- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
- Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
- Adjusted Current Ratio
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
The income tax profile demonstrates a significant downward trajectory over the analyzed six-year period, characterized by a sharp contraction in current tax obligations starting in 2016.
- Current Tax Expense
- Current tax obligations peaked in 2015 at 1,457 million US$, followed by a precipitous decline of approximately 51% in 2016 to 710 million US$. This downward trend persisted through 2019, reaching a period low of 579 million US$.
- Deferred Tax Components
- Deferred taxes consistently provided a tax benefit across all reported years, as evidenced by the negative values. While the benefit fluctuated between 2014 and 2017, a substantial spike occurred in 2018, where the benefit reached 250 million US$, representing the highest offset of the period.
- Total Income Tax Expense
- The total income tax expense mirrored the volatility of the current tax component, peaking at 1,428 million US$ in 2015. A sustained reduction followed, culminating in a period low of 443 million US$ in 2018, driven by the combination of reduced current taxes and maximized deferred tax benefits. A slight upward correction to 531 million US$ was noted in 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
The effective income tax rate exhibits a sustained downward trajectory from 2014 through 2019, decreasing from 34.80% to 18.60%. This decline is primarily driven by a significant reduction in the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and is further influenced by strategic restructuring and changes in international tax dynamics.
- Statutory Tax Rate Evolution
- The U.S. federal statutory tax rate remained constant at 35.00% from 2014 through 2017. A sharp decline occurred in 2018 to 24.50%, followed by a further reduction to 21.00% in 2019. This structural change serves as the primary catalyst for the overall reduction in the effective income tax rate.
- Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
- The transition to the new tax regime created a substantial one-time impact in 2018, reducing the effective income tax rate by 7.10%. This transition effect resulted in the lowest recorded effective rate of 16.60% for that fiscal year, although the rate before this transition impact was 23.70%.
- International Tax Drivers
- Non-U.S. rate differentials acted as a tax reducer from 2014 to 2017, with the most significant reduction occurring in 2017 at -3.60%. However, this trend reversed in 2018 and 2019, where the differential became a tax adder of 0.80% and 1.80%, respectively. Non-U.S. tax holidays provided a consistent, albeit small, reduction ranging from -0.80% to -1.10% throughout the period.
- Operational and Structural Reductions
- Subsidiary restructuring emerged as an increasingly significant factor in lowering the tax burden, with the impact expanding from -1.80% in 2017 to -2.60% in 2019. Additionally, the introduction of the Foreign Derived Intangible Income deduction in 2019 contributed a further reduction of 1.10%. The U.S. manufacturing deduction provided consistent relief between 2014 and 2018, peaking at -1.80% in 2016, before disappearing in 2019.
- Incidental Tax Adjustments
- Various non-recurring items created short-term volatility. A goodwill impairment caused a 5.30% increase in the tax rate in 2014, while gains on divestitures added 1.50% in 2015 and 1.00% in 2018. Spinoff-related costs contributed a 1.10% increase in 2015.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
The company's deferred tax position exhibited significant volatility between 2014 and 2019, characterized by substantial fluctuations in both gross deferred tax assets and total deferred tax liabilities. While the net position shifted from a liability to a temporary asset in 2016, it returned to a net liability position by the end of the period.
- Gross Deferred Tax Assets and Valuation Allowances
- Gross deferred tax assets grew from 1,003 million US dollars in 2014 to a peak of 1,274 million US dollars in 2017, before declining to 997 million US dollars in 2019. During this same period, valuation allowances increased from 154 million US dollars to 307 million US dollars, suggesting a more conservative outlook regarding the realizability of these assets over time.
- Deferred Tax Asset Components
- Net operating losses and tax credits showed an upward trend, rising from 238 million US dollars in 2014 to 407 million US dollars in 2019. Conversely, accrued liabilities and employee compensation and benefits experienced steady declines, falling to 228 million US dollars and 110 million US dollars respectively by 2019. Pension-related assets were highly volatile, peaking at 271 million US dollars in 2016 before settling at 95 million US dollars in 2019.
