Liquidity ratios measure the company ability to meet its short-term obligations.
Liquidity Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
The liquidity profile exhibits a period of relative stability followed by significant volatility between 2017 and 2019. While short-term solvency remained intact throughout the observed period, there were notable fluctuations in the availability of liquid assets relative to current liabilities.
- Current Ratio
- The current ratio remained above 1.0 for all reported years, peaking at 1.64 in 2017 before declining to 1.07 in 2018. A modest recovery to 1.19 was observed by 2019, indicating a consistent, albeit fluctuating, capacity to meet short-term obligations using all current assets.
- Quick Ratio
- A more constrained liquidity position is evident in the quick ratio, which remained below 1.0 for the majority of the period, with the exception of a peak at 1.22 in 2017. The decline to 0.72 in 2018 suggests an increased reliance on inventory liquidation to satisfy immediate liabilities during that fiscal year.
- Cash Ratio
- The most significant volatility is observed in the cash ratio. Following a steady increase to a high of 0.61 in 2017, the ratio experienced a sharp contraction to 0.18 in 2018. This substantial decrease represents a marked reduction in the most liquid assets available to cover current liabilities, followed by a partial rebound to 0.25 in 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Current Ratio
| Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | Sep 30, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Current assets | 7,139) | 6,619) | 8,252) | 9,960) | 10,049) | 10,867) | |
| Current liabilities | 5,976) | 6,164) | 5,045) | 8,008) | 7,800) | 8,454) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Current ratio1 | 1.19 | 1.07 | 1.64 | 1.24 | 1.29 | 1.29 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Current Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
1 2019 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 7,139 ÷ 5,976 = 1.19
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity profile from 2014 to 2019 is characterized by a general contraction in short-term assets and fluctuating liability levels. While the current ratio remained consistently above 1.0, indicating a sustained ability to cover short-term obligations, the margin of safety experienced notable volatility over the six-year period.
- Current Asset Trajectory
- A downward trend in current assets is observed from 2014 to 2018, with values decreasing from $10,867 million to $6,619 million. A moderate recovery followed in 2019, with current assets increasing to $7,139 million.
- Current Liability Dynamics
- Current liabilities exhibited significant fluctuations, notably dropping to a period low of $5,045 million in 2017. This reduction was followed by an increase to $6,164 million in 2018 and a subsequent slight decrease to $5,976 million in 2019.
- Current Ratio Interpretation
- The current ratio remained stable between 1.24 and 1.29 from 2014 to 2016. A peak of 1.64 was reached in 2017, primarily driven by the sharp decline in current liabilities. Liquidity then tightened significantly in 2018, with the ratio falling to its lowest point of 1.07, before recovering to 1.19 by September 30, 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Quick Ratio
| Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | Sep 30, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Cash and equivalents | 1,494) | 1,093) | 3,062) | 3,182) | 3,054) | 3,149) | |
| Receivables, less allowances | 2,985) | 3,344) | 3,072) | 2,701) | 4,319) | 5,019) | |
| Unbilled receivables (contract assets) | 456) | —) | —) | —) | —) | —) | |
| Total quick assets | 4,935) | 4,437) | 6,134) | 5,883) | 7,373) | 8,168) | |
| Current liabilities | 5,976) | 6,164) | 5,045) | 8,008) | 7,800) | 8,454) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Quick ratio1 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 1.22 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 0.97 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Quick Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
1 2019 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 4,935 ÷ 5,976 = 0.83
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity position of the organization exhibits significant volatility over the period from 2014 to 2019. While the quick ratio began near parity at 0.97, it experienced several fluctuations, ending the period at 0.83. A notable trend is the general decline in the volume of liquid assets, which was periodically offset by changes in current liability levels.
- Total Quick Assets Trend
- A consistent long-term decline is observed in total quick assets, which decreased from 8,168 million US dollars in 2014 to 4,935 million US dollars in 2019. This downward trajectory indicates a reduction in the immediate liquid resources available to meet short-term obligations over the six-year span.
- Current Liabilities Volatility
- Current liabilities demonstrated instability, with a significant reduction occurring in 2017, where they reached a period low of 5,045 million US dollars. This decrease was followed by an increase to 6,164 million US dollars in 2018, contributing to the volatility of the overall liquidity ratio.
- Quick Ratio Analysis
- The quick ratio fluctuated between a low of 0.72 and a peak of 1.22. The peak in 2017 was driven primarily by the sharp reduction in current liabilities rather than an increase in assets. The subsequent drop to 0.72 in 2018 represents the lowest liquidity point in the analyzed period, resulting from the simultaneous decline in quick assets and a rise in short-term liabilities. A partial recovery to 0.83 was observed by September 30, 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Ratio
| Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | Sep 30, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Cash and equivalents | 1,494) | 1,093) | 3,062) | 3,182) | 3,054) | 3,149) | |
| Total cash assets | 1,494) | 1,093) | 3,062) | 3,182) | 3,054) | 3,149) | |
| Current liabilities | 5,976) | 6,164) | 5,045) | 8,008) | 7,800) | 8,454) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Cash ratio1 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.37 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Cash Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
1 2019 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 1,494 ÷ 5,976 = 0.25
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The cash ratio exhibited significant volatility between 2014 and 2019, characterized by a period of stability and growth through 2017, followed by a sharp contraction in 2018 and a partial recovery in 2019. These fluctuations indicate shifting dynamics between the company's most liquid assets and its immediate short-term obligations.
- Liquidity Expansion (2014–2017)
- Between 2014 and 2016, the cash ratio trended slightly upward from 0.37 to 0.40, maintained by consistent cash asset levels and stable current liabilities. A significant peak was reached in 2017, where the ratio rose to 0.61. This spike was primarily driven by a substantial decrease in current liabilities, which dropped from 8,008 million USD in 2016 to 5,045 million USD in 2017, while total cash assets remained relatively constant at 3,062 million USD.
- Liquidity Contraction (2018)
- A sharp decline is observed in 2018, with the cash ratio falling to a period low of 0.18. This deterioration was the result of a dual impact: total cash assets plummeted from 3,062 million USD in 2017 to 1,093 million USD in 2018, while current liabilities concurrently increased to 6,164 million USD.
- Partial Recovery (2019)
- In 2019, the cash ratio improved to 0.25. This modest recovery was supported by an increase in total cash assets to 1,494 million USD and a slight reduction in current liabilities to 5,976 million USD, although the liquidity position remained significantly lower than the levels observed prior to 2018.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?