Solvency ratios also known as long-term debt ratios measure a company ability to meet long-term obligations.
Solvency Ratios (Summary)
Debt Ratios
Coverage Ratios
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
A significant deterioration in solvency is evident between February 2017 and February 2022. While the company maintained a relatively stable capital structure through 2019, a sharp escalation in leverage and a collapse in debt-servicing capacity occurred in the subsequent three fiscal years, culminating in extreme volatility by 2022.
- Leverage and Capital Structure
- Debt to equity ratios remained stable between 0.52 and 0.58 from 2017 to 2019, followed by a moderate increase to approximately 0.90 in 2020 and 2021. A critical spike occurred in February 2022, where the ratio surged to 6.99. This trend is mirrored in financial leverage, which stayed consistent between 2.44 and 2.57 until 2019, before rising to 4.41 in 2020 and escalating to 29.46 by 2022, indicating a severe erosion of the equity base relative to total assets.
- Impact of Operating Lease Liabilities
- The inclusion of operating lease liabilities reveals a more aggressive solvency risk profile. Debt to equity including leases remained aligned with standard debt ratios until 2020, at which point it jumped to 2.20 and reached 17.64 by 2022. Debt to assets including leases followed a similar trajectory, increasing from 0.21 in 2018 to 0.60 in 2022, suggesting that lease obligations constitute a primary driver of the company's total liability burden.
- Debt Serviceability and Coverage
- A precipitous decline in the ability to service debt is observed. The interest coverage ratio dropped from a robust 16.32 in 2017 to 11.59 in 2018, before entering negative territory in 2019 (-1.25) and remaining negative through 2022 (-6.31). This indicates that operating income became insufficient to cover interest expenses. Fixed charge coverage followed a downward trend, falling from 2.64 in 2017 to 0.08 in 2022, including a period of negative coverage in 2020, signaling a critical inability to meet fixed financial obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Equity
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Current finance lease liabilities | 2,494) | —) | 1,541) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent finance lease liabilities | 35,447) | —) | 102,412) | 3,800) | 4,500) | 5,100) | |
| Long term debt | 1,179,776) | 1,190,363) | 1,488,400) | 1,487,934) | 1,492,078) | 1,491,603) | |
| Total debt | 1,217,717) | 1,190,363) | 1,592,353) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Shareholders’ equity | 174,145) | 1,276,936) | 1,764,935) | 2,560,331) | 2,888,628) | 2,719,277) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to equity1 | 6.99 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.55 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Equity, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 0.59 | 0.54 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | — | 11.29 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | — | 15.16 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 0.56 | 1.04 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Equity, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 1.06 | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Equity, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 1.51 | 1.50 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 1,217,717 ÷ 174,145 = 6.99
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The solvency position of the entity underwent a severe deterioration between February 2017 and February 2022, characterized by a transition from a conservative capital structure to one indicative of extreme financial distress. This decline was driven not by a significant increase in borrowed funds, but by a precipitous collapse in shareholders' equity.
- Total Debt Trends
- Total debt levels remained relatively stable for the majority of the analyzed period. Between 2017 and 2020, debt fluctuated within a narrow range of approximately 1.49 billion to 1.59 billion US dollars. A moderate reduction occurred by February 2021, with debt decreasing to 1.19 billion US dollars, followed by a slight increase to 1.22 billion US dollars by February 2022.
- Shareholders' Equity Erosion
- A consistent and accelerating downward trend is observed in shareholders' equity. After peaking at 2.89 billion US dollars in March 2018, equity began a steep decline, falling to 1.76 billion US dollars by February 2020 and further to 1.28 billion US dollars by February 2021. The most critical collapse occurred in the final year of the period, where equity plummeted to 174.1 million US dollars by February 2022, representing a near-total depletion of the equity base.
