Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 24, 2020.

Analysis of Income Taxes

Microsoft Excel

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Emerson Electric Co., income tax expense (benefit), continuing operations

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
U.S. federal 247 341 351 394 904 742
State and local 24 52 40 11 106 59
Non-U.S. 308 300 311 305 447 516
Current 579 693 702 710 1,457 1,317
U.S. federal (2) (224) 7 2 31 (129)
State and local 12 (11) 4 4 — (5)
Non-U.S. (58) (15) (53) (19) (60) (19)
Deferred (48) (250) (42) (13) (29) (153)
Income tax expense 531 443 660 697 1,428 1,164

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


The income tax profile demonstrates a significant downward trajectory over the analyzed six-year period, characterized by a sharp contraction in current tax obligations starting in 2016.

Current Tax Expense
Current tax obligations peaked in 2015 at 1,457 million US$, followed by a precipitous decline of approximately 51% in 2016 to 710 million US$. This downward trend persisted through 2019, reaching a period low of 579 million US$.
Deferred Tax Components
Deferred taxes consistently provided a tax benefit across all reported years, as evidenced by the negative values. While the benefit fluctuated between 2014 and 2017, a substantial spike occurred in 2018, where the benefit reached 250 million US$, representing the highest offset of the period.
Total Income Tax Expense
The total income tax expense mirrored the volatility of the current tax component, peaking at 1,428 million US$ in 2015. A sustained reduction followed, culminating in a period low of 443 million US$ in 2018, driven by the combination of reduced current taxes and maximized deferred tax benefits. A slight upward correction to 531 million US$ was noted in 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)

Emerson Electric Co., effective income tax rate (EITR) reconciliation

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
U.S. federal statutory tax rate 21.00% 24.50% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00% 35.00%
State and local taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit 1.00% 1.20% 1.20% 0.50% 1.00% 1.00%
Non-U.S. rate differential 1.80% 0.80% -3.60% -2.90% -2.40% -4.20%
Non-U.S. tax holidays -1.10% -0.80% -1.00% -1.10% -1.10% -1.10%
U.S. manufacturing deduction 0.00% -1.10% -1.70% -1.80% -1.20% -1.50%
Foreign derived intangible income -1.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Gains on divestitures 0.00% 1.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.50% 0.00%
Subsidiary restructuring -2.60% -2.00% -1.80% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Spinoff-related 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.10% 0.00%
Goodwill impairment 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.30%
Other -0.40% 0.10% 0.20% 0.40% 0.40% 0.30%
Effective income tax rate, before transition impact of Tax Act 18.60% 23.70% 28.30% 30.10% 34.30% 34.80%
Transition impact of Tax Act 0.00% -7.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Effective income tax rate 18.60% 16.60% 28.30% 30.10% 34.30% 34.80%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


The effective income tax rate exhibits a sustained downward trajectory from 2014 through 2019, decreasing from 34.80% to 18.60%. This decline is primarily driven by a significant reduction in the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and is further influenced by strategic restructuring and changes in international tax dynamics.

Statutory Tax Rate Evolution
The U.S. federal statutory tax rate remained constant at 35.00% from 2014 through 2017. A sharp decline occurred in 2018 to 24.50%, followed by a further reduction to 21.00% in 2019. This structural change serves as the primary catalyst for the overall reduction in the effective income tax rate.
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
The transition to the new tax regime created a substantial one-time impact in 2018, reducing the effective income tax rate by 7.10%. This transition effect resulted in the lowest recorded effective rate of 16.60% for that fiscal year, although the rate before this transition impact was 23.70%.
International Tax Drivers
Non-U.S. rate differentials acted as a tax reducer from 2014 to 2017, with the most significant reduction occurring in 2017 at -3.60%. However, this trend reversed in 2018 and 2019, where the differential became a tax adder of 0.80% and 1.80%, respectively. Non-U.S. tax holidays provided a consistent, albeit small, reduction ranging from -0.80% to -1.10% throughout the period.
Operational and Structural Reductions
Subsidiary restructuring emerged as an increasingly significant factor in lowering the tax burden, with the impact expanding from -1.80% in 2017 to -2.60% in 2019. Additionally, the introduction of the Foreign Derived Intangible Income deduction in 2019 contributed a further reduction of 1.10%. The U.S. manufacturing deduction provided consistent relief between 2014 and 2018, peaking at -1.80% in 2016, before disappearing in 2019.
Incidental Tax Adjustments
Various non-recurring items created short-term volatility. A goodwill impairment caused a 5.30% increase in the tax rate in 2014, while gains on divestitures added 1.50% in 2015 and 1.00% in 2018. Spinoff-related costs contributed a 1.10% increase in 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

