EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jun 30, 2023 | Jun 30, 2022 | Jun 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2023 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance from 2018 to 2023 is characterized by significant volatility in economic profit, reflecting an unstable relationship between operating returns and the cost of the capital employed. Value creation has been inconsistent, with the entity alternating between periods of positive economic profit and substantial value destruction.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- Operating profitability exhibited extreme fluctuations over the six-year period. A peak in NOPAT was reached in 2021 at 2,923 million USD, following a severe contraction in 2020 where profit fell to 591 million USD. However, a downward trend emerged thereafter, with 2023 reporting a decline to 1,239 million USD, which is lower than the 2018 baseline of 1,482 million USD.
-
- Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
- There is a clear upward trajectory in invested capital, which grew from 10,334 million USD in 2018 to 17,123 million USD by 2023. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow band between 15.11% and 16.27%. The expansion of the capital base increased the absolute dollar amount of returns required to achieve a positive economic profit.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained unstable, with negative values recorded in three of the six years analyzed. The most significant value destruction occurred in 2020 (-1,578 million USD) and 2023 (-1,348 million USD). While 2019, 2021, and 2022 yielded positive results, the margins of value creation were narrow, particularly in 2022 where economic profit declined to 49 million USD despite relatively high NOPAT. The sharp decline in 2023 suggests that operating profits were insufficient to cover the imputed cost of the expanded capital base.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring charges.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..
6 2023 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2023 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..
9 2023 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Earnings Attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
- The net earnings exhibit significant volatility over the analyzed period. Starting at $1,108 million in mid-2018, the figure rose notably to $1,785 million in mid-2019. A sharp decline occurred in mid-2020, with earnings dropping to $684 million, likely reflecting impacts from external economic conditions or extraordinary events during that year. This was followed by a robust recovery to $2,870 million in mid-2021, marking the peak in the period under review. Subsequent years saw a decrease to $2,390 million in mid-2022 and further down to $1,006 million by mid-2023, indicating a downward trend after the substantial recovery.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT trends closely mirror those of net earnings, suggesting consistent operational profitability dynamics. The value increased from $1,482 million in mid-2018 to $1,921 million in mid-2019, indicating improved operational efficiency or profitability. It then sharply contracted to $591 million in mid-2020, consistent with the net earnings downturn during that year. A strong rebound occurred in mid-2021, with NOPAT peaking at $2,923 million. This was followed by a decline to $2,408 million in mid-2022 and a further reduction to $1,239 million in mid-2023, aligning with the observed decrease in net earnings.
- Summary of Trends and Insights
- Both net earnings and NOPAT display considerable fluctuations over the six-year period, characterized by a sharp downturn in 2020 and a pronounced recovery in 2021. The subsequent declining trend in 2022 and 2023 suggests emerging challenges or changes in the company's operating environment impacting profitability. The correlation between net earnings and NOPAT indicates that operating performance significantly influences net profitability. Monitoring external factors and internal operational efficiencies will be critical to understanding and addressing the causes of recent declines.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
- Provision for Income Taxes
- The provision for income taxes exhibited a generally decreasing trend from June 30, 2018, through June 30, 2023. Starting at 863 million US dollars in 2018, it sharply declined to 513 million in 2019 and further to 350 million in 2020. A moderate increase was observed in 2021 and 2022, reaching 456 million and 628 million respectively, followed by a decline again in 2023 to 387 million. This fluctuation suggests variability in taxable income or changes in tax rates and accounting policies during the period.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes showed a different pattern, with an initial increase from 750 million in 2018 to 629 million in 2019, then a decrease to 541 million in 2020. After that, there was a rising trend, peaking at 823 million in 2022 before decreasing again to 637 million in 2023. This indicates some volatility in actual tax payments, possibly reflecting timing differences between tax provisions and cash payments or changes in the company's cash tax obligations.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of accrued restructuring charges.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
9 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating upward trend across the periods analyzed. Initially, the debt remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019, slightly decreasing from 6,321 million USD to 6,238 million USD. However, a significant increase occurred in 2020, rising sharply to 8,789 million USD. This figure decreased somewhat in 2021 and 2022, dropping to 8,099 million USD and 7,645 million USD respectively. In 2023, the debt surged again, reaching the highest recorded level of 10,169 million USD, indicating a possible strategy involving greater leverage or increased financing needs.