- Debt to Equity Ratio Analysis
- The debt to equity ratio reflects the compounding effect of stable debt and evaporating equity. From 2017 to 2019, the ratio remained low and stable, fluctuating between 0.52 and 0.58. A significant upward shift began in February 2020, as the ratio climbed to 0.90 and reached 0.93 by February 2021. By February 2022, the ratio surged exponentially to 6.99, signaling a critical imbalance in the capital structure and a high level of financial leverage that severely impairs long-term solvency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability)
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., debt to equity (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Current finance lease liabilities | 2,494) | —) | 1,541) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent finance lease liabilities | 35,447) | —) | 102,412) | 3,800) | 4,500) | 5,100) | |
| Long term debt | 1,179,776) | 1,190,363) | 1,488,400) | 1,487,934) | 1,492,078) | 1,491,603) | |
| Total debt | 1,217,717) | 1,190,363) | 1,592,353) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Current operating lease liabilities | 346,506) | 360,061) | 463,005) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent operating lease liabilities | 1,508,002) | 1,509,767) | 1,818,783) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | 3,072,225) | 3,060,191) | 3,874,141) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Shareholders’ equity | 174,145) | 1,276,936) | 1,764,935) | 2,560,331) | 2,888,628) | 2,719,277) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to equity (including operating lease liability)1 | 17.64 | 2.40 | 2.20 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.55 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 1.06 | 0.96 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | — | 13.16 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | — | 18.24 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 2.08 | 2.66 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 1.67 | 1.46 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 1.90 | 1.87 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Debt to equity (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 3,072,225 ÷ 174,145 = 17.64
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The solvency profile exhibits a transition from a stable, equity-heavy capital structure to one characterized by extreme leverage and significant equity erosion between 2017 and 2022.
- Total Debt Trends
- Total debt, including operating lease liabilities, remained relatively constant at approximately 1.5 billion USD from 2017 through 2019. A substantial increase occurred in February 2020, with debt surging to 3.87 billion USD. While this figure moderated slightly in subsequent years, it remained elevated at approximately 3.07 billion USD by February 2022, more than double the levels observed prior to 2020.
- Shareholders' Equity Trends
- Shareholders' equity exhibited a gradual decline between 2017 and 2019, followed by an accelerated contraction starting in 2020. The most critical reduction occurred between February 2021 and February 2022, where equity plummeted from 1.28 billion USD to 174.1 million USD, representing a near-total erosion of the equity base.
- Debt to Equity Ratio Analysis
- The debt to equity ratio remained stable and low, fluctuating between 0.52 and 0.58 from 2017 to 2019, indicating a conservative solvency position. A dramatic shift occurred in 2020, with the ratio rising to 2.20. By February 2022, the ratio escalated exponentially to 17.64, reflecting a critical state of leverage where debt obligations vastly outweighed the available shareholders' equity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Capital
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Current finance lease liabilities | 2,494) | —) | 1,541) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent finance lease liabilities | 35,447) | —) | 102,412) | 3,800) | 4,500) | 5,100) | |
| Long term debt | 1,179,776) | 1,190,363) | 1,488,400) | 1,487,934) | 1,492,078) | 1,491,603) | |
| Total debt | 1,217,717) | 1,190,363) | 1,592,353) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Shareholders’ equity | 174,145) | 1,276,936) | 1,764,935) | 2,560,331) | 2,888,628) | 2,719,277) | |
| Total capital | 1,391,862) | 2,467,299) | 3,357,288) | 4,052,065) | 4,385,206) | 4,215,980) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to capital1 | 0.87 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.36 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Capital, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 0.37 | 0.35 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 1.04 | 0.92 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 1.24 | 0.94 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 0.36 | 0.51 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Capital, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 0.51 | 0.48 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Capital, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.60 | 0.60 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= 1,217,717 ÷ 1,391,862 = 0.87
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data from February 2017 through February 2022 reveals a significant deterioration in the solvency position, characterized by a sharp increase in the proportion of debt relative to total capital. While total debt levels remained relatively stable for the majority of the period, a precipitous decline in total capital has led to a substantial rise in leverage.
- Total Debt Trends
- Total debt exhibited relative stability between 2017 and 2019, hovering around 1.49 billion US dollars. A slight increase occurred in 2020, peaking at 1.59 billion US dollars, followed by a reduction to 1.19 billion US dollars in 2021. By February 2022, debt levels rose slightly again to 1.22 billion US dollars. Throughout the six-year period, the absolute fluctuations in debt were moderate compared to the changes in total capital.