Emerson Electric Co., components of deferred tax assets and liabilities

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Net operating losses and tax credits 407 396 444 164 207 238
Accrued liabilities 228 238 319 277 270 311
Postretirement and postemployment benefits 36 37 70 82 86 93
Employee compensation and benefits 110 119 173 206 180 196
Pensions 95 — 72 271 194 28
Other 121 151 196 158 173 137
Deferred tax assets, gross 997 941 1,274 1,158 1,110 1,003
Valuation allowances (307) (341) (309) (132) (160) (154)
Deferred tax assets, net 690 600 965 1,026 950 849
Intangibles (637) (693) (753) (510) (648) (649)
Pensions — (43) — — — —
Property, plant and equipment (195) (187) (265) (239) (260) (258)
Undistributed non-U.S. earnings (49) (52) (249) (9) — —
Other (39) (35) (37) (42) (51) (98)
Deferred tax liabilities (920) (1,010) (1,304) (800) (959) (1,005)
Net deferred income tax asset (liability) (230) (410) (339) 226 (9) (156)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


The company's deferred tax position exhibited significant volatility between 2014 and 2019, characterized by substantial fluctuations in both gross deferred tax assets and total deferred tax liabilities. While the net position shifted from a liability to a temporary asset in 2016, it returned to a net liability position by the end of the period.

Gross Deferred Tax Assets and Valuation Allowances
Gross deferred tax assets grew from 1,003 million US dollars in 2014 to a peak of 1,274 million US dollars in 2017, before declining to 997 million US dollars in 2019. During this same period, valuation allowances increased from 154 million US dollars to 307 million US dollars, suggesting a more conservative outlook regarding the realizability of these assets over time.
Deferred Tax Asset Components
Net operating losses and tax credits showed an upward trend, rising from 238 million US dollars in 2014 to 407 million US dollars in 2019. Conversely, accrued liabilities and employee compensation and benefits experienced steady declines, falling to 228 million US dollars and 110 million US dollars respectively by 2019. Pension-related assets were highly volatile, peaking at 271 million US dollars in 2016 before settling at 95 million US dollars in 2019.
Deferred Tax Liability Analysis
Total deferred tax liabilities reached a maximum of 1,304 million US dollars in 2017. Intangibles remained the most significant contributor to these liabilities, fluctuating between 510 million US dollars and 753 million US dollars. Liabilities related to property, plant, and equipment showed a general decrease from 258 million US dollars in 2014 to 195 million US dollars in 2019.
Undistributed Non-U.S. Earnings
A significant spike in liabilities for undistributed non-U.S. earnings was observed in 2017, reaching 249 million US dollars, compared to negligible or zero balances in preceding years. This figure decreased sharply to 49 million US dollars by 2019, indicating a substantial change in the tax treatment or repatriation of foreign earnings.
Net Deferred Income Tax Position
The net deferred income tax position shifted from a liability of 156 million US dollars in 2014 to a net asset of 226 million US dollars in 2016. However, this trend reversed sharply, resulting in a net liability of 410 million US dollars in 2018, which moderated to a net liability of 230 million US dollars by September 30, 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification

Emerson Electric Co., deferred tax assets and liabilities, classification

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Current deferred tax assets, net — — — 400 353 354
Noncurrent deferred tax assets 97 74 86 — — 62
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities 327 484 425 174 362 572

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


The financial data regarding deferred tax items reveals a volatile trajectory in noncurrent obligations and fluctuating asset balances over the six-year period ending September 30, 2019. The overall tax position is characterized by a consistent net noncurrent deferred tax liability, though the magnitude of this liability shifted substantially.

