Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
| Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | Sep 30, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,461) | 2,124) | 1,776) | 1,731) | 2,871) | 2,212) | |
| Invested capital2 | 16,266) | 15,617) | 15,181) | 16,521) | 17,328) | 17,628) | |
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| ROIC3 | 15.13% | 13.60% | 11.70% | 10.48% | 16.57% | 12.55% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| ROIC, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 2,461 ÷ 16,266 = 15.13%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance between 2014 and 2019 is characterized by a period of initial volatility followed by a consistent recovery in capital efficiency. The return on invested capital experienced a significant peak and trough before establishing a steady upward trajectory in the latter half of the analyzed period.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A non-linear trajectory is observed in NOPAT, which reached a peak of 2,871 million US$ in 2015 before experiencing a sharp decline to 1,731 million US$ in 2016. Following this trough, a sustained recovery occurred from 2017 through 2019, with NOPAT increasing annually to reach 2,461 million US$.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital exhibited a contraction phase from 2014 to 2017, decreasing from 17,628 million US$ to a period low of 15,181 million US$. This trend reversed in 2018 and 2019, with capital levels rising to 16,266 million US$. Despite the recent increase, the capital base at the end of the period remained lower than the initial 2014 level.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
- The ROIC mirrored the fluctuations of NOPAT, peaking at 16.57% in 2015 and falling to 10.48% in 2016. From 2016 onward, a consistent upward trend is evident, with the ratio improving to 15.13% by September 30, 2019. The steady increase in ROIC during the final three years indicates that the growth in operating profits outpaced the growth in the invested capital base, resulting in enhanced capital productivity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Decomposition of ROIC
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
The return on invested capital (ROIC) exhibited notable volatility between 2014 and 2019, characterized by a peak in 2015 followed by a significant contraction in 2016 and a subsequent steady recovery. This performance was influenced by fluctuating operational efficiency and capital utilization, partially offset by a consistent improvement in the after-tax retention ratio.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- A sharp increase in profitability occurred in 2015, where the margin reached a peak of 19.71%. Following this peak, the margin experienced a gradual decline, stabilizing within a range of 16.44% to 17.30% from 2016 through 2019. While lower than the 2015 high, the margin remained consistently above 2014 levels.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- Capital efficiency showed a marked decline, dropping from 1.39 in 2014 to a low of 0.88 in 2016. This contraction in turnover was a primary driver for the decline in ROIC during the same period. However, a recovery trend is evident from 2017 onward, with the ratio improving incrementally to 1.13 by 2019.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate Adjustment (1 – CTR)
- The after-tax retention component demonstrated a consistent and strong upward trend throughout the analyzed period. Starting at 61.34% in 2014, the figure rose steadily to 79.91% by 2019. This continuous improvement suggests a diminishing tax burden relative to profits, which acted as a supportive tailwind for ROIC growth in the later years.
- ROIC Synthesis
- The overall ROIC trajectory reflects the interplay between operational efficiency and capital deployment. The dip to 10.48% in 2016 was fundamentally tied to the trough in capital turnover. The subsequent ascent to 15.13% by 2019 was the result of a combined recovery in capital turnover and the significant positive impact of a lowering effective tax rate.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
| Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | Sep 30, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,461) | 2,124) | 1,776) | 1,731) | 2,871) | 2,212) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 619) | 737) | 766) | 782) | 1,525) | 1,394) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 3,079) | 2,862) | 2,543) | 2,512) | 4,396) | 3,607) | |
| Net sales | 18,372) | 17,408) | 15,264) | 14,522) | 22,304) | 24,537) | |
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||
| OPM3 | 16.76% | 16.44% | 16.66% | 17.30% | 19.71% | 14.70% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| OPM, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 3,079 ÷ 18,372 = 16.76%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operational profitability of the organization exhibited significant volatility between 2014 and 2019, characterized by an initial peak in efficiency followed by a structural contraction and a subsequent period of margin stabilization.
- Operating Profit Margin Dynamics
- The operating profit margin (OPM) rose from 14.70% in 2014 to a peak of 19.71% in 2015. This expansion was achieved despite a decline in net sales from 24,537 million to 22,304 million, indicating a significant improvement in operational efficiency or a shift in the product mix toward higher-margin offerings.
