AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Reynolds American Inc. (NYSE:RAI)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 3, 2017.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Reynolds American Inc., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Land and land improvements 95 94 93 92 93
Buildings and leasehold improvements 757 727 729 717 758
Machinery and equipment 2,064 1,967 1,925 1,739 1,758
Construction-in-process 94 110 83 105 46
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 3,010 2,898 2,830 2,653 2,655
Accumulated depreciation (1,662) (1,643) (1,627) (1,579) (1,618)
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,348 1,255 1,203 1,074 1,037

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


Between 2012 and 2016, there was a consistent upward trend in the total investment in property, plant, and equipment. Gross property, plant, and equipment increased from 2,655 million US dollars to 3,010 million US dollars, while the net book value grew from 1,037 million US dollars to 1,348 million US dollars over the same period.

Asset Composition and Growth
Machinery and equipment represented the largest component of the asset base and drove the majority of the growth. This category increased from 1,758 million US dollars in 2012 to 2,064 million US dollars in 2016. Land and land improvements remained virtually stagnant, fluctuating slightly between 92 and 95 million US dollars. Buildings and leasehold improvements showed a slight decline in 2013 before recovering to reach 757 million US dollars by 2016.
Depreciation and Net Asset Value
Accumulated depreciation increased moderately from 1,618 million US dollars in 2012 to 1,662 million US dollars in 2016. Because the rate of capital expenditure on new assets outpaced the rate of depreciation, the net property, plant, and equipment value expanded steadily year-over-year, reflecting a period of net asset accumulation.
Capital Investment Pipeline
Construction-in-process exhibited volatility, indicating periodic capital projects rather than a steady linear investment. The value peaked at 110 million US dollars in 2015 before decreasing to 94 million US dollars in 2016, suggesting the completion and capitalization of certain projects into the primary asset categories.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Reynolds American Inc., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Average age ratio 57.02% 58.59% 59.44% 61.66% 63.15%
Estimated total useful life (years) 29 27 29 26 23
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 17 16 17 16 15
Estimated remaining life (years) 13 11 12 10 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


Analysis of the asset age ratios reveals a progressive reduction in the average age of property, plant, and equipment from 2012 to 2016. This trend suggests a systematic improvement in the relative youth of the asset base, potentially driven by strategic capital expenditures or adjustments in the estimation of asset longevity.

Average Age Ratio
A consistent downward trajectory is observed, with the ratio decreasing from 63.15% in 2012 to 57.02% in 2016. This decline indicates that a smaller proportion of the assets' total estimated useful lives has been consumed, reflecting a more sustainable asset lifecycle.
Estimated Total Useful Life
The total useful life of assets experienced a general increase, rising from 23 years in 2012 to 29 years by 2016. Although a slight contraction occurred in 2015, the overall trend indicates that assets are being utilized or estimated to last longer than in the initial period of analysis.
Estimated Age and Remaining Life
The time elapsed since purchase remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 15 and 17 years throughout the five-year period. Simultaneously, the estimated remaining life increased from 9 years in 2012 to 13 years in 2016. The expansion of the remaining life, while the elapsed age remained stagnant, is primarily attributable to the increase in the estimated total useful life.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 1,662 1,643 1,627 1,579 1,618
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 3,010 2,898 2,830 2,653 2,655
Land and land improvements 95 94 93 92 93
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 57.02% 58.59% 59.44% 61.66% 63.15%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, at cost – Land and land improvements)
= 100 × 1,662 ÷ (3,010 – 95) = 57.02%


A consistent modernization of the asset base is evident throughout the five-year period analyzed. The overall trend is characterized by a steady increase in capital expenditures relative to the accumulation of depreciation, resulting in a progressively lower average age of property, plant, and equipment.

Asset Acquisition and Cost Trends
Property, plant, and equipment at cost demonstrated a positive growth trajectory, rising from 2,655 million US dollars in 2012 to 3,010 million US dollars by 2016. The most significant expansion occurred between 2013 and 2014, where costs increased by approximately 6.6%, signaling a period of intensified capital investment in new assets.
Accumulated Depreciation Patterns
Accumulated depreciation remained relatively stable compared to the growth in gross asset costs. After a slight decrease in 2013 to 1,579 million US dollars, the figure rose gradually to 1,662 million US dollars by 2016. The fact that the growth in total asset cost outpaced the growth in accumulated depreciation indicates that the addition of new, non-depreciated assets outweighed the depreciation of existing ones.
Average Age Ratio Interpretation
The average age ratio exhibited a continuous decline, moving from 63.15% in 2012 to 57.02% in 2016. This downward trend confirms a systematic rejuvenation of the company's fixed assets. A lower ratio suggests that the asset base is becoming younger on average, which typically correlates with improved operational efficiency and a reduced immediate need for large-scale replacement capital expenditures.
Land and Improvements Stability
Investment in land and land improvements remained nearly constant, fluctuating minimally between 92 million and 95 million US dollars. This stability indicates that the increase in total property, plant, and equipment was driven primarily by investments in depreciable assets, such as machinery or buildings, rather than real estate acquisition.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 3,010 2,898 2,830 2,653 2,655
Land and land improvements 95 94 93 92 93
Depreciation expense 100 104 95 98 110
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 29 27 29 26 23