Current Deferred Tax Assets
Current deferred tax assets remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2015, holding at approximately 354 million USD and 353 million USD, respectively. A moderate increase to 400 million USD was recorded in 2016 prior to the absence of reported values in subsequent years.
Noncurrent Deferred Tax Assets
Noncurrent assets exhibited an overall upward trend over the period. Starting at 62 million USD in 2014, these assets rose to 97 million USD by 2019, representing a notable increase in long-term tax recoverability.
Noncurrent Deferred Tax Liabilities
Significant volatility is observed in noncurrent deferred tax liabilities. A sharp contraction occurred from 2014 to 2016, where liabilities fell from 572 million USD to a period low of 174 million USD. This trend reversed abruptly in 2017 and 2018, with liabilities climbing back to 425 million USD and 484 million USD, respectively, before declining to 327 million USD in 2019.
Net Deferred Tax Positioning
Throughout the analyzed timeframe, noncurrent deferred tax liabilities consistently exceeded noncurrent deferred tax assets. The net noncurrent liability position was most compressed in 2016 and most expanded in 2014 and 2018, suggesting significant shifts in timing differences between accounting and taxable income.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes

Emerson Electric Co., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted

Emerson Electric Co., adjustments to financial statements

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Adjustment to Current Assets
Current assets (as reported) 7,139 6,619 8,252 9,960 10,049 10,867
Less: Current deferred tax assets, net — — — 400 353 354
Current assets (adjusted) 7,139 6,619 8,252 9,560 9,696 10,513
Adjustment to Total Assets
Total assets (as reported) 20,497 20,390 19,589 21,743 22,088 24,177
Less: Current deferred tax assets, net — — — 400 353 354
Less: Noncurrent deferred tax assets, net 97 74 86 — — 62
Total assets (adjusted) 20,400 20,316 19,503 21,343 21,735 23,761
Adjustment to Total Liabilities
Total liabilities (as reported) 12,224 11,400 10,819 14,125 13,960 14,010
Less: Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net 327 484 425 174 362 572
Total liabilities (adjusted) 11,897 10,916 10,394 13,951 13,598 13,438
Adjustment to Common Stockholders’ Equity
Common stockholders’ equity (as reported) 8,233 8,947 8,718 7,568 8,081 10,119
Less: Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) (230) (410) (339) 226 (9) (156)
Common stockholders’ equity (adjusted) 8,463 9,357 9,057 7,342 8,090 10,275
Adjustment to Net Earnings Common Stockholders
Net earnings common stockholders (as reported) 2,306 2,203 1,518 1,635 2,710 2,147
Add: Deferred income tax expense (benefit) (48) (250) (42) (13) (29) (153)
Net earnings common stockholders (adjusted) 2,258 1,953 1,476 1,622 2,681 1,994

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


An analysis of the financial position between 2014 and 2019 reveals a general contraction in the balance sheet size, characterized by a decline in total assets and a fluctuating liability profile. The systematic removal of deferred taxes results in consistent variances between reported and adjusted figures, impacting the assessment of liquidity, solvency, and profitability.

Asset Valuation and Liquidity
Total assets exhibit a downward trend, decreasing from a reported 24,177 million US$ in 2014 to 20,497 million US$ in 2019. The adjustment for deferred taxes consistently reduces the asset base, though the magnitude of this adjustment diminished significantly after 2016. Current assets followed a similar trajectory, with a notable decline starting in 2017, suggesting a reduction in short-term resource availability or a strategic reallocation of liquid assets.
Liability and Equity Adjustments
Total liabilities experienced a sharp decline in 2017, dropping from 14,125 million US$ to 10,819 million US$, before trending upward again through 2019. The removal of deferred tax liabilities generally lowers the adjusted liability figure, which typically results in an increase in adjusted common stockholders' equity. This indicates that the reported equity figures may understate the actual capital position when deferred tax obligations are excluded, as seen in the higher adjusted equity values for 2017, 2018, and 2019.
Net Earnings Performance
Net earnings for common stockholders show significant volatility, peaking in 2015 at 2,710 million US$ and reaching a low in 2017 at 1,518 million US$. The adjustment for deferred taxes consistently leads to a reduction in net earnings across all observed years. The gap between reported and adjusted earnings was most pronounced in 2018, where reported earnings of 2,203 million US$ were adjusted downward to 1,953 million US$, suggesting that a portion of the reported profitability was attributable to deferred tax benefits rather than core operational performance.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)

