Stock Analysis on Net

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 24, 2020.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Economic Profit

Emerson Electric Co., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period between September 30, 2014, and September 30, 2019, demonstrates fluctuating financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited volatility, while the cost of capital remained relatively stable, and invested capital generally decreased over the observed timeframe.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT began at US$2,212 million in 2014, increased to US$2,871 million in 2015, then declined significantly to US$1,731 million in 2016. A modest recovery to US$1,776 million occurred in 2017, followed by increases to US$2,124 million in 2018 and US$2,461 million in 2019. This indicates a period of initial growth, a substantial downturn, and a subsequent, though uneven, recovery in operational profitability.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital experienced minor fluctuations throughout the period. It started at 18.71% in 2014, decreased to 17.59% in 2015, and then rose to 19.30% in 2018 before settling at 18.93% in 2019. The changes were relatively small, suggesting a consistent cost of funding capital throughout the period.
Invested Capital
Invested capital generally trended downward. Beginning at US$17,628 million in 2014, it decreased to US$15,181 million in 2017. A slight increase to US$15,617 million was observed in 2018, followed by a further increase to US$16,266 million in 2019. This suggests a reduction in the capital employed by the business, with a modest reversal in the final two years.
Economic Profit
Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period, indicating that the company’s returns did not exceed its cost of capital. The largest negative economic profit was recorded in 2014 at US$-1,085 million. It improved to US$-177 million in 2015, but then worsened to US$-1,232 million in 2016. Subsequent years showed a gradual, though incomplete, improvement, with economic profit reaching US$-619 million in 2019. While the magnitude of the loss decreased, the company consistently failed to generate returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital.

In summary, while NOPAT demonstrated some recovery towards the end of the period, the consistently negative economic profit suggests ongoing challenges in generating returns that adequately compensate for the cost of invested capital. The decreasing trend in invested capital may reflect strategic decisions to optimize capital allocation, but has not yet translated into positive economic profit.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Emerson Electric Co., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Net earnings common stockholders
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowances2
Increase (decrease) in product warranty3
Increase (decrease) in liability for restructuring costs4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense7
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes8
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income9
Investment income, after taxes10
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax11
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in liability for restructuring costs.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings common stockholders.

6 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings common stockholders.

9 2019 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.

11 Elimination of discontinued operations.


The analysis of the financial data for the period from September 30, 2014, to September 30, 2019, reveals notable fluctuations in key profitability metrics.

Net Earnings Common Stockholders
The net earnings attributable to common stockholders demonstrate variability over the periods considered. Initially, there was an increase from 2,147 million USD in 2014 to a peak of 2,710 million USD in 2015. This was followed by a significant decrease to 1,635 million USD in 2016 and a slight further reduction to 1,518 million USD in 2017. Subsequently, the earnings recovered, rising to 2,203 million USD in 2018 and marginally improving to 2,306 million USD by 2019. This pattern suggests volatility in profitability, with a notable dip in the middle years before recovery in the latter two years.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT shows a similar trend to net earnings, with an increase from 2,212 million USD in 2014 to 2,871 million USD in 2015, followed by a substantial decrease to 1,731 million USD in 2016. Unlike net earnings, NOPAT stabilizes somewhat in 2017 with a slight increase to 1,776 million USD. In the subsequent years, NOPAT rises consistently, reaching 2,124 million USD in 2018 and 2,461 million USD in 2019. This trend indicates a recovery in operating profitability after a period of decline, with steady improvements in the final two years.

Overall, both net earnings and NOPAT experienced a peak in 2015, followed by a decline over the next one to two years, and then a recovery phase from 2017 onward. The recovery in NOPAT appears somewhat stronger and more consistent than that in net earnings. These trends highlight periods of operational challenges and subsequent improvement in financial performance.


Cash Operating Taxes

Emerson Electric Co., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Income tax expense
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


Income Tax Expense
The income tax expense demonstrated a fluctuating downward trend over the six-year period. Starting at $1,164 million in 2014, it increased to a peak of $1,428 million in 2015. However, from 2015 onwards, the figure declined significantly to $697 million in 2016 and further decreased to $660 million in 2017. The downward trend continued, reaching a low of $443 million in 2018, before showing a modest increase to $531 million in 2019. This pattern suggests variability in taxable income or changes in tax rates, with a notable reduction after 2015 and slight recovery toward 2019.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes followed a similar overall declining trajectory with some variation. Beginning at $1,394 million in 2014, the amount rose to $1,525 million in 2015, indicating higher cash tax payments that year. Subsequently, there was a sharp decline to $782 million in 2016 and a marginal decrease to $766 million in 2017. The downward movement persisted, with taxes dropping to $737 million in 2018 and then declining further to $619 million in 2019. This trend mirrors the reduction observed in income tax expense, possibly reflecting lower taxable income or effective tax management strategies resulting in decreased cash tax obligations over time.

Invested Capital

Emerson Electric Co., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Common stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowances3
Product warranty4
Liability for restructuring costs5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
Adjusted common stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of product warranty.

