EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Cash Flow Statement
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
- Analysis of Debt
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Estée Lauder Cos. Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jun 30, 2023 | Jun 30, 2022 | Jun 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2023 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
Over the analyzed period, the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) of the company exhibited notable fluctuations. Initially, NOPAT increased from 1,482 million US dollars in mid-2018 to a peak of 2,923 million US dollars in mid-2021. Subsequently, it declined sharply to 1,239 million US dollars by mid-2023. This volatility highlights a period of strong profitability followed by significant challenges affecting earnings.
The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the period, oscillating between approximately 13.0% and 14.0%. This consistency suggests a steady risk and capital structure environment, with only minor variations not likely to be the primary drivers of profit changes.
Invested capital displayed a generally upward trend, increasing from 10,334 million US dollars in mid-2018 to 17,123 million US dollars by mid-2023. Despite some fluctuations, notably a decrease in mid-2022, the overall growth in invested capital indicates ongoing asset investment and possibly expansion efforts.
Economic profit, which considers both operating profit and cost of capital, revealed significant volatility. After a positive start of 98 million US dollars in mid-2018, economic profit rose to a high of 333 million in mid-2019. However, by mid-2020, it plunged to negative 1,273 million US dollars, rebounded to a positive 742 million in mid-2021, and then decreased again to a negative 989 million by mid-2023. These swings suggest that although operating profit was sometimes strong, the company often struggled to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital, indicating challenges in value creation over the long term.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued restructuring charges.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..
6 2023 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2023 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..
9 2023 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Earnings Attributable to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
- The net earnings exhibit significant volatility over the analyzed period. Starting at $1,108 million in mid-2018, the figure rose notably to $1,785 million in mid-2019. A sharp decline occurred in mid-2020, with earnings dropping to $684 million, likely reflecting impacts from external economic conditions or extraordinary events during that year. This was followed by a robust recovery to $2,870 million in mid-2021, marking the peak in the period under review. Subsequent years saw a decrease to $2,390 million in mid-2022 and further down to $1,006 million by mid-2023, indicating a downward trend after the substantial recovery.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT trends closely mirror those of net earnings, suggesting consistent operational profitability dynamics. The value increased from $1,482 million in mid-2018 to $1,921 million in mid-2019, indicating improved operational efficiency or profitability. It then sharply contracted to $591 million in mid-2020, consistent with the net earnings downturn during that year. A strong rebound occurred in mid-2021, with NOPAT peaking at $2,923 million. This was followed by a decline to $2,408 million in mid-2022 and a further reduction to $1,239 million in mid-2023, aligning with the observed decrease in net earnings.
- Summary of Trends and Insights
- Both net earnings and NOPAT display considerable fluctuations over the six-year period, characterized by a sharp downturn in 2020 and a pronounced recovery in 2021. The subsequent declining trend in 2022 and 2023 suggests emerging challenges or changes in the company's operating environment impacting profitability. The correlation between net earnings and NOPAT indicates that operating performance significantly influences net profitability. Monitoring external factors and internal operational efficiencies will be critical to understanding and addressing the causes of recent declines.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
- Provision for Income Taxes
- The provision for income taxes exhibited a generally decreasing trend from June 30, 2018, through June 30, 2023. Starting at 863 million US dollars in 2018, it sharply declined to 513 million in 2019 and further to 350 million in 2020. A moderate increase was observed in 2021 and 2022, reaching 456 million and 628 million respectively, followed by a decline again in 2023 to 387 million. This fluctuation suggests variability in taxable income or changes in tax rates and accounting policies during the period.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes showed a different pattern, with an initial increase from 750 million in 2018 to 629 million in 2019, then a decrease to 541 million in 2020. After that, there was a rising trend, peaking at 823 million in 2022 before decreasing again to 637 million in 2023. This indicates some volatility in actual tax payments, possibly reflecting timing differences between tax provisions and cash payments or changes in the company's cash tax obligations.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of accrued restructuring charges.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc..
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
9 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating upward trend across the periods analyzed. Initially, the debt remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019, slightly decreasing from 6,321 million USD to 6,238 million USD. However, a significant increase occurred in 2020, rising sharply to 8,789 million USD. This figure decreased somewhat in 2021 and 2022, dropping to 8,099 million USD and 7,645 million USD respectively. In 2023, the debt surged again, reaching the highest recorded level of 10,169 million USD, indicating a possible strategy involving greater leverage or increased financing needs.
