AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Reynolds American Inc. (NYSE:RAI)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 3, 2017.

Analysis of Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Microsoft Excel

Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure

Reynolds American Inc., balance sheet: goodwill and intangible assets

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Customer lists 240 240 — — —
Contract manufacturing agreements 151 151 151 151 151
Trademarks 124 124 114 114 96
Other intangibles 15 15 15 — —
Finite-lived intangible assets, gross 530 530 280 265 247
Accumulated amortization (271) (248) (230) (219) (214)
Finite-lived intangible assets, net 259 282 50 46 33
Trademarks 29,098 29,098 2,268 2,268 2,318
Other 87 87 103 103 104
Indefinite-lived intangible assets 29,185 29,185 2,371 2,371 2,422
Intangible assets 29,444 29,467 2,421 2,417 2,455
Goodwill 15,992 15,993 8,016 8,011 8,011
Intangible assets and goodwill 45,436 45,460 10,437 10,428 10,466

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


A significant expansion in the valuation of intangible assets and goodwill occurred between December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2015, marking a substantial shift in the balance sheet composition. From 2012 through 2014, these figures remained relatively stagnant, followed by a sharp increase in 2015 that persisted into 2016.

Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
A dramatic increase is observed in indefinite-lived intangible assets, which rose from 2,371 million US$ in 2014 to 29,185 million US$ in 2015. This growth was driven almost exclusively by trademarks, which surged from 2,268 million US$ to 29,098 million US$ in the same period. These values remained constant through December 31, 2016.
Goodwill
Goodwill exhibited a stable trend of approximately 8,011 million US$ from 2012 to 2014. In 2015, this figure increased to 15,993 million US$, nearly doubling the previous year's balance. This amount remained largely unchanged at 15,992 million US$ by the end of 2016.
Finite-lived Intangible Assets
Gross finite-lived intangible assets grew from 280 million US$ in 2014 to 530 million US$ in 2015, primarily due to the introduction of customer lists valued at 240 million US$. Concurrently, accumulated amortization showed a steady upward trend, increasing from -214 million US$ in 2012 to -271 million US$ in 2016. Consequently, the net value of finite-lived intangible assets peaked at 282 million US$ in 2015 before declining to 259 million US$ in 2016.
Aggregate Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The combined total of intangible assets and goodwill experienced a massive escalation, rising from 10,437 million US$ in 2014 to 45,460 million US$ in 2015. This represents a more than fourfold increase in total intangible capital within a single fiscal year, with a slight reduction to 45,436 million US$ observed by December 31, 2016.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill

Reynolds American Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted

Reynolds American Inc., adjustments to financial statements

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Adjustment to Total Assets
Total assets (as reported) 51,095 53,224 15,196 15,402 16,557
Less: Goodwill 15,992 15,993 8,016 8,011 8,011
Total assets (adjusted) 35,103 37,231 7,180 7,391 8,546
Adjustment to Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity (as reported) 21,711 18,252 4,522 5,167 5,257
Less: Goodwill 15,992 15,993 8,016 8,011 8,011
Shareholders’ equity (adjusted) 5,719 2,259 (3,494) (2,844) (2,754)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


The financial data demonstrates a significant variance between reported and adjusted figures resulting from the removal of goodwill and intangible assets. This adjustment reveals a stark difference in the company's tangible asset base and net worth over the period from 2012 to 2016.

Asset Base Analysis
A consistent gap exists between reported total assets and adjusted total assets. Between 2012 and 2014, reported assets declined slightly from 16,557 million to 15,196 million, while adjusted assets followed a similar trajectory, decreasing to 7,180 million. A substantial increase is observed in 2015, where reported assets rose to 53,224 million and adjusted assets increased to 37,231 million, indicating a major expansion of the balance sheet, likely associated with a significant acquisition or corporate action.
Tangible Equity Trends
The removal of goodwill profoundly impacts the shareholders' equity figures. From 2012 to 2014, while reported equity remained positive, adjusted shareholders' equity was consistently negative, reaching a low of -3,494 million in 2014. This indicates that tangible assets were insufficient to cover total liabilities during this period. A fundamental shift occurred in 2015, as adjusted equity transitioned to a positive 2,259 million, further strengthening to 5,719 million by 2016.
Intangible Asset Proportions
The magnitude of the difference between reported and adjusted figures indicates a heavy reliance on goodwill and intangible assets. In 2014, these assets represented approximately 53% of the total reported assets. By 2016, although the absolute value of goodwill and intangibles increased, the adjusted asset base grew more aggressively, suggesting a modified asset composition following the 2015 expansion.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)