- Deferred Tax Liability Analysis
- Total deferred tax liabilities reached a maximum of 1,304 million US dollars in 2017. Intangibles remained the most significant contributor to these liabilities, fluctuating between 510 million US dollars and 753 million US dollars. Liabilities related to property, plant, and equipment showed a general decrease from 258 million US dollars in 2014 to 195 million US dollars in 2019.
- Undistributed Non-U.S. Earnings
- A significant spike in liabilities for undistributed non-U.S. earnings was observed in 2017, reaching 249 million US dollars, compared to negligible or zero balances in preceding years. This figure decreased sharply to 49 million US dollars by 2019, indicating a substantial change in the tax treatment or repatriation of foreign earnings.
- Net Deferred Income Tax Position
- The net deferred income tax position shifted from a liability of 156 million US dollars in 2014 to a net asset of 226 million US dollars in 2016. However, this trend reversed sharply, resulting in a net liability of 410 million US dollars in 2018, which moderated to a net liability of 230 million US dollars by September 30, 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
The financial data regarding deferred tax items reveals a volatile trajectory in noncurrent obligations and fluctuating asset balances over the six-year period ending September 30, 2019. The overall tax position is characterized by a consistent net noncurrent deferred tax liability, though the magnitude of this liability shifted substantially.
- Current Deferred Tax Assets
- Current deferred tax assets remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2015, holding at approximately 354 million USD and 353 million USD, respectively. A moderate increase to 400 million USD was recorded in 2016 prior to the absence of reported values in subsequent years.
- Noncurrent Deferred Tax Assets
- Noncurrent assets exhibited an overall upward trend over the period. Starting at 62 million USD in 2014, these assets rose to 97 million USD by 2019, representing a notable increase in long-term tax recoverability.
- Noncurrent Deferred Tax Liabilities
- Significant volatility is observed in noncurrent deferred tax liabilities. A sharp contraction occurred from 2014 to 2016, where liabilities fell from 572 million USD to a period low of 174 million USD. This trend reversed abruptly in 2017 and 2018, with liabilities climbing back to 425 million USD and 484 million USD, respectively, before declining to 327 million USD in 2019.
- Net Deferred Tax Positioning
- Throughout the analyzed timeframe, noncurrent deferred tax liabilities consistently exceeded noncurrent deferred tax assets. The net noncurrent liability position was most compressed in 2016 and most expanded in 2014 and 2018, suggesting significant shifts in timing differences between accounting and taxable income.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
Emerson Electric Co., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
An analysis of the financial position between 2014 and 2019 reveals a general contraction in the balance sheet size, characterized by a decline in total assets and a fluctuating liability profile. The systematic removal of deferred taxes results in consistent variances between reported and adjusted figures, impacting the assessment of liquidity, solvency, and profitability.
- Asset Valuation and Liquidity
- Total assets exhibit a downward trend, decreasing from a reported 24,177 million US$ in 2014 to 20,497 million US$ in 2019. The adjustment for deferred taxes consistently reduces the asset base, though the magnitude of this adjustment diminished significantly after 2016. Current assets followed a similar trajectory, with a notable decline starting in 2017, suggesting a reduction in short-term resource availability or a strategic reallocation of liquid assets.
- Liability and Equity Adjustments
- Total liabilities experienced a sharp decline in 2017, dropping from 14,125 million US$ to 10,819 million US$, before trending upward again through 2019. The removal of deferred tax liabilities generally lowers the adjusted liability figure, which typically results in an increase in adjusted common stockholders' equity. This indicates that the reported equity figures may understate the actual capital position when deferred tax obligations are excluded, as seen in the higher adjusted equity values for 2017, 2018, and 2019.
