Stock Analysis on Net

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. (NYSE:EL)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 18, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2023 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited volatility, peaking in 2021 before declining substantially in 2023. Invested capital generally increased over the period, with a notable rise between 2019 and 2021, followed by a decrease in 2022 and a subsequent increase in 2023. The cost of capital remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range throughout the observed years.

Economic Profit Trend
Economic profit was negative in 2018 and 2020, indicating that returns did not cover the cost of capital in those years. A positive economic profit was achieved in 2019 and 2021, suggesting value creation during those periods. However, economic profit turned negative again in 2022 and experienced a more substantial decline in 2023, reaching its lowest point over the analyzed timeframe. This suggests a weakening ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital in recent years.
NOPAT and Economic Profit Relationship
The highest economic profit in 2021 corresponded with the highest NOPAT during the period. Conversely, the lowest economic profit in 2023 coincided with the lowest NOPAT. This strong correlation suggests that NOPAT is a primary driver of economic profit. The significant drop in NOPAT from 2022 to 2023 directly contributed to the substantial decrease in economic profit.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital Influence
While invested capital increased overall, its impact on economic profit was moderated by the relatively stable cost of capital. The increase in invested capital did not consistently translate into higher economic profit, particularly in 2020 and 2023, when NOPAT was insufficient to generate returns exceeding the cost of that capital. The cost of capital decreased slightly in 2023, but this reduction was not enough to offset the decline in NOPAT and prevent a negative economic profit.

In summary, the economic profit performance is heavily influenced by NOPAT. While invested capital grew, the ability to generate sufficient operating profit to cover the cost of that capital varied considerably, resulting in periods of value creation and destruction.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring charges4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense7
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes8
(Gain) loss on marketable securities
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income9
Investment income, after taxes10
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring charges.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..

6 2023 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2023 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..

9 2023 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net Earnings Attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
The net earnings exhibit significant volatility over the analyzed period. Starting at $1,108 million in mid-2018, the figure rose notably to $1,785 million in mid-2019. A sharp decline occurred in mid-2020, with earnings dropping to $684 million, likely reflecting impacts from external economic conditions or extraordinary events during that year. This was followed by a robust recovery to $2,870 million in mid-2021, marking the peak in the period under review. Subsequent years saw a decrease to $2,390 million in mid-2022 and further down to $1,006 million by mid-2023, indicating a downward trend after the substantial recovery.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT trends closely mirror those of net earnings, suggesting consistent operational profitability dynamics. The value increased from $1,482 million in mid-2018 to $1,921 million in mid-2019, indicating improved operational efficiency or profitability. It then sharply contracted to $591 million in mid-2020, consistent with the net earnings downturn during that year. A strong rebound occurred in mid-2021, with NOPAT peaking at $2,923 million. This was followed by a decline to $2,408 million in mid-2022 and a further reduction to $1,239 million in mid-2023, aligning with the observed decrease in net earnings.
Summary of Trends and Insights
Both net earnings and NOPAT display considerable fluctuations over the six-year period, characterized by a sharp downturn in 2020 and a pronounced recovery in 2021. The subsequent declining trend in 2022 and 2023 suggests emerging challenges or changes in the company's operating environment impacting profitability. The correlation between net earnings and NOPAT indicates that operating performance significantly influences net profitability. Monitoring external factors and internal operational efficiencies will be critical to understanding and addressing the causes of recent declines.

Cash Operating Taxes

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).


Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes exhibited a generally decreasing trend from June 30, 2018, through June 30, 2023. Starting at 863 million US dollars in 2018, it sharply declined to 513 million in 2019 and further to 350 million in 2020. A moderate increase was observed in 2021 and 2022, reaching 456 million and 628 million respectively, followed by a decline again in 2023 to 387 million. This fluctuation suggests variability in taxable income or changes in tax rates and accounting policies during the period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes showed a different pattern, with an initial increase from 750 million in 2018 to 629 million in 2019, then a decrease to 541 million in 2020. After that, there was a rising trend, peaking at 823 million in 2022 before decreasing again to 637 million in 2023. This indicates some volatility in actual tax payments, possibly reflecting timing differences between tax provisions and cash payments or changes in the company's cash tax obligations.

Invested Capital

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Current debt
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Deferred revenue4
Accrued restructuring charges5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Redeemable noncontrolling interest
Noncontrolling interests
Adjusted stockholders’ equity, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Construction in progress8
Available-for-sale investments9
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of accrued restructuring charges.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of construction in progress.