Reynolds American Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted

Reynolds American Inc., adjusted financial ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
Total Asset Turnover
Reported total asset turnover 0.33 0.28 0.80 0.78 0.74
Adjusted total asset turnover 0.48 0.40 1.68 1.62 1.43
Financial Leverage
Reported financial leverage 2.35 2.92 3.36 2.98 3.15
Adjusted financial leverage 6.14 16.48 — — —
Return on Equity (ROE)
Reported ROE 27.97% 17.82% 32.51% 33.25% 24.20%
Adjusted ROE 106.19% 144.00% — — —
Return on Assets (ROA)
Reported ROA 11.89% 6.11% 9.67% 11.15% 7.68%
Adjusted ROA 17.30% 8.74% 20.47% 23.24% 14.88%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).


The comparison between reported and adjusted financial ratios reveals a significant impact of goodwill and intangible assets on the balance sheet. A distinct shift in the financial profile is evident starting in 2015, where a sharp decline in efficiency ratios and a dramatic increase in adjusted leverage suggest a substantial expansion of the asset base, likely due to a major acquisition.

Total Asset Turnover
A consistent gap exists between reported and adjusted turnover ratios, with adjusted figures being significantly higher across all periods. From 2012 to 2014, both metrics showed steady growth, peaking at 0.80 and 1.68, respectively. However, a sharp contraction occurred in 2015, with reported turnover falling to 0.28 and adjusted turnover to 0.40. A partial recovery was observed in 2016, though levels remained well below the pre-2015 trend.
Financial Leverage
Reported financial leverage remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2016, fluctuating within a range of 2.35 to 3.36. In contrast, the adjusted leverage for 2015 and 2016 shows extreme volatility. The adjusted ratio spiked to 16.48 in 2015 before decreasing to 6.14 in 2016. This disparity indicates that the removal of goodwill and intangible assets drastically reduces the tangible asset base, thereby magnifying the leverage ratio.
Return on Equity (ROE)
Reported ROE exhibited moderate fluctuations, ranging from 17.82% to 33.25%. The adjusted ROE for the final two years of the period shows a massive escalation, reaching 144.00% in 2015 and 106.19% in 2016. This suggests that the company's returns are generated by a much smaller base of tangible equity than the reported figures imply.
Return on Assets (ROA)
Adjusted ROA consistently outperformed reported ROA throughout the entire five-year period. The most pronounced difference occurred in 2013, where adjusted ROA reached 23.24% compared to a reported 11.15%. Similar to the turnover and ROE trends, a significant dip was recorded in 2015 (8.74% adjusted), followed by a strong recovery to 17.30% in 2016, mirroring the trajectory of the reported ROA but at a higher magnitude of profitability per asset unit.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Total Asset Turnover

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales, includes excise taxes 16,846 14,884 12,096 11,966 12,227
Total assets 51,095 53,224 15,196 15,402 16,557
Activity Ratio
Total asset turnover1 0.33 0.28 0.80 0.78 0.74
Adjusted for Goodwill
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales, includes excise taxes 16,846 14,884 12,096 11,966 12,227
Adjusted total assets 35,103 37,231 7,180 7,391 8,546
Activity Ratio
Adjusted total asset turnover2 0.48 0.40 1.68 1.62 1.43

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Total asset turnover = Net sales, includes excise taxes ÷ Total assets
= 16,846 ÷ 51,095 = 0.33

2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales, includes excise taxes ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 16,846 ÷ 35,103 = 0.48


A substantial shift in the asset structure occurred between 2014 and 2015, characterized by a significant increase in both reported and adjusted total assets. This expansion resulted in an immediate and sharp contraction in asset turnover ratios, although a slight recovery in efficiency is observed by the end of 2016.