- Total Capital Erosion
- A consistent and accelerating downward trend is observed in total capital. Starting at 4.22 billion US dollars in 2017, capital remained stable through 2018 before beginning a steady decline. The contraction became more severe from 2020 onwards, dropping to 3.36 billion US dollars in 2020, 2.47 billion US dollars in 2021, and ultimately collapsing to 1.39 billion US dollars by February 2022. This represents a total capital reduction of approximately 67% over the analyzed timeframe.
- Debt to Capital Ratio Analysis
- The debt to capital ratio remained stable between 0.34 and 0.37 from 2017 to 2019, indicating a balanced capital structure. However, starting in 2020, the ratio began to climb, reaching 0.47 and 0.48 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. A critical shift occurred in February 2022, where the ratio surged to 0.87. This spike indicates that debt now constitutes the vast majority of the total capital, signaling a severe increase in financial leverage and a heightened solvency risk.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability)
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., debt to capital (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Current finance lease liabilities | 2,494) | —) | 1,541) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent finance lease liabilities | 35,447) | —) | 102,412) | 3,800) | 4,500) | 5,100) | |
| Long term debt | 1,179,776) | 1,190,363) | 1,488,400) | 1,487,934) | 1,492,078) | 1,491,603) | |
| Total debt | 1,217,717) | 1,190,363) | 1,592,353) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Current operating lease liabilities | 346,506) | 360,061) | 463,005) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent operating lease liabilities | 1,508,002) | 1,509,767) | 1,818,783) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | 3,072,225) | 3,060,191) | 3,874,141) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Shareholders’ equity | 174,145) | 1,276,936) | 1,764,935) | 2,560,331) | 2,888,628) | 2,719,277) | |
| Total capital (including operating lease liability) | 3,246,370) | 4,337,127) | 5,639,076) | 4,052,065) | 4,385,206) | 4,215,980) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to capital (including operating lease liability)1 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.36 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 0.51 | 0.49 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 1.04 | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 1.20 | 0.95 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 0.68 | 0.73 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 0.63 | 0.59 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.65 | 0.65 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Debt to capital (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total capital (including operating lease liability)
= 3,072,225 ÷ 3,246,370 = 0.95
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The solvency profile exhibits a marked deterioration in capital structure between 2017 and 2022, transitioning from a conservative leverage position to one of high financial risk.
- Debt to Capital Ratio Trend
- Between February 2017 and March 2019, the debt to capital ratio remained stable, fluctuating minimally between 0.34 and 0.37. A significant inflection point occurred in February 2020, where the ratio surged to 0.69, continuing an upward trajectory to reach 0.95 by February 2022. This progression indicates that debt transitioned from a minority component of the capital structure to the primary source of financing.
- Total Debt Dynamics
- Total debt, inclusive of operating lease liabilities, was maintained at approximately 1.5 billion US dollars from 2017 through 2019. A sharp increase was recorded in February 2020, with liabilities rising to approximately 3.87 billion US dollars. While a slight reduction followed, debt levels remained elevated, concluding the period at 3.07 billion US dollars in February 2022.
- Total Capital Erosion
- Total capital peaked in February 2020 at 5.64 billion US dollars. However, the subsequent two years were characterized by a severe contraction of the capital base, which declined to 3.25 billion US dollars by February 2022. The simultaneous maintenance of high debt levels against a rapidly shrinking capital base explains the acceleration of the debt to capital ratio toward unity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Assets
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Current finance lease liabilities | 2,494) | —) | 1,541) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent finance lease liabilities | 35,447) | —) | 102,412) | 3,800) | 4,500) | 5,100) | |
| Long term debt | 1,179,776) | 1,190,363) | 1,488,400) | 1,487,934) | 1,492,078) | 1,491,603) | |
| Total debt | 1,217,717) | 1,190,363) | 1,592,353) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Total assets | 5,130,572) | 6,456,930) | 7,790,515) | 6,570,541) | 7,040,806) | 6,846,029) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to assets1 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.22 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Assets, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 0.19 | 0.18 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 0.56 | 0.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 0.55 | 0.47 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 0.12 | 0.20 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Assets, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 0.25 | 0.24 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Assets, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.35 | 0.36 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Debt to assets = Total debt ÷ Total assets
= 1,217,717 ÷ 5,130,572 = 0.24
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The solvency profile from February 2017 to February 2022 demonstrates a period of relative stability followed by a notable deterioration in the final reporting period.