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, at cost – Land and land improvements) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (3,010 – 95) ÷ 100 = 29


An analysis of property, plant, and equipment reveals a consistent expansion of the asset base. The total cost of these assets grew from US$ 2,655 million in 2012 to US$ 3,010 million by 2016. This growth was not driven by land acquisition, as land and land improvements remained nearly stagnant, fluctuating minimally between US$ 92 million and US$ 95 million over the period.

Estimated Total Useful Life
There is a general upward trend in the estimated total useful life of assets, which increased from 23 years in 2012 to 29 years in 2016. While a temporary decrease to 27 years was recorded in 2015, the overall shift suggests an extension in the perceived longevity of the company's capital assets.
Depreciation Expense Stability
Depreciation expenses remained relatively flat despite the increase in total asset costs. Expenses moved from US$ 110 million in 2012 to US$ 100 million in 2016, with a period low of US$ 95 million in 2014. This indicates that the annual charge for asset wear and tear did not scale linearly with the growth of the asset base.
Operational Correlation
The data suggests a correlation between the extension of the estimated useful life and the stabilization of depreciation expenses. By increasing the period over which assets are depreciated, the impact of new capital expenditures on the annual income statement was mitigated, allowing depreciation costs to remain steady or decline even as the total cost of property, plant, and equipment rose.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 1,662 1,643 1,627 1,579 1,618
Depreciation expense 100 104 95 98 110
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 17 16 17 16 15

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 1,662 ÷ 100 = 17


The analysis of the property, plant, and equipment metrics between 2012 and 2016 reveals a stable asset base with a gradual increase in the average age of holdings, interrupted by evidence of capital reinvestment.

Accumulated Depreciation Trends
Accumulated depreciation remained relatively stable throughout the five-year period, ending at 1,662 million US dollars in 2016. A notable decrease occurred in 2013, falling to 1,579 million US dollars from 1,618 million US dollars in 2012, which suggests the disposal or write-off of older assets. Following 2013, a consistent upward trajectory was observed, indicating a steady accumulation of depreciation charges over the remaining years.
Depreciation Expense Patterns
Annual depreciation expenses exhibited minor fluctuations, oscillating between a low of 95 million US dollars in 2014 and a high of 110 million US dollars in 2012. The lack of a strong linear trend suggests a consistent rate of asset consumption and a managed replacement cycle rather than aggressive expansion or rapid obsolescence.
Estimated Asset Age and Lifecycle
The time elapsed since purchase generally increased from 15 years in 2012 to 17 years by 2016. However, a reduction in the average age from 17 years in 2014 to 16 years in 2015 is observable. This decrease in elapsed time, coinciding with an increase in depreciation expense from 95 million to 104 million US dollars in the same period, indicates the acquisition of new fixed assets that lowered the weighted average age of the asset portfolio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,348 1,255 1,203 1,074 1,037
Land and land improvements 95 94 93 92 93
Depreciation expense 100 104 95 98 110
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 13 11 12 10 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land and land improvements) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (1,348 – 95) ÷ 100 = 13


The financial data indicates a consistent expansion of the net property, plant, and equipment (PPE) base from 2012 through 2016. While the total asset value grew steadily, the composition of these assets and their depreciation patterns reveal specific capital management trends.

Asset Base Expansion
Net PPE increased from US$ 1,037 million in 2012 to US$ 1,348 million in 2016, representing a growth of approximately 29.7%. This expansion was not driven by land acquisitions, as land and land improvements remained nearly constant, fluctuating minimally between US$ 92 million and US$ 95 million throughout the period.
Depreciation Expense Stability
Depreciation expenses remained relatively stable over the five-year period, ranging between US$ 95 million and US$ 110 million. The absence of a proportional increase in depreciation expense relative to the rising net PPE balance suggests a shift in the age or the estimated useful life of the asset portfolio.
Estimated Remaining Life Correlation
The estimated remaining life of assets exhibited a general upward trend, rising from 9 years in 2012 to 13 years in 2016, despite a slight contraction to 11 years in 2015. The increase in the estimated remaining life effectively extends the period over which asset costs are amortized, which helps explain why depreciation expenses did not rise in tandem with the increase in total net PPE.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?