5 Addition of liability for restructuring costs.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to common stockholders’ equity.

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of construction in progress.


Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibited a non-linear trend over the analyzed periods. It increased from 6,834 million USD in 2014 to peak at 7,624 million USD in 2015, followed by a reduction to 5,137 million USD in 2017. Subsequently, the amount rose again, reaching 6,191 million USD by 2019. This pattern suggests fluctuations in debt management, with a notable decrease in the middle period before a moderate rebound.
Common Stockholders’ Equity
Common stockholders’ equity showed a general decline from 10,119 million USD in 2014 to 7,568 million USD in 2016. Thereafter, it increased to 8,947 million USD in 2018, before descending again to 8,233 million USD in 2019. This series of movements indicates some volatility but overall a downward pressure on equity levels during the period.
Invested Capital
Invested capital steadily decreased from 17,628 million USD in 2014 to a low of 15,181 million USD in 2017. After 2017, it gradually increased to 16,266 million USD by 2019. The downward trend in the initial years followed by a recovery suggests adjustments in the company's capital investment strategy or asset base.
Overall Observations
The data reflects a period of financial adjustment, with both liabilities and equity experiencing declines and recoveries at different times. The decrease in invested capital up until 2017, coupled with reduced debt levels in the same period, could indicate an active effort to deleverage or optimize capital structure. Subsequently, the increases in debt and invested capital alongside fluctuating equity values imply dynamic financial management responsive to changing conditions or strategic priorities.

Cost of Capital

Emerson Electric Co., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 24.50%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 24.50%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Emerson Electric Co., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The period between September 30, 2014, and September 30, 2019, demonstrates a fluctuating, but generally improving, financial performance as measured by economic value added metrics. While economic profit remained negative throughout the observed timeframe, the magnitude of the losses decreased over the years. Invested capital experienced a decline initially, followed by a period of relative stabilization and a slight increase towards the end of the period. The economic spread ratio, reflecting the efficiency of capital allocation, exhibited a similar pattern of improvement.

Economic Profit
Economic profit consistently registered as a negative value across all reported years. The largest loss occurred in 2014, at -US$1,085 million. Subsequent years showed reductions in the size of the loss, reaching -US$619 million in 2019. This indicates a gradual improvement in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital, although it did not achieve positive economic profit during this period.
Invested Capital
Invested capital decreased from US$17,628 million in 2014 to US$15,181 million in 2017, representing a substantial reduction in capital employed. A modest increase was then observed in 2018 to US$15,617 million, followed by a further increase to US$16,266 million in 2019. This suggests a period of capital optimization followed by reinvestment or a change in capital structure.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio, expressed as a percentage, began at -6.16% in 2014. It improved significantly to -1.02% in 2015, before worsening again to -7.46% in 2016. From 2016, the ratio showed a consistent, albeit slow, upward trend, reaching -3.81% in 2019. This improvement suggests that the company became more efficient in generating returns on its invested capital over time, narrowing the gap between its cost of capital and its return on investment. The negative values consistently indicate that returns were still below the cost of capital, but the magnitude of the shortfall lessened.

Overall, the trend suggests a positive trajectory in the company’s economic performance, despite continued negative economic profit. The decreasing magnitude of losses, coupled with the improving economic spread ratio, indicates a strengthening of the company’s financial position and a more effective utilization of invested capital.


Economic Profit Margin

Emerson Electric Co., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The period between September 30, 2014, and September 30, 2019, demonstrates a fluctuating, but generally improving, economic profit margin. While economic profit remained negative throughout the observed timeframe, the magnitude of the loss decreased over the years. Net sales also exhibited volatility, impacting the economic profit margin calculations.

Economic Profit
Economic profit consistently registered as a negative value across all reported years. The largest loss occurred in 2014, at -US$1,085 million. Losses decreased to -US$177 million in 2015, before increasing again to -US$1,232 million in 2016. Subsequent years showed a gradual reduction in the size of the loss, reaching -US$619 million by 2019. This suggests improving operational efficiency or capital allocation over time, despite not yet achieving positive economic profit.
Net Sales
Net sales experienced significant variation. A decrease from US$24,537 million in 2014 to US$22,304 million in 2015 was followed by a substantial decline to US$14,522 million in 2016. Sales then recovered, reaching US$15,264 million in 2017, US$17,408 million in 2018, and further increasing to US$18,372 million in 2019. This sales volatility likely influenced the fluctuations observed in economic profit.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin mirrored the trends in economic profit, expressed as a percentage of net sales. The margin was -4.42% in 2014, improved to -0.79% in 2015, then deteriorated to -8.48% in 2016, coinciding with the lowest sales figures. A consistent upward trend was then observed, with the margin improving to -7.33% in 2017, -5.12% in 2018, and finally reaching -3.37% in 2019. This indicates that while the company did not generate positive economic profit, its ability to generate economic profit relative to sales improved over the period.

In summary, the company experienced negative economic profit throughout the analyzed period, but demonstrated a positive trend in its economic profit margin, particularly from 2016 onwards. This improvement appears linked to both increasing net sales and a reduction in the magnitude of economic losses.