- Net Earnings Performance
- Net earnings for common stockholders show significant volatility, peaking in 2015 at 2,710 million US$ and reaching a low in 2017 at 1,518 million US$. The adjustment for deferred taxes consistently leads to a reduction in net earnings across all observed years. The gap between reported and adjusted earnings was most pronounced in 2018, where reported earnings of 2,203 million US$ were adjusted downward to 1,953 million US$, suggesting that a portion of the reported profitability was attributable to deferred tax benefits rather than core operational performance.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
Emerson Electric Co., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
An analysis of the financial ratios from 2014 to 2019 reveals that the removal of deferred taxes consistently alters the perceived financial performance and position of the entity, although the magnitude of these adjustments varies by metric.
- Liquidity and Asset Efficiency
- The current ratio demonstrates minimal variance between reported and adjusted figures, indicating that deferred tax accounts have a negligible impact on short-term liquidity. Total asset turnover shows a consistent pattern where adjusted ratios are slightly higher than reported ratios. This suggests that the removal of deferred tax assets reduces the total asset base, thereby marginally improving the efficiency of asset utilization.
- Profitability Margins
- Reported net profit margins exhibit an overall upward trend, rising from 8.75% in 2014 to 12.55% in 2019. Adjusted net profit margins remain consistently lower than reported figures throughout the period. The gap was most pronounced in 2018, where the reported margin was 12.66% compared to an adjusted margin of 11.22%, indicating that deferred tax accounting positively influences reported bottom-line profitability.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage peaked in 2016 at a reported ratio of 2.87. In most years, the adjusted financial leverage is lower than the reported leverage, implying that the inclusion of deferred tax liabilities increases the perceived debt burden of the organization. By 2019, the reported leverage stood at 2.49, while the adjusted leverage was lower at 2.41.
- Returns on Investment
- Return on Equity (ROE) shows significant volatility, peaking in 2015 at 33.54%. The reported ROE is generally higher than the adjusted ROE, particularly in 2018 and 2019, suggesting that deferred tax effects inflate the reported returns to shareholders. Return on Assets (ROA) follows a similar pattern of volatility; while the adjusted ROA was slightly higher in 2015 and 2016, it remained lower than the reported ROA in the latter years of the analysis, specifically in 2018 and 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
2019 Calculations
1 Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 7,139 ÷ 5,976 = 1.19
2 Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 7,139 ÷ 5,976 = 1.19
The liquidity profile from 2014 to 2019 is characterized by a general decline in current asset levels and significant volatility in the current ratio. A convergence between reported and adjusted financial metrics is evident in the latter half of the period, indicating a shift in how current assets were valued or classified.
- Current Asset Trajectory
- Reported current assets experienced an overall downward trend, decreasing from US$ 10,867 million in 2014 to US$ 7,139 million by 2019. Between 2014 and 2016, a consistent gap existed between reported and adjusted current assets, with adjusted figures being lower. From 2017 through 2019, this variance disappeared, as reported and adjusted current assets became identical, reflecting a stabilization in asset adjustments.
- Adjusted Current Ratio Fluctuations
- The adjusted current ratio remained stable at 1.24 during 2014 and 2015, before dipping to 1.19 in 2016. A significant increase occurred in 2017, where the ratio peaked at 1.64, suggesting a temporary surge in short-term liquidity or a reduction in current liabilities. This peak was followed by a sharp decline to a period low of 1.07 in 2018, followed by a moderate recovery to 1.19 in 2019.
- Comparative Ratio Analysis
- The variance between the reported and adjusted current ratios was only present from 2014 to 2016, mirroring the variance seen in the underlying asset figures. By 2017, the reported and adjusted ratios converged completely, maintaining a 1:1 relationship through 2019, which aligns with the identical valuation of reported and adjusted current assets during those years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
2019 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net earnings common stockholders ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,306 ÷ 18,372 = 12.55%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net earnings common stockholders ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,258 ÷ 18,372 = 12.29%
The financial performance between 2014 and 2019 is characterized by a period of volatility in earnings and profitability, featuring a significant peak in 2015, a contraction through 2017, and a subsequent recovery phase.