Emerson Electric Co., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted

Emerson Electric Co., adjusted financial ratios

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Current Ratio
Reported current ratio 1.19 1.07 1.64 1.24 1.29 1.29
Adjusted current ratio 1.19 1.07 1.64 1.19 1.24 1.24
Net Profit Margin
Reported net profit margin 12.55% 12.66% 9.94% 11.26% 12.15% 8.75%
Adjusted net profit margin 12.29% 11.22% 9.67% 11.17% 12.02% 8.13%
Total Asset Turnover
Reported total asset turnover 0.90 0.85 0.78 0.67 1.01 1.01
Adjusted total asset turnover 0.90 0.86 0.78 0.68 1.03 1.03
Financial Leverage
Reported financial leverage 2.49 2.28 2.25 2.87 2.73 2.39
Adjusted financial leverage 2.41 2.17 2.15 2.91 2.69 2.31
Return on Equity (ROE)
Reported ROE 28.01% 24.62% 17.41% 21.60% 33.54% 21.22%
Adjusted ROE 26.68% 20.87% 16.30% 22.09% 33.14% 19.41%
Return on Assets (ROA)
Reported ROA 11.25% 10.80% 7.75% 7.52% 12.27% 8.88%
Adjusted ROA 11.07% 9.61% 7.57% 7.60% 12.33% 8.39%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


An analysis of the financial ratios from 2014 to 2019 reveals that the removal of deferred taxes consistently alters the perceived financial performance and position of the entity, although the magnitude of these adjustments varies by metric.

Liquidity and Asset Efficiency
The current ratio demonstrates minimal variance between reported and adjusted figures, indicating that deferred tax accounts have a negligible impact on short-term liquidity. Total asset turnover shows a consistent pattern where adjusted ratios are slightly higher than reported ratios. This suggests that the removal of deferred tax assets reduces the total asset base, thereby marginally improving the efficiency of asset utilization.
Profitability Margins
Reported net profit margins exhibit an overall upward trend, rising from 8.75% in 2014 to 12.55% in 2019. Adjusted net profit margins remain consistently lower than reported figures throughout the period. The gap was most pronounced in 2018, where the reported margin was 12.66% compared to an adjusted margin of 11.22%, indicating that deferred tax accounting positively influences reported bottom-line profitability.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage peaked in 2016 at a reported ratio of 2.87. In most years, the adjusted financial leverage is lower than the reported leverage, implying that the inclusion of deferred tax liabilities increases the perceived debt burden of the organization. By 2019, the reported leverage stood at 2.49, while the adjusted leverage was lower at 2.41.
Returns on Investment
Return on Equity (ROE) shows significant volatility, peaking in 2015 at 33.54%. The reported ROE is generally higher than the adjusted ROE, particularly in 2018 and 2019, suggesting that deferred tax effects inflate the reported returns to shareholders. Return on Assets (ROA) follows a similar pattern of volatility; while the adjusted ROA was slightly higher in 2015 and 2016, it remained lower than the reported ROA in the latter years of the analysis, specifically in 2018 and 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Current Ratio

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 7,139 6,619 8,252 9,960 10,049 10,867
Current liabilities 5,976 6,164 5,045 8,008 7,800 8,454
Liquidity Ratio
Current ratio1 1.19 1.07 1.64 1.24 1.29 1.29
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted current assets 7,139 6,619 8,252 9,560 9,696 10,513
Current liabilities 5,976 6,164 5,045 8,008 7,800 8,454
Liquidity Ratio
Adjusted current ratio2 1.19 1.07 1.64 1.19 1.24 1.24

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 7,139 ÷ 5,976 = 1.19

2 Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 7,139 ÷ 5,976 = 1.19


The liquidity profile from 2014 to 2019 is characterized by a general decline in current asset levels and significant volatility in the current ratio. A convergence between reported and adjusted financial metrics is evident in the latter half of the period, indicating a shift in how current assets were valued or classified.

