negative US$ 114,328 thousand by 2022. The most precipitous drop occurred between 2018 and 2020, where the metric shifted from a positive US$ 1,074,428 thousand to a deficit of US$ 357,553 thousand. A brief recovery to a positive US$ 81,063 thousand was noted in 2021, though this trend was not sustained into the following fiscal year.
- Operational Profitability Analysis
- A comparison between EBIT and EBITDA indicates that while the company managed to maintain a positive EBITDA in 2019 and 2021, the Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) remained negative during those same periods. This suggests that non-cash expenses, specifically depreciation and amortization, were substantial enough to mask underlying operational losses in the EBITDA figure during those specific years.
- Net Earnings and Bottom-Line Stability
- Net earnings exhibited a more consistent downward trajectory than EBITDA, entering negative territory in March 2019 and remaining negative for the duration of the analysis. The most severe net loss occurred in February 2020, reaching US$ 613,816 thousand. The persistent gap between the temporary recovery in EBITDA in 2021 and the continued net losses indicates that interest and tax obligations continued to weigh heavily on the bottom line regardless of short-term operational improvements.
- Correlation of Earnings Metrics
- The data reveals a strong correlation between the collapse of EBITDA and the decline of Earnings before tax (EBT) and EBIT. All four metrics moved synchronously downward from 2017 to 2020. However, the volatility observed between 2020 and 2022 suggests a period of financial instability where the company struggled to return to a baseline of operational profitability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 1,267,630) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | (114,328) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | — |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Amazon.com Inc. | 16.76 |
| Home Depot Inc. | 15.80 |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 13.20 |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 16.88 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 41.78 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Consumer Discretionary | 36.20 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 2,082,901) | 2,720,393) | 1,040,356) | 2,704,176) | 3,227,847) | 6,721,625) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | (114,328) | 81,063) | (357,553) | 251,690) | 1,074,428) | 1,426,124) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | — | 33.56 | — | 10.74 | 3.00 | 4.71 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 28.04 | 21.27 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 14.08 | 16.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 12.43 | 14.41 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 13.00 | 65.35 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 20.13 | 20.16 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 20.01 | 21.51 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 2,082,901 ÷ -114,328 = —
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data indicates a period of severe instability characterized by a precipitous decline in operational profitability and significant volatility in enterprise valuation from 2017 to 2022.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- A sharp downward trajectory in enterprise value is observed between February 2017 and February 2020, with the value contracting from 6,721,625 thousand to 1,040,356 thousand. While a temporary recovery occurred in February 2021, reaching 2,720,393 thousand, this gain was not sustained, as the value decreased again to 2,082,901 thousand by February 2022.
- EBITDA Performance
- Operational earnings exhibited a consistent and severe erosion over the analyzed period. EBITDA fell from a high of 1,426,124 thousand in 2017 to 251,690 thousand in 2019, eventually collapsing into a deficit of 357,553 thousand in 2020. Although a marginal return to profitability was recorded in 2021 with an EBITDA of 81,063 thousand, the figure reverted to a negative position of 114,328 thousand by 2022.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The EV/EBITDA ratio demonstrates extreme volatility, reflecting the degradation of the underlying earnings. The ratio initially compressed from 4.71 in 2017 to 3.00 in 2018, but then spiked to 10.74 in 2019 as EBITDA declined more rapidly than the enterprise value. In 2021, the ratio reached an outlier peak of 33.56, a result of a disproportionately low positive EBITDA relative to the recovered enterprise value. The absence of a ratio for 2020 and 2022 is attributable to negative EBITDA values, which renders the metric mathematically inapplicable for valuation purposes.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?