Asset Base Expansion
Between 2012 and 2014, reported total assets remained relatively stable with a slight downward trend, moving from 16,557 million to 15,196 million. However, a massive increase occurred in 2015, with reported assets rising to 53,224 million, a growth of approximately 250%. Adjusted total assets mirrored this trajectory, jumping from 7,180 million in 2014 to 37,231 million in 2015.
Reported Asset Turnover Trends
From 2012 to 2014, the reported total asset turnover showed a steady improvement, increasing from 0.74 to 0.80. The surge in the asset base in 2015 caused this ratio to drop precipitously to 0.28, before recovering slightly to 0.33 in 2016.
Adjusted Asset Turnover Trends
The adjusted total asset turnover followed a similar pattern to the reported ratio but at a higher magnitude. It rose from 1.43 in 2012 to a peak of 1.68 in 2014. Following the 2015 asset expansion, the adjusted ratio fell to 0.40, subsequently increasing to 0.48 in 2016.
Impact of Intangible Assets on Efficiency Metrics
A consistent gap exists between reported and adjusted turnover ratios, with adjusted figures significantly exceeding reported ones across all periods. This indicates that the inclusion of goodwill and intangible assets substantially lowers the perceived efficiency of the asset base. The divergence remained pronounced after the 2015 expansion, confirming that a significant portion of the new asset growth was comprised of non-tangible assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Leverage

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Total assets 51,095 53,224 15,196 15,402 16,557
Shareholders’ equity 21,711 18,252 4,522 5,167 5,257
Solvency Ratio
Financial leverage1 2.35 2.92 3.36 2.98 3.15
Adjusted for Goodwill
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted total assets 35,103 37,231 7,180 7,391 8,546
Adjusted shareholders’ equity 5,719 2,259 (3,494) (2,844) (2,754)
Solvency Ratio
Adjusted financial leverage2 6.14 16.48 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 51,095 ÷ 21,711 = 2.35

2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 35,103 ÷ 5,719 = 6.14


A significant shift in the balance sheet structure occurred in 2015, characterized by a substantial increase in both reported and adjusted total assets. Prior to this period, total assets remained relatively stable, with reported assets fluctuating between 15.2 billion and 16.6 billion US dollars. In 2015, reported total assets increased to 53.2 billion US dollars, reflecting a major expansion of the asset base, which slightly contracted to 51.1 billion US dollars by 2016.

Asset Composition and Intangibles
A consistent gap exists between reported and adjusted total assets across the entire period. Between 2012 and 2014, adjusted assets were approximately 47% to 48% of reported assets. Following the 2015 expansion, adjusted assets represented approximately 70% of reported assets. This indicates that while the absolute value of goodwill and intangible assets increased significantly in 2015, they constituted a smaller relative proportion of the total asset base compared to the 2012-2014 period.
Shareholders' Equity Trends
Reported shareholders' equity showed a gradual decline from 5.3 billion US dollars in 2012 to 4.5 billion US dollars in 2014, before surging to 18.3 billion US dollars in 2015 and reaching 21.7 billion US dollars in 2016. Conversely, adjusted shareholders' equity was negative from 2012 through 2014, reaching a low of negative 3.5 billion US dollars. A critical pivot occurred in 2015, when adjusted equity turned positive at 2.3 billion US dollars and continued to grow to 5.7 billion US dollars by 2016, signaling a transition to a positive tangible net worth.
Financial Leverage Analysis
Reported financial leverage remained relatively stable and low, trending downward from 3.15 in 2012 to 2.35 in 2016. However, a stark divergence is observed in the adjusted financial leverage. In 2015, adjusted leverage peaked at 16.48, vastly exceeding the reported ratio of 2.92. By 2016, the adjusted leverage decreased significantly to 6.14. This disparity underscores the extent to which intangible assets inflated the equity base in 2015, resulting in an exceptionally high leverage ratio when those intangibles were excluded.