Current Asset Trajectory
Reported current assets experienced an overall downward trend, decreasing from US$ 10,867 million in 2014 to US$ 7,139 million by 2019. Between 2014 and 2016, a consistent gap existed between reported and adjusted current assets, with adjusted figures being lower. From 2017 through 2019, this variance disappeared, as reported and adjusted current assets became identical, reflecting a stabilization in asset adjustments.
Adjusted Current Ratio Fluctuations
The adjusted current ratio remained stable at 1.24 during 2014 and 2015, before dipping to 1.19 in 2016. A significant increase occurred in 2017, where the ratio peaked at 1.64, suggesting a temporary surge in short-term liquidity or a reduction in current liabilities. This peak was followed by a sharp decline to a period low of 1.07 in 2018, followed by a moderate recovery to 1.19 in 2019.
Comparative Ratio Analysis
The variance between the reported and adjusted current ratios was only present from 2014 to 2016, mirroring the variance seen in the underlying asset figures. By 2017, the reported and adjusted ratios converged completely, maintaining a 1:1 relationship through 2019, which aligns with the identical valuation of reported and adjusted current assets during those years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net earnings common stockholders 2,306 2,203 1,518 1,635 2,710 2,147
Net sales 18,372 17,408 15,264 14,522 22,304 24,537
Profitability Ratio
Net profit margin1 12.55% 12.66% 9.94% 11.26% 12.15% 8.75%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net earnings common stockholders 2,258 1,953 1,476 1,622 2,681 1,994
Net sales 18,372 17,408 15,264 14,522 22,304 24,537
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted net profit margin2 12.29% 11.22% 9.67% 11.17% 12.02% 8.13%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net earnings common stockholders ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,306 ÷ 18,372 = 12.55%

2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net earnings common stockholders ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,258 ÷ 18,372 = 12.29%


The financial performance between 2014 and 2019 is characterized by a period of volatility in earnings and profitability, featuring a significant peak in 2015, a contraction through 2017, and a subsequent recovery phase.

Net Earnings Trajectory
Reported net earnings for common stockholders reached a peak of US$ 2,710 million in 2015 before declining to a period low of US$ 1,518 million in 2017. A recovery trend followed, with reported earnings rising to US$ 2,306 million by 2019. Adjusted net earnings followed a nearly identical pattern, peaking at US$ 2,681 million in 2015 and bottoming at US$ 1,476 million in 2017, before rebounding to US$ 2,258 million in 2019.
Net Profit Margin Analysis
The reported net profit margin demonstrated significant fluctuations, rising from 8.75% in 2014 to 12.15% in 2015. A downward trend occurred over the next two years, with the margin falling to 9.94% by 2017. Profitability improved sharply in 2018, reaching a high of 12.66% before stabilizing at 12.55% in 2019.
Adjusted Net Profit Margin Performance
The adjusted net profit margin mirrored the reported trend, starting at 8.13% in 2014 and reaching 12.02% in 2015. The margin declined to a low of 9.67% in 2017 before recovering to 12.29% by 2019. The consistent alignment between reported and adjusted margin trends suggests that the primary drivers of profitability were operational rather than the result of isolated accounting adjustments.
Comparative Variance
Reported net profit margins remained consistently higher than adjusted net profit margins throughout the analyzed period. The variance was most notable in 2018, where the reported margin exceeded the adjusted margin by 1.44 percentage points. This divergence indicates that non-recurring items or tax-related adjustments had a positive impact on the reported earnings relative to the adjusted operational results during that specific fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Total Asset Turnover

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales 18,372 17,408 15,264 14,522 22,304 24,537
Total assets 20,497 20,390 19,589 21,743 22,088 24,177
Activity Ratio
Total asset turnover1 0.90 0.85 0.78 0.67 1.01 1.01
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales 18,372 17,408 15,264 14,522 22,304 24,537
Adjusted total assets 20,400 20,316 19,503 21,343 21,735 23,761
Activity Ratio
Adjusted total asset turnover2 0.90 0.86 0.78 0.68 1.03 1.03

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 18,372 ÷ 20,497 = 0.90

2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 18,372 ÷ 20,400 = 0.90


An analysis of the asset base and efficiency ratios from 2014 to 2019 reveals a general contraction in total assets followed by a period of recovery in operational efficiency.