- Net Earnings Trajectory
- Reported net earnings for common stockholders reached a peak of US$ 2,710 million in 2015 before declining to a period low of US$ 1,518 million in 2017. A recovery trend followed, with reported earnings rising to US$ 2,306 million by 2019. Adjusted net earnings followed a nearly identical pattern, peaking at US$ 2,681 million in 2015 and bottoming at US$ 1,476 million in 2017, before rebounding to US$ 2,258 million in 2019.
- Net Profit Margin Analysis
- The reported net profit margin demonstrated significant fluctuations, rising from 8.75% in 2014 to 12.15% in 2015. A downward trend occurred over the next two years, with the margin falling to 9.94% by 2017. Profitability improved sharply in 2018, reaching a high of 12.66% before stabilizing at 12.55% in 2019.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Performance
- The adjusted net profit margin mirrored the reported trend, starting at 8.13% in 2014 and reaching 12.02% in 2015. The margin declined to a low of 9.67% in 2017 before recovering to 12.29% by 2019. The consistent alignment between reported and adjusted margin trends suggests that the primary drivers of profitability were operational rather than the result of isolated accounting adjustments.
- Comparative Variance
- Reported net profit margins remained consistently higher than adjusted net profit margins throughout the analyzed period. The variance was most notable in 2018, where the reported margin exceeded the adjusted margin by 1.44 percentage points. This divergence indicates that non-recurring items or tax-related adjustments had a positive impact on the reported earnings relative to the adjusted operational results during that specific fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
2019 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 18,372 ÷ 20,497 = 0.90
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 18,372 ÷ 20,400 = 0.90
An analysis of the asset base and efficiency ratios from 2014 to 2019 reveals a general contraction in total assets followed by a period of recovery in operational efficiency.
- Total Asset Trends
- Reported total assets declined from 24,177 million US$ in 2014 to a low of 19,589 million US$ in 2017. A slight reversal occurred thereafter, with assets increasing to 20,497 million US$ by 2019. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical trajectory, decreasing from 23,761 million US$ in 2014 to 19,503 million US$ in 2017, before rising to 20,400 million US$ in 2019.
- Asset Turnover Performance
- The asset turnover ratio remained stable at 1.01 for reported and 1.03 for adjusted values between 2014 and 2015. A significant decline was observed in 2016, where the adjusted total asset turnover dropped to 0.68. Following this trough, a consistent upward trend emerged, with the adjusted ratio improving annually to 0.78 in 2017, 0.86 in 2018, and reaching 0.90 by 2019.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- The variance between reported and adjusted figures is minimal across the entire period. The adjusted total asset turnover consistently remained slightly higher than or equal to the reported turnover ratio. This indicates that the adjustments applied to the asset base had a negligible impact on the overall interpretation of asset utilization efficiency.
The data indicates that while the company reduced its asset footprint significantly between 2014 and 2017, the subsequent increase in turnover ratios from 2016 onward suggests a successful improvement in the ability to generate revenue from its remaining asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
2019 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Common stockholders’ equity
= 20,497 ÷ 8,233 = 2.49
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted common stockholders’ equity
= 20,400 ÷ 8,463 = 2.41
The financial structure from 2014 to 2019 is characterized by a general contraction in total assets and fluctuations in stockholders' equity, which directly influenced the trajectory of financial leverage ratios.
- Asset and Equity Trends
- Reported total assets experienced a downward trend, declining from US$ 24,177 million in 2014 to US$ 20,497 million in 2019. During this same period, common stockholders' equity exhibited volatility, decreasing from US$ 10,119 million in 2014 to a low of US$ 7,568 million in 2016, before recovering to US$ 8,947 million in 2018 and settling at US$ 8,233 million in 2019.
