Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE:PG)

$24.99

Total Asset Turnover
since 2005

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check

Calculation

Procter & Gamble Co., total asset turnover, long-term trends, calculation

Microsoft Excel

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2026-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2025-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).

1 US$ in millions


The financial trajectory from 2005 to 2026 is characterized by an initial structural shift in asset utilization followed by a long-term trend of efficiency recovery. A significant contraction in the total asset turnover ratio occurred between 2005 and 2006, dropping from 0.92 to 0.50, which indicates a substantial increase in the asset base relative to revenue generation during that period.

Asset Base Expansion and Stabilization
The sharp decline in turnover observed in 2006 coincided with a surge in total assets, which increased from US$ 61,527 million to US$ 135,695 million. For the subsequent decade ending in 2014, the asset turnover ratio remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating within a narrow band between 0.50 and 0.63, suggesting that revenue growth largely mirrored the expanded asset scale.
Mid-Term Volatility and Efficiency Dip
A period of reduced efficiency is evident between 2015 and 2016, where the turnover ratio fell to 0.51. This decline was driven by a reduction in net sales, which dropped to US$ 65,299 million in 2015 and further to US$ 65,058 million in 2016, while total assets remained above US$ 120,000 million.
Long-Term Recovery and Optimization
Beginning in 2017, a consistent upward trend in asset efficiency is observable. The turnover ratio climbed steadily from 0.54 in 2017 to 0.69 by 2024. This improvement is attributed to a robust recovery in net sales, which grew from US$ 65,058 million in 2017 to a projected US$ 87,032 million by 2026, while total assets were managed more conservatively, peaking at US$ 126,521 million in the final projected year.

Overall, the data indicates that after a period of significant asset expansion and subsequent volatility, the operational focus shifted toward maximizing revenue output from the existing asset base, resulting in the highest turnover ratios since 2012.



Comparison to Industry (Consumer Staples)