- Debt to Assets Ratio Trend
- The ratio fluctuated between 0.18 and 0.24 over the six-year duration. A gradual improvement was observed between 2017 and 2021, with the ratio reaching a minimum of 0.18 in February 2021. However, 2022 marked a sharp reversal, as the ratio climbed to 0.24, representing the highest level of leverage relative to assets in the recorded period.
- Total Asset Volatility
- Total assets reached a peak of approximately 7.79 billion US dollars in February 2020. Following this peak, a precipitous decline occurred, with assets falling to 6.46 billion US dollars in 2021 and further contracting to 5.13 billion US dollars by February 2022. This substantial erosion of the asset base is the primary driver of the increased solvency risk seen in the final year.
- Total Debt Analysis
- Debt levels remained largely stagnant from 2017 through 2019, followed by a peak of 1.59 billion US dollars in February 2020. A significant reduction in total debt was achieved in 2021, dropping to 1.19 billion US dollars, before a slight increase to 1.22 billion US dollars was recorded in 2022.
The evidence suggests that while the company successfully reduced its absolute debt burden between 2020 and 2022, this was offset by a more aggressive decline in total assets. Consequently, the solvency position weakened in 2022 as the asset coverage for debt diminished.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability)
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., debt to assets (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Current finance lease liabilities | 2,494) | —) | 1,541) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent finance lease liabilities | 35,447) | —) | 102,412) | 3,800) | 4,500) | 5,100) | |
| Long term debt | 1,179,776) | 1,190,363) | 1,488,400) | 1,487,934) | 1,492,078) | 1,491,603) | |
| Total debt | 1,217,717) | 1,190,363) | 1,592,353) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Current operating lease liabilities | 346,506) | 360,061) | 463,005) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Noncurrent operating lease liabilities | 1,508,002) | 1,509,767) | 1,818,783) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Total debt (including operating lease liability) | 3,072,225) | 3,060,191) | 3,874,141) | 1,491,734) | 1,496,578) | 1,496,703) | |
| Total assets | 5,130,572) | 6,456,930) | 7,790,515) | 6,570,541) | 7,040,806) | 6,846,029) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Debt to assets (including operating lease liability)1 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.22 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 0.33 | 0.31 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 0.64 | 0.62 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 0.66 | 0.56 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 0.44 | 0.50 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 0.40 | 0.38 | — | — | — | — | |
| Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability), Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.44 | 0.44 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Debt to assets (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total assets
= 3,072,225 ÷ 5,130,572 = 0.60
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the solvency profile from February 2017 through February 2022 reveals a significant shift from a stable, low-leverage position to a state of increased financial risk. The period is characterized by an initial phase of stability followed by a sharp escalation in debt levels and a subsequent contraction of the asset base.
- Debt Accumulation Trends
- Between 2017 and 2019, total debt, including operating lease liabilities, remained nearly constant at approximately 1.49 billion US$. A substantial increase occurred in February 2020, where total debt spiked to 3.87 billion US$. Although there was a moderate reduction to 3.06 billion US$ in 2021, the debt level remained elevated, ending the period at 3.07 billion US$ in February 2022.
- Asset Base Dynamics
- Total assets exhibited moderate fluctuations between 2017 and 2019, ranging from 6.57 billion US$ to 7.04 billion US$. A peak was reached in February 2020 at 7.79 billion US$. However, a consistent downward trend followed, with assets declining to 6.46 billion US$ in 2021 and further eroding to 5.13 billion US$ by February 2022.