9 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating upward trend across the periods analyzed. Initially, the debt remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019, slightly decreasing from 6,321 million USD to 6,238 million USD. However, a significant increase occurred in 2020, rising sharply to 8,789 million USD. This figure decreased somewhat in 2021 and 2022, dropping to 8,099 million USD and 7,645 million USD respectively. In 2023, the debt surged again, reaching the highest recorded level of 10,169 million USD, indicating a possible strategy involving greater leverage or increased financing needs.
Stockholders’ equity
The stockholders’ equity shows an overall decline from 2018 through 2020, falling from 4,688 million USD to 3,935 million USD. This decreasing equity trend reversed in 2021, with a considerable rise to 6,057 million USD, potentially reflecting improvements in retained earnings or capital injections. In 2022 and 2023, the equity slightly decreased and then stabilized around the 5,590 million USD to 5,585 million USD range, suggesting a plateau in equity growth during the most recent periods.
Invested capital
Invested capital consistently increased over the six-year period. Starting at 10,334 million USD in 2018, the figure rose steadily each year reaching 17,123 million USD in 2023. This upward trajectory denotes ongoing investments in company assets or operations, supporting business expansion or restructuring activities. The steady growth reflects an accumulation of both debt and equity used to finance the company's strategic initiatives.

Cost of Capital

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Current and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 28.10%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 28.10%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Current and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Procter & Gamble Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2023 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initially negative in 2018, it turned positive in 2019 before experiencing a substantial decline in 2020. A recovery occurred in 2021, followed by a further decrease in 2022, and a significant negative shift in 2023.

Economic Spread Ratio Trend
In 2018, the economic spread ratio stood at -1.23%, indicating that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital. A positive shift was observed in 2019, with the ratio reaching 0.64%, suggesting the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital. However, this positive performance was short-lived, as the ratio plummeted to -11.41% in 2020, representing a substantial underperformance relative to the cost of capital. The ratio improved to 2.45% in 2021, signaling a return to value creation. This improvement was not sustained, as the ratio decreased to 0.34% in 2022 and then sharply declined to -7.88% in 2023, indicating a significant deterioration in value creation.

The economic spread ratio’s volatility suggests potential instability in the company’s ability to consistently generate returns above its cost of capital. The large negative values in 2020 and 2023 are particularly noteworthy, warranting further investigation into the underlying factors contributing to these periods of value destruction.

Relationship to Economic Profit
The economic spread ratio’s movements closely mirror those of economic profit. Negative economic profit values in 2018, 2020, and 2023 correspond with negative economic spread ratios, and positive economic profit in 2019 and 2021 aligns with positive ratios. This correlation confirms that the economic spread ratio accurately reflects the company’s value creation or destruction.

Invested capital generally increased throughout the period, from US$10,334 million in 2018 to US$17,123 million in 2023. However, the increasing invested capital did not consistently translate into positive economic profit or economic spread, particularly in 2020 and 2023, suggesting potential inefficiencies in capital allocation or operational performance during those years.


Economic Profit Margin

Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2023 Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
 
Net sales
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Procter & Gamble Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2023 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initial values were negative, transitioning to positive results before declining again. A review of the figures reveals a complex performance pattern requiring further investigation.

Economic Profit Margin
In fiscal year 2018, the economic profit margin was -0.93%, indicating the company did not generate returns exceeding its cost of capital. A substantial improvement was noted in 2019, with the margin rising to 0.50%. However, this positive performance was short-lived, as the margin plummeted to -11.10% in 2020. A recovery occurred in 2021, reaching 2.35%, but this was followed by a decrease to 0.28% in 2022. The most recent year, 2023, saw a significant decline, with the economic profit margin falling to -8.37%.

The economic profit margin’s volatility suggests sensitivity to underlying economic factors or internal operational changes. The substantial negative margin in 2020 and 2023 warrants particular attention, potentially signaling significant challenges in generating value for shareholders during those periods. The positive margins in 2019 and 2021, while encouraging, were not sustained.

Relationship to Adjusted Net Sales
Adjusted net sales generally increased from 2018 to 2022, moving from US$13,683 million to US$17,728 million. However, sales decreased in 2023 to US$16,120 million. Despite the overall sales growth trend, the economic profit margin did not consistently benefit, indicating that increased sales did not always translate into improved economic profitability. The decline in sales in 2023 coincided with a substantial drop in the economic profit margin, suggesting a potential correlation between revenue and value creation.

The observed pattern suggests that factors beyond revenue generation, such as cost of capital, operational efficiency, or investment decisions, significantly influence the company’s ability to generate economic profit. Further analysis is recommended to identify the specific drivers behind these fluctuations and to develop strategies for improving sustainable economic profitability.