- Impact of Operational Scale Contraction
- A substantial reduction in the scale of operations is observed in 2016, with net sales falling to 14,522 million and net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) decreasing to 2,512 million. Although the OPM retreated to 17.30% following the 2015 peak, the margin remained elevated relative to the 2014 baseline, suggesting a permanent shift toward a leaner operational structure.
- Recovery and Margin Stability
- Between 2017 and 2019, a steady recovery in top-line revenue is evident, as net sales increased from 15,264 million to 18,372 million. Throughout this growth phase, the OPM remained highly stable, fluctuating minimally between 16.44% and 16.76%. This indicates that the organization successfully scaled its operations while maintaining a consistent level of operating efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Turnover of Capital (TO)
| Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | Sep 30, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net sales | 18,372) | 17,408) | 15,264) | 14,522) | 22,304) | 24,537) | |
| Invested capital1 | 16,266) | 15,617) | 15,181) | 16,521) | 17,328) | 17,628) | |
| Efficiency Ratio | |||||||
| TO2 | 1.13 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 0.88 | 1.29 | 1.39 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| TO, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2019 Calculation
TO = Net sales ÷ Invested capital
= 18,372 ÷ 16,266 = 1.13
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of capital efficiency from 2014 to 2019 reveals a period of significant volatility followed by a steady recovery. A sharp contraction in asset productivity was observed peaking in 2016, after which a gradual upward trend in the turnover ratio indicates an improving ability to generate revenue from the invested capital base.
- Net Sales Volatility
- Revenue experienced a substantial decline, falling from 24,537 million US$ in 2014 to a low of 14,522 million US$ in 2016. Following this trough, a consistent recovery trend was established, with sales increasing annually to reach 18,372 million US$ by September 30, 2019.
- Invested Capital Management
- Invested capital remained relatively stable compared to the fluctuations in sales. A gradual decrease was observed from 17,628 million US$ in 2014 to a minimum of 15,181 million US$ in 2017. From 2018 onward, invested capital began to rise again, reaching 16,266 million US$ by the end of the period.
- Turnover of Capital (TO) Performance
- The turnover ratio reflects the direct impact of the revenue decline, dropping from 1.39 in 2014 to 0.88 in 2016. This decline suggests a period of underutilization of the capital base. However, the ratio recovered steadily from 2017 to 2019, ending at 1.13. While this indicates a positive trajectory in operational efficiency, the turnover rate remained below the 2014 peak throughout the observed timeframe.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
| Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | Sep 30, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,461) | 2,124) | 1,776) | 1,731) | 2,871) | 2,212) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 619) | 737) | 766) | 782) | 1,525) | 1,394) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 3,079) | 2,862) | 2,543) | 2,512) | 4,396) | 3,607) | |
| Tax Rate | |||||||
| CTR3 | 20.09% | 25.77% | 30.14% | 31.11% | 34.69% | 38.66% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| CTR, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 619 ÷ 3,079 = 20.09%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Analysis indicates a sustained reduction in the tax burden relative to operating profits between 2014 and 2019. The most prominent trend is the monotonic decrease in the effective cash tax rate, suggesting an increasing efficiency in tax management or the impact of legislative changes during this period.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Trend
- The CTR exhibited a continuous decline, starting at 38.66% in 2014 and falling to 20.09% by September 30, 2019. This represents a total reduction of 18.57 percentage points over the analyzed period, indicating a significant decrease in the proportion of operating profit paid as cash taxes.
- Cash Operating Tax Expenditure
- Cash operating taxes peaked in 2015 at 1,525 million US$, followed by a sharp contraction in 2016 to 782 million US$. From 2016 through 2019, these payments continued a steady downward trajectory, concluding the period at 619 million US$.
- Correlation with Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
- NOPBT showed significant volatility, peaking in 2015 at 4,396 million US$ before dropping to 2,512 million US$ in 2016. While NOPBT recovered gradually to 3,079 million US$ by 2019, the actual cash taxes paid continued to decline. This divergence between rising operating profits and falling tax payments drove the consistent compression of the effective cash tax rate.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?