The transition from negative to positive adjusted shareholders' equity, coupled with the sharp reduction in adjusted financial leverage between 2015 and 2016, indicates a substantial improvement in the company's tangible financial position. The volatility in adjusted leverage relative to the stability of reported leverage highlights the significant impact of goodwill and intangible assets on the perceived risk and solvency profiles of the organization.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 6,073 3,253 1,470 1,718 1,272
Shareholders’ equity 21,711 18,252 4,522 5,167 5,257
Profitability Ratio
ROE1 27.97% 17.82% 32.51% 33.25% 24.20%
Adjusted for Goodwill
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 6,073 3,253 1,470 1,718 1,272
Adjusted shareholders’ equity 5,719 2,259 (3,494) (2,844) (2,754)
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROE2 106.19% 144.00% — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

2016 Calculations

1 ROE = 100 × Net income ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 6,073 ÷ 21,711 = 27.97%

2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net income ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 6,073 ÷ 5,719 = 106.19%


A significant divergence is observed between reported and adjusted shareholders' equity over the period from 2012 to 2016. Between 2012 and 2014, reported equity remained positive while adjusted equity was consistently negative, indicating that goodwill and intangible assets constituted a substantial portion of the total equity base, exceeding the value of other equity components. A major shift occurred in 2015, where reported equity increased sharply from 4,522 million to 18,252 million, and adjusted equity transitioned to a positive value of 2,259 million.

Shareholders' Equity Trends
The gap between reported and adjusted equity highlights a heavy concentration of intangible assets. The transition in 2015 suggests a substantial capital event or restructuring that significantly expanded the tangible equity base, a trend that continued into 2016 as adjusted equity grew to 5,719 million.
Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
Reported ROE exhibited moderate volatility, peaking at 33.25% in 2013 and reaching a low of 17.82% in 2015 before recovering to 27.97% in 2016. Adjusted ROE was not recorded from 2012 to 2014, coinciding with the period of negative adjusted equity. Once adjusted equity became positive in 2015, Adjusted ROE was recorded at an exceptionally high 144.00%, subsequently moderating to 106.19% in 2016.
Impact of Intangibles on Performance Metrics
The extreme variance between reported and adjusted ROE indicates that the inclusion of goodwill and intangible assets significantly dilutes the reported return. The high adjusted ROE figures suggest that the entity generates substantial earnings relative to its tangible net worth, whereas the reported ROE provides a more conservative metric based on the total accounting equity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 6,073 3,253 1,470 1,718 1,272
Total assets 51,095 53,224 15,196 15,402 16,557
Profitability Ratio
ROA1 11.89% 6.11% 9.67% 11.15% 7.68%
Adjusted for Goodwill
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 6,073 3,253 1,470 1,718 1,272
Adjusted total assets 35,103 37,231 7,180 7,391 8,546
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROA2 17.30% 8.74% 20.47% 23.24% 14.88%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).

2016 Calculations

1 ROA = 100 × Net income ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 6,073 ÷ 51,095 = 11.89%

2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net income ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 6,073 ÷ 35,103 = 17.30%


The analysis of asset values and return on assets between 2012 and 2016 reveals a significant structural shift in the balance sheet occurring in 2015. While assets remained relatively stable or experienced slight declines from 2012 to 2014, a substantial increase occurred in 2015, followed by a marginal contraction in 2016.

Asset Base Comparison
Reported total assets grew from 15,196 million US dollars in 2014 to 53,224 million US dollars in 2015, representing an increase of approximately 250%. Adjusted total assets followed a similar trajectory, rising from 7,180 million US dollars to 37,231 million US dollars in the same period. The persistent variance between reported and adjusted assets indicates a heavy concentration of goodwill and intangible assets, which reached a peak in 2015 at approximately 15,993 million US dollars.
Return on Assets (ROA) Variance
A consistent premium is observed in the adjusted ROA compared to the reported ROA across all periods. The adjusted ROA peaked at 23.24% in 2013 before experiencing a sharp decline to 8.74% in 2015. This decline coincides with the massive expansion of the asset base, suggesting that the acquired assets did not immediately generate proportional net income during the initial year of integration.
Recovery and Efficiency Trends
A strong recovery in profitability metrics is evident in 2016. Reported ROA increased from 6.11% to 11.89%, while adjusted ROA rose from 8.74% to 17.30%. This upward trend indicates a rapid optimization of the expanded asset base and an improvement in operational efficiency following the 2015 surge.

The data demonstrates that excluding goodwill and intangible assets provides a higher measure of asset efficiency. The significant gap between the two ROA metrics highlights the extent to which intangible valuations dilute the reported return on assets, particularly after the large-scale acquisition in 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?