Stock Analysis on Net

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. (NYSE:EL)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 18, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2023 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited volatility, peaking in 2021 before declining substantially in 2023. Invested capital generally increased over the period, with a notable rise between 2019 and 2021, followed by a decrease in 2022 and a subsequent increase in 2023. The cost of capital remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range throughout the observed years.

Economic Profit Trend
Economic profit was negative in 2018 and 2020, indicating that returns did not cover the cost of capital in those years. A positive economic profit was achieved in 2019 and 2021, suggesting value creation during those periods. However, economic profit turned negative again in 2022 and experienced a more substantial decline in 2023, reaching its lowest point over the analyzed timeframe. This suggests a weakening ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital in recent years.
NOPAT and Economic Profit Relationship
The highest economic profit in 2021 corresponded with the highest NOPAT during the period. Conversely, the lowest economic profit in 2023 coincided with the lowest NOPAT. This strong correlation suggests that NOPAT is a primary driver of economic profit. The significant drop in NOPAT from 2022 to 2023 directly contributed to the substantial decrease in economic profit.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital Impact
While invested capital generally trended upward, the cost of capital remained relatively consistent. The increasing invested capital, without a corresponding increase in NOPAT, likely contributed to the negative economic profit observed in 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2023. The cost of capital, while stable, represents a hurdle that NOPAT struggled to clear consistently throughout the period.

Overall, the analysis reveals a pattern of inconsistent value creation. While periods of positive economic profit were achieved, the recent trend indicates a decline in the ability to generate returns that exceed the cost of capital. Further investigation into the factors driving the fluctuations in NOPAT and the efficiency of invested capital utilization is warranted.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring charges4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense7
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes8
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income9
Investment income, after taxes10
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring charges.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..

6 2023 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2023 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..

9 2023 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net Earnings Attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
The net earnings exhibit significant volatility over the analyzed period. Starting at $1,108 million in mid-2018, the figure rose notably to $1,785 million in mid-2019. A sharp decline occurred in mid-2020, with earnings dropping to $684 million, likely reflecting impacts from external economic conditions or extraordinary events during that year. This was followed by a robust recovery to $2,870 million in mid-2021, marking the peak in the period under review. Subsequent years saw a decrease to $2,390 million in mid-2022 and further down to $1,006 million by mid-2023, indicating a downward trend after the substantial recovery.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT trends closely mirror those of net earnings, suggesting consistent operational profitability dynamics. The value increased from $1,482 million in mid-2018 to $1,921 million in mid-2019, indicating improved operational efficiency or profitability. It then sharply contracted to $591 million in mid-2020, consistent with the net earnings downturn during that year. A strong rebound occurred in mid-2021, with NOPAT peaking at $2,923 million. This was followed by a decline to $2,408 million in mid-2022 and a further reduction to $1,239 million in mid-2023, aligning with the observed decrease in net earnings.
Summary of Trends and Insights
Both net earnings and NOPAT display considerable fluctuations over the six-year period, characterized by a sharp downturn in 2020 and a pronounced recovery in 2021. The subsequent declining trend in 2022 and 2023 suggests emerging challenges or changes in the company's operating environment impacting profitability. The correlation between net earnings and NOPAT indicates that operating performance significantly influences net profitability. Monitoring external factors and internal operational efficiencies will be critical to understanding and addressing the causes of recent declines.

Cash Operating Taxes

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).


Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes exhibited a generally decreasing trend from June 30, 2018, through June 30, 2023. Starting at 863 million US dollars in 2018, it sharply declined to 513 million in 2019 and further to 350 million in 2020. A moderate increase was observed in 2021 and 2022, reaching 456 million and 628 million respectively, followed by a decline again in 2023 to 387 million. This fluctuation suggests variability in taxable income or changes in tax rates and accounting policies during the period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes showed a different pattern, with an initial increase from 750 million in 2018 to 629 million in 2019, then a decrease to 541 million in 2020. After that, there was a rising trend, peaking at 823 million in 2022 before decreasing again to 637 million in 2023. This indicates some volatility in actual tax payments, possibly reflecting timing differences between tax provisions and cash payments or changes in the company's cash tax obligations.

Invested Capital

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Current debt
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Deferred revenue4
Accrued restructuring charges5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Redeemable noncontrolling interest
Noncontrolling interests
Adjusted stockholders’ equity, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Construction in progress8
Available-for-sale investments9
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of accrued restructuring charges.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of construction in progress.