- Stockholders’ equity
- The stockholders’ equity shows an overall decline from 2018 through 2020, falling from 4,688 million USD to 3,935 million USD. This decreasing equity trend reversed in 2021, with a considerable rise to 6,057 million USD, potentially reflecting improvements in retained earnings or capital injections. In 2022 and 2023, the equity slightly decreased and then stabilized around the 5,590 million USD to 5,585 million USD range, suggesting a plateau in equity growth during the most recent periods.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital consistently increased over the six-year period. Starting at 10,334 million USD in 2018, the figure rose steadily each year reaching 17,123 million USD in 2023. This upward trajectory denotes ongoing investments in company assets or operations, supporting business expansion or restructuring activities. The steady growth reflects an accumulation of both debt and equity used to finance the company's strategic initiatives.
Cost of Capital
Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 28.10%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 28.10%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jun 30, 2023 | Jun 30, 2022 | Jun 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2023 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative in 2018, it became positive in 2019 before experiencing a substantial decline in 2020. A recovery occurred in 2021, followed by a further decrease in 2022, and a significant negative shift in 2023.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- In 2018, the economic spread ratio stood at -1.23%, indicating that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital. A positive shift was observed in 2019, with the ratio reaching 0.64%, suggesting the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital. However, this positive trend was reversed in 2020, with the ratio plummeting to -11.41%, representing a substantial underperformance relative to the cost of capital. The ratio improved to 2.46% in 2021, signaling a return to value creation. This improvement was not sustained, as the ratio decreased to 0.34% in 2022 and then sharply declined to -7.87% in 2023, indicating a significant deterioration in value creation.
The economic spread ratio’s volatility appears to correlate with fluctuations in economic profit. Years with negative economic profit, such as 2018, 2020, and 2023, consistently corresponded with negative or substantially reduced economic spread ratios. Conversely, positive economic profit in 2019 and 2021 aligned with positive economic spread ratios.
- Relationship to Invested Capital
- Invested capital consistently increased throughout the period, rising from US$10,334 million in 2018 to US$17,123 million in 2023. Despite this growth in invested capital, the economic spread ratio did not consistently benefit, as evidenced by the negative ratios in 2018, 2020, and 2023. This suggests that increases in invested capital did not always translate into commensurate increases in returns exceeding the cost of capital.
The most pronounced decline in the economic spread ratio occurred between 2020 and 2023, coinciding with a significant decrease in economic profit. This suggests that factors impacting profitability had a substantial effect on the company’s ability to generate returns above its cost of capital.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jun 30, 2023 | Jun 30, 2022 | Jun 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net sales | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted net sales | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2023 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initial values were negative, transitioning to positive results before declining again. A review of the figures reveals a complex performance pattern requiring further investigation.
- Economic Profit Margin
- In fiscal year 2018, the economic profit margin was -0.93%, indicating the company did not generate returns exceeding its cost of capital. A substantial improvement occurred in 2019, with the margin rising to 0.50%. However, this positive performance was short-lived, as the margin plummeted to -11.10% in 2020. A recovery was noted in 2021, reaching 2.35%, but this was followed by a decrease to 0.28% in 2022. The most recent year, 2023, saw a significant decline, with the economic profit margin falling to -8.36%.
The economic profit margin’s volatility suggests a sensitivity to underlying economic factors or internal operational changes. The large negative margin in 2020 warrants specific attention, potentially linked to the impact of unforeseen events on sales and profitability. While positive margins were achieved in 2019 and 2021, their brevity and subsequent declines indicate an inability to consistently generate economic value.
- Relationship to Adjusted Net Sales
- Adjusted net sales generally increased from 2018 to 2022, peaking at US$17,728 million. However, sales decreased in 2023 to US$16,120 million. Despite the overall sales growth trend, the economic profit margin did not consistently benefit, suggesting that increases in sales were not sufficient to offset costs and capital charges, particularly in 2020 and 2023.
The divergence between adjusted net sales and the economic profit margin highlights the importance of considering not only revenue growth but also the efficiency with which revenue is translated into economic profit. The substantial decline in economic profit margin in 2023, despite a relatively high level of adjusted net sales, suggests potential issues with cost management, capital allocation, or both.