- Debt to Assets Ratio Progression
- The debt-to-assets ratio remained stable and low between 0.21 and 0.23 from 2017 to 2019, suggesting a conservative capital structure. This stability ended in 2020 when the ratio jumped to 0.50. Despite a slight improvement to 0.47 in 2021, the ratio rose sharply to 0.60 by February 2022. This final increase was driven by the simultaneous stabilization of high debt levels and a significant reduction in total assets, indicating a deterioration in solvency and an increased reliance on borrowed funds to sustain operations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Financial Leverage
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Total assets | 5,130,572) | 6,456,930) | 7,790,515) | 6,570,541) | 7,040,806) | 6,846,029) | |
| Shareholders’ equity | 174,145) | 1,276,936) | 1,764,935) | 2,560,331) | 2,888,628) | 2,719,277) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Financial leverage1 | 29.46 | 5.06 | 4.41 | 2.57 | 2.44 | 2.52 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Financial Leverage, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 3.17 | 3.04 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | — | 21.39 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | — | 32.52 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 4.74 | 5.28 | — | — | — | — | |
| Financial Leverage, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 4.18 | 3.82 | — | — | — | — | |
| Financial Leverage, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.32 | 4.22 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 5,130,572 ÷ 174,145 = 29.46
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the company's financial leverage from 2017 to 2022 reveals a transition from a stable capital structure to a state of extreme financial risk and insolvency.
- Asset and Equity Trends
- Total assets exhibited relative stability between 2017 and 2020, peaking at approximately 7.79 billion US dollars in February 2020 before trending downward to 5.13 billion US dollars by February 2022. In contrast, shareholders' equity underwent a continuous and accelerating decline throughout the entire period, falling from 2.72 billion US dollars in 2017 to 174.15 million US dollars in 2022, representing a near-total erosion of the equity base.
- Financial Leverage Evolution
- The financial leverage ratio remained consistent, fluctuating between 2.44 and 2.57 from 2017 through 2019, suggesting a managed approach to debt and equity financing. A pivot occurred in February 2020, where the ratio climbed to 4.41, and further increased to 5.06 in 2021, indicating a growing reliance on borrowed funds to support asset holdings.
- Solvency Deterioration
- A critical escalation in financial risk is observed in February 2022, as the financial leverage ratio surged to 29.46. This exponential increase is the result of the sharp contraction in shareholders' equity relative to the total asset base. Such a high leverage ratio indicates that the company's assets are almost exclusively financed by liabilities, signaling severe financial distress and a lack of solvency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Coverage
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Net earnings (loss) | (559,623) | (150,773) | (613,816) | (137,224) | 424,858) | 685,108) | |
| Add: Income tax expense | 86,967) | (185,989) | (151,037) | (19,385) | 270,802) | 380,547) | |
| Add: Interest expense, net | 64,702) | 76,913) | 64,789) | 69,474) | 65,661) | 69,555) | |
| Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) | (407,954) | (259,849) | (700,064) | (87,135) | 761,321) | 1,135,210) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Interest coverage1 | -6.31 | -3.38 | -10.81 | -1.25 | 11.59 | 16.32 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Interest Coverage, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | -1.51 | 22.09 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 17.14 | 13.60 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 13.49 | 9.88 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 37.80 | 1.46 | — | — | — | — | |
| Interest Coverage, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 7.64 | 15.91 | — | — | — | — | |
| Interest Coverage, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.30 | 13.23 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Interest coverage = EBIT ÷ Interest expense
= -407,954 ÷ 64,702 = -6.31
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data indicates a critical deterioration in solvency over the six-year period ending February 26, 2022. A transition from strong operating profitability to sustained operating losses has severely impaired the ability to service interest obligations, signaling significant financial distress.
- Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)
- A sharp downward trajectory in operating performance is observed. EBIT declined from $1,135,210 thousand in 2017 to $761,321 thousand in 2018, before shifting into negative territory in 2019. The most substantial operating loss occurred in 2020, reaching negative $700,064 thousand. Although there was a partial reduction in losses in 2021, EBIT remained negative through 2022, ending at negative $407,954 thousand.
- Net Interest Expense
- Interest expenses remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period, fluctuating within a narrow range between $64,702 thousand and $76,913 thousand. Because the cost of debt did not increase significantly, the collapse in the solvency ratio is attributable entirely to the decline in operating earnings rather than an increase in borrowing costs.