Total Asset Trends
Reported total assets declined from 24,177 million US$ in 2014 to a low of 19,589 million US$ in 2017. A slight reversal occurred thereafter, with assets increasing to 20,497 million US$ by 2019. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical trajectory, decreasing from 23,761 million US$ in 2014 to 19,503 million US$ in 2017, before rising to 20,400 million US$ in 2019.
Asset Turnover Performance
The asset turnover ratio remained stable at 1.01 for reported and 1.03 for adjusted values between 2014 and 2015. A significant decline was observed in 2016, where the adjusted total asset turnover dropped to 0.68. Following this trough, a consistent upward trend emerged, with the adjusted ratio improving annually to 0.78 in 2017, 0.86 in 2018, and reaching 0.90 by 2019.
Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
The variance between reported and adjusted figures is minimal across the entire period. The adjusted total asset turnover consistently remained slightly higher than or equal to the reported turnover ratio. This indicates that the adjustments applied to the asset base had a negligible impact on the overall interpretation of asset utilization efficiency.

The data indicates that while the company reduced its asset footprint significantly between 2014 and 2017, the subsequent increase in turnover ratios from 2016 onward suggests a successful improvement in the ability to generate revenue from its remaining asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Leverage

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Total assets 20,497 20,390 19,589 21,743 22,088 24,177
Common stockholders’ equity 8,233 8,947 8,718 7,568 8,081 10,119
Solvency Ratio
Financial leverage1 2.49 2.28 2.25 2.87 2.73 2.39
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted total assets 20,400 20,316 19,503 21,343 21,735 23,761
Adjusted common stockholders’ equity 8,463 9,357 9,057 7,342 8,090 10,275
Solvency Ratio
Adjusted financial leverage2 2.41 2.17 2.15 2.91 2.69 2.31

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Common stockholders’ equity
= 20,497 ÷ 8,233 = 2.49

2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted common stockholders’ equity
= 20,400 ÷ 8,463 = 2.41


The financial structure from 2014 to 2019 is characterized by a general contraction in total assets and fluctuations in stockholders' equity, which directly influenced the trajectory of financial leverage ratios.

Asset and Equity Trends
Reported total assets experienced a downward trend, declining from US$ 24,177 million in 2014 to US$ 20,497 million in 2019. During this same period, common stockholders' equity exhibited volatility, decreasing from US$ 10,119 million in 2014 to a low of US$ 7,568 million in 2016, before recovering to US$ 8,947 million in 2018 and settling at US$ 8,233 million in 2019.
Analysis of Financial Leverage
Reported financial leverage increased from 2.39 in 2014 to a peak of 2.87 in 2016, reflecting a period of increased reliance on debt relative to equity. A sharp correction occurred in 2017, with the ratio falling to 2.25. This low point was largely maintained in 2018 at 2.28, followed by an uptick to 2.49 in 2019.
Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Leverage
Adjusted financial leverage closely mirrored the movements of reported leverage, though it typically remained lower. The adjusted ratio peaked at 2.91 in 2016—notably higher than the reported ratio for that year—before reaching a minimum of 2.15 in 2017. The consistent proximity between reported and adjusted figures indicates that the adjustments made to assets and equity have a limited but observable impact on the overall leverage profile.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net earnings common stockholders 2,306 2,203 1,518 1,635 2,710 2,147
Common stockholders’ equity 8,233 8,947 8,718 7,568 8,081 10,119
Profitability Ratio
ROE1 28.01% 24.62% 17.41% 21.60% 33.54% 21.22%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net earnings common stockholders 2,258 1,953 1,476 1,622 2,681 1,994
Adjusted common stockholders’ equity 8,463 9,357 9,057 7,342 8,090 10,275
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROE2 26.68% 20.87% 16.30% 22.09% 33.14% 19.41%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 ROE = 100 × Net earnings common stockholders ÷ Common stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,306 ÷ 8,233 = 28.01%

2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net earnings common stockholders ÷ Adjusted common stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,258 ÷ 8,463 = 26.68%


The financial performance between 2014 and 2019 is characterized by significant volatility in both net earnings and return on equity. A notable peak in profitability occurred in 2015, followed by a contraction period in 2016 and 2017, and a subsequent recovery phase through 2019.

