AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 24, 2020.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Emerson Electric Co., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Land 336 316 295 210 251 275
Buildings 2,219 2,145 2,043 1,867 2,254 2,355
Machinery and equipment 5,645 5,470 5,175 4,932 6,011 6,353
Construction in progress 471 439 360 318 415 428
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 8,671 8,370 7,873 7,327 8,931 9,411
Accumulated depreciation (5,029) (4,808) (4,552) (4,396) (5,346) (5,609)
Property, plant and equipment, net 3,642 3,562 3,321 2,931 3,585 3,802

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


The overall trajectory of property, plant and equipment (PP&E) exhibits a significant contraction followed by a period of steady recovery and reinvestment between 2014 and 2019.

Gross Asset Trends
A substantial decrease in property, plant and equipment at cost is observed between 2014 and 2016, with the total value falling from US$ 9,411 million to US$ 7,327 million. This decline was systemic across all asset categories, specifically in machinery and equipment and buildings, suggesting a large-scale divestiture of assets during this period. Subsequent years show a consistent upward trend, reaching US$ 8,671 million by September 30, 2019, though the gross asset base remained below 2014 levels.
Asset Composition and Allocation
Machinery and equipment represent the largest component of the asset base throughout the observed period. Despite the 2016 trough, this category saw a recovery from US$ 4,932 million to US$ 5,645 million by 2019. Land and buildings followed a similar pattern of contraction and subsequent expansion, indicating a synchronized scaling of physical infrastructure to support operational needs.
Net Book Value Analysis
The net book value of PP&E mirrored the gross trends, reaching a minimum of US$ 2,931 million in 2016 before recovering to US$ 3,642 million by 2019. The relative stability in the relationship between net and gross assets suggests a consistent application of depreciation policies and a managed asset lifecycle over the six-year period.
Capital Expenditure and Future Capacity
Construction in progress experienced fluctuations, dipping to US$ 318 million in 2016 before rising to US$ 471 million by 2019. The increase in construction in progress during the latter part of the period indicates an acceleration in capital investment and the development of new capacity to support future growth.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Emerson Electric Co., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Average age ratio 60.34% 59.70% 60.07% 61.77% 61.59% 61.39%
Estimated total useful life (years) 18 18 18 18 17 18
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 11 11 11 11 11 11
Estimated remaining life (years) 7 7 7 7 7 7

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).


The analysis of asset age ratios between September 30, 2014, and September 30, 2019, reveals a high degree of stability in the company's property, plant, and equipment lifecycle management. The metrics indicate a consistent approach to asset depreciation and replacement over the six-year period, with minimal fluctuations in the underlying asset age estimates.

Average Age Ratio
The average age ratio remained relatively constant, fluctuating within a narrow range between 59.70% and 61.77%. A slight upward trend was observed from 2014 to 2016, peaking at 61.77%, followed by a moderate decline to a low of 59.70% in 2018. By 2019, the ratio stabilized at 60.34%, suggesting that the proportional age of the asset base has remained steady relative to its total estimated useful life.
Asset Life Cycle Metrics
The estimated total useful life of assets was maintained at 18 years for the majority of the period, with a brief deviation to 17 years in 2015. Correspondingly, the estimated age, representing the time elapsed since purchase, remained static at 11 years throughout the entire reporting window. This consistency results in a constant estimated remaining life of 7 years across all observed years.
Operational Implications
The uniformity of the estimated elapsed age and remaining life suggests a stabilized asset portfolio where new acquisitions and retirements are likely occurring at a rate that offsets the natural aging of the equipment. The lack of significant volatility in these figures points to a predictable depreciation schedule and a consistent capital expenditure strategy regarding the maintenance of the asset base's average age.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 5,029 4,808 4,552 4,396 5,346 5,609
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 8,671 8,370 7,873 7,327 8,931 9,411
Land 336 316 295 210 251 275
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 60.34% 59.70% 60.07% 61.77% 61.59% 61.39%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, at cost – Land)
= 100 × 5,029 ÷ (8,671 – 336) = 60.34%


An analysis of the fixed asset base reveals a period of contraction followed by a steady recovery in capital investment. A significant reduction in property, plant and equipment at cost occurred between 2014 and 2016, with assets decreasing from 9,411 million US$ to 7,327 million US$. This trend reversed after 2016, showing a consistent upward trajectory to 8,671 million US$ by September 30, 2019.