- Analysis of Financial Leverage
- Reported financial leverage increased from 2.39 in 2014 to a peak of 2.87 in 2016, reflecting a period of increased reliance on debt relative to equity. A sharp correction occurred in 2017, with the ratio falling to 2.25. This low point was largely maintained in 2018 at 2.28, followed by an uptick to 2.49 in 2019.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Leverage
- Adjusted financial leverage closely mirrored the movements of reported leverage, though it typically remained lower. The adjusted ratio peaked at 2.91 in 2016—notably higher than the reported ratio for that year—before reaching a minimum of 2.15 in 2017. The consistent proximity between reported and adjusted figures indicates that the adjustments made to assets and equity have a limited but observable impact on the overall leverage profile.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
2019 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net earnings common stockholders ÷ Common stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,306 ÷ 8,233 = 28.01%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net earnings common stockholders ÷ Adjusted common stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,258 ÷ 8,463 = 26.68%
The financial performance between 2014 and 2019 is characterized by significant volatility in both net earnings and return on equity. A notable peak in profitability occurred in 2015, followed by a contraction period in 2016 and 2017, and a subsequent recovery phase through 2019.
- Earnings Trends
- Adjusted net earnings exhibited a sharp increase from 1,994 million USD in 2014 to 2,681 million USD in 2015. This was followed by a decline to a low of 1,476 million USD in 2017 before trending upward to 2,258 million USD by 2019. Reported net earnings followed a similar trajectory, generally remaining slightly higher than adjusted figures for the majority of the analyzed period.
- Equity Base Fluctuations
- Adjusted common stockholders’ equity experienced a downward trend from 10,275 million USD in 2014 to a low of 7,342 million USD in 2016. A period of recovery occurred between 2017 and 2018, with equity peaking at 9,357 million USD, before contracting to 8,463 million USD by 2019.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Dynamics
- The Adjusted ROE demonstrates a cyclical pattern, reaching a peak of 33.14% in 2015. This peak was the result of concurrently high adjusted net earnings and a reduced equity base. The ratio reached its lowest point in 2017 at 16.30%, coinciding with the period of minimum adjusted earnings. A recovery trend is evident from 2017 onward, with the Adjusted ROE rising to 26.68% by September 30, 2019.
- Reported versus Adjusted Variance
- Reported ROE consistently exceeded Adjusted ROE in most years, with the most pronounced gap occurring in 2018, where reported ROE was 24.62% compared to an adjusted ROE of 20.87%. An exception is noted in 2016, where the Adjusted ROE of 22.09% slightly surpassed the reported ROE of 21.60%.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
2019 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net earnings common stockholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,306 ÷ 20,497 = 11.25%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net earnings common stockholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 2,258 ÷ 20,400 = 11.07%
The financial performance from 2014 to 2019 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability relative to the asset base. An initial increase in efficiency peaked in 2015, followed by a marked decline in 2016 and 2017, and a subsequent recovery through 2019.
- Asset Base Trends
- A consistent reduction in total assets occurred between 2014 and 2017, with reported total assets decreasing from US$ 24,177 million to US$ 19,589 million. This contraction was followed by a slight increase and stabilization, ending at US$ 20,497 million by September 30, 2019.
- Net Earnings Volatility
- Earnings demonstrated a non-linear trajectory. Adjusted net earnings rose from US$ 1,994 million in 2014 to a peak of US$ 2,681 million in 2015, before falling to a low of US$ 1,476 million in 2017. A recovery phase followed, with earnings increasing to US$ 2,258 million by 2019.
- Analysis of Adjusted ROA
- The adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) mirrored the earnings trend, rising sharply to 12.33% in 2015. A subsequent decline brought the ratio to its lowest point of 7.57% in 2017. The metric subsequently improved, reaching 11.07% by the end of the analyzed period, indicating a restoration of asset productivity.
- Reported versus Adjusted Metrics
- A close correlation is observed between reported and adjusted figures for most of the period. However, a notable divergence occurred in 2018, where the reported ROA of 10.80% significantly exceeded the adjusted ROA of 9.61%, suggesting the presence of non-recurring items or accounting adjustments that positively impacted reported earnings for that fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?