Earnings Trends
Adjusted net earnings exhibited a sharp increase from 1,994 million USD in 2014 to 2,681 million USD in 2015. This was followed by a decline to a low of 1,476 million USD in 2017 before trending upward to 2,258 million USD by 2019. Reported net earnings followed a similar trajectory, generally remaining slightly higher than adjusted figures for the majority of the analyzed period.
Equity Base Fluctuations
Adjusted common stockholders’ equity experienced a downward trend from 10,275 million USD in 2014 to a low of 7,342 million USD in 2016. A period of recovery occurred between 2017 and 2018, with equity peaking at 9,357 million USD, before contracting to 8,463 million USD by 2019.
Return on Equity (ROE) Dynamics
The Adjusted ROE demonstrates a cyclical pattern, reaching a peak of 33.14% in 2015. This peak was the result of concurrently high adjusted net earnings and a reduced equity base. The ratio reached its lowest point in 2017 at 16.30%, coinciding with the period of minimum adjusted earnings. A recovery trend is evident from 2017 onward, with the Adjusted ROE rising to 26.68% by September 30, 2019.
Reported versus Adjusted Variance
Reported ROE consistently exceeded Adjusted ROE in most years, with the most pronounced gap occurring in 2018, where reported ROE was 24.62% compared to an adjusted ROE of 20.87%. An exception is noted in 2016, where the Adjusted ROE of 22.09% slightly surpassed the reported ROE of 21.60%.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net earnings common stockholders 2,306 2,203 1,518 1,635 2,710 2,147
Total assets 20,497 20,390 19,589 21,743 22,088 24,177
Profitability Ratio
ROA1 11.25% 10.80% 7.75% 7.52% 12.27% 8.88%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net earnings common stockholders 2,258 1,953 1,476 1,622 2,681 1,994
Adjusted total assets 20,400 20,316 19,503 21,343 21,735 23,761
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROA2 11.07% 9.61% 7.57% 7.60% 12.33% 8.39%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 ROA = 100 × Net earnings common stockholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,306 ÷ 20,497 = 11.25%

2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net earnings common stockholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 2,258 ÷ 20,400 = 11.07%


The financial performance from 2014 to 2019 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability relative to the asset base. An initial increase in efficiency peaked in 2015, followed by a marked decline in 2016 and 2017, and a subsequent recovery through 2019.

Asset Base Trends
A consistent reduction in total assets occurred between 2014 and 2017, with reported total assets decreasing from US$ 24,177 million to US$ 19,589 million. This contraction was followed by a slight increase and stabilization, ending at US$ 20,497 million by September 30, 2019.
Net Earnings Volatility
Earnings demonstrated a non-linear trajectory. Adjusted net earnings rose from US$ 1,994 million in 2014 to a peak of US$ 2,681 million in 2015, before falling to a low of US$ 1,476 million in 2017. A recovery phase followed, with earnings increasing to US$ 2,258 million by 2019.
Analysis of Adjusted ROA
The adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) mirrored the earnings trend, rising sharply to 12.33% in 2015. A subsequent decline brought the ratio to its lowest point of 7.57% in 2017. The metric subsequently improved, reaching 11.07% by the end of the analyzed period, indicating a restoration of asset productivity.
Reported versus Adjusted Metrics
A close correlation is observed between reported and adjusted figures for most of the period. However, a notable divergence occurred in 2018, where the reported ROA of 10.80% significantly exceeded the adjusted ROA of 9.61%, suggesting the presence of non-recurring items or accounting adjustments that positively impacted reported earnings for that fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?