- Stockholders’ equity
- The stockholders’ equity shows an overall decline from 2018 through 2020, falling from 4,688 million USD to 3,935 million USD. This decreasing equity trend reversed in 2021, with a considerable rise to 6,057 million USD, potentially reflecting improvements in retained earnings or capital injections. In 2022 and 2023, the equity slightly decreased and then stabilized around the 5,590 million USD to 5,585 million USD range, suggesting a plateau in equity growth during the most recent periods.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital consistently increased over the six-year period. Starting at 10,334 million USD in 2018, the figure rose steadily each year reaching 17,123 million USD in 2023. This upward trajectory denotes ongoing investments in company assets or operations, supporting business expansion or restructuring activities. The steady growth reflects an accumulation of both debt and equity used to finance the company's strategic initiatives.
Cost of Capital
Estée Lauder Cos. Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Current and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 28.10%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 28.10%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Current and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jun 30, 2023 | Jun 30, 2022 | Jun 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2023 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit exhibited significant volatility over the analyzed period. Starting at 98 million USD in mid-2018, it increased sharply to 333 million USD in mid-2019. However, in mid-2020, the figure dropped dramatically to a negative 1,273 million USD, indicating substantial losses. This was followed by a recovery to 742 million USD in mid-2021, then a decline to 382 million USD in mid-2022. By mid-2023, the economic profit again turned negative, reaching -989 million USD. This pattern suggests that the company's profitability, after accounting for capital costs, has been highly inconsistent and subject to considerable fluctuations, possibly influenced by external economic factors or internal operational changes.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital showed a generally increasing trend over the six-year period. Beginning at 10,334 million USD in mid-2018, it rose steadily each year, reaching 17,123 million USD by mid-2023. Despite a slight decrease in mid-2022 to 14,574 million USD from the previous year's 15,610 million USD, the overall upward trajectory indicates ongoing investment and capital allocation within the company. This expansion in invested capital may reflect growth initiatives, asset acquisitions, or reinvestment strategies.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, representing the return spread over the cost of capital, mirrored the volatility observed in economic profit. It started at 0.95% in mid-2018, improved considerably to 2.9% in mid-2019, and then deteriorated sharply to -9.21% in mid-2020. Subsequently, it recovered to 4.75% in mid-2021 but decreased again to 2.62% in mid-2022. By mid-2023, the ratio declined to -5.78%, indicating that the company's returns fell below its capital costs during that period. The fluctuating economic spread ratio corroborates the mixed economic profit results, highlighting challenges in sustaining value creation over time.
- Overall Analysis
- The data reveals pronounced fluctuations in value creation performance, with economic profit and economic spread ratio oscillating between positive and negative values throughout the years. While invested capital generally increased, the inconsistent profitability measures suggest periods of underperformance relative to the cost of capital. These trends may reflect cyclical market conditions, strategic shifts, or operational challenges, underscoring the need for the company to focus on stabilizing returns and efficiently deploying capital to enhance long-term value.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jun 30, 2023 | Jun 30, 2022 | Jun 30, 2021 | Jun 30, 2020 | Jun 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net sales | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted net sales | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2023 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data exhibits notable fluctuations in both economic profit and related metrics over the six-year period ending June 30, 2023. These fluctuations suggest varying operational performance and profitability challenges during the timeframe.
- Adjusted Net Sales
- Adjusted net sales demonstrated a generally increasing trend from 2018 to 2022, rising from $13,683 million to $17,728 million. However, in the final year recorded (2023), adjusted sales declined to $16,120 million, signaling a potential slowdown or market challenges impacting revenue generation.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit, measured in millions of US dollars, showed considerable variability. Starting at $98 million in 2018, it increased substantially to $333 million in 2019, indicating improved profitability. This positive trend was reversed sharply in 2020 with a significant loss of $1,273 million, aligned likely with external disruptions. Recovery occurred in 2021 with a profit of $742 million, followed by a decline to $382 million in 2022, and a return to a substantial negative value of $989 million in 2023. The erratic pattern highlights challenges in maintaining consistent economic profit over the analyzed period.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin, expressed as a percentage, mirrored the economic profit trends. From a modest 0.72% in 2018, it increased markedly to 2.25% in 2019, before plunging to a negative margin of -8.96% in 2020. Subsequent recovery raised the margin to 4.55% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 2.16% in 2022 and a decline again to -6.14% in 2023. These fluctuations indicate volatility in profitability relative to sales, with substantial margin erosion in 2020 and 2023.
Overall, the financial metrics reflect volatility likely influenced by external economic pressures or internal operational factors, particularly evident in the steep downturns of 2020 and 2023. While adjusted net sales generally grew until 2022, the inconsistent economic profit and margin trends suggest challenges in converting sales growth into sustainable profit during certain periods.