- Interest Coverage Ratio
- The interest coverage ratio reveals a severe decline in the capacity to meet fixed financial obligations. The ratio was highly favorable in 2017 at 16.32, providing a significant cushion for debt servicing. This figure fell to 11.59 in 2018 and became negative in 2019 (-1.25), indicating that EBIT was no longer sufficient to cover interest expenses. The ratio reached a critical low of -10.81 in 2020. Despite a temporary improvement to -3.38 in 2021, the ratio deteriorated again to -6.31 by 2022, confirming a persistent state of insolvency regarding interest obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Fixed Charge Coverage
| Feb 26, 2022 | Feb 27, 2021 | Feb 29, 2020 | Mar 2, 2019 | Mar 3, 2018 | Feb 25, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Net earnings (loss) | (559,623) | (150,773) | (613,816) | (137,224) | 424,858) | 685,108) | |
| Add: Income tax expense | 86,967) | (185,989) | (151,037) | (19,385) | 270,802) | 380,547) | |
| Add: Interest expense, net | 64,702) | 76,913) | 64,789) | 69,474) | 65,661) | 69,555) | |
| Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) | (407,954) | (259,849) | (700,064) | (87,135) | 761,321) | 1,135,210) | |
| Add: Operating lease cost | 449,394) | 582,168) | 581,061) | 593,300) | 614,100) | 582,200) | |
| Earnings before fixed charges and tax | 41,440) | 322,319) | (119,003) | 506,165) | 1,375,421) | 1,717,410) | |
| Interest expense, net | 64,702) | 76,913) | 64,789) | 69,474) | 65,661) | 69,555) | |
| Operating lease cost | 449,394) | 582,168) | 581,061) | 593,300) | 614,100) | 582,200) | |
| Fixed charges | 514,096) | 659,081) | 645,850) | 662,774) | 679,761) | 651,755) | |
| Solvency Ratio | |||||||
| Fixed charge coverage1 | 0.08 | 0.49 | -0.18 | 0.76 | 2.02 | 2.64 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | 0.47 | 5.24 | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 9.94 | 8.97 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 8.02 | 6.05 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 3.17 | 1.04 | — | — | — | — | |
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 2.82 | 5.29 | — | — | — | — | |
| Fixed Charge Coverage, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.65 | 5.60 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-02-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-02-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-02-25).
1 2022 Calculation
Fixed charge coverage = Earnings before fixed charges and tax ÷ Fixed charges
= 41,440 ÷ 514,096 = 0.08
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data indicates a severe and sustained deterioration in the company's ability to cover its fixed obligations over the analyzed six-year period. A consistent decline in earnings, coupled with relatively static fixed charges, has led to a critical reduction in the fixed charge coverage ratio, signaling heightened solvency risk.
- Earnings Before Fixed Charges and Tax
- A precipitous decline in earnings is observed, falling from a peak of US$ 1,717,410 thousand in February 2017 to US$ 41,440 thousand by February 2022. The most significant collapse occurred between 2018 and 2020, with earnings crossing into negative territory in February 2020 at -US$ 119,003 thousand. Although a partial recovery was noted in February 2021, the subsequent decline in 2022 suggests that the operational capacity to generate funds for fixed obligations remains severely compromised.
- Fixed Charge Obligations
- Fixed charges remained remarkably stable for the majority of the period, fluctuating within a narrow range between US$ 645,850 thousand and US$ 679,761 thousand from 2017 through 2021. A notable reduction occurred in February 2022, where charges decreased to US$ 514,096 thousand. Despite this reduction, the decrease in charges was insufficient to offset the corresponding loss in earnings power.
- Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
- The coverage ratio exhibits a clear downward trajectory, moving from a healthy 2.64 in 2017 to a critical 0.08 in 2022. The ratio fell below the critical threshold of 1.0 in March 2019, indicating that earnings were no longer sufficient to cover fixed charges. The situation reached a nadir in February 2020 with a ratio of -0.18. While the ratio improved to 0.49 in 2021, it failed to return to a sustainable level, ultimately ending the period at 0.08, which represents a near-total inability to meet fixed financial obligations from operating earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?