9 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating upward trend across the periods analyzed. Initially, the debt remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019, slightly decreasing from 6,321 million USD to 6,238 million USD. However, a significant increase occurred in 2020, rising sharply to 8,789 million USD. This figure decreased somewhat in 2021 and 2022, dropping to 8,099 million USD and 7,645 million USD respectively. In 2023, the debt surged again, reaching the highest recorded level of 10,169 million USD, indicating a possible strategy involving greater leverage or increased financing needs.
Stockholders’ equity
The stockholders’ equity shows an overall decline from 2018 through 2020, falling from 4,688 million USD to 3,935 million USD. This decreasing equity trend reversed in 2021, with a considerable rise to 6,057 million USD, potentially reflecting improvements in retained earnings or capital injections. In 2022 and 2023, the equity slightly decreased and then stabilized around the 5,590 million USD to 5,585 million USD range, suggesting a plateau in equity growth during the most recent periods.
Invested capital
Invested capital consistently increased over the six-year period. Starting at 10,334 million USD in 2018, the figure rose steadily each year reaching 17,123 million USD in 2023. This upward trajectory denotes ongoing investments in company assets or operations, supporting business expansion or restructuring activities. The steady growth reflects an accumulation of both debt and equity used to finance the company's strategic initiatives.

Cost of Capital

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 28.10%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 28.10%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Procter & Gamble Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2023 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative in 2018, it became positive in 2019 before declining sharply in 2020. A recovery occurred in 2021, followed by a decrease in 2022 and a substantial negative value in 2023.

Economic Spread Ratio - Trend Analysis
The economic spread ratio began at -1.23% in 2018, indicating that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital. A positive shift occurred in 2019, with the ratio reaching 0.64%, suggesting the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital. However, this positive trend was reversed in 2020, with a significant decline to -11.42%, representing a substantial underperformance relative to the cost of capital. The ratio improved to 2.45% in 2021, demonstrating a return to profitability exceeding the cost of capital. This improvement was not sustained, as the ratio decreased to 0.33% in 2022 and then plummeted to -7.88% in 2023, signifying a significant deterioration in value creation.

The economic spread ratio’s volatility suggests potential instability in the company’s ability to generate returns consistently above its cost of capital. The large negative values in 2020 and 2023 are particularly noteworthy, warranting further investigation into the underlying factors contributing to these periods of value destruction.

Relationship to Economic Profit
The economic spread ratio’s movements correlate with the economic profit figures. Negative economic profit values in 2018, 2020, and 2023 align with negative economic spread ratios, indicating periods where the company did not generate sufficient returns to cover its cost of capital. Conversely, positive economic profit in 2019 and 2021 corresponds with positive economic spread ratios. The magnitude of the economic spread ratio appears to reflect the scale of the economic profit or loss.

The invested capital generally increased throughout the period, except for a decrease between 2021 and 2022. This increase in capital employed did not consistently translate into improved economic performance, as evidenced by the fluctuating economic spread ratio and the negative economic profit in several years.


Economic Profit Margin

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
 
Net sales
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Procter & Gamble Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2023 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initial values were negative, transitioning to positive results before declining again. A review of the figures reveals a complex performance pattern requiring further investigation.

Economic Profit Margin
In fiscal year 2018, the economic profit margin stood at -0.93%. This indicates that the company’s economic profit was negative relative to its adjusted net sales. A substantial improvement was noted in 2019, with the margin increasing to 0.49%, signifying positive economic profit generation. However, this positive trend was short-lived, as the margin plummeted to -11.11% in 2020. A recovery occurred in 2021, reaching 2.34%, but this was followed by a decrease to 0.27% in 2022. The most recent year, 2023, saw a significant decline, with the economic profit margin falling to -8.37%, representing the lowest value within the analyzed timeframe.

The economic profit margin’s volatility suggests a sensitivity to underlying economic factors or internal operational changes. The substantial negative margin in 2020 and 2023 warrants particular attention, potentially indicating significant challenges in generating returns exceeding the cost of capital during those periods. The positive margins in 2019 and 2021, while encouraging, were not sustained.

Relationship to Adjusted Net Sales
Adjusted net sales generally increased from 2018 to 2022, peaking at US$17,728 million. However, a decrease in adjusted net sales was observed in 2023, reaching US$16,120 million. Despite the overall upward trend in sales, the economic profit margin did not consistently benefit, as evidenced by the fluctuating economic profit values. This suggests that increases in sales were not always sufficient to offset the cost of capital and generate positive economic profit.

The divergence between adjusted net sales and the economic profit margin highlights the importance of considering profitability relative to capital employed. Further analysis is recommended to understand the drivers behind the margin fluctuations, including cost of capital changes, operational efficiency, and competitive pressures.