Asset Valuation and Depreciation Trends
Accumulated depreciation followed a pattern similar to the gross asset cost, experiencing a sharp decline in 2016 to 4,396 million US$ before rising steadily to 5,029 million US$ by 2019. The simultaneous drop in both gross cost and accumulated depreciation suggests a significant disposal or divestiture of older assets during the 2016 period.
Average Age Ratio Stability
The average age ratio remained remarkably stable over the six-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 59.70% and 61.77%. This stability indicates a disciplined capital expenditure strategy where the acquisition of new assets has effectively offset the depreciation of existing ones, maintaining a consistent age profile of the operational infrastructure.
Land Holdings
Land values exhibited a dip in 2016, reaching a low of 210 million US$, but subsequently grew every year through 2019 to reach 336 million US$. This suggests an increase in real estate investment or land acquisition following the 2016 asset contraction.
Capital Replacement Cycle
The consistency of the average age ratio, despite the volatility in total asset costs, implies that the company is replacing its depreciable assets at a rate that aligns with their useful life. The slight decrease in the ratio from 2016 (61.77%) to 2018 (59.70%) suggests a brief period of modernization or accelerated investment in newer equipment before stabilizing again in 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 8,671 8,370 7,873 7,327 8,931 9,411
Land 336 316 295 210 251 275
Depreciation expense 463 444 414 391 507 518
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 18 18 18 18 17 18

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, at cost – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (8,671 – 336) ÷ 463 = 18


An analysis of the fixed asset trajectory reveals a period of initial contraction followed by a consistent recovery in the asset base from 2014 to 2019. The relationship between total asset costs, land holdings, and depreciation expenses suggests a proportional alignment in capital management and accounting practices.

Property, Plant, and Equipment Trends
The total cost of property, plant, and equipment experienced a notable decline between 2014 and 2016, falling from 9,411 million US dollars to a period low of 7,327 million US dollars. Following 2016, a steady upward trend is observed, with values increasing annually to reach 8,671 million US dollars by September 30, 2019. Land holdings mirrored this pattern, decreasing from 275 million US dollars in 2014 to 210 million US dollars in 2016, before expanding to 336 million US dollars by the end of the analyzed period.
Depreciation Expense Correlation
Depreciation expenses demonstrated a direct correlation with the total cost of property, plant, and equipment. As the asset base contracted, depreciation expenses decreased from 518 million US dollars in 2014 to 391 million US dollars in 2016. The subsequent recovery in capital expenditures was accompanied by a corresponding rise in depreciation, reaching 463 million US dollars in 2019.
Stability of Estimated Useful Life
The estimated total useful life of assets remained highly stable throughout the period. Aside from a marginal adjustment to 17 years in 2015, the estimated life was consistently maintained at 18 years from 2016 through 2019. This consistency indicates a standardized approach to asset valuation and a stable composition of the company's long-term capital assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 5,029 4,808 4,552 4,396 5,346 5,609
Depreciation expense 463 444 414 391 507 518
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 11 11 11 11 11 11

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 5,029 ÷ 463 = 11


An examination of asset depreciation trends reveals a significant contraction in the asset base between 2014 and 2016, followed by a period of steady growth through 2019. The simultaneous decline in accumulated depreciation and annual depreciation expenses during the initial period suggests a strategic divestiture or the disposal of older, fully depreciated assets.

Accumulated Depreciation Analysis
A downward trend is observed from 2014 to 2016, with accumulated depreciation falling from 5,609 million USD to 4,396 million USD. Following this low point, values increased steadily over the subsequent three years, reaching 5,029 million USD by September 30, 2019. This pattern indicates a phase of asset reduction followed by a period of asset accumulation or reinvestment.
Depreciation Expense Trends
The annual depreciation expense follows a trajectory consistent with accumulated depreciation. Expenses decreased from 518 million USD in 2014 to 391 million USD in 2016, before trending upward to 463 million USD in 2019. The correlation between the expense and the accumulated balance confirms a reduction in the total depreciable base during the 2015-2016 window.
Asset Age and Tenure
The time elapsed since purchase remained static at 11 years throughout the entire reporting period. This indicates that the average age of the property, plant, and equipment portfolio remained constant, suggesting that new acquisitions were balanced by the disposal of older assets in a manner that maintained a stable average asset tenure.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015 Sep 30, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, net 3,642 3,562 3,321 2,931 3,585 3,802
Land 336 316 295 210 251 275
Depreciation expense 463 444 414 391 507 518
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 7 7 7 7 7 7

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).

2019 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (3,642 – 336) ÷ 463 = 7


Analysis of property, plant, and equipment indicates a period of asset contraction followed by a sustained recovery between 2014 and 2019.

Net Asset Valuation Trends
Net property, plant, and equipment experienced a downward trend from 2014 to 2016, falling from US$ 3,802 million to a minimum of US$ 2,931 million. Following this trough, a consistent upward trajectory is observed, with values increasing annually to reach US$ 3,642 million by September 30, 2019.
Land Holding Patterns
Land assets followed a trajectory similar to the overall net PP&E. A decline was noted from US$ 275 million in 2014 to US$ 210 million in 2016, after which land holdings grew steadily, peaking at US$ 336 million in 2019.
Depreciation Expense Correlation
Depreciation expenses shifted in correlation with the total asset base. Expenses decreased from US$ 518 million in 2014 to US$ 391 million in 2016, coinciding with the decline in net PP&E. As assets were reinvested or increased from 2017 onward, depreciation expenses rose incrementally, reaching US$ 463 million by 2019.
Consistency of Estimated Remaining Life
The estimated remaining life of the assets remained unchanged at 7 years for the entire duration of the analysis. This suggests a rigid and consistent accounting policy regarding the useful life of assets, regardless of the fluctuations in the total volume of property, plant, and equipment or the changes in land holdings.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?